Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Worst photos of RC.com
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 Next page Last page  View All


jakedatc


Jan 22, 2012, 3:01 PM
Post #3151 of 3255 (2842 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [camhead] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
qwert wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Qwert: ten day time-out for posting not-all-that-bad pics in the *Worst* thread. You would've escaped punishment if only you hadn't argued about it, and then posted even *more* not-that-bad pics (the offwidth inverts).

I second that motion.

Also, to everyone in the thread, it would be cool if, when you post the pics, you also post a link to the pic's page, so that we can see comments, info, photographer, etc., and maybe even vote it 5 stars.

I almost got GU'd! I vote aye on the 10 day suspenshun. And linking to the profile would be a great rule guideline.
Then so be it.
I am out of this thread until the 1st of February.

And here is a great pic without link, just to piss y'all off:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/468976-largest_For_Whomresized.jpg[/image]
Angelic

qwert

PS: Tape on indoor routes and boulders sucks, and is a sign that only brainless idiots climb at said location!

i made a new thread to continue that discussion. Qwert is welcome since he is the only one opposing the common point of view...
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...post=2563751#2563751
as opposed to the brainless idiots that have to set by color and have a limited selection of what holds they can use each route... silly Euro..

I would respond by telling Qwert that he doesnt know what he's talking about, but that would just encourage him to post more in here.

Oh, and, just to keep this thread rolling...

[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/479996-largest_DSCN2059.JPG[/image]

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...w_bluffs_119167.html

i made a new thread to continue that discussion. Qwert is welcome since he is the only one opposing the common point of view...
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...post=2563751#2563751


(This post was edited by jakedatc on Jan 22, 2012, 4:41 PM)


shockabuku


Jan 22, 2012, 4:38 PM
Post #3152 of 3255 (2820 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4860

Re: [jakedatc] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
camhead wrote:
jakedatc wrote:
qwert wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Qwert: ten day time-out for posting not-all-that-bad pics in the *Worst* thread. You would've escaped punishment if only you hadn't argued about it, and then posted even *more* not-that-bad pics (the offwidth inverts).

I second that motion.

Also, to everyone in the thread, it would be cool if, when you post the pics, you also post a link to the pic's page, so that we can see comments, info, photographer, etc., and maybe even vote it 5 stars.

I almost got GU'd! I vote aye on the 10 day suspenshun. And linking to the profile would be a great rule guideline.
Then so be it.
I am out of this thread until the 1st of February.

And here is a great pic without link, just to piss y'all off:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/468976-largest_For_Whomresized.jpg[/image]
Angelic

qwert

PS: Tape on indoor routes and boulders sucks, and is a sign that only brainless idiots climb at said location!

i made a new thread to continue that discussion. Qwert is welcome since he is the only one opposing the common point of view...
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...post=2563751#2563751
as opposed to the brainless idiots that have to set by color and have a limited selection of what holds they can use each route... silly Euro..

I would respond by telling Qwert that he doesnt know what he's talking about, but that would just encourage him to post more in here.

Oh, and, just to keep this thread rolling...

[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/479996-largest_DSCN2059.JPG[/image]

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...w_bluffs_119167.html

What was the point of this?


jakedatc


Jan 22, 2012, 4:43 PM
Post #3153 of 3255 (2815 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [shockabuku] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cheezytit.. i fixed it.


http://www.rockclimbing.com/...ker_Work_119103.html


theextremist04


Jan 22, 2012, 8:31 PM
Post #3154 of 3255 (2791 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 23, 2010
Posts: 189

Re: [qwert] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
climbingtrash wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Qwert: ten day time-out for posting not-all-that-bad pics in the *Worst* thread. You would've escaped punishment if only you hadn't argued about it, and then posted even *more* not-that-bad pics (the offwidth inverts).

I second that motion.

Also, to everyone in the thread, it would be cool if, when you post the pics, you also post a link to the pic's page, so that we can see comments, info, photographer, etc., and maybe even vote it 5 stars.

I almost got GU'd! I vote aye on the 10 day suspenshun. And linking to the profile would be a great rule guideline.
Then so be it.
I am out of this thread until the 1st of February.

