May 19, 2009, 9:49 AM
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Well, the frequent trespasser exception only applies if the landowner has notice of frequent trespassers. Since climbers who sign the liability waivers would NOT be trespassers, the exception would only apply if the landowners learned that climbers were frequently climbing without filling out the waivers. So if the climbing community mostly behaves itself, this could still be a workable solution.
Or am I missing something?
(This post was edited by MS1 on May 19, 2009, 9:52 AM)