Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Why is biner open-gate strength lower?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 


alexnees


Jan 4, 2007, 2:26 PM
Post #1 of 37 (2634 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 78

Why is biner open-gate strength lower?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey all,

I'm hoping someone can explain to me the REASON that biners are weaker when the gate is open. Bear with me as I try to explain the reasoning behind this seemingly ridiculous question.

Obviously, an oval loop (closed biner) is going to be stronger than a C-shaped loop (open biner) since the force applied can't lever open a closed biner. But....I've looked at lots of different designs (keylock, regular, wiregate, lockers) and it doesn't seem to me that, even when the gate is "closed," a biner actually forms a closed loop. There's still a gap, usually a couple millimeters, between the notch and the gate. If there wasn't a gap, it would be hard to open and close the biners because the gate would stick. So my question: If a biner is rated at 8kn open and 24 kn closed, and that biner is loaded with, say, 9 kn while closed, why doesn't it deform, stretching open a couple millimeters until the gate prevents it from stretching any more? In other words, it seems as though any biner that catches a big fall should get slightly deformed in the process. Apparently this isn't the case, but can anyone show me where I'm wrong in this?


areyoumydude


Jan 4, 2007, 2:38 PM
Post #2 of 37 (2619 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 27, 2003
Posts: 1970

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A 'biner does stretch and the gate engages when enough force is applied. If the gate is open at that point, all the force goes to the top of the spine of the 'biner making it much weaker.


(This post was edited by areyoumydude on Jan 4, 2007, 2:40 PM)


chug1


Jan 4, 2007, 2:41 PM
Post #3 of 37 (2610 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2006
Posts: 20

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One afternoon I was swinging around underneath the veranda, being held up by a Trango classic screwlock. Loaded with my weight, which would have only been about 0.8 kN, it stretched slightly. It was not a visible deformation, but the gate would no longer open freely. The hook in the nose of the carabiner was starting to engage the bar in the gate.

I assume that if I had loaded it to, say, 10kN, the carabiner body would have stretched so that the hook and bar were loading on each other, and I wouldn't have been able to get the gate open at all.


Partner j_ung


Jan 4, 2007, 2:42 PM
Post #4 of 37 (2606 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

alexnees wrote:
If a biner is rated at 8kn open and 24 kn closed, and that biner is loaded with, say, 9 kn while closed, why doesn't it deform, stretching open a couple millimeters until the gate prevents it from stretching any more?

It does. That's why the biner is stronger when closed; it can only "stretch" so much before its own shape stops the process. When open, there's nothing to stop it from deforming until it snaps.


moof


Jan 4, 2007, 2:43 PM
Post #5 of 37 (2603 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 400

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The biners do deflect with load, and witha few hundred pounds the gate starts taking some of the load. The point to the small clearance is to allow biner to be opened under body weight, for example to clip in a rope while aid climbing. For that amount of flexure there is no permanent bending going on, all elastic deformation.

Typically a closed gate biner fails under load at the nose first, breaking off the little catch.

Obviously the gate is much weaker than the spine of the biner, but in the case of a D shaped biner it does not take the majority of the load, as the rope is way over by the spine. This is also why ovals are typically weaker, or are built heavier to compensate for the worse mechanical advantage.

Put body weight on a biner and you should be able to see significant deflection at the nose/gate interface.


devils_advocate


Jan 4, 2007, 2:44 PM
Post #6 of 37 (2599 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 1823

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

alexnees wrote:
... why doesn't it deform, stretching open a couple millimeters until the gate prevents it from stretching any more? In other words, it seems as though any biner that catches a big fall should get slightly deformed in the process. Apparently this isn't the case, but can anyone show me where I'm wrong in this?