And here is a great pic without link, just to piss y'all off:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/468976-largest_For_Whomresized.jpg[/image]
Angelic

qwert

PS: Tape on indoor routes and boulders sucks, and is a sign that only brainless idiots climb at said location!
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...ell_Tolls_74004.html


(This post was edited by theextremist04 on Jan 23, 2012, 10:48 AM)


TarHeelEMT


Jan 22, 2012, 9:17 PM
Post #3155 of 3255 (2779 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [ilikepargo] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ilikepargo wrote:
Should this be here?

[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/479426-largest_climbing_in_el_paso_043.jpg[/image]

Badly framed 5.easy top-rope picture with extraneous gear on harness?

Yes. Yes it should.


ilikepargo


Jan 23, 2012, 1:12 AM
Post #3156 of 3255 (2758 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2008
Posts: 133

Re: [Lazlo] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Lazlo wrote:
Anyone noticed that bolt placement?

[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/6/479426-largest_climbing_in_el_paso_043.jpg[/image]
Belly getting in the way of reach.
A very easy step up would make the reach possible.
What's up with the d00de's knee?
The frontside, where the bolt is actually placed, has so many jugs that it it looks to be about a 5.6 move (at best).

If this guy is an utter n00b, then I can respect him for getting started and wish him a great time complete with a bunch of learning. After all, everyone starts somewhere. But if this pic is essentially photographic spray, then it has so many issues that I never even get around to noticing the bolt placement.


Partner cracklover


Jan 23, 2012, 8:11 AM
Post #3157 of 3255 (2733 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [cracklover] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
Qwert: ten day time-out for posting not-all-that-bad pics in the *Worst* thread. You would've escaped punishment if only you hadn't argued about it, and then posted even *more* not-that-bad pics (the offwidth inverts).

Ok, enough of that.

Here's a new one. The title is "Gene near the top of Jump Start"



The caption says "This photo shows the upper part of Jump Start"

GSly

Too bad - he deleted that pic. But for those of you who missed it, looks like he submitted another similar one. Major WTF factor:



Link: http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._Degrees_119215.html

GO


Partner cracklover


Jan 23, 2012, 8:13 AM
Post #3158 of 3255 (2731 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [jakedatc] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
cheezytit.. i fixed it.


http://www.rockclimbing.com/...ker_Work_119103.html

Ya, Jake, that's a truly great one. Which is why I submitted it like three pages ago, lol.

But nobody noticed it, so good on you for pointing it out again.

GO


lena_chita
Moderator

Jan 23, 2012, 8:17 AM
Post #3159 of 3255 (2727 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 5651

Re: [shockabuku] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
qwert wrote:
Pics like these are a diamond a dozenů

qwert

Wow. Dime a dozen. A dime is one tenth of a dollar, i.e. not worth much.

And in case you are not familiar with them, diamonds are generally considered to be fairly valuable.

Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, it is a mute point.

Angelic


Partner cracklover


Jan 23, 2012, 8:30 AM
Post #3160 of 3255 (2723 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [camhead] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:


Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO


camhead


Jan 23, 2012, 8:43 AM
Post #3161 of 3255 (2715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20733

Re: [cracklover] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?


climbingtrash


Jan 23, 2012, 8:55 AM
Post #3162 of 3255 (2693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 4822

Re: [cracklover] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.youtube.com/...er_detailpage#t=196s


Partner cracklover


Jan 23, 2012, 9:19 AM
Post #3163 of 3255 (2677 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [camhead] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?

The powers that be have decided that crap photos that are voted up as a joke to the FP will be suppressed. I hope that's clear?

GO


camhead


Jan 23, 2012, 9:26 AM
Post #3164 of 3255 (2669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20733

Re: [cracklover] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?

The powers that be have decided that crap photos that are voted up as a joke to the FP will be suppressed. I hope that's clear?

GO

No, still not clear. When was this decision made? Was there any announcement, or discussion? Where did you find out about it?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just want to know the details.


herites


Jan 23, 2012, 9:30 AM
Post #3165 of 3255 (2661 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2011
Posts: 210

Re: [lena_chita] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I see what you did there.


climbingtrash


Jan 23, 2012, 10:21 AM
Post #3166 of 3255 (2632 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 4822

Re: [cracklover] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

So we can no long vote gate stuff like this to the front page?



