Forums: Community: The Soap Box:
Climbing for Christ
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for The Soap Box

Premier Sponsor:

 


hbeimel


Nov 6, 2006, 5:56 AM
Post #1 of 535 (7832 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 21, 2006
Posts: 13

Climbing for Christ
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hello all PA Climbers. If you are not aware of Climbing for Christ it is a Christian Climbers Organization. They have chapters all over the country. They do Mission/Climbing Trips all over the world as well as organize climbing trips in local areas like the Dacks, NRG, etc... They are looking to put a chapter in Central Pa somewhere near Messiah College and PSU. If any of you would like to be a part of a Christian Climbing Club, check them out at www.climbingforchrist.org and see what you think. Becoming a member is free and would help get a chapter in Central Pa more quickly. Just click under "become a member" on the right side of the home page. They went to Haiti, Mexico & Lesotho in 2006. Trips for 2007 are to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro, a mission trip to Indonesia and a return trip to Haiti. They have had trips to Everest, Denali, Aconcagua, Rainer and Mt. Whitney to name a few. If you consider yourself a Christian or even if you are not and are looking for more climbing partners, join the club so we can get a club going closer to home. Climb on and God Bless!


coloredchalker


Nov 6, 2006, 6:07 AM
Post #2 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I hope it works to get the chapter started. Maybe I'll see the group down here in Haiti.

On a side note, brace yourself for impact!


bluedubbed


Nov 6, 2006, 6:52 AM
Post #3 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2002
Posts: 33

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Jezuz got me up a 12d and will send your project. Praise the lord.


bluedubbed


Nov 6, 2006, 6:54 AM
Post #4 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2002
Posts: 33

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Jezuz got me up a 12d and will send your project, but I still love satan.

http://www.churchofsatan.com/


cosmiccragsman


Nov 6, 2006, 7:56 AM
Post #5 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 778

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Bluedubbed wrote:
In reply to:
I still love satan
You may love him, but he sure as Hell doesn't love you.
The only thing satan cares about, is keeping you away from Christ.

Cosmiccragsman


Partner thespider


Nov 6, 2006, 7:57 AM
Post #6 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 471

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??


flipnfall


Nov 6, 2006, 8:02 AM
Post #7 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 717

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Oh boy!

The worms! The worms are starting to crawl out of the can! :shock:

My suggesting to the original poster is ignore the flack you're going to get and only respond to like-minded people, otherwise this is going to be an infinite chain of non-christian trollers taunting you. If you bite, it's going to quicly get off topic.

Climbing for Christ sounds great to me, but don't expect RC.com to be the most receptive environment and don't be intimidated into losing your voice 'round here! :wink:

Down boy! DOWN!

GT


c4c


Nov 6, 2006, 8:06 AM
Post #8 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

yes. :roll:


timm


Nov 6, 2006, 8:11 AM
Post #9 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2005
Posts: 314

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

hbeimel : God bless you. Ignore the trolls.

Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. (1 John 4:7-8, NIV)

And so we know and rely on the love God has for us. God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him. (1 John 4:16, NIV)


mack_north


Nov 6, 2006, 9:19 AM
Post #10 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 74

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I would like to climb for Christ but I have a penchant for methamphetamine and gay massages. Will He still help me send?


c4c


Nov 6, 2006, 9:21 AM
Post #11 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I would like to climb for Christ but I have a penchant for methamphetamine and gay massages. Will He still help me send?

yes :roll:

if you had to be perfect to be a christian climber (or a pastor) then there wouldn't be any.


blue_halcyon


Nov 6, 2006, 9:32 AM
Post #12 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2006
Posts: 9

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I think I'm going to heave ...


grk10vq


Nov 6, 2006, 9:38 AM
Post #13 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2004
Posts: 527

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.


timm


Nov 6, 2006, 9:48 AM
Post #14 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2005
Posts: 314

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

And this is coming from the dood that is doing the countdown every hour for his Orange Alien Ebay auction and just posted there that the "end is near" ??

http://www.rockclimbing.com/post/1475156#1475156


awilson86


Nov 6, 2006, 9:55 AM
Post #15 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 23, 2006
Posts: 64

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

gonna have to check and see if there is a chapter here in VA. sounds like good times.
definatly ignore the trolls.
good to see a fair amouint of Christians here on RC.com


curtis_g


Nov 6, 2006, 10:20 AM
Post #16 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 594

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

http://srcfc.org/

maybe you've seen their ads in 'Climbing'

they put out great newsletters and emails too.
check them out.

peace
Curtis


curtis_g


Nov 6, 2006, 10:20 AM
Post #17 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 594

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

http://srcfc.org/

maybe you've seen their ads in 'Climbing'

they put out great newsletters and emails too.
check them out.

peace
Curtis


timm


Nov 6, 2006, 10:21 AM
Post #18 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 4, 2005
Posts: 314

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

I'll have to ignore my advice to ignore the trolls and bite on this one.

If you don't agree with our religion, then just please stay out of the thread. OK?

How would you like someone stepping all over your stoopid Orange Alien Ebay auction thread ??? You know, the one that you bump every couple of hours ???

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...ewtopic.php?t=121561

I don't agree with that kinda stoopidity just for auctioning a silly single Orange Alien but I agree with your right to be able to do it without interference from trolls.

Just give climbers that want to discuss Christianity and fellowship amongst ourselves that same consideration. OK ??

Cheers and good luck w/ your Ebay auction.


jt512


Nov 6, 2006, 10:44 AM
Post #19 of 535 (7713 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

I'll have to ignore my advice to ignore the trolls and bite on this one.

If you don't agree with our religion, then just please stay out of the thread. OK?

We'll stay out of your Christian thread when you Christians stay out of our children's education, our private sex lives, vital medical research, and every other facet of our lives. "OK?"

Jay


climbs4fun
Moderator

Nov 6, 2006, 6:09 PM
Post #20 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 18, 2003
Posts: 9530

climbs4fun moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

climbs4fun moved this thread from Moderators & Editors to US - East Coast.


altelis


Nov 6, 2006, 6:18 PM
Post #21 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2166

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

THANK YOU JT512---wish i could rate today, def a trophy...


paganmonkeyboy


Nov 6, 2006, 6:22 PM
Post #22 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 29, 2003
Posts: 663

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
We'll stay out of your Christian thread when you Christians stay out of our children's education, our private sex lives, vital medical research, and every other facet of our lives. "OK?"
Jay

gotta bump this sentiment...seriously - say what you will about religion vs jesus the man and his message, since many times one is different from the other - you gotta admit there's a little bit of 'your chocolate is in my peanut butter' with regards to the overlap of law and religion...


vincent


Nov 6, 2006, 6:34 PM
Post #23 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2003
Posts: 178

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

A lot of negativity in this thread.

All that matters though is that God loves you, he has a plan for your life, he wants you to have a beautiful, thrilling existence. Climbing figures into this because whenever I climb something awesome, see the gorgeous earth we inhabit, feel so alive inside, I thank God for being in my life.


blueeyedclimber


Nov 6, 2006, 6:41 PM
Post #24 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4572

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

I'll have to ignore my advice to ignore the trolls and bite on this one.

If you don't agree with our religion, then just please stay out of the thread. OK?

We'll stay out of your Christian thread when you Christians stay out of our children's education, our private sex lives, vital medical research, and every other facet of our lives. "OK?"

Jay

You do know that there are Christians who DON'T side with the religious right, RIGHT?


Partner thespider


Nov 6, 2006, 6:45 PM
Post #25 of 535 (7711 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 471

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

This topic is going nowhere fast... :( :(


c4c


Nov 6, 2006, 7:28 PM
Post #26 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
http://srcfc.org/

maybe you've seen their ads in 'Climbing'

they put out great newsletters and emails too.
check them out.

peace
Curtis

just for clarification: Solid Rock (srcfc.org) and climbing for Christ (www.climbingforchrist.org) are two different organizations


curt


Nov 6, 2006, 7:50 PM
Post #27 of 535 (5056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
THANK YOU JT512---wish i could rate today, def a trophy...

I gotcha covered. 8^)

Curt


abtisme


Nov 6, 2006, 8:10 PM
Post #28 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 50

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Climbing for Christ seems like a really cool organization. I'd like to get involved with something like that. Climbing for me is like a form of worship. Every time I get out there is a moment when I have to stop and just say "thank you." Thanks for posting up and letting others know.

-aaron


rjtrials


Nov 6, 2006, 8:26 PM
Post #29 of 535 (5057 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2002
Posts: 342

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

I'll have to ignore my advice to ignore the trolls and bite on this one.

If you don't agree with our religion, then just please stay out of the thread. OK?

Can I "Send for Satan?"


roadman33


Nov 6, 2006, 8:38 PM
Post #30 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 26, 2004
Posts: 84

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

WTF

Climbing for Whom? For christ sake!

That's a load of bullshit!

You climb for yourself. Anyway, god can fly so she doesn't need to climb. Du..


livinonasandbar


Nov 6, 2006, 8:43 PM
Post #31 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 3, 2003
Posts: 356

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Jesus may love you, but his heavenly father has a few other words for you:

If your brother, the son of your father or of your mother, or your son or daughter, or the spouse whom you embrace, or your most intimate friend, tries to secretly seduce you, saying, "Let us go and serve other gods," unknown to you or your ancestors before you, gods of the peoples surrounding you, whether near you or far away, anywhere throughout the world, you must not consent, you must not listen to him; you must show him no pity, you must not spare him or conceal his guilt. No, you must kill him, your hand must strike the first blow in putting him to death and the hands of the rest of the people following. You must stone him to death, since he has tried to devert you from Yahweh your God...

-Deuteronomy 13:7-11

Anyone into Yoga or Buddhism had better watch their backs when sharing a crag with those Climbers for Christ types... unless, of course, they're just poser, a la carte Christians who find it a tad inconvenient to buy into the Bible's more challenging teachings.

To hell with religion.


billl7


Nov 6, 2006, 8:46 PM
Post #32 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

This is the ultimate Troll - done not just for self-gratification but for raising everyone's awareness for what the OP thinks is Right. And having a bunch of flies get stuck in the honey increases the publicity.

Does it go up to T11??


healyje


Nov 6, 2006, 9:03 PM
Post #33 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4186

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Jesus, not another one of these loser trolls. This sort of thing sucks to high heaven. If jesus wants to come out, rope up, and pay his dues like the rest of us fine, otherwise this sort of thing is just blows. You're welcome, but leave your damn religion at home or in the trunk where it belongs. F#ck and these are same clueless folks that bitch about radical Islam...


bones


Nov 6, 2006, 9:15 PM
Post #34 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 17, 2003
Posts: 253

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Climb for Christ???

How about "do something to better your community, society, or mankind for your prophet"? But climb for Christ? ...that's just stupid.


In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Do you have to be a christian to climb for christ??

no. just brainwashed.

I'll have to ignore my advice to ignore the trolls and bite on this one.

If you don't agree with our religion, then just please stay out of the thread. OK?

We'll stay out of your Christian thread when you Christians stay out of our children's education, our private sex lives, vital medical research, and every other facet of our lives. "OK?"

Jay

Exactly!


cosmiccragsman


Nov 6, 2006, 9:16 PM
Post #35 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 778

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

To all the climbers out there that love the Lord,
give me a pm, and we can talk about getting a list
going of fellow Christian climbers, who would like to get together
and do some climbing, or just to talk to one another.

Cosmiccragsman


Partner macherry


Nov 6, 2006, 9:18 PM
Post #36 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15520

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

just a friendly reminder peeps, keep it civil. the OP was just looking for like minded climbers. if you're not interested, keep movin"


curt


Nov 6, 2006, 9:20 PM
Post #37 of 535 (5056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
http://srcfc.org/

maybe you've seen their ads in 'Climbing'

they put out great newsletters and emails too.
check them out.

peace
Curtis

just for clarification: Solid Rock (srcfc.org) and climbing for Christ (www.climbingforchrist.org) are two different organizations

Now, again, which one is it that buggers little altar boys?

Curt


fracture


Nov 6, 2006, 9:30 PM
Post #38 of 535 (5057 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
just a friendly reminder peeps, keep it civil.

Civil? Where's the fun in that?

Please stfu.


Partner macherry


Nov 6, 2006, 9:34 PM
Post #39 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15520

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

once again:

Please note that this is a serious thread weather or not you agree with its content. This is NOT a community thread. Your flames and trolls are not welcome and this thread will be heavily monitored, so keep your posts civil and respectful.


cosmiccragsman


Nov 6, 2006, 9:38 PM
Post #40 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 778

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thank You Macherry :D

Cosmiccragsman


shimanilami


Nov 6, 2006, 10:15 PM
Post #41 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 1998

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

A couple of years back, I ran into "Solid Rock - Climbers for Christ" at the Pinnacles, Discovery Wall. They had top-ropes set on every route not 5.10 or harder. (That's about 15 routes.) They weren't even climbing most of them.

So I asked if I could pull their ropes 'cuz I wanted to lead. They said no. I asked if I could climb on their ropes. They said, "OK, but you'll have to join us in prayer first." I noticed another group in a prayer circle, asking God to protect them on their TR.

I proceeded to grab all the rope bags and backpacks I could and toss them into the poison oak bushes nearby. When they ran to try to stop me, my wife started pulling their ropes and throwing those into the poison oak, too.

Then they were all nicey-nice. "You can climb on our ropes after all." Yeah. Right. As if.

Fuck you. Fuck Solid Rock. Fuck anybody who tries to push their misguided idealogy on others in this way. If you try, don't be surprised when you get a reaction like mine.

My church is the rock itself, and the Valley is my Vatican. My faith is in myself, my partner, and my rope.

I climb to escape from your bull shit. Keep it to yourself.


healyje


Nov 6, 2006, 10:34 PM
Post #42 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4186

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Get a free google group for this crap.


mhayenga


Nov 7, 2006, 1:16 AM
Post #43 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 8, 2006
Posts: 18

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason" is an interesting attack on Christianity. It argues that it is derived from heathen mythology. I recommend reading it.

http://www.thomaspaine.org/Archives/AOR1.html


col


Nov 7, 2006, 1:52 AM
Post #44 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 232

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Wow, there are some people with some attitude around here!

Thats said,

In reply to:
Bluedubbed wrote:
In reply to:
I still love satan
You may love him, but he sure as Hell doesn't love you.
The only thing satan cares about, is keeping you away from Christ.

Cosmiccragsman

So if i voluntarily stay away from Christ, Satan will have no interest in me? Looks like a great course of action.....


stone_d_cologne


Nov 7, 2006, 2:12 AM
Post #45 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 338

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

go climb for yourself!


hey, is any of you gay or had an abortion lately...?


Partner the_mitt


Nov 7, 2006, 2:16 AM
Post #46 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
once again:

Please note that this is a serious thread weather or not you agree with its content. This is NOT a community thread. Your flames and trolls are not welcome and this thread will be heavily monitored, so keep your posts civil and respectful.

So if someone starts an Islamic fundamentalist climbing group you will defend that one to? Hope so cause you just stuck your neck out for the Christians rights.

Mitt
Just playing devils advocate :)


dougsabum


Nov 7, 2006, 2:54 AM
Post #47 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 46

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hi - if you personally want to climb for Christ, great, more power to you.

But as far as missions go, please don't tell other people what and how to believe. It's embarassing and demeaning for everybody involved. I couldn't even imagine someone going to Thailand to climb and telling those great people with their fantastic culture who to pray to.

Seriously.


thomasribiere


Nov 7, 2006, 3:34 AM
Post #48 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Sensitive issue. This is the reason why I moved it to Mods and Eds. We decided to send it back to East Coast and watch it closely. But it's going tough. I can't delete or edit each inflammatory post.
Moved to Community.


thomasribiere


Nov 7, 2006, 3:35 AM
Post #49 of 535 (5055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

thomasribiere moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

thomasribiere moved this thread from US - East Coast to Community.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 4:52 AM
Post #50 of 535 (4948 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: thomasribiere moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

gee thanks. Now it (really)opens it up to all the flamers out there. At least now PTC might show up. move it back to the east coast where it belongs. Thats where the people the OP intended it for will see it. They wanted climbers from their region to see and join their group of like-minded climbers. They will never see it in community. Taking your mod job too far imho


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 4:57 AM
Post #51 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: thomasribiere moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

...



... nah. Too easy.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 4:58 AM
Post #52 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

just for full disclosure. I am on paid staff for Climbing for Christ. I cannot speak for SRCFC as it is not connected to our organization. But if you have a legitimate question for me about Climbing for Christ I will answer it to the best of my ability.


robbovius


Nov 7, 2006, 5:07 AM
Post #53 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8399

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

c4c, does your organization have a poilicy of unsolicited witnessing and ministry at the crags?


blueeyedclimber


Nov 7, 2006, 5:28 AM
Post #54 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4572

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Jesus, not another one of these loser trolls. This sort of thing sucks to high heaven. If jesus wants to come out, rope up, and pay his dues like the rest of us fine, otherwise this sort of thing is just blows. You're welcome, but leave your damn religion at home or in the trunk where it belongs. F#ck and these are same clueless folks that b---- about radical Islam...

I usually like and respect your posts, healy, but this screams of adolescent bigotry. This post was an earnest attempt to contact other Christians, and no attempt was made to jam anything down anyones throat.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 5:34 AM
Post #55 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
c4c, does your organization have a poilicy of unsolicited witnessing and ministry at the crags?

good question. No we don't. If we have an "outreach" at a local crag it is usually in the form of a cleanup or a give away (water) or just a climbing outing. Climbers as a whole (away from their keyboards) are pretty nice and willing to talk. We just tell them who we are and if they want to pursue a conversation fine, if not, we don't force it. I personally like to climb with lots of different types of people with different viewpoints who have an open mind to listen to my beliefs and explain what they personally believe. I don't care for confrontation and feel it is non-productive. We try to be the example at the crags-- kind, considerate, LNT, environmentaly aware, etc.
-Thanks for your question.


robbovius


Nov 7, 2006, 5:41 AM
Post #56 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8399

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
c4c, does your organization have a poilicy of unsolicited witnessing and ministry at the crags?

good question. No we don't. If we have an "outreach" at a local crag it is usually in the form of a cleanup or a give away (water) or just a climbing outing. Climbers as a whole (away from their keyboards) are pretty nice and willing to talk. We just tell them who we are and if they want to pursue a conversation fine, if not, we don't force it. I personally like to climb with lots of different types of people with different viewpoints who have an open mind to listen to my beliefs and explain what they personally believe. I don't care for confrontation and feel it is non-productive. We try to be the example at the crags-- kind, considerate, LNT, environmentaly aware, etc.
-Thanks for your question.

No problem. alot of the flack you're catching here, comes from that "pushyness" of the few, that taints the many, and the incessant demagoguery and proselytizing of the televangelists.

good luck with it. try to ignore the angry flames, but laugh at the funny ones. ;-)


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 5:52 AM
Post #57 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
c4c, does your organization have a poilicy of unsolicited witnessing and ministry at the crags?

good question. No we don't. If we have an "outreach" at a local crag it is usually in the form of a cleanup or a give away (water) or just a climbing outing. Climbers as a whole (away from their keyboards) are pretty nice and willing to talk. We just tell them who we are and if they want to pursue a conversation fine, if not, we don't force it. I personally like to climb with lots of different types of people with different viewpoints who have an open mind to listen to my beliefs and explain what they personally believe. I don't care for confrontation and feel it is non-productive. We try to be the example at the crags-- kind, considerate, LNT, environmentaly aware, etc.
-Thanks for your question.

No problem. alot of the flack you're catching here, comes from that "pushyness" of the few, that taints the many, and the incessant demagoguery and proselytizing of the televangelists.

good luck with it. try to ignore the angry flames, but laugh at the funny ones. ;-)

I do. I do. :lol: guys like this:

Code
 http://www.rockclimbing.com/topic/121152

don't help us at all. He was an idiot. Correct, but an idiot non-the-less.

A new chapter is starting up in New England as well. check it out if your interested.
Climb-on.


coloredchalker


Nov 7, 2006, 5:58 AM
Post #58 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hi - if you personally want to climb for Christ, great, more power to you.

But as far as missions go, please don't tell other people what and how to believe. It's embarassing and demeaning for everybody involved. I couldn't even imagine someone going to Thailand to climb and telling those great people with their fantastic culture who to pray to.

Seriously.

In reply to:
go climb for yourself!

In reply to:
Get a free google group for this crap.

Yeah, you all are some bright ones. "please don't tell others what and how to believe". Yet you're more than willing to tell others what to do and how to act, and what to believe. Love the double standard, keep up the good work!!! I'm going to keep telling people they should climb for Christ, that way at least it keeps us even and we can agree on something.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 6:00 AM
Post #59 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hi - if you personally want to climb for Christ, great, more power to you.

But as far as missions go, please don't tell other people what and how to believe. It's embarassing and demeaning for everybody involved. I couldn't even imagine someone going to Thailand to climb and telling those great people with their fantastic culture who to pray to.

Seriously.

We don't force others to believe what we believe we simply go and share what we believe. If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it? Where we go we are usually working alongside of locals in what they are already doing in their communiities. Check out our work in Haiti. We are not just sharing the Good new about salvation freely available through Jesus Christ but also sharing the abundance that God has given us, by helping them to build a building for their preexisting church that is also a school and health care facility. We are continuing to help them with sanitation and water purity. As well as reforestation projects.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 6:03 AM
Post #60 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Get a free google group for this crap.

actually we already have our own website you can check it out at

Code
HTTP://www.climbingforchrist.org



billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 6:49 AM
Post #61 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
We don't force others to believe what we believe we simply go and share what we believe. If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it? Where we go we are usually working alongside of locals in what they are already doing in their communiities. Check out our work in Haiti. We are not just sharing the Good new about salvation freely available through Jesus Christ but also sharing the abundance that God has given us, by helping them to build a building for their preexisting church that is also a school and health care facility. We are continuing to help them with sanitation and water purity. As well as reforestation projects.
It is germain that many US citizens in Alaska are accepting free oil from Chavez of Venezuela; he's the man at the UN who called bush the devil. So it is not surprising to me that many christian "missions" are to places where people are vulnerable due to physical hardship. I know what is going on so there's no need to check out your work in Haiti.

Christians can't divorce themselves from the fact that they are charged with evangelism. For everyone else, many would rather not walk around with a sign that sez: "christians, leave me alone - I like where I am at." So I accept that there will be friction on occasion but I also am particular along these lines about who I would consider as my friend.

The "cure for cancer" metaphor is quite broken since we're talking about a)simple belief and 1 old book versus b) the scientific method.

Bill L

====================================
Galileo Galilei (1600's): "Take note, theologians, ...
you run the risk of eventually having to condemn as
heretics those who would declare the earth to stand
still ...."

Rev. George Coyne, Vatican's Chief Astronomer
(11/18/2005): "Intelligent design isn't science, even
though it pretends to be. If you want to teach it in
schools, intelligent design should be taught when
religion or cultural history is taught, not in
science."


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 6:51 AM
Post #62 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Jesus, not another one of these loser trolls. This sort of thing sucks to high heaven. If jesus wants to come out, rope up, and pay his dues like the rest of us fine, otherwise this sort of thing is just blows. You're welcome, but leave your damn religion at home or in the trunk where it belongs. F#ck and these are same clueless folks that b---- about radical Islam...

I usually like and respect your posts, healy, but this screams of adolescent bigotry. This post was an earnest attempt to contact other Christians, and no attempt was made to jam anything down anyones throat.

Mostly, I sense major frustration from healy. I wish I was more like him.

The OP may have been made in an earnest attempt to contact other climbing christians. Then again, there certainly have been like-minded posts that widely deviated. And you can't deny that the evangelism mandate which will forever be an irritation to many.

There's been plenty of jamming on both sides! And good on the mods to let this thread run free, IMHO.

Time for me to get to work and do something productive!

Bill L


zozo


Nov 7, 2006, 7:01 AM
Post #63 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2004
Posts: 3431

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
just for full disclosure. I am on paid staff for Climbing for Christ.

So it was spam after all :? Your lucky it only got moved to community and not deleted all together.


coloredchalker


Nov 7, 2006, 7:03 AM
Post #64 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

It is germain that many US citizens in Alaska are accepting free oil from Chavez of Venezuela; he's the man at the UN who called bush the devil. So it is not surprising to me that many christian "missions" are to places where people are vulnerable due to physical hardship. I know what is going on so there's no need to check out your work in Haiti.
Christians can't divorce themselves from the fact that they are charged with evangelism. For everyone else, many would rather not walk around with a sign that sez: "christians, leave me alone - I like where I am at." So I accept that there will be friction on occasion but I also am particular along these lines about who I would consider as my friend.

The "cure for cancer" metaphor is quite broken since we're talking about a)simple belief and 1 old book versus b) the scientific method.

Bill L

Bill I don't think your getting your point across, I don't get it. What does christian missions in areas of hardship have to do with oil comming fron Venezuela or Bush being called the devil?

And knowing whats going on in the world, and doing something about it are two different things. So you know whats going on, what are you doing about it and how is what your doing affecting others to make the world a better place? Education and health care benefit the whole world whether they are connected to a religious group or not. But since the religious group Climbers for Christ is funding and organizing work in Haiti I guess they have the liberty to incorporate their particular agenda. I can tell you from first hand experience that the Haitians don't care what you come espousing as long as they can get something that will preserve their life. Seriously, who on this site would say that religious groups should stop their humantiarian work because its cramming something down some ones throat? And if you'd say they should what are you going to do to fill the void? Excuse us christians if we feel responsible to help the less fortunate where, yeah, life is harder than in your 1st world bubble.


stone_d_cologne


Nov 7, 2006, 7:19 AM
Post #65 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 338

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Hi - if you personally want to climb for Christ, great, more power to you.

But as far as missions go, please don't tell other people what and how to believe. It's embarassing and demeaning for everybody involved. I couldn't even imagine someone going to Thailand to climb and telling those great people with their fantastic culture who to pray to.

Seriously.

In reply to:
go climb for yourself!

In reply to:
Get a free google group for this crap.

Yeah, you all are some bright ones. "please don't tell others what and how to believe". Yet you're more than willing to tell others what to do and how to act, and what to believe. Love the double standard, keep up the good work!!! I'm going to keep telling people they should climb for Christ, that way at least it keeps us even and we can agree on something.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

so you want to tell me what I should NOT do? you're definitely brighter than me!


shakylegs


Nov 7, 2006, 7:43 AM
Post #66 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4772

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
just for full disclosure. I am on paid staff for Climbing for Christ.

So it was spam after all :? Your lucky it only got moved to community and not deleted all together.

Which would make sense had he started the thread. Which he didn't.


jt512


Nov 7, 2006, 8:34 AM
Post #67 of 535 (4939 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it?

No, I don't think you would.

In reply to:
Experts attack Bush's stance in Aids battle

US promotes abstinence as global conference opens in Bangkok

Peter Gill

Sunday July 11, 2004

The US faces condemnation this week from leaders of the worldwide struggle against Aids over the Bush administration's reliance on sexual abstinence as a response to the intensifying epidemic.

...

Under the influence of the Christian right, Bush has adopted the so-called ABC approach to Aids prevention - A for abstinence, B for being faithful and C for condoms. But condoms are to be promoted only for use by 'high risk groups' such as prostitutes and drug abusers, with sexual abstinence the objective for all unmarried young people.

...

Bush's policy was laid down earlier this year in a 100-page document entitled 'The President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief'. It is backed by a $15 billion commitment over five years and targets 15 countries, 12 in sub-Saharan Africa. References to condoms - for decades heavily promoted in the US drive for population control in the developing world - make clear that they are to play a marginal role. They can be distributed 'near areas where high-risk behaviour takes place' such as brothels, but they are not to be promoted for the general population, which should receive 'a clear message that the best means of preventing HIV/Aids is to avoid risk altogether'.

Jay


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 9:51 AM
Post #68 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
just for full disclosure. I am on paid staff for Climbing for Christ.

So it was spam after all :? Your lucky it only got moved to community and not deleted all together.

Zozo, the OP is a member of Climbing for Christ but his post was not suggested by us. He acted on his own accord. I simply thought that I should be upfront with who my employer was when I entered the discussion.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 9:57 AM
Post #69 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it?

No, I don't think you would.

In reply to:
Experts attack Bush's stance in Aids battle

US promotes abstinence as global conference opens in Bangkok

Peter Gill

Sunday July 11, 2004

The US faces condemnation this week from leaders of the worldwide struggle against Aids over the Bush administration's reliance on sexual abstinence as a response to the intensifying epidemic.

...

Under the influence of the Christian right, Bush has adopted the so-called ABC approach to Aids prevention - A for abstinence, B for being faithful and C for condoms. But condoms are to be promoted only for use by 'high risk groups' such as prostitutes and drug abusers, with sexual abstinence the objective for all unmarried young people.

...

Bush's policy was laid down earlier this year in a 100-page document entitled 'The President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief'. It is backed by a $15 billion commitment over five years and targets 15 countries, 12 in sub-Saharan Africa. References to condoms - for decades heavily promoted in the US drive for population control in the developing world - make clear that they are to play a marginal role. They can be distributed 'near areas where high-risk behaviour takes place' such as brothels, but they are not to be promoted for the general population, which should receive 'a clear message that the best means of preventing HIV/Aids is to avoid risk altogether'.

Jay
prevention is always the best cure. I don't see your point? All I can say is I think I would, because I care.


mhayenga


Nov 7, 2006, 10:10 AM
Post #70 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 8, 2006
Posts: 18

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it?

No, I don't think you would.

In reply to:
Experts attack Bush's stance in Aids battle

US promotes abstinence as global conference opens in Bangkok

Peter Gill

Sunday July 11, 2004

The US faces condemnation this week from leaders of the worldwide struggle against Aids over the Bush administration's reliance on sexual abstinence as a response to the intensifying epidemic.

...

Under the influence of the Christian right, Bush has adopted the so-called ABC approach to Aids prevention - A for abstinence, B for being faithful and C for condoms. But condoms are to be promoted only for use by 'high risk groups' such as prostitutes and drug abusers, with sexual abstinence the objective for all unmarried young people.

...

Bush's policy was laid down earlier this year in a 100-page document entitled 'The President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief'. It is backed by a $15 billion commitment over five years and targets 15 countries, 12 in sub-Saharan Africa. References to condoms - for decades heavily promoted in the US drive for population control in the developing world - make clear that they are to play a marginal role. They can be distributed 'near areas where high-risk behaviour takes place' such as brothels, but they are not to be promoted for the general population, which should receive 'a clear message that the best means of preventing HIV/Aids is to avoid risk altogether'.

Jay
prevention is always the best cure. I don't see your point? All I can say is I think I would, because I care.

Well, JT addessed AIDS, so I guess I should address cancer.

In reply to:
DEATHS from cervical cancer could jump fourfold to a million a year by 2050, mainly in developing countries. This could be prevented by soon-to-be-approved vaccines against the virus that causes most cases of cervical cancer – but there are signs that opposition to the vaccines might lead to many preventable deaths.

The trouble is that the human papilloma virus (HPV) is sexually transmitted. So to prevent infection, girls will have to be vaccinated before they become sexually active, which could be a problem in many countries.

In the US, for instance, religious groups are gearing up to oppose vaccination, despite a survey showing 80 per cent of parents favour vaccinating their daughters. "Abstinence is the best way to prevent HPV," says Bridget Maher of the Family Research Council, a leading Christian lobby group that has made much of the fact that, because it can spread by skin contact, condoms are not as effective against HPV as they are against other viruses such as HIV.

"Giving the HPV vaccine to young women could be potentially harmful, because they may see it as a licence to engage in premarital sex," Maher claims, though it is arguable how many young women have even heard of the virus.

http://hughesforamerica.typepad.com/hughes_for_america/2005/04/christian_talib_4.html

Also, both this vaccine & abstinence are methods for prevention. Nice of Christians to eliminate an option for those who do not follow their beliefs.


qdiggety


Nov 7, 2006, 10:14 AM
Post #71 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

http://youtube.com/watch?v=d5YrB7TpT1Y


slablizard


Nov 7, 2006, 10:14 AM
Post #72 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
A couple of years back, I ran into "Solid Rock - Climbers for Christ" at the Pinnacles, Discovery Wall. They had top-ropes set on every route not 5.10 or harder. (That's about 15 routes.) They weren't even climbing most of them.

So I asked if I could pull their ropes 'cuz I wanted to lead. They said no. I asked if I could climb on their ropes. They said, "OK, but you'll have to join us in prayer first." I noticed another group in a prayer circle, asking God to protect them on their TR.

W_H_A_T ?

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

You're lucky man...that never happens to me :twisted: :twisted:


jt512


Nov 7, 2006, 10:28 AM
Post #73 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If I had the cure for aids or cancer don't you think that I should share that with those who need it?

No, I don't think you would.

In reply to:
Experts attack Bush's stance in Aids battle

US promotes abstinence as global conference opens in Bangkok

Peter Gill

Sunday July 11, 2004

The US faces condemnation this week from leaders of the worldwide struggle against Aids over the Bush administration's reliance on sexual abstinence as a response to the intensifying epidemic.

...

Under the influence of the Christian right, Bush has adopted the so-called ABC approach to Aids prevention - A for abstinence, B for being faithful and C for condoms. But condoms are to be promoted only for use by 'high risk groups' such as prostitutes and drug abusers, with sexual abstinence the objective for all unmarried young people.

...

Bush's policy was laid down earlier this year in a 100-page document entitled 'The President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief'. It is backed by a $15 billion commitment over five years and targets 15 countries, 12 in sub-Saharan Africa. References to condoms - for decades heavily promoted in the US drive for population control in the developing world - make clear that they are to play a marginal role. They can be distributed 'near areas where high-risk behaviour takes place' such as brothels, but they are not to be promoted for the general population, which should receive 'a clear message that the best means of preventing HIV/Aids is to avoid risk altogether'.

Jay
prevention is always the best cure. I don't see your point? All I can say is I think I would, because I care.

Study after study has shown that counseling abstinence, not only is ineffective, but actually backfires. In contrast, condom use has been definitively proven to reduce the spread of HIV in populations. Are you agreeing, then, that you would give teenagers condoms, rather than urge them to abstain from sex?

Jay


thomasribiere


Nov 7, 2006, 10:28 AM
Post #74 of 535 (4937 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

c4c,

I cannot tell you what we Mods decide together, but I was the single one who Wanted to see it simply disappear. The evolution (if I can use this word!) of this thread was not satisfying. I could have deleted all the offensive posts, but this would have generated more offensive posts. I could have locked it, and maybe I should have locked it. But I decided to move it here, and after all, the discussion is much more civil here in the Community. And I'm satisfied with that. Maybe we have the habit to discuss such topics here.
Just understand that Christians might be offended because I moved the thread, but after all other people feel offended when Christians are too present. It's difficult as a mod to satisfy every belief or non-belief.
Feel free to post again. I will let other Mods moderate the thread as my attempt seems unsatisfying to many users.


Partner blonde_loves_bolts


Nov 7, 2006, 10:32 AM
Post #75 of 535 (5013 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 2287

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
A couple of years back, I ran into "Solid Rock - Climbers for Christ" at the Pinnacles, Discovery Wall. They had top-ropes set on every route not 5.10 or harder. (That's about 15 routes.) They weren't even climbing most of them.

So I asked if I could pull their ropes 'cuz I wanted to lead. They said no. I asked if I could climb on their ropes. They said, "OK, but you'll have to join us in prayer first." I noticed another group in a prayer circle, asking God to protect them on their TR.

W_H_A_T ?

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

You're lucky man...that never happens to me :twisted: :twisted:

I wonder what the experience would have been like if they'd been from the Church of Scientology...

:shock:


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 10:39 AM
Post #76 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
c4c,

I cannot tell you what we Mods decide together, but I was the single one who Wanted to see it simply disappear. The evolution (if I can use this word!) of this thread was not satisfying. I could have deleted all the offensive posts, but this would have generated more offensive posts. I could have locked it, and maybe I should have locked it. But I decided to move it here, and after all, the discussion is much more civil here in the Community. And I'm satisfied with that. Maybe we have the habit to discuss such topics here.
Just understand that Christians might be offended because I moved the thread, but after all other people feel offended when Christians are too present. It's difficult as a mod to satisfy every belief or non-belief.
Feel free to post again. I will let other Mods moderate the thread as my attempt seems unsatisfying to many users.

Thanks for your explanation Thomas, I have actually accepted it as the best place for it and have begun to respond in ways that I normally would not in the open forum. Its all good. Thanks for not killing it. It is a good way for all the haters to get rid of some of their angst.


slablizard


Nov 7, 2006, 10:58 AM
Post #77 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

hey you call hater yourself. :roll:
Whoever sees things differently from you is not an hater. It's just someone different from you.
like me..see? I have atail and horns..but I don't hate you!

hey may I have your soul?


livinonasandbar


Nov 7, 2006, 11:06 AM
Post #78 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 3, 2003
Posts: 356

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hey, qdiggety, that's a good one:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=d5YrB7TpT1Y

Thanks!


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 11:09 AM
Post #79 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
hey you call hater yourself. :roll:
Whoever sees things differently from you is not an hater. It's just someone different from you.
like me..see? I have atail and horns..but I don't hate you!

hey may I have your soul?

I never said for those haters out there like slablizard. You just included yourself in with them for some reason? I'm glad that you don't hate me, I don't hate you either. And no you may not have my soul, I've promised it to someone else.


Partner j_ung


Nov 7, 2006, 11:23 AM
Post #80 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
c4c,

I cannot tell you what we Mods decide together, but I was the single one who Wanted to see it simply disappear. The evolution (if I can use this word!) of this thread was not satisfying. I could have deleted all the offensive posts, but this would have generated more offensive posts. I could have locked it, and maybe I should have locked it. But I decided to move it here, and after all, the discussion is much more civil here in the Community. And I'm satisfied with that. Maybe we have the habit to discuss such topics here.
Just understand that Christians might be offended because I moved the thread, but after all other people feel offended when Christians are too present. It's difficult as a mod to satisfy every belief or non-belief.
Feel free to post again. I will let other Mods moderate the thread as my attempt seems unsatisfying to many users.

Good on ya, Thomas. It's a thankless job and you do it well. :D


slablizard


Nov 7, 2006, 11:29 AM
Post #81 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
hey you call hater yourself. :roll:
Whoever sees things differently from you is not an hater. It's just someone different from you.
like me..see? I have atail and horns..but I don't hate you!

hey may I have your soul?

I never said for those haters out there like slablizard. You just included yourself in with them for some reason? I'm glad that you don't hate me, I don't hate you either. And no you may not have my soul, I've promised it to someone else.

Glad to see that you still have sense of humor :) No I was just pointing out the negativity of your post.
I don't see why one has to be a "lover" or a "hater" like in nature colors we have many, many shades...of the same energy.
You just decided to follow your belief like a buddhist, a muslim or a Hindu. Nothing wrong with that.
Nothing wrong with being indifferent about organized religion as well IMO


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 11:30 AM
Post #82 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Bill I don't think your getting your point across, I don't get it. What does christian missions in areas of hardship have to do with oil comming fron Venezuela or Bush being called the devil?
Right. So you were right on when you later said ...
In reply to:
But since the religious group Climbers for Christ is funding and organizing work in Haiti I guess they have the liberty to incorporate their particular agenda.
I don't think it is too much of a stretch for you to see that Chavez is likewise furthering his agenda by helping poor Alaskans. To be explicitly clear, I was refering to the christian agenda which is well understood - I don't need to check it out. And, regarding who is helping others the most, you can't justify christianity by deeds as there is a lot of innocent spilt blood throughout history - even christian on christian.

Regarding chavez's use of the devil: In these kinds of contexts, it's always the other guy that's irreparably lost when it's really the old religions that had their place at one time but are now obsolete. Molding the current world to them is like the tail wagging the dog, IMHO.

I'll concede that maybe chavez really doesn't believe bush is the devil or wasn't really hoping to convince anyone of that. Likely, he was pre-empting bush's propensity to label governments as evil.

Dude, come to the dark side.

Bill L


lena_chita
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 11:40 AM
Post #83 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Off-topic, but ever since I first heard about the existence of "Climbers for Christ", I have been wondering, are there also

Kayakers for Christ,
BASE jumpers for Christ,
Marathon runners for Christ,
Violin players fro Christ,
etc. etc.

Or is climbing community unique in this respect?

I have no doubt that there are religious bikers and snorkelers out there, but do any of them SNORKEL FOR CHRIST?


I just don't get it.

You are a Christian? Good for you!

Your religion permeates every aspect of your life? Enjoy it!

So why single out CLIMBING as the activity "for Christ"? Why not Toothbrushing for Christ?


Partner j_ung


Nov 7, 2006, 11:45 AM
Post #84 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Well, I suppose if Christ and your toothbrush were your two favorite things about your life, you might try to combine them. :wink:


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 11:50 AM
Post #85 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Off-topic, but ever since I first heard about the existence of "Climbers for Christ", I have been wondering, are there also

Kayakers for Christ,
BASE jumpers for Christ,
Marathon runners for Christ,
Violin players fro Christ,
etc. etc.

Or is climbing community unique in this respect?

I have no doubt that there are religious bikers and snorkelers out there, but do any of them SNORKEL FOR CHRIST?


I just don't get it.

You are a Christian? Good for you!

Your religion permeates every aspect of your life? Enjoy it!

So why single out CLIMBING as the activity "for Christ"? Why not Toothbrushing for Christ?

Because I'm a climber. Somehow I don't think there would be a whole lot of interest in a Toothbrushing for Christ org. although I bet there are some Christian dentists out there that think it is a good idea. There are some other christian orgs out there I think. I know there is a mountain biking one. Never heard of a scuba one though?


thomasribiere


Nov 7, 2006, 12:07 PM
Post #86 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Never heard of a scuba one though?
Maybe because Jesus walked ON the water?


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 12:11 PM
Post #87 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Never heard of a scuba one though?
Maybe because Jesus walked ON the water?

good point. :lol:


madriver


Nov 7, 2006, 12:14 PM
Post #88 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2001
Posts: 8700

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

if Jesus could vote ...who would he vote for...and would he ask for a paper ballot?

Love

P. Pilot


lena_chita
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 12:16 PM
Post #89 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Because I'm a climber.

Yes, sure you are a climber, but climbing is only a PART of your life, so why single it out as an offering "for Christ"?

Shouldn't your entire life be "for Christ", if you are such a devout person that you climb for Christ?

Christians already have their organization-- Christian church. Why create a subdivision of climber-Christians?


lena_chita
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 12:18 PM
Post #90 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Never heard of a scuba one though?
Maybe because Jesus walked ON the water?

So is there a record of Jesus climbing then?


Partner brent_e


Nov 7, 2006, 12:19 PM
Post #91 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5109

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
c4c,

I cannot tell you what we Mods decide together, but I was the single one who Wanted to see it simply disappear. The evolution (if I can use this word!) of this thread was not satisfying. I could have deleted all the offensive posts, but this would have generated more offensive posts. I could have locked it, and maybe I should have locked it. But I decided to move it here, and after all, the discussion is much more civil here in the Community. And I'm satisfied with that. Maybe we have the habit to discuss such topics here.
Just understand that Christians might be offended because I moved the thread, but after all other people feel offended when Christians are too present. It's difficult as a mod to satisfy every belief or non-belief.
Feel free to post again. I will let other Mods moderate the thread as my attempt seems unsatisfying to many users.

Good on ya, Thomas. It's a thankless job and you do it well. :D

Thank you Thomas, Thank you Jay.

You people make this site tick and for that I am grateful.

as rc.com is life.

:D

thanks!!!


coloredchalker


Nov 7, 2006, 12:21 PM
Post #92 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill I don't think your getting your point across, I don't get it. What does christian missions in areas of hardship have to do with oil comming fron Venezuela or Bush being called the devil?
Right. So you were right on when you later said ...
In reply to:
But since the religious group Climbers for Christ is funding and organizing work in Haiti I guess they have the liberty to incorporate their particular agenda.
I don't think it is too much of a stretch for you to see that Chavez is likewise furthering his agenda by helping poor Alaskans. To be explicitly clear, I was refering to the christian agenda which is well understood - I don't need to check it out. And, regarding who is helping others the most, you can't justify christianity by deeds as there is a lot of innocent spilt blood throughout history - even christian on christian.

Regarding chavez's use of the devil: In these kinds of contexts, it's always the other guy that's irreparably lost when it's really the old religions that had their place at one time but are now obsolete. Molding the current world to them is like the tail wagging the dog, IMHO.

I'll concede that maybe chavez really doesn't believe bush is the devil or wasn't really hoping to convince anyone of that. Likely, he was pre-empting bush's propensity to label governments as evil.

Dude, come to the dark side.

Bill L

Any group or individual that works in any area has an agenda. Has goals they want to accomplish, be it good or bad. But should we throw the baby out with the bath water, so to speak, and say that since we don't like the beliefs of an organization we should restrict or fight against their effort to help humanity, I don't think so. Everyday I work along side organizations that believe differently than I do, but their work makes mine easier and vis versa, I'm not trying to shut them up or down.

And hey, if secular humanists want to get out there and do all the humanitarian work that christian groups are doing, then it just means we can focus more on getting our message out :). We can help each other.

Chavez, well thats a different story altogether, hopefully he's banned from comming back to our country.

Why don't you come to the light side, we're having a great time and the future looks promising. I can't think of any reason to go back to the dark side...


Mods, you're doing a fine job, you can put this thread where ever you think is best just don't delete it or lock it. Everybody is allowed their voice.


slablizard


Nov 7, 2006, 1:26 PM
Post #93 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Off-topic, but ever since I first heard about the existence of "Climbers for Christ", I have been wondering, are there also

Kayakers for Christ,
BASE jumpers for Christ,
Marathon runners for Christ,
Violin players fro Christ,
etc. etc.

Genius!

We could have Military for Christ!
Like Desert ops for Christ...Covered Ops for Christ...Even Abrahams M1 Tanks for Christ...to invade a country for Christ!
What you say? They did that already? When?? With a President for Christ too?
Unbelievable!
:roll: :roll:


DO they have peace corps for Christ? What ? No Peacecorps for Christ? Like GreenpeaceForChrist? StopTheGlobalwarmingForChrist? None of that?

IDEA!

Thermonuclear submariners for Christ? I mean come on..with the doomsday power! And A cross shaped periscope....
Awesome.


htotsu


Nov 7, 2006, 3:58 PM
Post #94 of 535 (5134 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

To those of you who keep using Bush's policies to attempt to discredit Christianity itself:

http://www.sojo.net/...&item=petition_flash

Bush does not speak for all of us, or - dare I say - even most of us. You call us brainwashed? I know I'm not the one buying the media's message that the "religious right" represents Christianity.

"God is not a Republican. Or a Democrat." - Sojourners

And as for the person who asked, "Shouldn't your whole life be for Christ?" - in your attempt to be glib, you are making the point for the group to exist. Climbing is a part of many people's lives. I don't know much about this organization, but it is decidedly not called "Climbing for Christ, to the exclusion of all other Christ-centered activity."

And for the record, I've seen many a post from people, religious and non-religious, who write of how climbing gives them peace, makes them feel connected to/appreciative of nature, and generally does them good. So if people want to put these incredible moments into the context of their beliefs and "Climb for Christ" or for a closer relationship with Christ, then members can call it whatever they want. You don't have to join. I'm glad to know about the group.

Special thanks to those of you, regardless of your beliefs, who have appealed to others to keep this discussion civil.


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 4:29 PM
Post #95 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill I don't think your getting your point across, I don't get it. What does christian missions in areas of hardship have to do with oil comming fron Venezuela or Bush being called the devil?
Right. So you were right on when you later said ...
In reply to:
But since the religious group Climbers for Christ is funding and organizing work in Haiti I guess they have the liberty to incorporate their particular agenda.
I don't think it is too much of a stretch for you to see that Chavez is likewise furthering his agenda by helping poor Alaskans. To be explicitly clear, I was refering to the christian agenda which is well understood - I don't need to check it out. And, regarding who is helping others the most, you can't justify christianity by deeds as there is a lot of innocent spilt blood throughout history - even christian on christian.

Regarding chavez's use of the devil: In these kinds of contexts, it's always the other guy that's irreparably lost when it's really the old religions that had their place at one time but are now obsolete. Molding the current world to them is like the tail wagging the dog, IMHO.

I'll concede that maybe chavez really doesn't believe bush is the devil or wasn't really hoping to convince anyone of that. Likely, he was pre-empting bush's propensity to label governments as evil.

Dude, come to the dark side.

Any group or individual that works in any area has an agenda. Has goals they want to accomplish, be it good or bad. But should we throw the baby out with the bath water, so to speak, and say that since we don't like the beliefs of an organization we should restrict or fight against their effort to help humanity, I don't think so.
Yes, we should "fight" it on occasion and some of that is happening now, here in this thread. There's part of that in what healyje said. Others too. (and no, that's not condoning outright violence or disrespect)
In reply to:
[And hey, if secular humanists want to get out there and do all the humanitarian work that christian groups are doing, then it just means we can focus more on getting our message out :). We can help each other.
Who's this we? And no thanks anyway - I mean the part about helping you get your message out.
In reply to:
Why don't you come to the light side, we're having a great time and the future looks promising.
No thanks. Even if I do end up at the gates of the heaven in The Old Book and am invited in, I'll decline regardless of who I recognize in there. The whole temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation things is just plain wrong no matter how sugary sweet it all looks.

Best Wishes (at least from my point of view),

Bill L


slablizard


Nov 7, 2006, 5:08 PM
Post #96 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Bush does not speak for all of us, or - dare I say - even most of us. You call us brainwashed? I know I'm not the one buying the media's message that the "religious right" represents Christianity.
"God is not a Republican. Or a Democrat." - Sojourners

Htotsu ( may I one day maybe ask you the meaning of your nick? )
The point is that most of you "Christians" or "religious right" voted Bush in the first place, that is why generally one connects religion with Dubya and consequently the war.
And when you have a president that admits publicly to "speak with god" I am, allow me, a little concerned.


Partner angry


Nov 7, 2006, 5:16 PM
Post #97 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 21, 2003
Posts: 8400

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Off-topic, but ever since I first heard about the existence of "Climbers for Christ", I have been wondering, are there also

Kayakers for Christ,
BASE jumpers for Christ,
Marathon runners for Christ,
Violin players fro Christ,
etc. etc.

Or is climbing community unique in this respect?

I have no doubt that there are religious bikers and snorkelers out there, but do any of them SNORKEL FOR CHRIST?


I just don't get it.

You are a Christian? Good for you!

Your religion permeates every aspect of your life? Enjoy it!

So why single out CLIMBING as the activity "for Christ"? Why not Toothbrushing for Christ?

There is definately a Christian Cycling Coalition that races in Colorado. On the back of the jersey it says "how may I pray for you". If I'm reading that, the answer is usaully to make me faster.


jt512


Nov 7, 2006, 5:17 PM
Post #98 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Why don't you come to the light side, we're having a great time and the future looks promising.

The Christian future looks promising? I beg to differ. If the fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. continue to have their way, our future looks dim indeed. What have the Christians done for us lately? They have attempted, and continue to attempt, to replace legitimate science education about the origins of life with religious mythology. They have thwarted educational efforts about condom use that has proven to be effect at limiting the spread of AIDS because they believe that preventing sex is morally superior to preventing sexually transmitted disease. They have caused laws to be passed that will limit the most promising medical research in history -- stem cell research -- because they believe that collections of less than 100 embryonic cells cultured in a petri dish have more right to "life" than people dying and suffering from a myriad of diseases.

The Christian future is hardly "promising." It's frankly bleak.

Jay


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 5:30 PM
Post #99 of 535 (5131 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Why don't you come to the light side, we're having a great time and the future looks promising.

The Christian future looks promising? I beg to differ. If the fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. continue to have their way, our future looks dim indeed. What have the Christians done for us lately? They have attempted, and continue to attempt, to replace legitimate science education about the origins of life with religious mythology. They have thwarted educational efforts about condom use that has proven to be effect at limiting the spread of AIDS because they believe that preventing sex is morally superior to preventing sexually transmitted disease. They have caused laws to be passed that will limit the most promising medical research in history -- stem cell research -- because they believe that collections of less than 100 embryonic cells cultured in a petri dish have more right to "life" than people dying and suffering from a myriad of diseases.

The Christian future is hardly "promising." It's frankly bleak.

Jay

Hear, hear.


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 5:32 PM
Post #100 of 535 (4968 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
To those of you who keep using Bush's policies to attempt to discredit Christianity itself:

http://www.sojo.net/...&item=petition_flash

Bush does not speak for all of us, or - dare I say - even most of us. You call us brainwashed? I know I'm not the one buying the media's message that the "religious right" represents Christianity.
Let's not look at the media then.

Bush's political career arose out of Texas so lets look at Texas - out of the Republican Party of Texas. I'll read your link if you'll read the platform for the Republican Party of Texas - I'll find it online if someone asks. And then tell us how many christian ideals/goals/visions it conflicts with as well as literally (yes, literally) promotes and enforces in its candidate members. And I'll come back and dis-passionately answer any questions you may have regarding your link.

Bill L

Edit: Here it is: 2006 Republican Party of Texas Platform. I read it back in the months before we invaded Iraq. I bet it reads about like it did before Bush was our president - I'll look it up the version prior to Bush being elected into the presidential office if anyone asks.


c4c


Nov 7, 2006, 7:30 PM
Post #101 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I think I may move to Texas.


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 7, 2006, 7:39 PM
Post #102 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I think I may move to Texas.

You frighten me. :cry:


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 8:20 PM
Post #103 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I think I may move to Texas.
I share that sentiment (edit: in a reversed sort of way). :wink:

I grew up in Western Washington state which I have since come to view as a fairly liberal state. When I moved to the SW and as I was driving through Idaho, Utah, Colorado, etc. I was in a U-Haul with nothing but the dog and the radio (family drove ahead to our knew home state). Anyway, I was dismayed that as I drove farther south there seemed to be an increasing number of christian probrams on the dial with fire-and-brimstone messages, etc.. Not long afterwards, I read the Replican Party of TX platform and I thought I was a fish out of water (or maybe a fish in a barrel?). Some but not all of that feeling has subsided.

Anyway, have learned to greatly enjoy the SW: going climbing tomorrow!! :D :D

Bill L


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 7, 2006, 8:35 PM
Post #104 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Curious...

If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???


billl7


Nov 7, 2006, 9:21 PM
Post #105 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 7, 2006, 9:25 PM
Post #106 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.


Partner blonde_loves_bolts


Nov 7, 2006, 9:43 PM
Post #107 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 2287

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.

He's probably just feeling insecure because your signature just told him he's an idiot.


annak


Nov 7, 2006, 10:32 PM
Post #108 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 10, 2004
Posts: 191

Re: Nutjobs for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Off-topic, but ever since I first heard about the existence of "Climbers for Christ", I have been wondering, are there also

Kayakers for Christ,
BASE jumpers for Christ,
Marathon runners for Christ,
Violin players fro Christ,
etc. etc.

Or is climbing community unique in this respect?

I have no doubt that there are religious bikers and snorkelers out there, but do any of them SNORKEL FOR CHRIST?


I just don't get it.

You are a Christian? Good for you!

Your religion permeates every aspect of your life? Enjoy it!

So why single out CLIMBING as the activity "for Christ"? Why not Toothbrushing for Christ?

Awesome, lena_chita, I love it! How about:

Eating for Christ
Drinking for Christ
F***ing for Christ


c4c


Nov 8, 2006, 3:51 AM
Post #109 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.

He's probably just feeling insecure because your signature just told him he's an idiot.
And what does your sig tell me about myself blondie? -I like it btw.
rrradam-good question. Christians believe that God sometimes allows accidents to come into our lives. If He does allow an accident to happen then it is for our good. Christians believe that God works all things together for good. Granted that is rather hard to understand in the midst of the storm. Does that answer the question?


c4c


Nov 8, 2006, 3:59 AM
Post #110 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Did I get the extra credit?????


healyje


Nov 8, 2006, 4:51 AM
Post #111 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4186

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
The Christian future is hardly "promising." It's frankly bleak.

Jay

Maybe there are gods if we've stumbled on a topic where I agree with jt512 and slablizard...


robbovius


Nov 8, 2006, 5:38 AM
Post #112 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8399

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.

He's probably just feeling insecure because your signature just told him he's an idiot.
And what does your sig tell me about myself blondie? -I like it btw.
rrradam-good question. Christians believe that God sometimes allows accidents to come into our lives. If He does allow an accident to happen then it is for our good. Christians believe that God works all things together for good. Granted that is rather hard to understand in the midst of the storm. Does that answer the question?

that's not hard to understand if you rephrase it as "what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger" ;-)

there is no growth without pain, physically, emotionally, or spritually.


overlord


Nov 8, 2006, 5:56 AM
Post #113 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
there is no growth without pain, physically, emotionally, or spritually.

i beg to differ.

there definitely is growth withouth the things you mentioned when im getting a BJ :P


billl7


Nov 8, 2006, 6:22 AM
Post #114 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.
What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.
I'm not really qualified to answer. But I also don't see the point of the question. I mean, I don't give my kids everything they ask for. And I can imagine that at some point I might decide that one of them should die for some greater good - seems unlikely though.

Sorry for the 'raspberry'.

Bill L


htotsu


Nov 8, 2006, 6:30 AM
Post #115 of 535 (4966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Bill and Slab, you are both missing my point. Slab, you just equated "religious right" with "you Christians," when I very specifically pointed out that they are not the same thing. Bill, I am at work and do not have time to check out your link yet, but I will. That said, I think it's sad that you will only look at the one I posted if I promise to look at the one you posted. Regardless of the Republican party platform, my point is that it does not itself represent Christianity. Republicans do not have a singular claim on Christ. Republicans using Christianity or saying they are Christians or putting forth what they call a Christian agenda in no way makes all Christians Republicans.

Dannon is yogurt, but not all yogurt is Dannon. Get it? The "religous right" saying they're Christians does not make all Christians part of the "religious right."

I am a Christian, and I did not vote for Bush. In either election. And I am not alone. Bush's saying he's a Christian does not magically make me agree with him. There are conservatives who are not Christians, so obviously the stance of the "religious right" is not restricted to Christians. They just get a snazzy, alliterative title. Furthermore, there are Christians in the center and on the left that you just don't hear about much because the "religious right" gets a lot of press and includes a lot of very vocal people. But they do not own Christ, they do not own my faith, and they do not own my vote.


robbovius


Nov 8, 2006, 6:46 AM
Post #116 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8399

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
there is no growth without pain, physically, emotionally, or spritually.

i beg to differ.

there definitely is growth withouth the things you mentioned when im getting a BJ :P

ahh, yes, "point" taken ;-)


Partner blonde_loves_bolts


Nov 8, 2006, 6:57 AM
Post #117 of 535 (4967 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 7, 2005
Posts: 2287

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If a group of Climbers for Christ prayed for Jesus to watch over them as they climbed, and to bring them home safely, but had a bad accident due to rockfall or lightning strike (aka "an act of God"), would that mean that they were forsaken by Jesus ???
Ppphlllbt! That's material for 2nd grade Sunday School studies and extra credit for 1st graders.

Bill L


What kind of answer is that ???

You answered nothing, but simply attempted to discredit my question by impying that it is beneath you.

He's probably just feeling insecure because your signature just told him he's an idiot.
And what does your sig tell me about myself blondie? -I like it btw.

That you have a sense of humor. :wink:

And thank you - I aim to please.


billl7


Nov 8, 2006, 7:11 AM
Post #118 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

htotsu, maybe we are not so far apart in our thinking on Bush - maybe.

Bush does not represent Christianity but in a simplistic sense he is a product of it. He certainly believes he is a Chirstian ans so we see politically voiced words/phrases like: we're on a "crusade" and "it's our calling" and they are "evil." Also simplistically, the religious folks in TX have furthered his rise to his current office. No, republicans do not have a singular claim on Christ but there is a very very strong link as evidenced in the TX Republican platform.

And I don't think the democrats have a corner on things. It's more like the lesser of 2 evils so to speak (not that I generally think of folks as evil).

My main point: Christianity by its nature divides people. All are on one side or the other side of the fence. God is on 1 side and will abhore the other for eternity. Yes? I think that approach worked when strength in numbers mattered for survival of a group in the wilderness but the world is much more crowded and so Christianity is very outdated.

I'll admit that I was surprised to hear a vocal Christian at work yesterday say she voted for Kerry and wore black for 2 days after that election. So I was indeed tending to lump it all into one bag as I had assumed she would vote otherwise. Still, there is that fence I mentioned above.

Time to head into the mountains.

Bill L


ericbeyeler


Nov 8, 2006, 7:36 AM
Post #119 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 160

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Increasing the signal-to-noise ratio...
I am a Christian.
I am a climber.
I live in south-central PA.
Look me up.

Eric

p.s. I am also celebrating the recent election results :)


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 8, 2006, 9:03 AM
Post #120 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Christianity by its nature divides people.


I personally think Jesus would have a problem with this... The path he walked was not one of division, but instead unity, love, and compassion.

Man by nature looks for differences in people, rather than for the similarities, and religion is just another excuse to do so.




Most "Christians" do a terrible job of walking in the footsteps of their prophet, and even judge people in the name of a man who taught not to judge... Ironic, isn't it ??? :?

I think Jesus would shake his head in disgust if he were here to see what people have done to his message.





On a final note...
Atheism is a non-prophet organization. :wink:


c4c


Nov 8, 2006, 10:10 AM
Post #121 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Christianity by its nature divides people.


I personally think Jesus would have a problem with this... The path he walked was not one of division, but instead unity, love, and compassion.

Man by nature looks for differences in people, rather than for the similarities, and religion is just another excuse to do so.




Most "Christians" do a terrible job of walking in the footsteps of their prophet, and even judge people in the name of a man who taught not to judge... Ironic, isn't it ??? :?

I think Jesus would shake his head in disgust if he were here to see what people have done to his message.





On a final note...
Atheism is a non-prophet organization. :wink:

words from the prophet Jesus himself

Luke 12:49-54 (New Living Translation)
New Living Translation (NLT)
Holy Bible. New Living Translation copyright © 1996, 2004 by Tyndale Charitable Trust. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers.



Jesus Causes Division
49 “I have come to set the world on fire, and I wish it were already burning! 50 I have a terrible baptism of suffering ahead of me, and I am under a heavy burden until it is accomplished. 51 Do you think I have come to bring peace to the earth? No, I have come to divide people against each other! 52 From now on families will be split apart, three in favor of me, and two against—or two in favor and three against.
53 ‘Father will be divided against son
and son against father;
mother against daughter
and daughter against mother;
and mother-in-law against daughter-in-law
and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.’”

54 Then Jesus turned to the crowd and said, “When you see clouds beginning to form in the west, you say, ‘Here comes a shower.’ And you are right.

non-prophet :lol: :lol:


captiancareless


Nov 8, 2006, 10:19 AM
Post #122 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 94

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Why would a omnipotent, omniscient spirit being need someone to climb for them or do anything for them?

It would not.

It seems to me there would be another motive for your organization. Like introducing people to your beliefs. This to me seems dishonest.

Also why would the above mentioned spirit being want spineless, groveling, subjects that always prostrate themselves and bow down to something they themselves cannot see , just so they can "store up treasures in heaven"?

Both perspectives from the servant to the master seem selfish.

Mind you I think there's nothing wrong with selfish. ~bob~


coloredchalker


Nov 8, 2006, 11:02 AM
Post #123 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Hi - if you personally want to climb for Christ, great, more power to you.

But as far as missions go, please don't tell other people what and how to believe. It's embarassing and demeaning for everybody involved. I couldn't even imagine someone going to Thailand to climb and telling those great people with their fantastic culture who to pray to.

Seriously.

In reply to:
go climb for yourself!

In reply to:
Get a free google group for this crap.

Yeah, you all are some bright ones. "please don't tell others what and how to believe". Yet you're more than willing to tell others what to do and how to act, and what to believe. Love the double standard, keep up the good work!!! I'm going to keep telling people they should climb for Christ, that way at least it keeps us even and we can agree on something.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

so you want to tell me what I should NOT do? you're definitely brighter than me!

Yeah, actually I'm not telling you what do I'm just telling how inconsitent it is for someone to say things like "go climb for yourself", "don't tell other people what to believe", etc. When in fact that is doing the very thing they are telling other people not to do.

I'm mearly telling you what I'm going to continue doing. :)

How was I telling you what you should NOT do aside from saying indirectly that you should contradict yourself :? :? :? .


leezerdgirl


Nov 8, 2006, 1:33 PM
Post #124 of 535 (4964 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2005
Posts: 141

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Oh lordy.

Christians on a climbing mission aren't that different from those resort people who offer you a free vacation if you'll come listen to the sales pitch. As long as the terms of the deal are clear up front, people have every right to make their own choices. If you're so well off it's not worth it to you, bully for you. If you have more modest means, it might be a very welcome opportunity.

You could argue that it's unfair to take advantage of desperate people who have no other means to get the help the Christians are offering. This is more of a gray area, kind of like sweat shops--but go back to that assumption there's no other way to get the help. Sure it would be better if the help came in a perfect package, bright and shiny with no strings attached, but the world is rarely like that.

Now, the case of Christians denying people access to public resources unless they pray? Bad behavior, no question. I suppose some Christians would say the ends justify the means, i.e. it's okay to play dirty in order to save a soul. But the climb-for-christ people here aren't doing that, they're just trying to connect with each other. I'm a shameless heathen but I have no problem with that. RC.com is a public resource, and I wouldn't deny it to any group of climbers, Christian, fundamentalist Islamic, convicted felons, people in spandex, whomever.

Edited to add: btw, I agree with keeping your god out of my politics. I think the separation of church and state is a damn fine idea. Yes, we elected an insane president who is influenced by a particularly distasteful branch of Christianity. But now we've just ousted a good number of the right-wing loonies in Congress like Santorum. That's the beauty of our system--it's self-correcting. Don't want Christians in your bedroom? Vote them out of your capitol. Kicking them off your climbing forum, however, is a tad bit fascist, don't you think?


pinktricam


Nov 8, 2006, 1:38 PM
Post #125 of 535 (4972 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
... sounds like good times.
definatly ignore the trolls.
good to see a fair amouint of Christians here on RC.com
Amen :!:


coloredchalker


Nov 8, 2006, 1:56 PM
Post #126 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

You could argue that it's unfair to take advantage of desperate people who have no other means to get the help the Christians are offering. This is more of a gray area, kind of like sweat shops--but go back to that assumption there's no other way to get the help. Sure it would be better if the help came in a perfect package, bright and shiny with no strings attached, but the world is rarely like that.

Girl, most of what you say makes complete sense but I would like to clarify one point. All the work I'm involved with and that I have seen done by christian orgs. comes with no strings attatched, which you might not believe, but 'tis true. For instance, the org. I work with has schools, and a medical clinic, etc. At the schools the children don't even have to pay because donor dollars cover expenses. And the child doesn't have to be a christian, come to church, read a sentence out of the bible etc... At the clinic, there is no preliminary baptism service for entry or 100 hr prayer log required to recieve treatment. If you can pay the minimal fee, and lots of times even if you can't, you will recieve treatment.
No strings attatched.

Just to clarify.

Thats how Jesus worked, whether healing some one, visiting someones house, etc, he didn't require them to do anything or be any particular person before interacting with them. He just responded to them where they were at.


c4c


Nov 8, 2006, 2:11 PM
Post #127 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

Now, the case of Christians denying people access to public resources unless they pray? Bad behavior, no question. I suppose some Christians would say the ends justify the means, i.e. it's okay to play dirty in order to save a soul. But the climb-for-christ people here aren't doing that, they're just trying to connect with each other. I'm a shameless heathen but I have no problem with that. RC.com is a public resource, and I wouldn't deny it to any group of climbers, Christian, fundamentalist Islamic, convicted felons, people in spandex, whomever.
Leezergirl, We would not force someone to pray with us. We might invite you. But highly doubt forcing anything, be it a prayer, attendance at a meeting, or even a conversation would be very effective way to convince people to convert to christianity. Like the org's that coloredchalker works with, Climbing for Christ does not have any prerequisites for those that receive our help. If they ask why we are doing it, will be sure to tell them.

ptc- glad to see you make an appearance :D


leezerdgirl


Nov 8, 2006, 2:33 PM
Post #128 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2005
Posts: 141

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Sorry about that, should have prefaced my rant by acknowledging that not all religious missionaries tie help and evangalism together. Some do good deeds only for the sake of doing good deeds, not necessarily winning converts.

c4c, coloredchalker, nice to hear that you and your orgs believe in non-coercion. I support anyone in being ready to communicate their beliefs, and appreciate it when they are willing to let it go if the audience is not receptive. Of course, there are times and places to be forceful about your beliefs, such as when your rights are being infringed upon. I'm thinking MLK, Gandhi, etc.

You'll have to forgive those of us with a bad attitude toward Christians, based on bad experiences. Me, I grew up a lone Jew in the Bible Belt south. Had kids feeling my head for horns, etc. I had a bad attitude toward Christians for a long time. But I grew out of it. Hopefully, so did they.


billl7


Nov 8, 2006, 6:28 PM
Post #129 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
To those of you who keep using Bush's policies to attempt to discredit Christianity itself:

http://www.sojo.net/...&item=petition_flash
I watched the video. It's at least clear that there are Christians out there who do no support Bush. And it jives with my Christian co-worker who mourned that Bush won a 2nd term. Broadens my view a little bit, not that it would very much change the main views I've expressed.

Bill L


billl7


Nov 8, 2006, 6:53 PM
Post #130 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Did I get the extra credit?????
Well said ... to you and all around. My bad.


ericbeyeler


Nov 8, 2006, 9:10 PM
Post #131 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2004
Posts: 160

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Bill -
Here is another link to check out.
http://cpt.org/...ications/history.php
Unfortunately, the good news Jesus taught has been grossly misrepresented by certain political ideologies or even well-meaning but misguided Christians.
When you look at what Jesus actually taught, as opposed to what is being touted by some people, you get a very different picture.

Love your enemies, do good to those that hate you.

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

If I am hated as a Christian, I want it to be because I act like Jesus, as is the case of many Christians in Asian, Middle Eastern, and African countries. Unfortunately, Christianity in America has a bad name not because it acts like Jesus but because many times those who take the name Christian act hatefully, have misguided political agendas, or are hypocritical. We need to repent, please forgive us.

Eric


annak


Nov 8, 2006, 11:47 PM
Post #132 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 10, 2004
Posts: 191

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Why don't you come to the light side, we're having a great time and the future looks promising.

The Christian future looks promising? I beg to differ. If the fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. continue to have their way, our future looks dim indeed. What have the Christians done for us lately? They have attempted, and continue to attempt, to replace legitimate science education about the origins of life with religious mythology. They have thwarted educational efforts about condom use that has pr oven to be effect at limiting the spread of AIDS because they believe that preventing sex is morally superior to preventing sexually transmitted disease. They have caused laws to be passed that will limit the most promising medical research in history -- stem cell research -- because they believe that collections of less than 100 embryonic cells cultured in a petri dish have more right to "life" than people dying and suffering from a myriad of diseases.

The Christian future is hardly "promising." It's frankly bleak.

Jay

Guess what I heard today on NPR -- turns out our Supreme Court is busy
deciding about whether certain medical procedures should be allowed, in responce to our government's decision on the matter. It is already bad enough that the politicians and the judges rather than physicians are deciding of how exactly the second trimester abortions should be conducted. Turns out that our glorious government decided that a less invasive and safer procedure that is proven to cause less complications for women health should be illegal, on the basis of their Christian "pro-life" believes. Basically, they prefer to cause harm to a woman, just to make sure that 3-6 month old fetus demises in the uterus, and not half-way out. And the Supreme Court is busy deciding whether or not to confirm this decision. I did not know whether to laugh or cry.


coloredchalker


Nov 9, 2006, 5:37 AM
Post #133 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Guess what I heard today on NPR -- turns out our Supreme Court is busy
deciding about whether certain medical procedures should be allowed, in responce to our government's decision on the matter. It is already bad enough that the politicians and the judges rather than physicians are deciding of how exactly the second trimester abortions should be conducted. Turns out that our glorious government decided that a less invasive and safer procedure that is proven to cause less complications for women health should be illegal, on the basis of their Christian "pro-life" believes. Basically, they prefer to cause harm to a woman, just to make sure that 3-6 month old fetus demises in the uterus, and not half-way out. And the Supreme Court is busy deciding whether or not to confirm this decision. I did not know whether to laugh or cry.

Why do you say "Christian prolifers" as if christians are the only ones in favor of life? I bet your pretty happy your mom was a prolifer and didn't just consider you an inconvenient mass of reproducing cells. Or pehaps youd rather have missed out on life and been classified as trash?


Partner jammer


Nov 9, 2006, 5:52 AM
Post #134 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: 3468

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Man, it's too bad that people get slammed when they talk about christians on this site. It seems that it's always open season on them. Sup with dat? Can't it be more like live and let live??


sdkbcassidy


Nov 9, 2006, 7:16 AM
Post #135 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2006
Posts: 53

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Man, it's too bad that people get slammed when they talk about christians on this site. It seems that it's always open season on them. Sup with dat? Can't it be more like live and let live??

Except the problem is that to be a good Christian, you have to get the word out. Gotta convert the unbelievers. I'm all for live and let live, but I don't get the same respect. It gets annoying in the extreme. A few examples? I don't even have to refer to government or politics.

- When I was 4 and my Christian neighbor decided that not only should her kids understand that Christmas is only about Jesus and that Santa Claus doesn't exist, the rest of the neigborhood kids should know as well. Thanks. I would have liked to have held on to my delusions a little longer. I'm still pissed about that one.

- When I was a freshman in college and one of my classmates (a newly converted christian) from high school kept calling, trying to save me from my evil ways, going down the evil path. Apparently, he was having visions in church. Ugh.

- 2 weeks ago on a flight home when the person next to me started a conversation about whether or not I believed in heaven. I was all content to read my book, but he wanted to talk. When I told him I thought it didn't matter one way or the other, he started in. At first, he seemed fairly reasonable and willing to listen to my point-of-view, just as I was willing to listen to his. But, then he asked me to start assuming all sorts of unprovable things were true so that he could get to his "logical" conclusion that Jesus was going to save me. In my line of work, it all starts w/ assumptions - you make bad ones and everything after that is crap, doesn't mean a thing. Once I pointed out a few holes in his assumptions he was, luckily for me, done with me.

I could go on, but hopefully you get the point.


Partner tradman


Nov 9, 2006, 7:52 AM
Post #136 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7158

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'm all for live and let live, but I don't get the same respect.

Yep, you're all for live and let live.

Except that you remember and store up every imagined slight from the age of 4 and complain bitterly about them without the slightest provocation, then use them as a justification for ongoing attacks on people who've never done you wrong and who in fact you've never even met.

Heck, we should make you a saint.

:roll:


annak


Nov 9, 2006, 8:02 AM
Post #137 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 10, 2004
Posts: 191

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Guess what I heard today on NPR -- turns out our Supreme Court is busy
deciding about whether certain medical procedures should be allowed, in responce to our government's decision on the matter. It is already bad enough that the politicians and the judges rather than physicians are deciding of how exactly the second trimester abortions should be conducted. Turns out that our glorious government decided that a less invasive and safer procedure that is proven to cause less complications for women health should be illegal, on the basis of their Christian "pro-life" believes. Basically, they prefer to cause harm to a woman, just to make sure that 3-6 month old fetus demises in the uterus, and not half-way out. And the Supreme Court is busy deciding whether or not to confirm this decision. I did not know whether to laugh or cry.

Why do you say "Christian prolifers" as if christians are the only ones in favor of life? I bet your pretty happy your mom was a prolifer and didn't just consider you an inconvenient mass of reproducing cells. Or pehaps youd rather have missed out on life and been classified as trash?


You do not get it. They are talking about situations what an abortion is abolutely neccessary (such that even pro-lifes agree) due to grim consequencies for the mother or serious development problmes with the fetus. Like when the mother can die, or fetus has 3 legs and no head. What they debate is how to perform the procedure. With this in mind, reread my original post.

Regarding my mother -- it was her choice to have me, not the choice made by the russian goverment on her behalf. I definitely would not want to be an unwanted child and cause miserry to unfortunate parents.


htotsu


Nov 9, 2006, 9:42 AM
Post #138 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
htotsu, maybe we are not so far apart in our thinking on Bush - maybe.

Bush does not represent Christianity but in a simplistic sense he is a product of it. He certainly believes he is a Chirstian ans so we see politically voiced words/phrases like: we're on a "crusade" and "it's our calling" and they are "evil."

Christianity did not give him his personality. He, and others in the "religious right" use Christianity and religious language to further his own agenda. He says - and may in fact believe - that the two are connected, but I really want to point out that dogmatic people can be dogmatic about whatever they want.

In reply to:
No, republicans do not have a singular claim on Christ but there is a very very strong link as evidenced in the TX Republican platform.
Chicken vs. egg. Some people believe something strongly and then choose a political stance as a result. Others have a political stance and see people connecting it with Christianity, and then take advantage of the connection, real or perceived.

In reply to:
My main point: Christianity by its nature divides people.
...
I think that approach worked when strength in numbers mattered for survival of a group in the wilderness but the world is much more crowded and so Christianity is very outdated.

Actually in the days of the wilderness it is Judaism that you are thinking of. For some reason it's OK in our society to rip Christians, but not Jews, even though the Judeo-Christian "being and living differently and separately and being accountable to God" thing comes from the "Judeo" part. For us that idea did not start with Christ, it is more accurately attributable to Moses.

But to push that further, yes, there are aspects of Christianity that will divide people. You can say the same about food. Vegetarians do not eat meat. So does vegetarianism divide people? Yes. Does that make vegetarians cruel or unthinking? They are doing this for reasons they are willing to stand behind, whether for their health, out of concern for animals, to impress a girl, whatever. They get to choose.

Do some people use vegetarianism as their justification for acting superior to others, for vilifying others, or for trying to make people like shit for eating meat? Sure, I've seen people do it. But that does not necessarily make them representative of VEGETARIANISM itself, or other vegetarians in general. I know vegetarians who are happy to explain why they feel its the right choice for them, and are wonderful people whom I am glad to know regardless of what they choose to eat.

So, you see, vegetarians are human, and each comes with his or her own individual personality. Christians are human, too. Each will express or not express belief differently, and the point is it's rarely a great idea to lump people of any group together based on the vocal few. Most would call that discrimination or stereotyping.

In reply to:
I'll admit that I was surprised to hear a vocal Christian at work yesterday say she voted for Kerry and wore black for 2 days after that election. So I was indeed tending to lump it all into one bag as I had assumed she would vote otherwise.

This is all I really wanted to say with my original post. The fact that Christianity and the Republican party have the same followers is patently false. Whatever our reasons, we may indeed feel similarly about Bush, you and I.

Take care, and enjoy the mountains.


slablizard


Nov 9, 2006, 11:51 AM
Post #139 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I just find unbelievable how one can found his/her life on religious mithology...
just to be sure that you will be "saved" ? Saved from what? As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved...

Hey can you please save this ball of pure energy from??? As I see it we are in this world to experience matter, that's why we have a physical body, going back to the source when you die, will null everything that has a meaning for a "matter being" no more ethics, physical and moral laws...that is for the earth!

It would be like trying to make a supernova feel guilty. To send a black hole to hell... :wink:
we know nothing about where we live and we pretend to have rules for after we died....isn't that absurd? Following a book that was written centuries ago....justifying the incomprehensible as " a miracle" easy no? :)

Very interesting from my point of view, how people can believe blindly in the bible, but ignore for example what happens in front of their eyes. Like global warming, and such.

I can accept the power of pray...but just as the sum of the energy of the minds of whoever is praying...not because "god" is listening to you...you are doing that!

ANyway...live and let live.


lena_chita
Moderator

Nov 9, 2006, 12:31 PM
Post #140 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
... I bet your pretty happy your mom was a prolifer and didn't just consider you an inconvenient mass of reproducing cells. Or pehaps youd rather have missed out on life and been classified as trash?

Now, where is the logic in this statement? What makes you think that the mother in question was a pro-lifer? Just b/c she had this ONE child (annak?-- I get confused by multiple quotes within quotes) doesn't mean that she was a pro-lifer. For all you know, the Mother had 2 abortions before having a child, then had a child BY CHOICE, and then decided to get tubal ligations to avoid ever having a child again :)

(My appologies to your Mother, annak, she was picked only for demostration purposes)


coloredchalker


Nov 9, 2006, 1:11 PM
Post #141 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I just find unbelievable how one can found his/her life on religious mithology...
just to be sure that you will be "saved" ? Saved from what? As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved...

Hey can you please save this ball of pure energy from??? As I see it we are in this world to experience matter, that's why we have a physical body, going back to the source when you die, will null everything that has a meaning for a "matter being" no more ethics, physical and moral laws...that is for the earth!

It would be like trying to make a supernova feel guilty. To send a black hole to hell... :wink:
we know nothing about where we live and we pretend to have rules for after we died....isn't that absurd? Following a book that was written centuries ago....justifying the incomprehensible as " a miracle" easy no? :)

Very interesting from my point of view, how people can believe blindly in the bible, but ignore for example what happens in front of their eyes. Like global warming, and such.

I can accept the power of pray...but just as the sum of the energy of the minds of whoever is praying...not because "god" is listening to you...you are doing that!

ANyway...live and let live.

I find it unbelievable how a person can make statements sound like fact when in fact they have absdolutely nothing to base their statment on.
In reply to:
"As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved..."
What, where do you get that from? As christians at least we have a shred (how ever small it may be) to base a belief on but from what kind of system or reasoning do you get the above statement?


coloredchalker


Nov 9, 2006, 1:31 PM
Post #142 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Guess what I heard today on NPR -- turns out our Supreme Court is busy
deciding about whether certain medical procedures should be allowed, in responce to our government's decision on the matter. It is already bad enough that the politicians and the judges rather than physicians are deciding of how exactly the second trimester abortions should be conducted. Turns out that our glorious government decided that a less invasive and safer procedure that is proven to cause less complications for women health should be illegal, on the basis of their Christian "pro-life" believes. Basically, they prefer to cause harm to a woman, just to make sure that 3-6 month old fetus demises in the uterus, and not half-way out. And the Supreme Court is busy deciding whether or not to confirm this decision. I did not know whether to laugh or cry.

Why do you say "Christian prolifers" as if christians are the only ones in favor of life? I bet your pretty happy your mom was a prolifer and didn't just consider you an inconvenient mass of reproducing cells. Or pehaps youd rather have missed out on life and been classified as trash?


You do not get it. They are talking about situations what an abortion is abolutely neccessary (such that even pro-lifes agree) due to grim consequencies for the mother or serious development problmes with the fetus. Like when the mother can die, or fetus has 3 legs and no head. What they debate is how to perform the procedure. With this in mind, reread my original post.

Regarding my mother -- it was her choice to have me, not the choice made by the russian goverment on her behalf. I definitely would not want to be an unwanted child and cause miserry to unfortunate parents.

OK, I'm just saying every person that is prolife is not a christian and certaintly there are lots of prolifers that wouldn't want to be associated with christianity, so why does it all get lumped together?
I don't think unfortunate applies to parents in this debate, they aren't the mass of cells being hacked to peices. Yeah, it might be unfortnute for a man to say to his buddy-"dude, I'm not getting any right now 'cause we're really can't afford to get pregnant". That may be unfortunate but at least its responsible living.

And for the other poster, maybe your mother wasn't a hard line prolifer but at least she was prolife when she decided to carry her pregnancy with you to full term.


slablizard


Nov 9, 2006, 5:13 PM
Post #143 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I find it unbelievable how a person can make statements sound like fact when in fact they have absdolutely nothing to base their statment on.
In reply to:
"As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved..."
What, where do you get that from? As christians at least we have a shred (how ever small it may be) to base a belief on but from what kind of system or reasoning do you get the above statement?

LOL!

You as "believer" asking me for a proof of my reasonings? That's absurd! You base your reasonings on faith !

Do you think that a soul, a spiritual being, a being not bounded by matter and physical laws can still experience or suffer for very human and body related feelings as envy, attachment, regret or fear? What would be the point of having a physical body and a life time if not for experience what we call life?
I get that type of "reasoning" from Philosophy and spirituality...And no, I'm sorry, but you have not more evidence than mine..just different books.

Can you prove me that a star has feelings? Can you prove me that a soul has fear? does a nuclear explosion (our sun) that (incidentally) gives life to millions of creatures feel love for them? Does our magnetic field that protects us from solar wind feels something for us? Still it's keeping us alive a lot more than ANY god.

prove me wrong.


slablizard


Nov 9, 2006, 5:14 PM
Post #144 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I find it unbelievable how a person can make statements sound like fact when in fact they have absdolutely nothing to base their statment on.
In reply to:
"As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved..."
What, where do you get that from? As christians at least we have a shred (how ever small it may be) to base a belief on but from what kind of system or reasoning do you get the above statement?

LOL!

You as "believer" asking me for a proof of my reasonings? That's absurd! You base your reasonings on faith !

Do you think that a soul, a spiritual being, a being not bounded by matter and physical laws can still experience or suffer for very human and body related feelings as envy, attachment, regret or fear? What would be the point of having a physical body and a life time if not for experience what we call life?
I get that type of "reasoning" from Philosophy and spirituality...And no, I'm sorry, but you have not more evidence than mine..just different books.

Can you prove me that a star has feelings? Can you prove me that a soul has fear? does a nuclear explosion (our sun) that (incidentally) gives life to millions of creatures feel love for them? Does our magnetic field that protects us from solar wind feels something for us? Still it's keeping us alive a lot more than ANY god.

prove me wrong.


Partner brent_e


Nov 9, 2006, 5:42 PM
Post #145 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5109

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I find it unbelievable how a person can make statements sound like fact when in fact they have absdolutely nothing to base their statment on.
In reply to:
"As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved..."
What, where do you get that from? As christians at least we have a shred (how ever small it may be) to base a belief on but from what kind of system or reasoning do you get the above statement?

LOL!

You as "believer" asking me for a proof of my reasonings? That's absurd! You base your reasonings on faith !

Do you think that a soul, a spiritual being, a being not bounded by matter and physical laws can still experience or suffer for very human and body related feelings as envy, attachment, regret or fear? What would be the point of having a physical body and a life time if not for experience what we call life?
I get that type of "reasoning" from Philosophy and spirituality...And no, I'm sorry, but you have not more evidence than mine..just different books.

Can you prove me that a star has feelings? Can you prove me that a soul has fear? does a nuclear explosion (our sun) that (incidentally) gives life to millions of creatures feel love for them? Does our magnetic field that protects us from solar wind feels something for us? Still it's keeping us alive a lot more than ANY god.

prove me wrong.

You're wrong.


(good argument)


billl7


Nov 9, 2006, 5:46 PM
Post #146 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
And for the other poster, maybe your mother wasn't a hard line prolifer but at least she was prolife when she decided to carry her pregnancy with you to full term.
Do you realize that you are reducing the many reasons why people have children down to simply that they are against abortions??

Bill L


hangerlessbolt


Nov 9, 2006, 5:57 PM
Post #147 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2001
Posts: 7255

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Can I just carry his gear? I mean the dude looks hella strong!


billl7


Nov 9, 2006, 6:14 PM
Post #148 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
htotsu, maybe we are not so far apart in our thinking on Bush - maybe.

Bush does not represent Christianity but in a simplistic sense he is a product of it. He certainly believes he is a Chirstian ans so we see politically voiced words/phrases like: we're on a "crusade" and "it's our calling" and they are "evil."

Christianity did not give him his personality. He, and others in the "religious right" use Christianity and religious language to further his own agenda. He says - and may in fact believe - that the two are connected, but I really want to point out that dogmatic people can be dogmatic about whatever they want. .
Even for the religious right, if it was them that got him into office, there's something that binds them together and it is called Christianity - albeit as they interpret it.

Edit: It's not just Bush that keeps me sounding like I'm talking in circles: Bush -> Christianity -> Bush. I have acquaintances, quite close to me and ones who I respect in fact, who haven't had any problem at all with that kind of circle. But I realize more than before that this isn't all Christians.

Also, in terms of fundamentalist versus not so fundamentalist (reading ahead to cintune's msg below): Is the Bible fallible or not? If a Christian tells me they think it is fallible then I'm more inclined to listen to what they might have to say.

Bill L


cintune


Nov 9, 2006, 6:15 PM
Post #149 of 535 (4875 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1290

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Happened to come across this today on Slate.com, might clear things up a bit:

"Modern evangelicalism emerged from an early-20th-century conflict between Protestant liberals and fundamentalists. The fundamentalists felt that the liberals had strayed too far from the teachings of the Bible and urged a return to the most orthodox teachings. The evangelicals staked out a middle ground—more conservative than the liberals but not quite as old-fashioned as the fundamentalists. The evangelicals and fundamentalists remain two distinct groups, though they share a belief in the importance of a personal relationship with God and the Bible. In general, the fundamentalists tend to be stricter and more isolated from mainstream culture. An evangelical parent might encourage his kids to listen to Christian rock, for example, while a fundamentalist parent would object to all music of that kind."

So, the point, I think, is that a lot of what we atheists find so repulsive about Xianity really falls on the "fundamentalist" rather than the "evangelical" side of this division. Seems to me that these climbers for Christ are more the "let's all be nice to each other like Jesus" types, not so much the "you are going to hell if I don't save your sorry ass" types.

Although there can obviously be some significant overlap.

Anyway, I'm in SC Pa and I use the Messiah College library fairly often, and have encountered climbers from there at local crags, and have never felt personally offended or put upon by any of them. On the other hand, I don't think I've ever run into a "fundamentalist" climber; I'd think they'd be too busy castigating the world to have fun climbing.

I also beleive there can be such a thing as a moderate Muslim, FWIW.

That said, I think it's extremely unlikely that there is an objective "god," there are just ideas about god. Some people find these ideas very appealing.


billl7


Nov 9, 2006, 6:27 PM
Post #150 of 535 (4934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
My main point: Christianity by its nature divides people.
...
I think that approach worked when strength in numbers mattered for survival of a group in the wilderness but the world is much more crowded and so Christianity is very outdated.

Actually in the days of the wilderness it is Judaism that you are thinking of. For some reason it's OK in our society to rip Christians, but not Jews, even though the Judeo-Christian "being and living differently and separately and being accountable to God" thing comes from the "Judeo" part. For us that idea did not start with Christ, it is more accurately attributable to Moses.
On this, I do think Jesus moved things along to a slightly less tolerable state. But I also think there is much much more to go.

On the ripping Christians instead of Jews, Jesus opened that religion (the old testament is also in there) up to anyone and so we start having strangers in white shirts and black ties knocking on our doors to encourage us to make deeply personal changes. And signs outside churches on Halloween that say: "Free Games and Candy - Oct 31", hoping to get a chance to likewise persuade children out of earshot of their parents.

Bill L


Partner tradman


Nov 10, 2006, 2:25 AM
Post #151 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7158

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
And signs outside churches on Halloween that say: "Free Games and Candy - Oct 31", hoping to get a chance to likewise persuade children out of earshot of their parents.

Did you consider the possibility that the church is just throwing a fun party for kids?

Probably not, huh?

You think this says something about christians? I think we can all see that it says something about you.


c4c


Nov 10, 2006, 4:29 AM
Post #152 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Happened to come across this today on Slate.com, might clear things up a bit:

"Modern evangelicalism emerged from an early-20th-century conflict between Protestant liberals and fundamentalists. The fundamentalists felt that the liberals had strayed too far from the teachings of the Bible and urged a return to the most orthodox teachings. The evangelicals staked out a middle ground—more conservative than the liberals but not quite as old-fashioned as the fundamentalists. The evangelicals and fundamentalists remain two distinct groups, though they share a belief in the importance of a personal relationship with God and the Bible. In general, the fundamentalists tend to be stricter and more isolated from mainstream culture. An evangelical parent might encourage his kids to listen to Christian rock, for example, while a fundamentalist parent would object to all music of that kind."

So, the point, I think, is that a lot of what we atheists find so repulsive about Xianity really falls on the "fundamentalist" rather than the "evangelical" side of this division. Seems to me that these climbers for Christ are more the "let's all be nice to each other like Jesus" types, not so much the "you are going to hell if I don't save your sorry ass" types.

Although there can obviously be some significant overlap.

Anyway, I'm in SC Pa and I use the Messiah College library fairly often, and have encountered climbers from there at local crags, and have never felt personally offended or put upon by any of them. On the other hand, I don't think I've ever run into a "fundamentalist" climber; I'd think they'd be too busy castigating the world to have fun climbing.

I also beleive there can be such a thing as a moderate Muslim, FWIW.

That said, I think it's extremely unlikely that there is an objective "god," there are just ideas about god. Some people find these ideas very appealing.

Sorry guys I would be clasified as a "fundamental" Christian I believe the Bible is infallible. If it isn't then the whole thing is just a crock of shit so to speak. How can I believe any of it if I don't believe all of it. It's not up to me (thankfully) to save your sorry butts from eternity spent seperated from a holy God in a real place called Hell---thats between you and God. So you are right that I am of the lets be nice like Jesus group because my goal is to be like Him. I do listen to Christian Rock though.


coloredchalker


Nov 10, 2006, 5:32 AM
Post #153 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I find it unbelievable how a person can make statements sound like fact when in fact they have absdolutely nothing to base their statment on.
In reply to:
"As a spiritual being you will have no phisical boundaries anymore, no desires, no addictions no pulses...just pure energy. There's nothing to be saved..."
What, where do you get that from? As christians at least we have a shred (how ever small it may be) to base a belief on but from what kind of system or reasoning do you get the above statement?

LOL!

You as "believer" asking me for a proof of my reasonings? That's absurd! You base your reasonings on faith !

Do you think that a soul, a spiritual being, a being not bounded by matter and physical laws can still experience or suffer for very human and body related feelings as envy, attachment, regret or fear? What would be the point of having a physical body and a life time if not for experience what we call life?
I get that type of "reasoning" from Philosophy and spirituality...And no, I'm sorry, but you have not more evidence than mine..just different books.

Can you prove me that a star has feelings? Can you prove me that a soul has fear? does a nuclear explosion (our sun) that (incidentally) gives life to millions of creatures feel love for them? Does our magnetic field that protects us from solar wind feels something for us? Still it's keeping us alive a lot more than ANY god.

prove me wrong.

I'm taking a few deep breaths so that I can be gentle with you...breath....breath...

Ok, first of all you ask me what I think and then ask me to prove you wrong, do you see the problem there? You think that when we die we are magically transformed in to energy and will be absent any feeling. I can't ask you to prove that to me, it would be impossible. But for you to insist that that is what happens is absurd because you have no more reason to believe that than I have to believe something else. I don't know whether souls can or can't feel anything or what state they reside in, it might very well be a ball of glowing energy. But I can take the words of an expert on this subject and trust what he has to say. But no, I can't prove it and actually I'm not even going to try, sorry to disappoint you.
As for your other questions- no, apples to oranges, no, no, apples to oranges, and more no.

"Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen". Keep the faith brother!


coloredchalker


Nov 10, 2006, 5:38 AM
Post #154 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:

LOL!

You as "believer" asking me for a proof of my reasonings? That's absurd! You base your reasonings on faith !

And by the way, I didn't ask you for proof, I just asked where you cam up with this idea. Big difference.


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 6:40 AM
Post #155 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
And signs outside churches on Halloween that say: "Free Games and Candy - Oct 31", hoping to get a chance to likewise persuade children out of earshot of their parents.

Did you consider the possibility that the church is just throwing a fun party for kids?

Probably not, huh?

You think this says something about christians? I think we can all see that it says something about you.
Except I know the church - I attended services there for 6 years; edit: although neither as a member nor as a believer; here is their web page; one could call them and ask if they had that message on their marque this year; PM me and we'll trade full names and you can try to ask about our attendance; personally, I don't see what the big deal about this would be for a Christian; what Christian wouldn't want to have some hours of an arbitrary child's time to witness to them??)


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 6:43 AM
Post #156 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Sorry guys I would be clasified as a "fundamental" Christian I believe the Bible is infallible. If it isn't then the whole thing is just a crock of s--- so to speak. How can I believe any of it if I don't believe all of it. It's not up to me (thankfully) to save your sorry butts from eternity spent seperated from a holy God in a real place called Hell---thats between you and God. So you are right that I am of the lets be nice like Jesus group because my goal is to be like Him. I do listen to Christian Rock though.
c4c, You are a first class fellow and I'm not referring to the part about Chrisitian Rock.


htotsu


Nov 10, 2006, 6:57 AM
Post #157 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Hi Bill. On the bible, I don't believe it dropped out of the sky. I think too many people, not only Christians but also those who criticize Christianity, just don't spend enough time actually studying it enough to know what they are talking about. Looking into the original Greek and Hebrew. Trying to understand context as well as content. Looking into the eras themselves and what else was going on in history.

Neither Christians themselves NOR anyone else should go merely by what is said by those in power. The whole point of Christ was that he was making the God of the Jews accessible to everyone, not just the Jews, not just the powerful, not just the literate. Many non-Christians ask Christians to think, and not to accept things blindly. Well, guess what? So does the bible.

In reply to:
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. - 2 Tim 2:15 (KJV)

In reply to:
These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. - Acts 17:11

Good advice in any situation.

(Oh, and on the Halloween thing, if parents who are not members of that church are sending their children in WITHOUT ACCOMPANYING THEM, then that's the problem. In no way are those churches saying "send in your children, and please remain outside so you don't hear what we tell them." You have made an unwarranted assumption there)

And to you, Slab, you really look silly demanding proof for something when you have no way to prove the alternative you put forth.
In reply to:
I get that type of "reasoning" from Philosophy and spirituality...And no, I'm sorry, but you have not more evidence than mine..just different books.
Exactly. Meaning you have no more evidence than ours. You draw your conclusions based on "philosophy and spirituality" and rest on faith that your conclusions are so, even though you cannot submit proof here. Your conclusions are simply different from mine. We each have that right.


c4c


Nov 10, 2006, 7:05 AM
Post #158 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

htotsu, I wish that I could rate today and we could rate in community because that was a trophy post imho. Man I need to study more, I will be the first to say that I don't know my Bible as well as I should. That is one of the things that I love about the Bible you can spend a lifetime studying and never learn it all. That true about climbing as well, come to think about it, Maybe thats why I love them both so much. .....Maybe thats why I work for climbing for Christ? Its a perfect blend of two things that I love.


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 7:05 AM
Post #159 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
(Oh, and on the Halloween thing, if parents who are not members of that church are sending their children in WITHOUT ACCOMPANYING THEM, then that's the problem. In no way are those churches saying "send in your children, and please remain outside so you don't hear what we tell them." You have made an unwarranted assumption there)
I agree that most of those kinds of parents probably don't care although I also doubt they are aware of the lifetime consequences (the part about division). It was intended as an example of the effect of the New Testament, contrasting not ripping Jews with ripping Christians.


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 7:11 AM
Post #160 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hi Bill. On the bible, I don't believe it dropped out of the sky. I think too many people, not only Christians but also those who criticize Christianity, just don't spend enough time actually studying it enough to know what they are talking about. Looking into the original Greek and Hebrew. Trying to understand context as well as content. Looking into the eras themselves and what else was going on in history.
Not sure what you mean about "dropped out of the sky".

Unless one is into that kind of study for study's sake, to study it like that requires an ordinary bloke to cross the threshold of faith in order to have the motivation. That's where I stumble in that sort of pursuit.


coloredchalker


Nov 10, 2006, 7:20 AM
Post #161 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
htotsu, I wish that I could rate today and we could rate in community because that was a trophy post imho. Man I need to study more, I will be the first to say that I don't know my Bible as well as I should. That is one of the things that I love about the Bible you can spend a lifetime studying and never learn it all. That true about climbing as well, come to think about it, Maybe thats why I love them both so much. .....Maybe thats why I work for climbing for Christ? Its a perfect blend of two things that I love.

This reminds me of some thoughts I had the other day. Why do we spend so much time talking about climbing? Because it is something we love. We go to a party, we're going to be talking about climbing "man I had this epic experience climbing the other day...", "you have got to try climbing", "I'm going with some friends climbing this weekend, you should come with us!", "All other sports are lame, climbing is the only real sport", etc. We tell people about climbing whether they are really interested or not. We will spend our time away from the rock just wishing we could get back to it.
Its no different with anything else your passionate about, a woman, a food, a beverage, an animal, etc...
Yeah, people who are passionate about a religious idea are probably going to talk about it and try to get other people to try it because thats just human nature. So the next time you want to tell some one to "shut up about god already", just think that maybe they'd like to tell you to just "shut up about climbing already". I mean, just think that this is just person talking about their passion and if you don't agree with them you can at least agree that its good to be passionate about some thing.


Partner tradman


Nov 10, 2006, 7:31 AM
Post #162 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7158

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I don't see what the big deal about this would be for a Christian; what Christian wouldn't want to have some hours of an arbitrary child's time to witness to them??

Me.

And almost every other christian I know. People - and that includes children - are perfectly capable of asking about religion as and when they're interested.

Again, your assumption that every christian is a religious predator who would happily prey on young children says a lot more about you than anyone else.

Still, I'm impressed by your church; they're clearly a very tolerant and forgiving bunch to have you around for six years knowing that you badmouth them behind their backs.


slablizard


Nov 10, 2006, 9:28 AM
Post #163 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'm taking a few deep breaths so that I can be gentle with you...breath....breath...

Ok, first of all you ask me what I think and then ask me to prove you wrong, do you see the problem there? You think that when we die we are magically transformed in to energy and will be absent any feeling. I can't ask you to prove that to me, it would be impossible. But for you to insist that that is what happens is absurd because you have no more reason to believe that than I have to believe something else. I don't know whether souls can or can't feel anything or what state they reside in, it might very well be a ball of glowing energy. But I can take the words of an expert on this subject and trust what he has to say. But no, I can't prove it and actually I'm not even going to try, sorry to disappoint you.
As for your other questions- no, apples to oranges, no, no, apples to oranges, and more no.
"Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen". Keep the faith brother!

I'm not trying to prove anything I'm just trying to show you that we both don't know. And that , to me, faith is just one easy way to explain everything we don't know. "God did it" "It's a miracle" it seems sop simplicistic to me.
Like Santa Claus for the kids. We all know it's a lie but we keep telling it.
ANd for your comparison about talking about climbing and talking about religion here yes I agree, if this was called "climbingforchrist.com"

But it's not, and religion is more and more cause for distruction and death ( watch the news lately?) today than ever. Islam, Christianity, Induism...all have good princiles...in theory, but when they are applied by men in the real word...the end result is usually submission and sufference...
apart few cases of really good people


slablizard


Nov 10, 2006, 9:28 AM
Post #164 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'm taking a few deep breaths so that I can be gentle with you...breath....breath...

Ok, first of all you ask me what I think and then ask me to prove you wrong, do you see the problem there? You think that when we die we are magically transformed in to energy and will be absent any feeling. I can't ask you to prove that to me, it would be impossible. But for you to insist that that is what happens is absurd because you have no more reason to believe that than I have to believe something else. I don't know whether souls can or can't feel anything or what state they reside in, it might very well be a ball of glowing energy. But I can take the words of an expert on this subject and trust what he has to say. But no, I can't prove it and actually I'm not even going to try, sorry to disappoint you.
As for your other questions- no, apples to oranges, no, no, apples to oranges, and more no.
"Faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen". Keep the faith brother!

I'm not trying to prove anything I'm just trying to show you that we both don't know. And that , to me, faith is just one easy way to explain everything we don't know. "God did it" "It's a miracle" it seems sop simplicistic to me.
Like Santa Claus for the kids. We all know it's a lie but we keep telling it.
ANd for your comparison about talking about climbing and talking about religion here yes I agree, if this was called "climbingforchrist.com"

But it's not, and religion is more and more cause for distruction and death ( watch the news lately?) today than ever. Islam, Christianity, Induism...all have good princiles...in theory, but when they are applied by men in the real word...the end result is usually submission and sufference...
apart few cases of really good people


Partner tradman


Nov 10, 2006, 9:44 AM
Post #165 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7158

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
But it's not, and religion is more and more cause for distruction and death ( watch the news lately?) today than ever. Islam, Christianity, Induism...all have good princiles...in theory, but when they are applied by men in the real word...the end result is usually submission and sufference...

Every ideology has been subverted to control and brutalise people at one time or another, even atheism. Well, especially atheism really. But it has very little to do with the ideologies and a lot to do with the people who are distorting them.

I'm sure that most people would think it just as foolish to blame all atheists for the horrors of Mao and Stalin as it is to blame all muslims for 9/11.


healyje


Nov 10, 2006, 2:21 PM
Post #166 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4186

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

That folks think the bible or koran are the "word" of god is the most ridiculous part of these two particular religions. Hell, the politics associated with what ended up in what we call the "bible" today alone should be enough to question the veracity of the it. But to take such a mishmash of stories told over time by humans as anything but that is just so beyond clueless as to be surreal. There is nothing whatsoever authoritative about the origins of this collection of words other than some humans recorded them often enough for them to survive for your reading pleasure.

And as books go it's a pretty disheveled mess. Right off the top of my head I'd say this collection of fable, parable, and prayer, which has interpreted and reinterpreted over the ages, could still stand a decent edit and purging. Oh, and bring back a couple of those worthy old books that were left out of the current edition. And last, to be honest, it could really use a woman's touch after several millenia of persecuting them from ranks of authority and brutally erasing their seminal contributions to what you folks now call your faith and religion.

Personally, I think L. Ron Hubbard did a better job than this and his books still suck. Tolkien on the otherhand actual did a plausible job and you don't hear people doubting the existence of wizards and dragons, now do you?


slablizard


Nov 10, 2006, 2:32 PM
Post #167 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
But it's not, and religion is more and more cause for distruction and death ( watch the news lately?) today than ever. Islam, Christianity, Induism...all have good princiles...in theory, but when they are applied by men in the real word...the end result is usually submission and sufference...

Every ideology has been subverted to control and brutalise people at one time or another, even atheism. Well, especially atheism really. But it has very little to do with the ideologies and a lot to do with the people who are distorting them.

I'm sure that most people would think it just as foolish to blame all atheists for the horrors of Mao and Stalin as it is to blame all muslims for 9/11.


:?: Atheism is not an ideology, and Lenin didn't murdered millions "in the name of atheism" he ( I guess ) just excluded religion as useless to his reign of horrors, as the Khmer rouges did.
I don't blame muslims or chistians, I blame the ideology that makes them THINK they are right and therefore justifies their actions (in their view)

the SS "Got mit Uns" and the "God bless America" even when it's invading a country illegaly. Religion and gods used and misused to justify crimes!


htotsu


Nov 10, 2006, 3:14 PM
Post #168 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
This reminds me of some thoughts I had the other day. Why do we spend so much time talking about climbing? Because it is something we love. We go to a party, we're going to be talking about climbing "man I had this epic experience climbing the other day...", "you have got to try climbing", "I'm going with some friends climbing this weekend, you should come with us!", "All other sports are lame, climbing is the only real sport", etc. We tell people about climbing whether they are really interested or not. We will spend our time away from the rock just wishing we could get back to it.
Its no different with anything else your passionate about, a woman, a food, a beverage, an animal, etc...
Yeah, people who are passionate about a religious idea are probably going to talk about it and try to get other people to try it because thats just human nature. So the next time you want to tell some one to "shut up about god already", just think that maybe they'd like to tell you to just "shut up about climbing already".
Very good point, and a great analogy.


htotsu


Nov 10, 2006, 3:23 PM
Post #169 of 535 (4835 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Hi Bill. On the bible, I don't believe it dropped out of the sky. I think too many people, not only Christians but also those who criticize Christianity, just don't spend enough time actually studying it enough to know what they are talking about. Looking into the original Greek and Hebrew. Trying to understand context as well as content. Looking into the eras themselves and what else was going on in history.
Not sure what you mean about "dropped out of the sky".

Unless one is into that kind of study for study's sake, to study it like that requires an ordinary bloke to cross the threshold of faith in order to have the motivation. That's where I stumble in that sort of pursuit.
Hello. What I meant by that is that I don't look at the version or translation in my hand and one particular sentence within it and take that sentence as truth. Too many do, and that is how people can use the bible to justify just about anything. (Incidentally, I also hear "God helps him who helps himself" attributed to the bible all the freakin time, but it is actually a quote by Benjamin Franklin that appeared in the Almanac, the second most popular publication in any household of that era). So I'm saying people need to take their time with it to try and get at the meaning.

And you make an excellent point about motivation, though many take the time to investigate not necessarily out of their own belief, but rather to better understand the source of the beliefs of others. Or perhaps just to better understand things like early American literature, for example, which is full of biblical references. Any reader of the time would have understood those references, but the modern reader without that background is at a disadvantage there and will miss out on some of what those authors are trying to convey.

Even if someone isn't willing to do as much homework on it as I suggested before (and please know that this is not meant to be malicious, and is meant for anyone who would blast something without knowing much about it beyond what has been said about it by others), I say that anyone who is not willing to read a book in its entirety should not consider himself qualified to write a review.


cintune


Nov 10, 2006, 4:15 PM
Post #170 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1290

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

A guy named David Plotz is doing that online, blogging the Bible. Pretty interesting synopsis of all those crazy garbled old myths and legends.

http://www.slate.com/id/2150150/

I find it utterly amazing that people can still base their entire worldview on this stuff. It has to be the world's most successful PR campaign.


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 4:33 PM
Post #171 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
So I'm saying people need to take their time with it to try and get at the meaning.
Okay. I agree that Christians need to study it more thoroughly. However, it would completely different to say that a non-believer will eventually believe if they just study it enough.

coloredchalker,

Because the church I attended does what it does (e.g., the marque) I consider them as first class the same as I consider c4c to be first class. Clearly, they are doing what they believe is paramount, sticking to the given framework, and are not hiding behind what's nice or what's not nice. And witnessing to arbitrary people, even arbitrary minors doesn't shock me given that we're talking about eternity here. It was just an example of the evangelical nature of the new testament.

And I liked your analogy about talking about climbing. But it is just an analogy and is quite limited considering the profound and global issues that have been discussed in this thread. That is, for me this is not just about minor irritants. To say it another way there is the following question.

Which has significantly more often led a people into war or resulted in the murder of innocents: religion or climbing?

The rest of the unanswered arrows you have sent my way are lost.

Bill L


billl7


Nov 10, 2006, 5:26 PM
Post #172 of 535 (4833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

On election day this week, the church's marque had: "Give God what is right - not what is left." It changes once a week.


bluedubbed


Nov 13, 2006, 8:34 AM
Post #173 of 535 (771 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2002
Posts: 33

Re: Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Even after 7 pages, I still love Satan.

For all those that aspire to obtain OT VIII and love Xenu:
http://www.xenu.net/

You all are nothing but greedy cults.


qdiggety


Nov 13, 2006, 8:55 AM
Post #174 of 535 (764 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808

Re: [bluedubbed] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Shouldn't this whole thing be moved to "The Soapbox"?


reno


Nov 13, 2006, 9:08 AM
Post #175 of 535 (1147 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [qdiggety] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Shouldn't this whole thing be moved to "The Soapbox"?

Done.


coloredchalker


Nov 13, 2006, 9:56 AM
Post #176 of 535 (1298 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

[reply][quote]So I'm saying people need to take their time with it to try and get at the meaning.
[/quote]
Okay. I agree that Christians need to study it more thoroughly. However, it would completely different to say that a non-believer will eventually believe if they just study it enough.

coloredchalker,

Because the church I attended does what it does (e.g., the marque) I consider them as first class the same as I consider c4c to be first class. Clearly, they are doing what they believe is paramount, sticking to the given framework, and are not hiding behind what's nice or what's not nice. And witnessing to arbitrary people, even arbitrary minors doesn't shock me given that we're talking about eternity here. It was just an example of the evangelical nature of the new testament.

And I liked your analogy about talking about climbing. But it is just an analogy and is quite limited considering the profound and global issues that have been discussed in this thread. That is, for me this is not just about minor irritants. To say it another way there is the following question.

Which has significantly more often led a people into war or resulted in the murder of innocents: religion or climbing?

The rest of the unanswered arrows you have sent my way are lost.

Bill L[/reply]

Bill,
yes the analogy is just away of looking at it, not bullet proof. There are plenty of people on this sight that are pretty passionate about polotics and don't hesitate to discuss that in threads, but nobodies saying they shouldn't post here. Whats the difference? Politics are certaintly as divisive as religion, if not more so.
And to answer your question I' going to go with religions. Though that's just a hunch.


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 11:14 AM
Post #177 of 535 (1276 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
coloredchalker: There are plenty of people on this sight that are pretty passionate about polotics and don't hesitate to discuss that in threads, but nobodies saying they shouldn't post here. Whats the difference?
Did I say one should hesitate about religious posts? I don't think so. But, obviously, I wish they wouldn't and sympathize with those who take offense at being evangelized on RC.com.
In reply to:
coloredchalker: And to answer your question I' going to go with religions. Though that's just a hunch.
That would be my hunch as well.

Bill L


bigfatrock


Nov 13, 2006, 12:39 PM
Post #178 of 535 (1256 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2006
Posts: 1321

Re: [hbeimel] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Why not just go to the crag and climb with people. Be their friend and don’t try to cram it down their throat. If the opportunity arises to share your faith then do it. Put away your agenda and do as Christ commanded you to...just love people. It boggles my mind that people start "Christian Groups". You live in a world where most people don't believe what you do, get used to it, and accept it. Stop being a separatist and then trying to convert.

p.s.Climbing Magazine had an article a few months ago about “men of the cloth” whom were mountaineers and the amount of time the spent pioneering.


(This post was edited by bigfatrock on Nov 13, 2006, 12:43 PM)


quiteatingmysteak


Nov 13, 2006, 2:34 PM
Post #179 of 535 (1234 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 803

Re: [bigfatrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Be their friend and don’t try to cram it down their throat.


this to me always tends to be the main reason people dont trust the church. I hear about fears of "hidden agendas" and scandals turning people away.... it makes even more sense that christianity is such a glorious thing, because there are so may people out to get us :O!

the scandals and perverts are a very, very small proportion of the church, be it catholic or not. Probably as small or even smaller than when these things occur in the real life. how many sex offenders ARENT catholic priests? some things get turned up really big.


we are a pretty intelligent nation, or so we say that we are. Yet we dont assume that every muslim is a terrorist. I know your parents DRAGGED you to go to church as a kid and you railed against the anti-drug speeches through your teenage years... but i promise that religion isn't "out to get you" :D

personally in my experience i have fed homeless, built homes in mexico, repaired fences, cleaned up neighborhoods, helped save a street from a mudslide that spent 3 days destroying a neighborhood, and all without a "ok now you ahve to go to my church because i helped you." i did these things through my church because they were good and decent things to do. i probably havent seen mroe than a handful of those people i affected since, but i iknow i affected each and every one of em.


my 2c


dingus


Nov 13, 2006, 3:06 PM
Post #180 of 535 (1221 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17347

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Question: Are C4C climbers more, or less, likely to take on dangerous risks in their climbing activities?

DMT


dingus


Nov 13, 2006, 3:09 PM
Post #181 of 535 (1218 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17347

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
we are a pretty intelligent nation, or so we say that we are. Yet we dont assume that every muslim is a terrorist.

Maybe you don't. I assure you, not I. But I think you can make book on the fact that many Americans, god fearing and heathen alike, most certainly DO consider every Muslim a terrorist - starting with our commander in chief.

DMT


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 3:29 PM
Post #182 of 535 (1208 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

bigfatrock,

I agree that the church does not have a corner on weirdo's. And it wasn't "hidden agendas" and scandals that turned me away. Nor was it being forced to go to church by my parents nor was it the anti-drug speeches. Honest.

For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing. I suppose though that the justifications you mentioned are easier for a witnessing Christian to chip away at.

Bill L


htotsu


Nov 13, 2006, 3:52 PM
Post #183 of 535 (1204 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

 
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?


In reply to:
bigfatrock wrote:
Put away your agenda and do as Christ commanded you to...just love people.
Are you really unaware that it was Christ who put forth the command to go and share the story?

In reply to:
It boggles my mind that people start "Christian Groups". You live in a world where most people don't believe what you do, get used to it, and accept it. Stop being a separatist and then trying to convert.
Yet another one where you can replace "Christian" with "Rockclimbing," or just about anything else. It boggles your mind when it's something that you are not a part of - nice. How about this - you don't tell me what to do, and I don't tell you what to believe. How about we each get to choose. Mmkay?

(This post was edited by htotsu on Nov 13, 2006, 3:53 PM)


ter_bee


Nov 13, 2006, 4:58 PM
Post #184 of 535 (1190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 19, 2004
Posts: 418

Re: [dingus] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Question: Are C4C climbers more, or less, likely to take on dangerous risks in their climbing activities?

DMT

wow, a great question. doesn't anyone want to answer?

--
i'd like to offer my apologies to the op for a thread that was responded to by a larger-than-target audience. you were not, i believe, prosteletyzing; those of us who rightly take offense to prosteletyzing needn't have felt so obligated to lash out. i think.

i'd also like to apologize for being one of those inappropriate responders. as much as i like cosmiccragsman, i'd rather have (that'd be gay) sex with marge schott than join your group. and i think marge is dead.


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 5:03 PM
Post #185 of 535 (1189 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?
Hi htotsu,

Sure. Create a fallible species with a finite lifespan. Let them chose what to believe. Send them to hell for eternity if they don't choose The One belief system.

Bill L


pinktricam


Nov 13, 2006, 5:08 PM
Post #186 of 535 (1187 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?
Hi htotsu,

Sure. Create a fallible species with a finite lifespan. Let them chose what to believe. Send them to hell for eternity if they don't choose The One belief system.

Bill L
Bill, man and woman was originally created in a perfect and sinless state with the ability to commune directly with God, then came the 'fall'.


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 5:19 PM
Post #187 of 535 (1181 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [pinktricam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?
Hi htotsu,

Sure. Create a fallible species with a finite lifespan. Let them chose what to believe. Send them to hell for eternity if they don't choose The One belief system.

Bill L
Bill, man and woman was originally created in a perfect and sinless state with the ability to commune directly with God, then came the 'fall'.
That's what I recall as well. Then, much much later, anyone can choose to believe in The Way or not.


htotsu


Nov 13, 2006, 5:40 PM
Post #188 of 535 (1172 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?
Hi htotsu,

Sure. Create a fallible species with a finite lifespan. Let them chose what to believe. Send them to hell for eternity if they don't choose The One belief system.

Bill L
Oh, I see what you mean. Well, first off, I want to say that I used to hesitate about that exact same thing. It's a matter of faith, but it was a big decision. I had to decide whether I believed what Jesus had to say, and one of those things was "I am the way, the truth and the life." He didn't say "I am a way, a truth and a life." That was a turning point for me. It is one that I know is not easy to accept, because it was not easy for me. I know exactly how that notion sounds to a non-believer because I was one. But I had to make a choice.

I will say that the "Let them choose what to believe" and punish them if they choose the wrong thing issue that you raise is also not easy. But it's like having children. You love them ferociously. You do what you can to tell them what you want them to know about the world, and you want them to trust you. But you can't ever make them do what you say, and you can't make them believe you. They have to make their own decisions. And consequences follow. That is just the way of life. You can point out the pitfalls of certain choices to them until you turn blue, but you cannot - as much as it may pain you to see it happen before your eyes - keep them from making those choices.

I know that it is not on an eternal scale, so there really is no fully-appropriate analogy here. Still, is it wrong to bring children into the world just because you do not know what their ultimate choices will be?

(This post was edited by htotsu on Nov 13, 2006, 5:41 PM)


jt512


Nov 13, 2006, 6:34 PM
Post #189 of 535 (1152 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Bill wrote:
For me, the finale was when I rejected the temporal-mistake-eternal-isolation thing.
Hi Bill. Could you elaborate on this?
Hi htotsu,

Sure. Create a fallible species with a finite lifespan. Let them chose what to believe. Send them to hell for eternity if they don't choose The One belief system.

Bill L
Oh, I see what you mean. Well, first off, I want to say that I used to hesitate about that exact same thing. It's a matter of faith, but it was a big decision. I had to decide whether I believed what Jesus had to say, and one of those things was "I am the way, the truth and the life." He didn't say "I am a way, a truth and a life." That was a turning point for me.

Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 6:44 PM
Post #190 of 535 (1148 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
jt512: Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.
BBBBbbbbbbooooooooooo!


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 13, 2006, 7:21 PM
Post #191 of 535 (1141 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I am the way, the truth and the life.

If I had a dollar for every person in history who's made a similar claim to that...


billl7


Nov 13, 2006, 7:24 PM
Post #192 of 535 (1141 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I know that it is not on an eternal scale, so there really is no fully-appropriate analogy here.
It is worse than that. There is no issue at all with my kids "believing" that I am in essence their father (which, interestingly, may not be the case for kids adopted late in their lives). I won't even begin to dig into kids out there who really ought to reject their parent's instructions/wishes/desires - or at least some of it.
In reply to:
Still, is it wrong to bring children into the world just because you do not know what their ultimate choices will be?
No - we probably agree with that. But I also suspect that neither of us would reject our biological or adopted child for eternity just for the reason that the child rejected me/you as parent for the remainder of his/her relatively short life (no threat intended to my kids if they are reading this Wink ).

Bill L


squamishdirtbag


Nov 13, 2006, 7:49 PM
Post #193 of 535 (1133 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 17, 2005
Posts: 115

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you


c4c


Nov 14, 2006, 5:09 AM
Post #194 of 535 (1111 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [dingus] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Question: Are C4C climbers more, or less, likely to take on dangerous risks in their climbing activities?

DMT
Dingus why are you in all of my threads???? Smile This is a real good question. I don't think that their belief in God will change the amount of risk they take. I have a confidence that I am not going to die until its my time but that doesn't mean that I am careless. Most of our members do tend to be on the more ....cough.conservative sideWink


c4c


Nov 14, 2006, 5:12 AM
Post #195 of 535 (1111 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [ter_bee] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Question: Are C4C climbers more, or less, likely to take on dangerous risks in their climbing activities?

DMT

wow, a great question. doesn't anyone want to answer?

--
i'd like to offer my apologies to the op for a thread that was responded to by a larger-than-target audience. you were not, i believe, prosteletyzing; those of us who rightly take offense to prosteletyzing needn't have felt so obligated to lash out. i think.

i'd also like to apologize for being one of those inappropriate responders. as much as i like cosmiccragsman, i'd rather have (that'd be gay) sex with marge schott than join your group. and i think marge is dead.
Apology accepted. And don't join if you don't want to.


c4c


Nov 14, 2006, 5:15 AM
Post #196 of 535 (1111 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I am the way, the truth and the life.

If I had a dollar for every person in history who's made a similar claim to that...

I think that you would have a dollar.


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 5:47 AM
Post #197 of 535 (1102 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you

I don't think anybody would dispute your statement.

Does God send people to hell? That's a pretty important question to answer, and I'll use an analogy (my apologies) to illustrate how I think about it.
God has a big house that he is inviting people into. To get in you just have to, first of all, know the owner of the house and secondly, enter the house the way he tells you to, 2 easy things. Now if you choose not to get to know the owner of the house or try to enter the house a different way you'll be prevented from getting in to the house. Because you have made a choice not to do the necessary things.
So if you end up outside of Gods house, through the choices you made, then you will be in hell. Hell would be anything outside of Gods house.
God is not willing that anyone should choose to stay outside of his house but that all should come in. (to paraphrase).


billl7


Nov 14, 2006, 6:57 AM
Post #198 of 535 (1088 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 8:02 AM
Post #199 of 535 (1080 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?

Good questions
"Easy", because it's not a matter of a long list of do's and don'ts. "obey all these commands and then maybe I'll let you in", nope.

"Many are called", every one is invited into the house, "but few are chosen", few want to enter the right way and so God chooses to not let them in through the wrong way. In the cotext of the story in Matthew 22:1-14 (one place this verse is found, it is also found in Matt.20:16) A man is throwing a party and he invites his friends to come in but the friends refuse or are too busy... (analogus to God inviting the Jews into his house). So the man then goes and invites any one who wants to, to come in... (analogus to God inviting nonjews into his house) some respond to the mans invitation. The man finds one person who responded to the invitation but didn't come in the right way (in Jesus' parable here, the guest didn't come dressed properly) and so he gets escorted out of the party.
It is the same thing as I was saying: you can only get into Gods house (the mans feast in this parable) by comming the correct way. If you come the correct way nothingelse matters.

It is "camel through the eye of a needle", and the story is speaking about the challenge that rich, wealthy, people have with obeying God and trusting him instead of relying on their wealth. For example- a poor, street person is more likely to turn to God and say "I trust you that there is something better after this life than what I'm experiencing now" compared to a rich person who can easily say "I'm just going to use my money to provide the best life on earth I possibly can, who cares about what happens afterwards". Also the rich have a greater responsibility to do something with what God has given them, "to whom much has been given much will be expected" but for them to enter Gods house they still just have to do 2 things.

Maybe this creates more questions than it answers. Crazy


squamishdirtbag


Nov 14, 2006, 8:47 AM
Post #200 of 535 (1212 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 17, 2005
Posts: 115

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you

I don't think anybody would dispute your statement.

Does God send people to hell? That's a pretty important question to answer, and I'll use an analogy (my apologies) to illustrate how I think about it.
God has a big house that he is inviting people into. To get in you just have to, first of all, know the owner of the house and secondly, enter the house the way he tells you to, 2 easy things. Now if you choose not to get to know the owner of the house or try to enter the house a different way you'll be prevented from getting in to the house. Because you have made a choice not to do the necessary things.
So if you end up outside of Gods house, through the choices you made, then you will be in hell. Hell would be anything outside of Gods house.
God is not willing that anyone should choose to stay outside of his house but that all should come in. (to paraphrase).

your post doesn't mean fuck all about my quote, what i mean is religion is clearly causing suffering in our world. How can it be justified????? So a muslim walks around saying ya ali did thia and that, then a chistin walks by says jesus did this yadaya god. And from an outsiders view its lunacy because you can't both be right. Theres only one RIGHT GOD IS DEAD


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 9:54 AM
Post #201 of 535 (1095 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you

I don't think anybody would dispute your statement.

In reply to:
Theres only one RIGHT GOD IS DEAD

Man I don't see what kind of point your trying to make with your original quote. So religion is responsible for lots of violence, so what? That doesn't make the violence right, and I haven't heard anyone hear trying to excuse religious violence either, but there isn't anything I can do about the past. Only I can try to keep it from happening in the future. SO WHAT IS YOUR POINT!
Yeah, God's dead, I'm gonna take your word for it.
In this case I'd say that christian climbers take less risk than nonchristian climbers (yeah squam I know that doesn't have anything to do with your post, it's in reply to an earlier one, in case you missed it.).


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 9:56 AM
Post #202 of 535 (1093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

all three of us can't be right either.
Crazy


slablizard


Nov 14, 2006, 10:03 AM
Post #203 of 535 (1091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you

I don't think anybody would dispute your statement.

Does God send people to hell? That's a pretty important question to answer, and I'll use an analogy (my apologies) to illustrate how I think about it.
God has a big house that he is inviting people into. To get in you just have to, first of all, know the owner of the house and secondly, enter the house the way he tells you to, 2 easy things. Now if you choose not to get to know the owner of the house or try to enter the house a different way you'll be prevented from getting in to the house. Because you have made a choice not to do the necessary things.
So if you end up outside of Gods house, through the choices you made, then you will be in hell. Hell would be anything outside of Gods house.
God is not willing that anyone should choose to stay outside of his house but that all should come in. (to paraphrase).


FANTASTIC!Wink

so basically my free will is to chose bethween heaven and hell! Hey you want to live with all the angel or all the devils? Oh yeah you can choose! MadSlySlySlyLaughLaugh
And what if I don't want to be invited at all?


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 10:11 AM
Post #204 of 535 (1090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [slablizard] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Mideast violence is fueled by religion. I can't even think of a way to dispute this?? CAn you

I don't think anybody would dispute your statement.

Does God send people to hell? That's a pretty important question to answer, and I'll use an analogy (my apologies) to illustrate how I think about it.
God has a big house that he is inviting people into. To get in you just have to, first of all, know the owner of the house and secondly, enter the house the way he tells you to, 2 easy things. Now if you choose not to get to know the owner of the house or try to enter the house a different way you'll be prevented from getting in to the house. Because you have made a choice not to do the necessary things.
So if you end up outside of Gods house, through the choices you made, then you will be in hell. Hell would be anything outside of Gods house.
God is not willing that anyone should choose to stay outside of his house but that all should come in. (to paraphrase).


FANTASTIC!Wink

so basically my free will is to chose bethween heaven and hell! Hey you want to live with all the angel or all the devils? Oh yeah you can choose! MadSlySlySlyLaughLaugh
And what if I don't want to be invited at all?
Are you talking Hells Angels or VikkiS' Angels?
If you don't want to be invited just ignore the invitation, thats up to you Cool


htotsu


Nov 14, 2006, 10:30 AM
Post #205 of 535 (1087 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.


htotsu


Nov 14, 2006, 11:13 AM
Post #206 of 535 (1083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Still, is it wrong to bring children into the world just because you do not know what their ultimate choices will be?
No - we probably agree with that. But I also suspect that neither of us would reject our biological or adopted child for eternity just for the reason that the child rejected me/you as parent for the remainder of his/her relatively short life (no threat intended to my kids if they are reading this Wink ).

Bill L
:) Thanks for this. I definitely understand where you are coming from here, and I respect your view and your difficulty with the the choosing you or not choosing you part. I know how extreme it sounds.

To clarify the point I was trying to make with this analogy, I was focusing on the idea that the choices your children make can lead them to positive or negative circumstances. Whether it's about you in particular, or about something you have tried to teach them, they will make their choices and live with those results, whatever those results may be. There can be times when you see them going in a direction that you know will lead to trouble, and you tell them so, and that it will affect the path that their lives will take, but they may choose it anyway.

I was comparing this to your temporal mistake comment. Even in this life you can make one mistake that will truly affect the rest of your life, so it's not that unusual an idea. Choices have consequences. But we (not I - not yet!) bring children into the world anyway, hoping - but not knowing whether - they will make choices that will end well. Ultimately they make the decisions and live with the consequences. If the just consequence of their choice is prison, for example, you don't love them any less, but you still have to watch them go to prison. You don't change the legal system. Even if you have the power to do so, if you are just, then you will not.

So back to your point. You and I may have a lot in common with regard to whatever "legal system" we would set up for our own kids, and we may have areas where we differ. As for whether we would reject a child for eternity, it's moot because we don't deal in eternity with one another in this life. But there are parents whose children have done them, or others, serious wrongs, and that affects the remainder of their natural lives. There's a precedent for this, whether parents cut their kids out of their wills, or just never speak to them again after a certain point. You and God may disagree on what constitutes a "serious wrong"! That's for sure. But there are parents who give up on turning a wayward child around, whatever the waywardness involved, according to those parents and the rules they set. With God the idea is that as long as you are alive there is a chance for reconciliation. That's the case for some parents, and not the case for others. As for the kids, and as for us, again, the choice is always ours to make, and to answer for if necessary.

(This post was edited by htotsu on Nov 14, 2006, 11:14 AM)


jt512


Nov 14, 2006, 11:24 AM
Post #207 of 535 (1078 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay


billl7


Nov 14, 2006, 11:32 AM
Post #208 of 535 (1075 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?
"Easy", because it's not a matter of a long list of do's and don'ts. "obey all these commands and then maybe I'll let you in", nope.
I would use the word "simple" where you use "easy".

Sure, it is a simple thing to get in - but one has to want in which requires belief as a very first step. Yes? For me, my coming to "belief" is not easy ... indeed I would say impossible ... more so than the challenges faced by rich/wealthy folks you mention who already want in.

Apples versus oranges.

Bill L


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 3:13 PM
Post #209 of 535 (1057 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference


coloredchalker


Nov 14, 2006, 3:17 PM
Post #210 of 535 (1055 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?
"Easy", because it's not a matter of a long list of do's and don'ts. "obey all these commands and then maybe I'll let you in", nope.
I would use the word "simple" where you use "easy".

Sure, it is a simple thing to get in - but one has to want in which requires belief as a very first step. Yes? For me, my coming to "belief" is not easy ... indeed I would say impossible ... more so than the challenges faced by rich/wealthy folks you mention who already want in.

Apples versus oranges.

Bill L

"Whats impossible for man is possible for God." But it does take "want" on your part. No problem though, sincerely, I hope you have a great and happy life what ever your beliefs are. Smile


billl7


Nov 14, 2006, 4:34 PM
Post #211 of 535 (1046 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?
"Easy", because it's not a matter of a long list of do's and don'ts. "obey all these commands and then maybe I'll let you in", nope.
I would use the word "simple" where you use "easy".

Sure, it is a simple thing to get in - but one has to want in which requires belief as a very first step. Yes? For me, my coming to "belief" is not easy ... indeed I would say impossible ... more so than the challenges faced by rich/wealthy folks you mention who already want in.

Apples versus oranges.

Bill L

"Whats impossible for man is possible for God." But it does take "want" on your part. No problem though, sincerely, I hope you have a great and happy life what ever your beliefs are. Smile
Is it possible for the Christian God to make me believe?

Are you saying that belief comes after want when you say: "... it does take "want" on your part...? Just want to be clear.


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 14, 2006, 4:48 PM
Post #212 of 535 (1044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [c4c] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
I am the way, the truth and the life.

If I had a dollar for every person in history who's made a similar claim to that...

I think that you would have a dollar.

Oh dear, you're even further gone than I thought. Frown


cintune


Nov 14, 2006, 5:44 PM
Post #213 of 535 (1039 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1290

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

An imaginary friend, the opposite of an imaginary enemy, is a made-up person, animal or character that is created in the minds of some people, especially young children, and is sometimes seen in those with autism. Despite an imaginary friend being unreal, the child will act as if the imaginary being is physically present by talking to it, playing with it, or even attempting to feed it. Of course, to another person it will seem as though the child is talking into thin air. If told that there is nothing there, the child will often retaliate in a defensive manner by stating that the so-called imaginary friend is invisible.

Oftentimes children will dismiss the imaginary friend once they find real ones or become old enough to realize that their friend is fictional. Parents shouldn't be worried about their children having an imaginary friend, as it often helps a child realize the difference between reality and fantasy, as well as give them some form of self-esteem.

Having imaginary friends at an advanced age should be looked at by a proper psychologist, as it may be a mental or drug-related problem. It has been suggested that deities, spirits, totems, demons, and similar supernatural beings are the invisible friends of adults and children alike.

[edit] Explanation of behavior

People may invent imaginary friends for companionship, as part of play, or for other reasons. Imaginary friends can serve as an important source of companionship to some children and adults, especially if companionship is absent for them in the social world. As an example, young children in boarding schools often develop imaginary friends to cope with extreme stress and separation from their intimate relations.

The development of imaginary friends by a person does not signify a problem or disorder.[1][2] However, it can occasionally become problematic if it begins to interfere with everyday social interactions. For parents, an understanding of a child's conversations with their imaginary friends can reveal a lot about the anxieties and fears of that child. It can also give an insight into the child's aspirations and perception of the world. Some children report that their "imaginary friends" manifest themselves physically, and are indistinguishable from "real" people, however it is unknown whether these cases correspond specifically to any condition.

Children often use their imaginary friends as outlets for expressing desires which they would normally be afraid to engage in or for which they would normally be punished. For example, it is not uncommon for a child to engage in mischief or wrong-doing and then to blame the crime on their imaginary friend. Through the imaginary friend, the child is able to act out fantasies that they are otherwise restricted from experiencing due to societal constraints. It is also common for children to give their imaginary friends personality traits that they themselves would like to exhibit but lack the self esteem to do so: shy children often describe their imaginary friends as playful and outgoing jokesters who are always making them laugh and who are very popular. In this way, children see their imaginary friends as ideal versions of themselves but simply haven't developed the ability to internalize this image into an abstraction in the mind's eye. In other words, they lack the ability to set goals inside their minds, and instead must envision these goals as concrete objects in the real world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_friend


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 14, 2006, 5:57 PM
Post #214 of 535 (1033 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

OK... For those who believe that God loves us, wants us to go to heaven, but gave us 'freewill' to make our own choices, of which will determine if we go to heaven or hell, especially if we choose to believe in him or not.

You mean to tell me that your omnipitant being, capable of creating everything and knowing EVERYTHING is reduced to just sitting there with his fingers crossed "hoping" that you'll make the correct choice ???



And... What was your God doing before he created everything ??? As many of you believe, he says "...I am the Alpha (beginning) and the Omega (end)..." What was he doing for an eternity before the "beginning", and why didn't he create it earlier ???


Hmmm... If Jesus and God are the same (Trinity=Father, Son, & Holy Spirit), who was Jesus praying to. Be carefull how you answer this, as you may violate the "Thou shalt not put any other Gods before me." commandment.


Or... Why did he even create all this and us ??? He was lonely, and wanted someone to worship him ???


Even... You all do understand that the Jewish God, Christian God, and Muslim God are ALL THE SAME DUDE, right ??? Just different names depending on the revision of the original Hebrew superstitions/traditions that became the formalized Jewish religion. Yet more people have died in the name of this 'one God' than anything else, even fellow believers in the same God (but different revision) and are still being killed in the name of as we type.



Now... These are NOT dificult questions, and they are even direct not fague questions, so I would appreciate direct answers, not fague interpretations of standard quips that answer nothing.

It has been my experience 100% of the time that these types of questions CANNOT be directly answered, and are more than likely all together ignored as it requires one to directly confront the fact that there are inconsistant and unreasonable core beliefs that make up any religion, and if one confronts those facts then there are consequences they are not willing to deal with. And in the rare case when any attempts at answers are even given, they answer nothing directly, and just really skirt the question.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 14, 2006, 6:40 PM)


htotsu


Nov 14, 2006, 6:54 PM
Post #215 of 535 (1013 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

What is the meaning of eternity, and what came before that? Sure, simple question. Why do we exist? Christians and non-Christians alike have been asking that question long before you were in diapers, my friend. No answer that I could provide would satisfy you.

If you do not know the answers, then how can you be so sure that you are not asking difficult questions? As if you are the first to ask them.

Your tone suggests to me that you believe that you already know the answers, or have no real interest in them because you have no real interest in better understanding those whom you are asking. (Asking on a rockclimbing forum rather than simply doing a search on your own is an interesting choice for someone who feels strongly enough about this to write such a lengthy post).

Nonetheless, I'll take the trinity for 100, Alex. Ice, liquid, and steam. Three different forms, yet all are water.


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 14, 2006, 7:39 PM
Post #216 of 535 (1006 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

As I said... You answered nothing.

In reply to:
"What is eternity?"
Ummm... Its defined as forever, unending time. Both ways, not just forward.

Yes, I do know the answers, and to me they are VERY consistant and reasonable, which is the anithesis of what you may believe to be answers, even though you failed to share them with me.

I can answer them for you, but since I've had to read and research literally volumes of text and information, religious, mmetaphysical, as well as sientific, written by PhDs, Gurus, and Theologists... Don't expect me to be able to explain it to you "easily in less than 100 words", as even the PhDs, Gurus, and Theologists need volumes to explain the details of the true nature of reality.

Will you not agree that the person who has weighed and considered the most options makes a better more informed choice than someone who has considered only a few or just one ??? Can you consider anything that directly opposes your belief with equal weight ??? I believe that you cannot, and will instinctively defend your belief... Rather than "objectively" consider it, you will "subjectively" debate it.


A brief synopsis...

What was before the beginning? Before the Big-Bang, which created 'spacetime' as well as all the energy/matter, there was nothing. No such thing as time, whithout 'spacetime', thus no "before" since that is a measure of time.

As for water, ice, and steam... All are different phase transitions of the molecule H20, depending on the energy contained within a large group of molecules. BTW... You left out water vapor and plasma, the latter of which is a 4th phase transition in which all its electrons have been stripped away.



As for the common christian belief in the Trinity, it was invented by man in 325 AD by the Council of Nicaea to answer the question I asked, as well as a few others. Please see this for details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/...st_Council_of_Nicaea

Just as the same is true for todays common christian belief in The Rapture, only that was invented/popularized much later, as in the late 1800's. Please see this for details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapture

How many examples of how religious beliefs are "man-made" would you like me to provide.

In reply to:
(Asking on a rockclimbing forum rather than simply doing a search on your own is an interesting choice for someone who feels strongly enough about this to write such a lengthy post).
Even worse than a BS answer, this is just a snipe at me. I didn't start this thread on a "rockclimbing forum", and as you can see, I have done quite a bit of "searching" in my 40 years.


Any more questions about what you "think" you know to be true, about science or even your own beliefs ???

For example...
Did you know that Noah was really commanded to take "...7 pairs of clean animals, and 1 pair of unclean animals..." aboard his boat ??? Or are you in the vast majority (98%) of people who believe he was told to take a pair of each ??? We won't get into the FACT that there is lots of geological evidence that the "...earth was flooded to a depth of 20 feet above the highest moutain tops..." is not true.


In reply to:
No answer that I could provide would satisfy you.
This I agree with, as you and I have vastly different standards to which we evaluate "truths" and "facts".



There ya go... The above is an example of direct answers regarding just a sampling of my beliefs, and I can site experimental and observational evidence to back it up, not just quips and circular questions... Now you try.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 14, 2006, 8:41 PM)


squamishdirtbag


Nov 14, 2006, 7:41 PM
Post #217 of 535 (1004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 17, 2005
Posts: 115

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

"Man I don't see what kind of point your trying to make with your original quote. So religion is responsible for lots of violence, so what?"

SO WHAT? ARE YOU FUCKed IN THE HEAD!!!!! I bet you wont say that if it was your house being bombed or your head rolling on the ground.
I hope you just didnt word your post right, cuz the vibe im getting is that you think violence is ok. The point of my original post is to show an obvious fact that religion is a major cause of violence/suffering.
So that makes it pretty frickin WRONG ...?

PS(no beef on the dali lama and his peps there pretty chill, mostly bashing Judiasm, Islam and Christianity)


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 14, 2006, 7:49 PM
Post #218 of 535 (1002 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

And yea, I know... My spelling sux, and I'm too impatient to use the spell check.

Feel free to discredit my post on the basis that I can't spell, I've had people use that argument on me.Tongue


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 14, 2006, 8:15 PM
Post #219 of 535 (989 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
PS(no beef on the dali lama and his peps there pretty chill, mostly bashing Judiasm, Islam and Christianity)

You should read The Universe in a Nutshell by: Tenzin Gyatso (Dali Lama) Its pretty deep, and not a religious book, more philosophical.


And just to state to all, I am not "bashing" any particualr 'religious' belief, I am drawing attention to some of the items that are willfully ignored regarding most religious dogma, and since I am challanging believers to 'confront' these items, it is by definition "confrontational".

For what its worth... My wife's a practicing Catholic, we just don't talk much religion, unless she wants to know where something is in her book, as I'm better versed in the book than most christians.



What I will "bash" is the implication that all most all religions make, including christianity, is that any belief other than their own is inherantly wrong. I will ask them, "What evidence leads you to believe that your belief is correct, and all others are wrong?" The only answers I've been provided with are ones that ironically are used by all religions to validate their own, and invalidate the of others.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 14, 2006, 8:37 PM)


Partner blazesod


Nov 14, 2006, 8:55 PM
Post #220 of 535 (969 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 27, 2002
Posts: 240

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Adam, (and other skeptics)
You must look from outside of time to understand them true meaning of omnipotent.

God is not simply a creature, but an idea of everything... that every being is connected. Surely you must have felt this to some extent as we all live in a symbiotic circle?

What it comes down to is:
You are simply arguing with one another because you believe you are right.

There is no right.
Let mankind believe what they will
climb for each other :)

eat your rice, drink your tea, wear your clothes.

Cheers,
Dave


htotsu


Nov 14, 2006, 8:56 PM
Post #221 of 535 (969 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
And yea, I know... My spelling sux, and I'm too impatient to use the spell check.

Feel free to discredit my post on the basis that I can't spell, I've had people use that argument on me.Tongue
If I had any interest in using that on you, I would have done so in my last response. Note that I did not.

You spend a lot of time telling me what you think I believe and asking me whether I know what is actually in the bible. I have actually read it, thank you. Enough to remind you of scriptural reference that I knew of already, and are even touched upon in your own source, for what is currently CALLED the rapture
- 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17
http://www.biblegateway.com/...204;&version=50;
- Matthew 24:31-51
http://www.biblegateway.com/...024;&version=50;

and enough to know that there are far too many references to post here of the holy spirit/holy ghost being linked to Jesus being linked to God the father.

Also, I respectfully ask that you pay attention to your own sources. The link you posted in wikipedia indicates clearly that the purpose of the Council of Nicaea was to resolve conflicts that already existed, which means that the concept of whether Jesus was of the same substance as God or of something somewhat lesser already existed. It was not invented at this council. Furthermore, the concept of trinity is not even mentioned there. Read it again. For someone who mentions science as much as you do, I would expect you to recognize that trinity refers to three beings, not just the two that are referred to in this particular conflict.

At least you took the time to qualify your reference to "the rapture" by using the convenient "invented/popularized" wording. Regardless, that does not mean the scripture references were not already there to be found. People believed the earth was flat, but the bible even refers to it as "the circle of the earth" in Isaiah 40:22. Maybe people should have been paying more attention. Back to H20, water was water before you called it that. What you call it doesn't change what it is, be it trinity, rapture, water, or even, say, courteousness.

If you want to come across as someone who knows so very much, and if you want to attempt to make others appear uninformed, then at least do some more research. But here you clearly have a preset notion, and are using other things to support it, rather than starting from evidence and drawing conclusions from it. Sounds a lot like the way people criticize the religious for their faith. Funny how it never applies to the non-religious. Funny how the non-religious don't see that they still base many of their beliefs on faith disguised as fact so they can look down their noses at those who put their faith in different things.

In any case, we can play dueling scriptures and wikipedia all you want, but I will point out that your tone is deliberately disrespectful. I have not done this to you. If you are so confident in what you consider to be your well-researched wikipedia facts (in addition to the volumes of texts, etc., etc.) then why the need for the attitude? You are so condescending. As if I had no idea that water was H20. As if I couldn't possibly be educated just because we disagree on these matters.

Anyway, believe what you like. I said it before - we each get to choose. You don't have to like my choice, I don't have to like yours. I do believe that a little humility goes a long way, and that is a lesson you (and I, and all of us) could stand to keep in mind a bit more often.

(This post was edited by htotsu on Nov 14, 2006, 9:00 PM)


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 14, 2006, 9:29 PM
Post #222 of 535 (953 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Oh God... Why am I gonna do this, as is t even possible for you to in any way objectively ANYTHING that implies you may be wrong ???

In other words, I know I'm wasting my my time, but...


In reply to:
Furthermore, the concept of trinity is not even mentioned there. Read it again.
"In 325, the Council of Nicaea adopted a term for the relationship between the Son and the Father that from then on was seen as the hallmark of orthodoxy; it declared that the Son is "of the same substance" (ὁìïïýóéïò) as the Father. This was further developed into the formula "three persons, one substance". The answer to the question "What is God?" indicates the one-ness of the divine nature, while the answer to the question "Who is God?" indicates the three-ness of "Father, Son and Holy Spirit."

The Council of Nicaea was reluctant to adopt language not found in Scripture, and ultimately did so only after Arius showed how all strictly biblical language could also be interepreted to support his belief, that there was a time before Jesus was created when he did not exist. In adopting non-biblical language, the council's intent was to preserve what they thought the Church had always believed, that Jesus is fully God, coeternal with God the Father and God the Holy Spirit.
"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity
I had linked Council of Nicaea, as that was what I was reffering to, as it was there that this "common belief was formalized".

In reply to:
At least you took the time to qualify your reference to "the rapture" by using the convenient "invented/popularized" wording.
See above in the Trinity response, note word in bold, looks like common.

In reply to:
Regardless, that does not mean the scripture references were not already there to be found.
Honestly answer this... How many people interpret things in the manner that they want to ??? Look again at the quote above I supplied regarding the "interpretations" made in order to support their ideas. This is true of all religions, even in the many different sects of christianity. How can you state that your interpretation is right, and all others are wrong?

In reply to:
People believed the earth was flat, but the bible even refers to it as "the circle of the earth" in Isaiah 40:22. Maybe people should have been paying more attention.
I guess you weren't around then to correctly interpret this, and all the scollars could have benifitted for your insight...
(Note-That was sarcasm)
The 'christian' monk Bruno certainly would have, as he was burned at the stake in a italian piaza by his own church for his belief that the earth may not be the ceter of the universe. Again, see "interpretations".

In reply to:
Back to H20, water was water before you called it that. What you call it doesn't change what it is, be it trinity, rapture, water, or even, say, courteousness.
Actually, you have apples and oranges here, as H2O is not man-made, nor is it open to interpretaion. H2O is H2O to a Christian, Muslim, Athiest, Caveman, or even Duck... Trinity and Rapture are "man-made" concepts and constructs, and are only correct to a select few "men" (and women) who choose to believe it. Correctness is a way of quantifying a evidence, truth or fact, and is directly subject to one's knowlege-base.

In reply to:
If you want to come across as someone who knows so very much, and if you want to attempt to make others appear uninformed, then at least do some more research. But here you clearly have a preset notion, and are using other things to support it, rather than starting from evidence and drawing conclusions from it. Sounds a lot like the way people criticize the religious for their faith. Funny how it never applies to the non-religious. Funny how the non-religious don't see that they still base many of their beliefs on faith disguised as fact so they can look down their noses at those who put their faith in different things.
Another snipe... And this does apply to "scientists" as well, as I personally believe string theory to be crap as far as a Theory of Everything (for which it was constructed), and when string theorists are confronted with something that shows they are wrong, they cook up another theory or adjust a parameter to explain it... This is just how things are "reinterpreted" in religion to keep pace with undeniable facts, but it has to be undeniable before they will confront it. And I certainly don't "look down my nose" at my wife's beliefs, and I'd never tell her her beliefs are rubish.

In reply to:
In any case, we can play dueling scriptures and wikipedia all you want, but I will point out that your tone is deliberately disrespectful. I have not done this to you. If you are so confident in what you consider to be your well-researched wikipedia facts (in addition to the volumes of texts, etc., etc.) then why the need for the attitude? You are so condescending. As if I had no idea that water was H20. As if I couldn't possibly be educated just because we disagree on these matters.
There is no emotion in my posts, thus no diliberate disrespect. Just stating things, sorry I can't 'sugar coat' it. I do however ridicule those who believe their belief is correct, and that everybody else is inherantly incorrect. That's a jugement, whether direct or implied. As for the use of the term H2O instead of water, it was necessary to better explain phase transitions, and how your use of that as an analogy is incorrect, sorry you were offended. And I can't paste pages of text books into this thread, so wikipedia was an easy source... If you'd rather, I'll give you the published research papers instead, but they are not easy reading.

In reply to:
Anyway, believe what you like.
OK.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 14, 2006, 9:42 PM)


billl7


Nov 14, 2006, 9:32 PM
Post #223 of 535 (950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1814

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Well, I think I will just saunter away from this thread with an "air" of victory. Wink

Seriously, thanks to htotsu and c4c for the honesty and directness. It was more than 20 years ago that I made my decision about the subject of this thread (i.e. no thanks). Somehow, it has been refreshing to re-hash the issues again: feel like I learned something.

Bill L


c4c


Nov 15, 2006, 4:04 AM
Post #224 of 535 (928 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thanks Bill-- keep on the journey, never stop learning.

I'm still watching from a distance to scared to jump in. I always lost those debate things in High school.

My reply would be that If we could rationally explain God then He wouldn't be God. I know that will not satisfy rrradam though. I am enjoying the discussion though very thought provoking! Angelic I like that new smilie---Angelic very....angelic!


htotsu


Nov 15, 2006, 4:27 AM
Post #225 of 535 (995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

rrradam, hey, my bad - I read through that page, and only saw the numerous refs to Jesus and God, and obviously missed that ref to three instead of two. The trinity is hereby mentioned.

But it doesn't change my other point. You specifically said that the notion was "invented" and "man-made" at that council. That was incorrect and misleading, and you are now backpedaling on that. Being "invented" is not the same as it being "formalized," and there are still those who have different views on the matter today.

As for tone, you think I'm referring to your arguments, but I'm not. Comments like " Oh God... Why am I gonna do this, as is t even possible for you to in any way objectively ANYTHING that implies you may be wrong ??? In other words, I know I'm wasting my my time, but... " and making references to your "volumes of text by PhDs, gurus and theologians" as though that makes anything you have to say better than anything anyone else (who does not agree with you) has to say, are condescending and obnoxious. I can't make you see it.

In reply to:
I do however ridicule those who believe their belief is correct, and that everybody else is inherantly incorrect.
The way you have been posting, it boggles the mind that you don't see how closely this describes you.

And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. - Matthew 7:3-5

In any case, Bill, glad to have had the convo with you as well. We can agree to disagree wherever we need to, but I think we each gained something in understanding where the other is coming from.


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 7:54 AM
Post #226 of 535 (1075 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [squamishdirtbag] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
"Man I don't see what kind of point your trying to make with your original quote. So religion is responsible for lots of violence, so what?"

SO WHAT? ARE YOU FUCKed IN THE HEAD!!!!! I bet you wont say that if it was your house being bombed or your head rolling on the ground.
I hope you just didnt word your post right, cuz the vibe im getting is that you think violence is ok. The point of my original post is to show an obvious fact that religion is a major cause of violence/suffering.
So that makes it pretty frickin WRONG ...?

PS(no beef on the dali lama and his peps there pretty chill, mostly bashing Judiasm, Islam and Christianity)

Man you conveniently threw away the rest of my post that goes on to say how there isn't anything I can do about the past. Yeah religion causes lots of violence but that doesn't make the violence right. (in other words- violence is still wrong) (bolded so you don't miss it this time) And for the future, all I can do is make sure that I don't participate or aid in any violence motivated by "God told me to kill these people".
So I'll say it again, SO WHAT!!! So what do you want me to do to atone for all the wrong that has been done in the name of religion? So what, how does the violence of religion affect anything we've been saying in this thread? So what are you doing about it to make the world a better and more peacefull place?
SO WHAT!!!
SO WHAT!!!
SO WHAT!!!
so whats your beef anyways?


(This post was edited by coloredchalker on Nov 15, 2006, 8:01 AM)


bigfatrock


Nov 15, 2006, 8:58 AM
Post #227 of 535 (1068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 2, 2006
Posts: 1321

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?

You are correct. Not having read what the other posters said, scripture does clearly speak that it is God who chooses, NOT MAN. This is how there is a just God and a merciful God. If God was completely just we would ALL get hell because of sin, but since he is merciful he chooses some. It is somewhat incomprehensible I know, but he IS God and we are but mere man. I believe only those who feel called by God will come. Scripture speaks of this. I'm horrible with remembering scriptuer, but I did go to Seminary for a year, found out it wasn't for me.


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 9:38 AM
Post #228 of 535 (1063 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [billl7] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
How does "2 easy things" jive with "few are chosen" and something about the difficulty of a camel getting through the eye of a needle (or maybe that's low gate of a city)?
"Easy", because it's not a matter of a long list of do's and don'ts. "obey all these commands and then maybe I'll let you in", nope.
I would use the word "simple" where you use "easy".

Sure, it is a simple thing to get in - but one has to want in which requires belief as a very first step. Yes? For me, my coming to "belief" is not easy ... indeed I would say impossible ... more so than the challenges faced by rich/wealthy folks you mention who already want in.

Apples versus oranges.

Bill L

"Whats impossible for man is possible for God." But it does take "want" on your part. No problem though, sincerely, I hope you have a great and happy life what ever your beliefs are. Smile
Is it possible for the Christian God to make me believe?

Are you saying that belief comes after want when you say: "... it does take "want" on your part...? Just want to be clear.
He won't make you believe if you don't want to. But if you want to believe and just can't find the reason to believe or motivation, or answers you are looking for, or what ever it maybe, you just have to tell God how you feel. "God, I want to believe but I can't make the next step, can you help me?" And then see what happens.


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 10:14 AM
Post #229 of 535 (1059 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference

My "belief system" is based on evidence. Are you suggesting that evidence-based reasoning is faith-based reasoning? Because they are not: faith, by definition, is belief in the absence of evidence.

Jay


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 10:37 AM
Post #230 of 535 (1050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference

My "belief system" is based on evidence. Are you suggesting that evidence-based reasoning is faith-based reasoning? Because they are not: faith, by definition, is belief in the absence of evidence.

Jay

I'm not suggesting anything, but I'm saying that despite how much evidence you have you'll never have %100 percent. Faith makes up the difference.


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 11:36 AM
Post #231 of 535 (1043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference

My "belief system" is based on evidence. Are you suggesting that evidence-based reasoning is faith-based reasoning? Because they are not: faith, by definition, is belief in the absence of evidence.

Jay

I'm not suggesting anything, but I'm saying that despite how much evidence you have you'll never have %100 percent. Faith makes up the difference.

No. That's silly. I base my beliefs on evidence. Sometimes the evidence is incomplete, and my beliefs have to be tentative and subject to revision based on new, possibly incompatible, evidence. That's why science moves forward, whereas religion tends not to. No matter how much evidence accumulates against a proposition, if it contradicts the holy book, it will be very difficult for religious people to accept. This authority of religious books is so obviously self-refuting that it blows my mind that people can be so deluded by it: not only do religious books contradict each other, they contradict themselves! How then could any intelligent person consider such books to be authoritative.

Jay


cintune


Nov 15, 2006, 2:05 PM
Post #232 of 535 (1029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1290

Re: [c4c] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

"In this way, children see their imaginary friends as ideal versions of themselves but simply haven't developed the ability to internalize this image into an abstraction in the mind's eye. In other words, they lack the ability to set goals inside their minds, and instead must envision these goals as concrete objects in the real world."


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 2:12 PM
Post #233 of 535 (1028 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference

My "belief system" is based on evidence. Are you suggesting that evidence-based reasoning is faith-based reasoning? Because they are not: faith, by definition, is belief in the absence of evidence.

Jay

I'm not suggesting anything, but I'm saying that despite how much evidence you have you'll never have %100 percent. Faith makes up the difference.

No. That's silly. I base my beliefs on evidence. Sometimes the evidence is incomplete, and my beliefs have to be tentative and subject to revision based on new, possibly incompatible, evidence. That's why science moves forward, whereas religion tends not to. No matter how much evidence accumulates against a proposition, if it contradicts the holy book, it will be very difficult for religious people to accept. This authority of religious books is so obviously self-refuting that it blows my mind that people can be so deluded by it: not only do religious books contradict each other, they contradict themselves! How then could any intelligent person consider such books to be authoritative.

Jay

hey believe what ever you want, no biggy. But if you think your belief doesn't consist of some faith then your a deluded elitest. But if your happy there I'll not rock your boat. Science contradicts itself all the time too nanny nanny boob booob Tongue


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 2:31 PM
Post #234 of 535 (1026 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Yes, it was the point at which you turned off your rational mind.

Jay
Oh, Jay. Bill is not a Christian, and even he boos your post. I pity you, not because we disagree about the Christian faith, but because this is how you choose to conduct yourself. Ghandi said you must be the change you want to see in the world. Why don't you show us all how you'd like for us to behave? I sure hope that wasn't it.

I must have misinterpreted his post then. Nonetheless, the point where you abandon critical thinking and make the decision to accept religion on faith is indeed the point at which you turn off your rational mind. Christians have phrases from the Bible that they quote, when convenient, to justify this precise behavior, so I do not understand why you would be offended by my post.

Jay

Jay,
true enough that faith and rationale are at opposite ends of the spectrum most of the time. But what ever you believe is no different as far as balancing rationale and faith. You have faith that your belief system is right, because you can't prove that it is. Maybe you have more rationality to it but there is still a part of it that is based on faith.
Thats life!, we're not going to get all the answers 'till we cross over, and faith makes up the difference

My "belief system" is based on evidence. Are you suggesting that evidence-based reasoning is faith-based reasoning? Because they are not: faith, by definition, is belief in the absence of evidence.

Jay

I'm not suggesting anything, but I'm saying that despite how much evidence you have you'll never have %100 percent. Faith makes up the difference.

No. That's silly. I base my beliefs on evidence. Sometimes the evidence is incomplete, and my beliefs have to be tentative and subject to revision based on new, possibly incompatible, evidence. That's why science moves forward, whereas religion tends not to. No matter how much evidence accumulates against a proposition, if it contradicts the holy book, it will be very difficult for religious people to accept. This authority of religious books is so obviously self-refuting that it blows my mind that people can be so deluded by it: not only do religious books contradict each other, they contradict themselves! How then could any intelligent person consider such books to be authoritative.

Jay

hey believe what ever you want, no biggy. But if you think your belief doesn't consist of some faith then your a deluded elitest. But if your happy there I'll not rock your boat. Science contradicts itself all the time too nanny nanny boob booob Tongue

Time for you to back up your claims. Please give me an example of where my belief system (one based on evidence) relies on faith. Secondly, give me an example of science contradicting itself. If you do that, and I can't refute your argument, then I will happily concede. But if you can't produce examples, then out of fairness you should concede that you're wrong. Anybody can say "your evidence-based belief system requires faith," but that doesn't make it so. So, can substantiate your claim with examples?

Jay


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 2:36 PM
Post #235 of 535 (1025 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

ok I'll take it, though I might not beable to give you irrefutable proof, but I'm looking. I'll get back to you tomorrow.
Can you please state your belief system so I know what I'm working with?
Thanks.


slablizard


Nov 15, 2006, 2:43 PM
Post #236 of 535 (1022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
ok I'll take it, though I might not beable to give you irrefutable proof, but I'm looking. I'll get back to you tomorrow.
Can you please state your belief system so I know what I'm working with?
Thanks.

lol!

you just don't get it do you.


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 2:47 PM
Post #237 of 535 (1020 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
ok I'll take it, though I might not beable to give you irrefutable proof, but I'm looking. I'll get back to you tomorrow.
Can you please state your belief system so I know what I'm working with?
Thanks.

I base my beliefs on evidence, not faith. Faith is, by definition, belief in proposition that lack evidence.


coloredchalker


Nov 15, 2006, 2:52 PM
Post #238 of 535 (1018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

ok, but what your saying is pretty neutral really. I can't refute what you base your beliefs on. You base it on evidence, ok, what ever you say. I'm just saying that what ever your evidence shows you, its not going to give you the whole picture. So with out evidence of something, either your going to form an opinion based on faith or have no opinion at all.
What is your belief on the state of a person after death? Either you have no belief on this or your belief involves faith, because noone has proof of any answer to this question.
That is my point.

edited because my brain wasn't communicating properly with my hands.


(This post was edited by coloredchalker on Nov 15, 2006, 2:58 PM)


slablizard


Nov 15, 2006, 3:15 PM
Post #239 of 535 (1013 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
ok, but what your saying is pretty neutral really. I can't refute what you base your beliefs on. You base it on evidence, ok, what ever you say. I'm just saying that what ever your evidence shows you, its not going to give you the whole picture. So with out evidence of something, either your going to form an opinion based on faith or have no opinion at all.
What is your belief on the state of a person after death? Either you have no belief on this or your belief involves faith, because noone has proof of any answer to this question.
That is my point.

edited because my brain wasn't communicating properly with my hands.

Repeat with me: Science is not based on beliefs.
You don't need to believe that water is made of H2o, you can prove it in a lab, over and over again. What whole picture? The origins of life? Of the universe? We'll get there eventually, just look at the progress made in this centuries, while the bible you base your life and choices on never changes.
That is because you believe the bible without the need of a proof. You just like to believe it is true. It is called FAITH.
if tomorrow the string theory replaces the relativity theory you will see dramatic changes in physics books, not so for the bible, if they discover that noah's ark never existed you guys will make up a justification and say that god is just testing your faith....like with fossils. Am I wrong?

The state of a person after death is...sorry to disappoint you...dead, and it stays like that. The body decomposes and your thoughts emotions, memories and feelings are lost or mixed in the collective subconscious of the whole universe.
Not that it would make a difference anyway since we keep repeating the same errors over and over again trough centuries.


(This post was edited by slablizard on Nov 15, 2006, 3:17 PM)


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 3:24 PM
Post #240 of 535 (1012 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [coloredchalker] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
What is your belief on the state of a person after death? Either you have no belief on this or your belief involves faith, because noone has proof of any answer to this question.

No one has proof of what happens to a person's "soul" after death. This is because no one has any evidence that a "soul," separate from a person's physical neurologic system exists. "Soul" is a supernatural concept that exists in certain religions. There is no evidence that a "soul" even exists, much less outlives a person's body. I have no evidence that a "soul" exists; therefore, I have no reason to believe that one does.

This argument has almost surely been made elsewhere in the thread, but I'll repeat it here for obvious reasons. Do you believe that there is a giant ceramic teapot in orbit around the planet Pluto? I'll bet you don't. Why? Because there is absolutely no evidence for it; the hypothesis is off the wall. What you need to understand is that the hypothesis that there is a "soul" separate from the body that carries on after the body dies is just as off the wall as the giant orbiting teapot hypothesis. There is no more evidence for one than the other, and therefore no more reason to believe in one more than the other. The fact that a lot of people currently believe that there is a "soul" is not evidence that a "soul" exists. There was a time when a lot of people currently believed that the sun revolved around the earth. Mass belief is not evidence.

Now, to digress a bit: If you also believe that the "soul" goes someplace (say, "heaven") then your claim is in even more trouble because, not only have you posited, without evidence, the existence of (1) a "soul," that (2) outlives the body, but also the existence of a "heaven" for the "soul" to go to. Now religions don't stop at just three unsubstantiated supernatural things. There is, at least in some religions, a "Hell" where bad "souls" go, a "Devil" who is in charge of "Hell," some other supernatural agent to decide which "souls" go to "Heaven" and which go to "Hell," "angels" to do...whatever "angels" supposedly do, and on and on. I think that if you can stand back and take a very objective look you will see that these supernatural creations of our current religions are myths, no different, in essence, from the myths of the ancient religions that no modern person takes very seriously -- or the myth of the giant orbiting teapot, which no one has ever taken seriously.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 15, 2006, 3:58 PM)


c4c


Nov 15, 2006, 4:32 PM
Post #241 of 535 (990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [jt512] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Science is also full of theories which in fact are not proven, therefore one must believe them by faith until evidence proves them wrong.


jt512


Nov 15, 2006, 4:43 PM
Post #242 of 535 (987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792

Re: [c4c] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Science is also full of theories which in fact are not proven, therefore one must believe them by faith until evidence proves them wrong.

Have you run into the concept, perhaps in school, that you should back up your claims with evidence? Examples perhaps? Without such support your statement is just an empty claim.

Jay


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 5:04 PM
Post #243 of 535 (984 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
rrradam, hey, my bad - I read through that page, and only saw the numerous refs to Jesus and God, and obviously missed that ref to three instead of two. The trinity is hereby mentioned.
OK... Props to you, as this shows that you can be accountable and will address when you make a mistake.

In reply to:
But it doesn't change my other point. You specifically said that the notion was "invented" and "man-made" at that council. That was incorrect and misleading, and you are now backpedaling on that. Being "invented" is not the same as it being "formalized," and there are still those who have different views on the matter today.
Why is it that all the quotes attributed to Jesus and God are written by MAN, and not by themselves ??? Why is there not a book in the New Testament written by Jesus himself ??? This is called 'hearsay', and in the case of quotes attributed to Jesus, they were written at a minimum of 30 years after he made them. Now honestly, tell me how well YOU could quote me 30 years from now from just memory, as his bros did NOT carry around parchment and write his every word... Many of them were actually illeterate, as 'higher education' was how to make a wheel or mend a fishing net in his time.

Point... I'm sure you'll agree that religions other than your own, and all those of the past (Greek/Roman/Egyptian/Norse mythologies, Wicca, Americal Indian, Islam, Book of Morman, Hinduism, Buddism, etc...) are all "man-made", as you believe your's is the only one that can be "divine" (if the others are also "divine" yet conflict withy your's then we'd have a conflict, right?). I simply believe your's is just as "man-made" as you'd rationalize the others to be.. Or even Christians in todays era can "rationalize" and "interpret" the words written by "man" to justify them bombing an abortion clinic and killing poeple in the process.

In reply to:
As for tone, you think I'm referring to your arguments, but I'm not. Comments like " Oh God... Why am I gonna do this, as is t even possible for you to in any way objectively ANYTHING that implies you may be wrong ??? In other words, I know I'm wasting my my time, but... " and making references to your "volumes of text by PhDs, gurus and theologians" as though that makes anything you have to say better than anything anyone else (who does not agree with you) has to say, are condescending and obnoxious. I can't make you see it.
Fair enough... I am impatient, and I get frustrated when I repeat myself. But more frustrating is trying to reason on a topic with someone who is unreasonable concerning that topic... That's what, "...wasting my time..." refers to.

Before you get all pissed or offended, follow me here...
Being reasonable about 'something' requires one to be able to weigh all the evidence and ideas EQUALLY, then come to a conclusion. You may be reasonable concerning a host of things, but your faith CANNOT be one of them, as a crux of your core beliefs is that if you "do not believe" then you are damned to hell... Thus, you HAVE TO believe, so you CANNOT weigh anything equally that implies (directly or indirectly) that your faith can be wrong. The scale is always tipped in favor of your beliefs. Have I made this point, or can you in some way show me "what would make you believe that your beliefs are wrong" ??? No offense or slam intended, just pointing out that you inherantly CANNOT think "critically" about your belief system, as that's just the way it is, as most dogmas are set up that way through centuries/melenia of defense of them.

Consider this...
In reply to:
A child generally believes in Santa Claus because they are taught that, and that belief is reinforced by family and friends and even institutions (school, malls, parades, etc...). They feel they "have to believe" and be a good person in order to get the reward (presents), as if they don't believe or are bad they are punished (no presents). In fact, they will even defend their belief if other kids question them or ridicule them, as they "have to believe" to get the reward.
Do you agree with that ???

Now I'm going to only make some simple substitutions.... Those in bold print above...
In reply to:
A person generally believes in a God because they are taught that, and that belief is reinforced by family and friends and even institutions (school, churches, religious holidays, etc...). They feel they "have to believe" and be a good person in order to get the reward (Heaven), as if they don't believe or are bad they are punished (Hell). In fact, they will even defend their belief if other people question them or ridicule them, as they "have to believe" to get the reward.
Now no offense intended, but the ONLY difference is the object deified and the reward, and the fact that the belief is much more profound, as the rewards/punishments are much more profound.

Point... I do NOT think you are 'stupid', just as a child isn't 'stupid' for his belief in Santa... That's what he's taught by those who love and care for him. It is only when they can equally weigh the evidence, that he can 'reasonably' question or be "critical" of his beliefs and thus come to a NEW belief, if that's what the evidence shows is required.



In reply to:
In reply to:
I do however ridicule those who believe their belief is correct, and that everybody else is inherantly incorrect.
The way you have been posting, it boggles the mind that you don't see how closely this describes you.
I guess this is a 'catch-22', as yes, I believe you are incorrect, just as you believe I and everybody else is incorrect. Don't know how I can debate this without implying that. I do not ridicule my wife (practicing Catholic), I even let her baptise the kids as its important to her, and to me they just got a little wet. Two of my good friends are Pastors, and we enjoy each others' company, and love to discuss things, even religion... But my wife, my Pastor friends, and the majority of Christian friends I have do NOT feel compelled to push their ideals upon others in the guise of "witnessing". As a good Cristian friend of mine puts it (whom I would like my son to be like most out of all the people I know, myself included)... "People know I'm a Cristian, and if they want to know more, they'll ask me." I have asked him, as he has a great message.

I will tell you that from our different perspectives, you know more than I do. Let me explain...

The more I learn search for answers, the more unanswered questions I get... But these tend to be very complex questions of detail (i.e. what was happening before 10^-37 seconds of the Big Bang?, why do we have mitocondrial DNA?, is gravity actually a force?, etc...). I may be much more aware of the true nature of reality (i.e. strictly speaking 'light' (photons) do NOT reflect or travel in a straight line, NOTHING actually "touches" anything else, 2 people traveling at different velocities relative to one another age at different rates, etc... [BTW... These are undeniable facts I can easily prove if you like]) than you may be, but you don't have as many 'unanswered questions' as you do not ask as many questions, as many of the answers are provided by your belief system... Thus from your our different perspective, you know more than I do, since I have a greater ratio of unanswered questions to answered ones. Does that make sense ???

In reply to:
And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. - Matthew 7:3-5
Not sure what this is supposed to mean, but let me give you some "bio information" on me:
I am a highschool drop-out that never got passed 10th grade, was a homeless drug addict a little over 18 years ago (in recovery), and was a 'born again christian' from 14-17 years old attending church, bible school, and christian camp-outs and the like (I was not forced, I really believed at that time, and would have been in this thread defending my faith along side you.). I just started to question the answers that had been 'provided' to me. I researched the answers to many questions, as I still so (now I'm into theoretical physics), including religious, spiritual, metaphysical/philosophical, natural, and scientific questions. I still am "teachable", and am learning as I go along... When I am provided with new or more accurate 'evidence' that shows I am incorrect, I re-assess my belief in somethings accuracy. I just have a vastly different standard to which I evaluate the validity of 'evidence', but I am keen on and enjoy "thought experiments" which require only reason and logic and a broad understanding of the specific details, this is where we differ the most. (see above about the faithfulls ability to reason or think "critically" about their faith.) I just have a much 'broader' understanding of nature, science, and even theology (not just your's) than you do, but this is only because I do not "readily dismiss as false" anything, not because I am 'smarter' than you, as chances are... You have a higher degree of formal education that I do.

It takes A LOT of work and research to even begin tounderstand these facts, concepts, and evidence... I CANNOT summerize it into short quips that are easily understood, just as the PhD's who study and write the material cannot. Your belief system, and more importantly the answers provided by it are much easier to understand, as they do not require the rigorous examination and proof to be accepted as fact. Most people are not willing to invest the time and energy into exploring these avenues of understanding, especially if the answers are already provided and people are willing to ignore questions that they cannot answer or force them to confront the validity of their beliefs. Not a slam, as do you not agree with this last paragraph ???


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 5:41 PM)


htotsu


Nov 15, 2006, 6:29 PM
Post #244 of 535 (949 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

rrad, I just can't answer all of this now. I will say this - I was not raised in the church. I became a Christian as an adult. So the whole Santa Claus analogy doesn't apply to me. You make so very many assumptions. I asked a lot of questions, and did a lot of research, AND have done so since. You seem to be under the impression that Christians stop asking questions once they are believers. Quite the contrary, and I already pointed out that there are scriptures encouraging believers not to just believe anything they hear.

There is an entire realm of Christianity called Apologetics, from the Greek "to offer explanation for." This involves real-world explanations for some of the questions that have come up here, and others that some may be thinking about. Since you are interested in weighing views equally, I am certain that you will do some research on Christian apologetics to find the answers you are looking for, at least from a Christian perspective. But know this - you are absolutely wrong about me when you say that I automatically have fewer questions because my belief system simply provides them for me. That is such an incorrect view of how this works that I really want to take a moment to explain that.

This is a lifetime of learning. Yes there are things to take on faith. Just as there are in life, for everyone. Anyone who cannot see how theories in science are often accepted as fact, for example, and who do not see how what is so clearly faith is used in between the evidence and the conclusion, and who cannot think of examples of science contradicting itself, is the one who is not asking enough questions.

As for you, you pulled back somewhat with the attitude, but went right on to write that it's because you are trying to reason with someone who is unreasonable. Again, what you mean is someone who disagrees with you, and therefore that person is unreasonable. (shaking my head)

Anyway, it's been fun. Hope you will look more into the other side to become better informed. I do it all the time, and you would do well not to assume otherwise.


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 7:14 PM
Post #245 of 535 (941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Ummm...
In reply to:
rrad, I just can't answer all of this now. I will say this - I was not raised in the church. I became a Christian as an adult. So the whole Santa Claus analogy doesn't apply to me. You make so very many assumptions.
Read the word generally in the analogy, as I even made it italicised for you for this very purpose. It may not apply to you, so are you therefore are going to discredit it or ignore it ??? It deserves a response, as it is well written, accurate, and direct.

In reply to:
As for you, you pulled back somewhat with the attitude, but went right on to write that it's because you are trying to reason with someone who is unreasonable. Again, what you mean is someone who disagrees with you, and therefore that person is unreasonable. (shaking my head)
You interpret someone being critical of your beliefs as "attitude"... I cannot sugar coat it any better so as not to offend you by doing so, and I cannot debate this with you without being critical of your words. I take no offense to anyone being critical of me, and the only 'attitude' I see from you is when you are offended by my words, thus your reply concerning that shows a little emotion... No big deal. You apparently were offended when I pointed out how you, and others with dogmatic views, are unable to reasonably debate those views. Not my fault you are offended and/or fail to agree with that point... Until you can see that point, there is no hope for you to be able to be critical of your faith. Sorry, but I 'assume' this will still offend you.


In reply to:
Anyone who cannot see how theories in science are often accepted as fact, for example, and who do not see how what is so clearly faith is used in between the evidence and the conclusion, and who cannot think of examples of science contradicting itself, is the one who is not asking enough questions.
What does this mean ??? I don't follow you. Please show me an example of where "...how what is so clearly faith is used in between the evidence and the conclusion". I even pointed out the falicies in many String Theorists (for example) who do not adhere to accepted 'scientific method' for the evaluation of their theories. I can think of many more,and cite them if you wish. Science can be wrong, and often is... But Scientists don't susually get all butt-hurt when they are critisised or proven wrong... Instead they generally toos the theory, or ammend it and look for evidence to either prove of disprove the theory.

Aristotle thought there were 4 elements, Earth, Wind, Fire, and Water. Nope, wrong.

Plato believed the heavens to revolve around the Earth on 'perfect' circlular spheres. Nope, wrong.

Kepler believed the orbits of the planets to be perfectly circular, then added epicycles on these orbits to account for observations. Nope, wrong.
(Note-Not going to research if the people I'm attributing this to is correct, as it is believed to be off the top of my head, and the names have no relavance to the point anyway.)

Newtonion physics was overthrown by Einstein who theorised, by thought alone, the theories of Special and General Relativity... This was later proven when all of Einstein's predictions were later observed, and continue to be done to finer and finer degrees to this day. Is it possible that Relativity can be wrong? Sure, and there are experiments designed to detect if it is, but cannot falify it to this date. BTW... Einstien didn't win his Nobel in Relativity, he did for his study of the 'Photo-Electric Effect'.


Point... Scientific knowlege has progressed throughout the ages, and they were not burned at the stake by 'scientists' for doing so, as the goal of science is to better understand the nature of reality to the finest degree possible. When that 'understanding' has threatened religious doctrine, not just christianity, people have been burned at the stake because it threatened their idea of reality... As I said, the faithful CANNOT be critical of their beliefs, and only after they CANNOT deny the scientific fact, they will ammend the religion. (i.e. Earth is round, etc...)


Science WELCOMES and encourages critical thought, is that as only when we question what we believe to be true, and probe deeper can wee see we were wrong about "what we thought we know".


You have accused me of "looking down my nose", being condesending, and thinking I'm smarter, yet this is not the case... I make my point by citing evidence, facts, making logical rational points, and asking pointed questions... This is not me "looking down my nose", being condesending, or thinking I'm smarter, its debating. The fact that you have no logical or rational answer to my questions, or cannot find any evidence what so ever is not my fault, and maybe you failure to be able to answer them makes you feel/look stupid in your eyes. Not mine, as I said before, I don't think you are stupid.



If you believe you are able to be reasonable and engage in critical thought, then answer my original questions to the best of your ability with an answer other than quoting or interpreting a phrase from a 'book'. You can build a 'chain of logic' from your book, but this requires a preponderance of direct (not indirect) items to do this, and you need to qualify your book, as in why it is correct where as books of other faiths are incorrect... Reason is, a Muslim can just as easily interpret a phrase from his book justifying your murder, and that certainly doesn't make it right.

You don't have to 'convince' me, as you will be the one to benifit from looking at just these few critically.

Here ya go, I'll even repost it:
In reply to:
OK... For those who believe that God loves us, wants us to go to heaven, but gave us 'freewill' to make our own choices, of which will determine if we go to heaven or hell, especially if we choose to believe in him or not.

You mean to tell me that your omnipitant being, capable of creating everything and knowing EVERYTHING is reduced to just sitting there with his fingers crossed "hoping" that you'll make the correct choice ???



And... What was your God doing before he created everything ??? As many of you believe, he says "...I am the Alpha (beginning) and the Omega (end)..." What was he doing for an eternity before the "beginning", and why didn't he create it earlier ???


Hmmm... If Jesus and God are the same (Trinity=Father, Son, & Holy Spirit), who was Jesus praying to. Be carefull how you answer this, as you may violate the "Thou shalt not put any other Gods before me." commandment.


Or... Why did he even create all this and us ??? He was lonely, and wanted someone to worship him ???


Even... You all do understand that the Jewish God, Christian God, and Muslim God are ALL THE SAME DUDE, right ??? Just different names depending on the revision of the original Hebrew superstitions/traditions that became the formalized Jewish religion. Yet more people have died in the name of this 'one God' than anything else, even fellow believers in the same God (but different revision) and are still being killed in the name of as we type.



Now... These are NOT dificult questions, and they are even direct not fague questions, so I would appreciate direct answers, not fague interpretations of standard quips that answer nothing.


If you are going to use phrases from a book, you NEED to state why your book is correct, and the books of other faiths are not. (You CANNOT use the book to qualify the book, as a scientist would be laughed at if he tried this.)


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 7:31 PM)


htotsu


Nov 15, 2006, 7:26 PM
Post #246 of 535 (936 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
It deserves a response, as it is well written, accurate, and direct.

Not that you're biased.

Listen - there are other people in this thread. If you are reading the posts you will see what I am referring to by those who cannot seem to think of situations where science contradicted itself, and where facts + faith = many scientific conclusions and theories.

In reply to:
You don't have to 'convince' me, as you will be the one to benifit from looking at just these few critically.
Oh, for the love of whatever it is that you love. Your condescension is beyond reason. I already suggested the realm which you should explore for responses. You tell me that it does not necessarily apply to me, and yet I should answer all of the questions for you, even after I have directed you towards another resource that you may not have explored. Then repost your entire list of questions.

I told you where to go if you are actually interested in those answers. Now it's time for you to add some C.S. Lewis to your volumes and volumes of texts by PhDs. And I am not referring to the Chronicles of Narnia. You are the one who insisted that you want to weigh ALL views equally. I wonder if you really mean that, or if you mean all views except for Christianity. Happy reading!


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 7:49 PM
Post #247 of 535 (932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Another "non-answer". Your answer shouldn't matter whether I am biased or not... I am asking you for "your" answers. My answers have no bearing on whether or not you are biased to them, they are still my answers, and I am detailed in them... I also do not avoid, ignore, or dance around any questions... I'll answer them in detail to the best of my ability. Why can't you, or anyone else in this thread, do that ??? Because you don't want to get pinned down by them, or just don't have any answers, and for you its OK to ignore the fact that your belief system cannot answer such fundamental questions, yet you'll deny other answers, and even deny evidence. (your brain should register a "syntax error" here)

I welcome any and all debate concerning the items I have posted.

You've accused me of being condesending and thinking I'm smart just because I state facts, theories, and rational reasonable questions. I even post the details of them, and do not post 'vague and abstract' proofs of my ideas or reasoning. You accuse me of being condesending because I pose questions and ideas that you cannot explain away, so you attempt to descredit me instead as a person. You are faulting me for doing the very thing I am asking you to do...

Show me evidence, logical reasoning, critical thought, or even at least be direct and not 'vague and abstract' in your reasons WHY YOU BELIEVE YOUR BELIEFS ARE CORRECT. You do not want to reply with what you actually believe the answers are, as this will pin you down to them, and easily show that you have no reasonable evidence to support that belief (no more than a Jew, Muslim, Wiccan, Morman, etc...), thus you would have to confront what that means.


Sorry if you feel this is offensive... It is not meant to be at all. Have you considered that since I am trying to make you confront something you want deeply to ignore, that that is what is making you feel so offended ???

(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 7:58 PM)


htotsu


Nov 15, 2006, 8:23 PM
Post #248 of 535 (925 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2005
Posts: 673

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You accuse me of being condesending because I pose questions and ideas that you cannot explain away, so you attempt to descredit me instead as a person.
...
Have you considered that since I am trying to make you confront something you want deeply to ignore, that that is what is making you feel so offended ???
Rrad, I say exactly what I mean. Please stop trying to psychoanalyze.

There are times to converse, and times not to. This is the latter for me. You can have the last word (in this thread, anyway) - go ahead. Take it. It's yours. I know you wanna. But remember that I did recommend places for you to go if you actually have any interest in learning more about another perspective that is not just based on the bible, rather than spending that time telling me how unreasonable you think I am, how well-read you are, or how much of a waste of time it is to discuss a topic with someone who hasn't the slightest interest in genuinely learning anything about the other side.

Wait a minute... hmm...

Oh yeah, you mentioned that you didn't understand what was meant by the scripture about the plank in the eye.

You wrote:
In reply to:
I do however ridicule those who believe their belief is correct, and that everybody else is inherantly incorrect.

And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. - Matthew 7:3-5

This means if you are doing something while also accusing someone else of doing it, you are a hypocrite. (editing to add:) Humility means being willing to listen, not just talk, or in this case, write. I could be wrong, but I'm just not feelin that coming from you. I am under no obligation to continue a conversation with someone I feel is just rude and uninterested.

(This post was edited by htotsu on Nov 15, 2006, 8:25 PM)


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 8:27 PM
Post #249 of 535 (921 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

My bad... Till you put it like that, I thought I was right.

I will now forget what I have learned, deny the facts I have seen, and believe that your magician created everything.

Just don't ask me to drink any Kool-Aid.



~Adam (now saved)Angelic


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 8:31 PM)


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 8:29 PM
Post #250 of 535 (1187 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
My bad... Till you put it like that, I thought I was right.

I will now forget what I have learned, deny the facts I have seen, and believe that your magician created everything.

Just don't ask me to drink any Kool-Aid.



~Adam (now saved)Angelic
Now THAT's condesending ridicule if I might say so myself.Tongue


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 8:31 PM)


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 15, 2006, 8:52 PM
Post #251 of 535 (1103 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [htotsu] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
I told you where to go if you are actually interested in those answers. Now it's time for you to add some C.S. Lewis to your volumes and volumes of texts by PhDs. And I am not referring to the Chronicles of Narnia. You are the one who insisted that you want to weigh ALL views equally. I wonder if you really mean that, or if you mean all views except for Christianity. Happy reading!

I started reading Mere Christianity once. I lasted about two chapters before giving up in disgust. As far as I could tell, it's just the same old same old - we have a moral sense, therefore God. Crazy


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 8:59 PM
Post #252 of 535 (1101 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Adam,

I'm not vouching for the scientific accuracy of everything on the site, but you might want to check out http://www.godandscience.org. I found it on the internet today after reading a bunch of these posts.

Oh yeah....I won't get into a big argument about religion. Just thought you would be interested.


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 15, 2006, 9:06 PM
Post #253 of 535 (1095 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Adam,

I'm not vouching for the scientific accuracy of everything on the site, but you might want to check out http://www.godandscience.org. I found it on the internet today after reading a bunch of these posts.

Oh yeah....I won't get into a big argument about religion. Just thought you would be interested.

Man, I'm embarrassed for you right now. That site is ridiculously bad. There's a rather large thread on it here.


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 9:11 PM
Post #254 of 535 (1093 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Yeah.... I'm sure the "Internet Infidels" site is a lot less biased, eh?


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 15, 2006, 9:22 PM
Post #255 of 535 (1088 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

It's not a question of bias. It's a question of blatant use of circular reasoning, unsupported assertions, non sequiturs, and various other stupidity.

As for Internet Infidels - poke around. You might be surprised.


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 9:28 PM
Post #256 of 535 (1086 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

##warning: vague "Eiger Sanction" reference follows##

you know.... unsupported assertions I can stand, but non-sequiturs really make my ass drag.


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 9:35 PM
Post #257 of 535 (1084 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Thanx David. I appreciate the link.

The 'evidence' they cite is incorrect, as it is 'bad scientific method' used to bolster an idea.


Example:
They site evidence of the effectiveness of prayer, but it is not the prayer that is effective, it is the act of praying that is effective.

Let me explain...
Recently, the Catholic Church funded and oversaw a lengthy scientific experiment in order to prove the power of prayer. They provided the oversight to ensure that the 'scientists' wouldn't try to pull anything or skew the results based on any preconceived biases.

There were 3 large groups of sick people in hospitals (so they could be monitered), many terminal...

(Note-Those praying did not know about the experiment, they were just asked to pray for these sick people.)

1 Group of patients was prayed for daily, each individually, by congregations (100's of thousands of total prayers) of many different faiths, not just Catholics or even just Christians, and these patients were told that they were being prayed for.

A 2nd group was prayed for, by the same people, at the same prayer sessions, in the same way, and these patients were NOT told they were being prayed for.

A 3rd group was NOT prayed for by the congregations, as they were the control group.


Results...
Group 1 showed a marked improvement, while group 2 actually came in just a fraction of a percentage point under the control group.

Meaning, those aware of the fact that they were being prayed for by so many people improved, while those who were NOT aware of any praying done on their behalf did not. This is an example of the 'power of the mind', as if it were prayer, group 2 would have improved along with group 1.




The 'evidence' I saw on that site, and others does not follow the scientific method to set up experiments that contain enough people, have valid control groups, and even do not consider such things as 'power of the mind'.


BTW... Those who meditate effectively show a higher degree of improvement, but that was not included in this study... It is just a sidenote from other studies of the mind and the power of meditaion.





The one example of 'evidence' I have just debunked is not the only one where the faithful try to use bad science or faulty interpretations of the results to justify the existance a God or the Supernatural.

Because somehting cannot be explained scientifically is not 'proof' of the supernatural, just as an object seen in the sky that cannot be definitively identified is NOT an alien space craft, it is mearly a UFO... But that acronym has become synonomous with aliens, even though it does not mean alien space craft.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 9:35 PM)


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 10:14 PM
Post #258 of 535 (1073 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Adam,

Could you send me a link to the bad "evidence" you debunked? Checked around a bit, but it's a big site.


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 15, 2006, 10:26 PM
Post #259 of 535 (1069 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Adam,

Could you send me a link to the bad "evidence" you debunked? Checked around a bit, but it's a big site.

And yet, from your calm post, you don't seem to have developed the urge to poke your frontal lobe out with an ice pick.

Strange... must be just me then.


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 10:28 PM
Post #260 of 535 (1067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
Adam,

Could you send me a link to the bad "evidence" you debunked? Checked around a bit, but it's a big site.

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/smj.html

I believe they only had 393 people in the study, and they were split into only two groups.

And I didn't say it was "bad 'evidence'", what I said was it was not proper 'scientific method', as the test certainly could have been set up to get a more accurate result.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 10:33 PM)


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 10:33 PM
Post #261 of 535 (1061 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

thanks for the link

now quit pushing this stuff on me!Laugh


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 10:34 PM
Post #262 of 535 (1058 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
thanks for the link

now quit pushing this stuff on me!Laugh


My bad brutha... Sorry.Tongue


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 10:34 PM)


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 11:14 PM
Post #263 of 535 (1049 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

That was a double-blind study with 393 people, divided into two groups, with statistically significant results suggesting that prayer had a positive effect on the patients.

I'm sure any study could be done better. And who knows, perhaps it was just freak luck. But if scientific methods were followed, which it appears they were, should you dismiss the results?

How were the scientific methods bad (in this study) again?


blondgecko
Moderator

Nov 15, 2006, 11:32 PM
Post #264 of 535 (1045 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
That was a double-blind study with 393 people, divided into two groups, with statistically significant results suggesting that prayer had a positive effect on the patients.

I'm sure any study could be done better. And who knows, perhaps it was just freak luck. But if scientific methods were followed, which it appears they were, should you dismiss the results?

How were the scientific methods bad (in this study) again?

Well, this much bigger study showed no effect under double-blind conditions, and a negative effect when the patients knew they were being prayed for.


david_smithrock


Nov 15, 2006, 11:45 PM
Post #265 of 535 (1038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Is there anything more than an abstract online for that study? It would be interesting to check that out.

Does that mean you think the other study is invalid then?


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 15, 2006, 11:51 PM
Post #266 of 535 (1037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [blondgecko] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

No prob Dave...

Look at the actual test results
http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/smj2.htmlThere is not what I would call a substantiel marked improvement, in fact most (>85%) are almost the same, and 2 of the items monitered are even better in the control group.

I would call the results "slightly" in favor of IP, and would have to either expand the test to include more patients, more time, or more prayers in order to get better data, as in data that is not so close to the line.

To be honest... I just scanned the test, and misunderstood something when I read it, so I will concede that valid scientific method was used to conduct the test and collect the data, but I do not put the same weight/value on the interpretation of the results since they are SO CLOSE to the line.




Now even Blondie's link shows what I would call too close to make a definitive call also, but its further from the line than the study which you and I are talking about.


Point is... Many of the faithful will read the gist of the test cited as 'proof' and not question it, and look no further. When in reality, we need to look at all the tests in order to gleen a 'proof'. More tests, performed under different condidtions, with different people, and different facilities... Gather that info up, then make a choice... Don't just pic a test that proves one's point.


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 15, 2006, 11:53 PM)


david_smithrock


Nov 16, 2006, 12:03 AM
Post #267 of 535 (1031 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 361

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Adam,

Definitely agree with your last point there. You can't trust one study, one person's opinion, or even your own experience to show "the truth". What in this world can really be explained definitively? It is interesting, however, to check this stuff out.

Good times, good times..........


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 16, 2006, 12:18 AM
Post #268 of 535 (1029 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [david_smithrock] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
You can't trust one study, one person's opinion, or even your own experience to show "the truth".

I agree with you 100%....

The more experiences, knowlege, different opinions & ideas, theories, and evidence one has to draw from, the closer they are able to get to "the truth".


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 16, 2006, 1:22 AM)


c4c


Nov 16, 2006, 4:27 AM
Post #269 of 535 (1017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 1279

Re: [rrradam] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

rrradam, welcome to the club! my job is done here. AngelicWinkLaughSlyPirate

seriously, thanks for the extremely thought provoking discussions. Never stop exploring.


Partner rrrADAM


Nov 16, 2006, 4:56 AM
Post #270 of 535 (1017 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535

Re: [c4c] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
rrradam, welcome to the club! my job is done here. AngelicWinkLaughSlyPirate

seriously, thanks for the extremely thought provoking discussions. Never stop exploring.


Thanx... Back at ya brutha.

I don't want people to agree with me, I just try to get them to think outside the 'box', or as you put it "never stop exploring".


(This post was edited by rrradam on Nov 16, 2006, 4:59 AM)


coloredchalker


Nov 16, 2006, 6:06 AM
Post #271 of 535 (1011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 550

Re: [slablizard] Climbing for Christ [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
ok, but what your saying is pretty neutral really. I can't refute what you base your beliefs on. You base it on evidence, ok, what ever you say. I'm just saying that what ever your evidence shows you, its not going to give you the whole picture. So with out evidence of something, either your going to form an opinion based on faith or have no opinion at all.
What is your belief on the state of a person after death? Either you have no belief on this or your belief involves faith, because noone has proof of any answer to this question.
That is my point.

edited because my brain wasn't communicating properly with my hands.

Repeat with me: Science is not based on beliefs.
You don't need to believe that water is made of H2o, you can prove it in a lab, over and over again. What whole picture? The origins of life? Of the universe? We'll get there eventually, just look at the progress made in this centuries, while the bible you base your life and choices on never changes.
That is because you believe the bible without the need of a proof. You just like to believe it is true. It is called FAITH.
if tomorrow the string theory replaces the relativity theory you will see dramatic changes in physics books, not so for the bible, if they discover that noah's ark never existed you guys will make up a justification and say that god is just testing your faith....like with fossils. Am I wrong?

The state of a person after death is...sorry to disappoint you...dead, and it stays like that. The body decomposes and your thoughts