Did it ever occur to you that metal can be bent and yet bend back? Look up "elastic deformation" and compare to "plastic deformation".


climbaddic


Jan 4, 2007, 2:45 PM
Post #7 of 37 (2594 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 3, 2003
Posts: 108

Re: [areyoumydude] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I always wonder that myself. Wire gates for example uses steel. Does this wire really takes the weight? I certainly would be scared to hang on that let along fall on it. Some carabiners use what appears to be sheet metal. I highly doubt those will take any weight either. I guess I need to talk to carabiner designer :)


bues0022


Jan 4, 2007, 2:56 PM
Post #8 of 37 (2577 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2006
Posts: 28

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You are correct in regards to assuming deformation of the biner when loaded, but the amount is off. The gate helps immensely under load because the deformation is not into the plastic deformation region of the material. Think of this...take a paperclip and bend it so one leg is sticking out. That's plastic deformation. On the atomic scale the particles have shifted around and moved to reach the lowest energy state. Now, take that same leg and push it down slightly, see how it springs back? All materials have a limit to the amount of stress applied before plastic deformation, and in the second case this hasn't been exceeded. Back to the biner question now...When the gate is open, the C shape can deform sooner due to the non symmetric loading about the support. The stress created in the long axis includes a bending moment instead of pure tension. When the gate is closed, the biner will deform slightly when loaded, but not into the plastic deformation regiem (think of a spring). Therefore the gate side can help carry the load. The bending moment is also reduced on the long axis. This is why the closed rating is more than just double the open rating.

Metals are extremely resilient materials which allow for this cyclical loading for a large number of cycles (aluminum is notoriously much weaker than steel however, one reason why in gyms the biners are many times steel). Even in a big fall, the metal usually is far below its yield strength so it won't plasticaly deform.


alexnees


Jan 4, 2007, 3:21 PM
Post #9 of 37 (2549 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 78

Re: [bues0022] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks all for the helpful replies, especially bues0022. Obviously I never got far enough in physics to learn about plastic vs. elastic deformation, but it makes a lot of sense. Cool stuff.


alpinismo_flujo


Jan 4, 2007, 3:57 PM
Post #10 of 37 (2507 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 603

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

This site is so civil now! Last year - you would have been flamed for asking that question.

Kudos!


petsfed


Jan 4, 2007, 4:20 PM
Post #11 of 37 (2483 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571

Re: [climbaddic] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climbaddic wrote:
I always wonder that myself. Wire gates for example uses steel. Does this wire really takes the weight? I certainly would be scared to hang on that let along fall on it. Some carabiners use what appears to be sheet metal. I highly doubt those will take any weight either. I guess I need to talk to carabiner designer :)

Oddly enough, the wire is just as strong as the rest of the carabiner, for that exact reason. Having looked at a lot of failed wiregates, the wires never failed, it was the aluminum that failed. Crazy, huh?


gunkiemike


Jan 4, 2007, 4:26 PM
Post #12 of 37 (2473 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2002
Posts: 2232

Re: [alpinismo_flujo] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Back in the Dark Ages (1970's to you youngin's), it was not uncommon to find oval biners that wouldn't open up under a load of 200 lb (less than 1 kN). I still have a couple SMC biners from that era, and you can see noticeable biner flexion, on the order of a few tenths of a mm at the gate pin, just by pulling it lengthwise IN YOUR HANDS. So yea, biners "stretch" until the gate is under tension. New biner bodies are stiffer, due to forged shaping, and (I imagine) stiffer alloys.


vegastradguy


Jan 4, 2007, 4:26 PM
Post #13 of 37 (2473 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919

Re: [petsfed] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

petsfed wrote:
climbaddic wrote:
I always wonder that myself. Wire gates for example uses steel. Does this wire really takes the weight? I certainly would be scared to hang on that let along fall on it. Some carabiners use what appears to be sheet metal. I highly doubt those will take any weight either. I guess I need to talk to carabiner designer :)

Oddly enough, the wire is just as strong as the rest of the carabiner, for that exact reason. Having looked at a lot of failed wiregates, the wires never failed, it was the aluminum that failed. Crazy, huh?

even more oddly, a wire gate biner, more often than not, is stronger than a regular one.....


petsfed


Jan 4, 2007, 9:11 PM
Post #14 of 37 (2419 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571

Re: [vegastradguy] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vegastradguy wrote:
petsfed wrote:
climbaddic wrote:
I always wonder that myself. Wire gates for example uses steel. Does this wire really takes the weight? I certainly would be scared to hang on that let along fall on it. Some carabiners use what appears to be sheet metal. I highly doubt those will take any weight either. I guess I need to talk to carabiner designer :)

Oddly enough, the wire is just as strong as the rest of the carabiner, for that exact reason. Having looked at a lot of failed wiregates, the wires never failed, it was the aluminum that failed. Crazy, huh?

even more oddly, a wire gate biner, more often than not, is stronger than a regular one.....

They are VASTLY over engineered to deal with the fear that comes with seeing a wire keep you from death. Its only recently that wiregates have started to approximate how light they could be, and still be full strength.


jeremy11


Jan 5, 2007, 11:44 AM
Post #15 of 37 (2351 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 28, 2004
Posts: 597

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...kes_again_83057.html
here is a biner that I broke while testing. read the description for info.
two major lessons - the force a short static fall applies, and what a bit of whiplash can do - imagine taking a hard fall and looking up to see your rope through a biner popped open like this?? Shocked


basilisk


Jan 5, 2007, 10:09 PM
Post #16 of 37 (2297 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [jeremy11] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.psychovertical.com/?wiregates

an excellent article on wiregates

if you're lazy, here's a summary: a regular biner has an aluminum body with an aluminum gate. a wiregate has an aluminum body with a steel gate. it should go without saying that steel is stronger than aluminum. therefore, wiregates are ultimately stronger than normal biners


jt512


Jan 5, 2007, 10:17 PM
Post #17 of 37 (2290 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21781

Re: [vegastradguy] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

vegastradguy wrote:
petsfed wrote:
climbaddic wrote:
I always wonder that myself. Wire gates for example uses steel. Does this wire really takes the weight? I certainly would be scared to hang on that let along fall on it. Some carabiners use what appears to be sheet metal. I highly doubt those will take any weight either. I guess I need to talk to carabiner designer :)

Oddly enough, the wire is just as strong as the rest of the carabiner, for that exact reason. Having looked at a lot of failed wiregates, the wires never failed, it was the aluminum that failed. Crazy, huh?

even more oddly, a wire gate biner, more often than not, is stronger than a regular one.....

First of all the wires are stainless steel, which I presume is stronger than aluminum.

But, that said, wire gate and conventional gate biners usually have the same strength rating when their design is otherwise the same. Some wire gate biners have more advanced designs than cheaper conventional gate biners, which is why, I suspect that they have stronger ratings.

Jay


shockabuku


Jan 5, 2007, 10:29 PM
Post #18 of 37 (2285 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762

Re: [basilisk] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

basilisk wrote:
http://www.psychovertical.com/?wiregates

an excellent article on wiregates

if you're lazy, here's a summary: a regular biner has an aluminum body with an aluminum gate. a wiregate has an aluminum body with a steel gate. it should go without saying that steel is stronger than aluminum. therefore, wiregates are ultimately stronger than normal biners

I don't understand how that follows. Based on my limited experience breaking biners (on purpose, with a pull testing machine) and the comments from moof, above, it's usually the hook on the nose that breaks, though I saw one solid gate break at the pin. This implies to me that the hook is the weak point, and it remains aluminum even on a wire gate biner. It certainly doesn't make any sense to me that retaining the weak link unchanged, the hook, and changing a part less likely to fail, the gate, to a stronger steel part would do that. I don't understand how the wire gate biner becomes any stonger than the solid gate biner.


shockabuku


Jan 5, 2007, 10:31 PM
Post #19 of 37 (2283 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762

Re: [jt512] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
But, that said, wire gate and conventional gate biners usually have the same strength rating when their design is otherwise the same. Some wire gate biners have more advanced designs than cheaper conventional gate biners, which is why, I suspect that they have stronger ratings.

Jay

Okay, that sounds better. I can believe the improved design argument.


gosharks


Jan 5, 2007, 11:28 PM
Post #20 of 37 (2262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 6, 2004
Posts: 262

Re: [shockabuku] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
This implies to me that the hook is the weak point, and it remains aluminum even on a wire gate biner. It certainly doesn't make any sense to me that retaining the weak link unchanged, the hook, and changing a part less likely to fail, the gate, to a stronger steel part would do that.