Unsure


Partner j_ung


Jan 23, 2012, 10:45 AM
Post #3167 of 3255 (2612 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18687

Re: [camhead] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?

The powers that be have decided that crap photos that are voted up as a joke to the FP will be suppressed. I hope that's clear?

GO

No, still not clear. When was this decision made? Was there any announcement, or discussion? Where did you find out about it?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just want to know the details.

I actually made that decision way back when I was blue, but it sort fell by the wayside.


edge


Jan 23, 2012, 11:06 AM
Post #3168 of 3255 (2597 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9093

Re: [camhead] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?

The powers that be have decided that crap photos that are voted up as a joke to the FP will be suppressed. I hope that's clear?

GO

No, still not clear. When was this decision made? Was there any announcement, or discussion? Where did you find out about it?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just want to know the details.

It has been a long standing policy, one that the relatively newer photo eds were not aware of.

There was no official announcement, just a directive by the site management to the photo eds (of which I am not in either category, but I do recall the thread where the policy was instated.)

I believe the motive was to have high quality or relevant pics appear on the front page, so that new visitors wouldn't get the impression that the site is full of chuffing wankers, at least until the second click anyways...


Lazlo


Jan 23, 2012, 12:20 PM
Post #3169 of 3255 (2571 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5070

Re: [edge] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (5 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have a hard time believing this gem hasn't made it in...



http://www.rockclimbing.com/...re_in_CT_111953.html


Partner cracklover


Jan 23, 2012, 1:07 PM
Post #3170 of 3255 (2550 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [Lazlo] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Lazlo wrote:
I have a hard time believing this gem hasn't made it in...



http://www.rockclimbing.com/...re_in_CT_111953.html

Awesome!

GO


Gmburns2000


Jan 23, 2012, 4:43 PM
Post #3171 of 3255 (2496 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15128

Re: [j_ung] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
cracklover wrote:
camhead wrote:
j_ung wrote:
[image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/479461-largest_P081211_09.43__01_.jpg[/image]

Although, with some contrast and a better background, this could be some sweet, sweet shit.

That is amazing. We need to all vote it five stars to get it on the FP.

FYI, you can vote them up if you like, but such photos will now be suppressed from the front page.

Cheers,

GO

What are you talking about? Are you saying that there is a new criteria for pics getting on the front page? Or is it just your personal opinion that (awesome) pics like this should not be on the FP?

The powers that be have decided that crap photos that are voted up as a joke to the FP will be suppressed. I hope that's clear?

GO

No, still not clear. When was this decision made? Was there any announcement, or discussion? Where did you find out about it?

I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just want to know the details.

I actually made that decision way back when I was blue, but it sort fell by the wayside.

I've already seen it twice on the FP, so either the mods were late to the game or they don't care (or, as Edge noted, they don't know).


Kartessa


Jan 23, 2012, 4:46 PM
Post #3172 of 3255 (2494 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7356

Re: [Lazlo] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Lazlo wrote:
I have a hard time believing this gem hasn't made it in...



http://www.rockclimbing.com/...re_in_CT_111953.html

I think I dated that one once


Partner j_ung


Jan 24, 2012, 4:58 AM
Post #3173 of 3255 (2435 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18687

Re: [Kartessa] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh, fuck yeah!



And just to be fair...



Gumby thong and all.


(This post was edited by j_ung on Jan 24, 2012, 5:00 AM)


camhead


Jan 24, 2012, 6:35 AM
Post #3174 of 3255 (2419 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20733

Re: [j_ung] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
Oh, fuck yeah!



And just to be fair...



Gumby thong and all.

Sorry, I just looked at the clipboard, and I don't think this can be a "worst photo," since it involves cute sports tops.


Partner cracklover


Jan 24, 2012, 8:04 AM
Post #3175 of 3255 (2378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9999

Re: [climbingtrash] Worst photos of RC.com [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbingtrash wrote:
So we can no long vote gate stuff like this to the front page?



Unsure

Correct! And nice find!

GO

First page Previous page 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook