Forums: Climbing Information: Technique & Training: Re: [caughtinside] Smearing: Edit Log




lena_chita
Moderator

Mar 10, 2011, 7:04 PM

Views: 13375

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [caughtinside] Smearing
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  

caughtinside wrote:
camhead wrote:
If you can't do a sequence using the holds provided, then either a) the setter sucks, or b) you need to get better. It's that simple.

Well I would disagree. How many times have you seen a group of people on a route outdoors climb a route the exact same way?

Sure, people climb differently, indoor and out, but this isn't necessarily contradictory to what camhead is saying.

I think it takes more skill to set a problem that would be V3 both for a 6ft tall person, AND 5ft tall person, for example. But I have seen examples where problems were set in that way, and no smearing was required...

I honestly don't understand why smearing was singled out or thought to be bad in the context of this thread. It is a technique like any other. And it is NOT the frantic scraping of feet against the wall that some people seem to think means smearing...

I have seen some problems set specifically FOR smearing-- simulating a situation where you have a good seam at the junction of a roof and a vertical wall, but no good feet on that vertical wall, and you just have to traverse for a bit, and smear feet. Very much applicable to real-life outdoor situation, and legitimate in gym, too.


(This post was edited by lena_chita on Mar 10, 2011, 7:06 PM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by lena_chita (Moderator) on Mar 10, 2011, 7:06 PM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?