The stress (force/area) is higher on the wire gate because the cross sectional area is smaller. Therefore, you need a stronger material there with higher tensile strength (which is measured in stress).


marde


Jan 6, 2007, 4:48 AM
Post #21 of 37 (2232 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 169

Re: [gosharks] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The stress (force/area) is higher on the wire gate because the cross sectional area is smaller. Therefore, you need a stronger material there with higher tensile strength (which is measured in stress).
Thats only true for keylock biners
standard biners have two "steel rivets" in the gate which are nearly the same diameter than a wiregate


gosharks


Jan 6, 2007, 11:49 AM
Post #22 of 37 (2175 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 6, 2004
Posts: 262

Re: [marde] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

marde wrote:
Thats only true for keylock biners
standard biners have two "steel rivets" in the gate which are nearly the same diameter than a wiregate

I dont have a biner around to check this on, but i feel that the cross sectional area of the pin/gate interface(s) is larger than the area of the wiregate wires.


marde


Jan 6, 2007, 4:34 PM
Post #23 of 37 (2130 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 169

Re: [gosharks] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

after all, it just does not matter.
Biners with closed gates don't brake
(in climbing situations).
The only thing that matters is open gate strength.


g_i_g_i


Jan 8, 2007, 12:28 PM
Post #24 of 37 (2049 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2005
Posts: 53

Re: [petsfed] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
They are VASTLY over engineered to deal with the fear that comes with seeing a wire keep you from death. Its only recently that wiregates have started to approximate how light they could be, and still be full strength.

That's not really true: the breaking strength of a carabiner is indeed the force at which it might break, they are not *vastly* over engineered. In fact carabiners do break during normal operation, not even in the worst case scenario, so according exclusively to some engeneering standards (not those used to design climbing equipment, evidently) they are actually not very well designed...

As for the new very light wire carabiners, some of them actually are lighter mainly because of novel design and manufacturing processes (e.g. helium), but the majority are just basically smaller (e.g. neutrino, camp nano, ecc), and climbers nowadays are willing to put up with the smaller size in order to shed grams. In my opinion this has to do with fashion and shifting priorities in the climbing world at least as much as with generally improved designs.


devils_advocate


Jan 8, 2007, 1:05 PM
Post #25 of 37 (2013 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 1823

Re: [g_i_g_i] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

g_i_g_i wrote:
In fact carabiners do break during normal operation, not even in the worst case scenario, so according exclusively to some engeneering standards (not those used to design climbing equipment, evidently) they are actually not very well designed...

Unimpressed What does this mean exactly? And what "engineering standards" are you referring to?


Partner brent_e


Jan 8, 2007, 1:17 PM
Post #26 of 37 (838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5109

Re: [j_ung] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
alexnees wrote:
If a biner is rated at 8kn open and 24 kn closed, and that biner is loaded with, say, 9 kn while closed, why doesn't it deform, stretching open a couple millimeters until the gate prevents it from stretching any more?

It does. That's why the biner is stronger when closed; it can only "stretch" so much before its own shape stops the process. When open, there's nothing to stop it from deforming until it snaps.

this is why you shouldn't tighten your locking biner too much during your rappel. You may feel it and it's loose - don't crank it tight. It will be hard to open again unless loaded.


g_i_g_i


Jan 8, 2007, 2:24 PM
Post #27 of 37 (825 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2005
Posts: 53

Re: [devils_advocate] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

devils_advocate wrote:
g_i_g_i wrote:
In fact carabiners do break during normal operation, not even in the worst case scenario, so according exclusively to some engeneering standards (not those used to design climbing equipment, evidently) they are actually not very well designed...

Unimpressed What does this mean exactly? And what "engineering standards" are you referring to?

Well, I knew I could be misunderstood.
In a nutshell: climbing equipment is not designed and tested following the same criteria as the majority of the structural stuff around us. Forgetting about deformation, fatigue, and dynamics for a moment, most structural elements are designed taking into account all possible forces that they are expected to experience in the worst case scenario, and making the element able to resist to more than that, just to be sure. So, for example, when you are on an elevator with a couple of obese people, and you read in the little note above the door that the elevator is designed to carry 3 normal people, or 600lb (or whatever), you shouldn't start sweating cold, trying to do the math, because in fact the structure of the elevator can withstand probably 10-12 times as much, or even more. It might not move, but it won't break.

On the other hand, when a manufacturer tells you that a carabiner breaks at 8 kN with the gate open, they mean it! well, more or less, in fact there are many chances that the carabiner will hold a little more, but still, I wouldn't bet my life on it. Now, 8 kN do not happen only in a worst case scenario situation, quite the opposite, and that's why carabiners do break sometimes, and that has to be expected.

If you want another example, here it is: if cars brakes were designed like climbing equipment, the driver might be required to brake slowly in order to keep some bolts in the brakes from failing, or to install another redundant series of bolts, just in case the original ones fail, and somebody would consider a sudden unexpected stop gone wrong to be an operator error, with no liability for the car brakes manufacturer.

I hope the examples clarified what I meant.

(edited because "the brake breaks", not the other way around)


(This post was edited by g_i_g_i on Jan 8, 2007, 2:28 PM)


gosharks


Jan 8, 2007, 11:10 PM
Post #28 of 37 (805 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 6, 2004
Posts: 262

Re: [g_i_g_i] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factor_of_safety


petsfed


Jan 9, 2007, 12:32 AM
Post #29 of 37 (796 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571

Re: [g_i_g_i] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I wouldn't say that from an engineering standpoint, climbing equipment is poorly designed. The design goal is "as strong as necessary while still as light as possible". The key is the necessary/possible distinction. Its a poor engineer who designs a machine with an engine 10 or 12 times more powerful than could ever be needed to accomplish the stated goal. Its just woefully inefficient. If you want to see equipment that goes as strong as possible (and thus disregarding all weight requirements), check out the litany of steel carabiners on the market. Sure they can support a bus, but they are far too heavy for amateur use. They only really see usage in the gym and rescue arenas, where the added durability and/or strength is not only handy, but necessary.


g_i_g_i


Jan 9, 2007, 7:56 AM
Post #30 of 37 (780 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2005
Posts: 53

Re: [petsfed] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

petsfed wrote:
I wouldn't say that from an engineering standpoint, climbing equipment is poorly designed.

well, of course, what I'm saying is that it just meets different standards, as we both seem to realize.

As for the safety factor link, it could be misleading because, as I tried to explain before, there is no empirical safety factor accounted for in the design of climbing equipment.


streetshark


Oct 21, 2011, 8:40 AM
Post #31 of 37 (715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 3

Re: [g_i_g_i] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't quite see how the gate is taking any weight or adding any strength (obviously it does, or there wouldn't be a separate 'open-gate strength'). Take a keylock biner for example. The gate has no notch that fits into the nose when closed. So clearly that does not contribute to the open gate strength.

So how does the gate limit the bending (stretching) motion of the biner when loaded? does it prevent the bending outward and snapping off?


Partner j_ung


Oct 21, 2011, 10:18 AM
Post #32 of 37 (692 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681

Re: [streetshark] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

streetshark wrote:
I don't quite see how the gate is taking any weight or adding any strength (obviously it does, or there wouldn't be a separate 'open-gate strength'). Take a keylock biner for example. The gate has no notch that fits into the nose when closed. So clearly that does not contribute to the open gate strength.

So how does the gate limit the bending (stretching) motion of the biner when loaded? does it prevent the bending outward and snapping off?

Take a closer look at your keylock biner and you'll see that it does, in fact, have surfaces that contact each other if the biner deforms enough. As mentioned upthread (and 4 years ago—good revival!) you won't be able to deform the biner by hand. It takes more force, such as that generated in a fall, to bring the surfaces in contact with each other.


shockabuku


Oct 21, 2011, 11:03 AM
Post #33 of 37 (670 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762

Re: [brent_e] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

brent_e wrote:
j_ung wrote:
alexnees wrote:
If a biner is rated at 8kn open and 24 kn closed, and that biner is loaded with, say, 9 kn while closed, why doesn't it deform, stretching open a couple millimeters until the gate prevents it from stretching any more?

It does. That's why the biner is stronger when closed; it can only "stretch" so much before its own shape stops the process. When open, there's nothing to stop it from deforming until it snaps.

this is why you shouldn't tighten your locking biner too much during your rappel. You may feel it and it's loose - don't crank it tight. It will be hard to open again unless loaded.

Which is presumably why loaded, locking carabiners can become unscrewed regardless of how tight you screw them shut while not weighted.


mr_rogers


Oct 21, 2011, 11:25 AM
Post #34 of 37 (655 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 8, 2006
Posts: 57

Re: [j_ung] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
As mentioned upthread (and 4 years ago—good revival!) you won't be able to deform the biner by hand. It takes more force, such as that generated in a fall, to bring the surfaces in contact with each other.

If you'd like to get a "hands on" feel for a 'biner deforming, go bounce test some placements.

I've got Petzl Owals (a beefy, keylock oval) at the business end of my daisy/aider combo. When I bounce test I generally have one hand grabbing the Owal, almost like a handle. I don't weigh much, even with an aid rack, but I can feel the biner flexing when I'm really putting the mojo into the bounce test. It's kinda rad.


(This post was edited by mr_rogers on Oct 21, 2011, 12:24 PM)


dynosore


Oct 21, 2011, 2:03 PM
Post #35 of 37 (624 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1738

Re: [alexnees] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I happen to have a Camp biner here so I did some quick calculations. The open gate rating is 9kn and closed is 22kn. So the difference is 13kn or about 2900 lbf.

I measured the wire gate, and it is 0.0875" diameter. Calculating the cross section you get .006in^2. Multiply by 2 (for 2 wires) and you get .012in^2. Assume a really strong steel, with a yield strength of 100k psi. That gives you 1200 lb breaking force for the wire gate. That's only about 5.3kn. So clearly, the wire itself does NOT take most of the additional 13kn load of closed vs. open gate. I assume, ahem, that the difference is that the closed gate keeps the biner from deforming too far and allows the strongest part, the spine, to do its job and absorb most of the load?


(This post was edited by dynosore on Oct 21, 2011, 2:05 PM)


ceebo


Oct 22, 2011, 6:59 AM
Post #36 of 37 (549 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2009
Posts: 862

Re: [dynosore] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

dynosore wrote:
I happen to have a Camp biner here so I did some quick calculations. The open gate rating is 9kn and closed is 22kn. So the difference is 13kn or about 2900 lbf.

I measured the wire gate, and it is 0.0875" diameter. Calculating the cross section you get .006in^2. Multiply by 2 (for 2 wires) and you get .012in^2. Assume a really strong steel, with a yield strength of 100k psi. That gives you 1200 lb breaking force for the wire gate. That's only about 5.3kn. So clearly, the wire itself does NOT take most of the additional 13kn load of closed vs. open gate. I assume, ahem, that the difference is that the closed gate keeps the biner from deforming too far and allows the strongest part, the spine, to do its job and absorb most of the load?

That depends entirely on the shape of the biner, and possible locations of the rope during impact. Some biners have an acute angle toward the spine so that the rope allways sits on that area. Such biners (like on on quickdraws, although their are slightly bigger screwgate veriants) can afford to be more light weight with a very hollow feel due to the rope always being directed to the strong point. On the negitave side, if for some reason they did get cross or tri loaded they would fail or heavily deform in a medium-large fall.

On the other hand i have a solid rounded steel biner that does not really direct rope to a strong point. The rope can put more force on the gate side of the biner. But, the biner is solid steel.. and so long as the gate is shut it can withstand allot of force, even tri loaded (i think it is still 9kn open gate though). Acute angle ''performance'' biners would brake far ahead of my steely.

Thing is though, its very hard to cross load an acute angle biner becuase either A: it is held in place by the quickdraw sling or B: as a locking biner veriant it is not (should not) really be used in a situation where kn cross loading above its rating should even occur, such as top roping.


snoboy


Oct 24, 2011, 11:15 AM
Post #37 of 37 (452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 19, 2004
Posts: 79

Re: [ceebo] Why is biner open-gate strength lower? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

To those who say that large falls do not reach the yield point of a steel biner... I say they should see a biner that has been used for numerous (probably high 100s, maye 1000s) of drop tests. This was a large steel D biner, and it was signifigantly longer than a brand new one! :o

For those who think wire gates are scary have a look at what holds your solid gates on!?!

In a true oval biner the gate would probably hold only 1/2 the additional load, and in a D, I expect it would hold some smaller percentage. So dynosore's calculations seem to hold true.


Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?
Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook