Forums: Community: Campground:
Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 


Partner philbox
Moderator

Jul 10, 2007, 3:09 PM
Post #1 of 33 (17879 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag
Report this Post
 

I need to remind the users of this forum that nekkid pics need to be linked only and not embedded in posts as images. Please also ensure that the NSFW tag is used.

I hope you all understand that this will help keep this site available to as many people as possible and particularly for all you lazy bums who whould be working in your cubicles. Now get back to work.


the_climber


Jul 10, 2007, 11:21 PM
Post #2 of 33 (17830 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2003
Posts: 6142

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

I would have to agree with the above post... although the cubical remark hurt... as I recently had to move from myown office toa *ahem* *cough* cubical*.....


Working sucks BTW...Unsure


Partner philbox
Moderator

Jul 10, 2007, 11:33 PM
Post #3 of 33 (17822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [the_climber] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

the_climber wrote:
I would have to agree with the above post... although the cubical remark hurt... as I recently had to move from myown office toa *ahem* *cough* cubical*.....


Working sucks BTW...Unsure

I feel your pain.


Partner epoch
Moderator

Jul 11, 2007, 4:00 AM
Post #4 of 33 (17803 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 27, 2005
Posts: 32058

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

yup


(This post was edited by epoch on Jul 11, 2007, 4:01 AM)


imnotclever


Jul 11, 2007, 9:09 AM
Post #5 of 33 (17755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 8, 2003
Posts: 10000

     Re: [epoch] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Wait a second, there were no examples of the right way to do it. I might still do it wrong.

Note to self: If WJCA posts after this one with a link, Don't click on it.


Partner philbox
Moderator

Jul 11, 2007, 2:14 PM
Post #6 of 33 (17705 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [imnotclever] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Well the mods have been discussing just where to draw the line on what should and should not be linked. My suggestion is that if you don't particularly want your work collegues peering over your shoulder and seeing what you are looking at then that photo should be linked.

I am not going to go down the road of being the arbiter of all things good taste. I am not going to say whether one nip or two is acceptable. You guys need to find the balance in what would be apropriate to be viewed in the average cube farm. It really is over to you.

I will however have no hesitation in removing pics that may be either borderline or non acceptable if they are embedded.

If I come across hard core porn even if it is linked then expect to have action taken against you. Sorry to have to put it that way, just trying to be very clear about an area that has innumerable shades of grey.

I think we are all mature enough to know where the line is on these issues. I am certainly not wanting to be the censor of rc.com either. That role is up to each and every individual user, please self censor.


wjca


Jul 11, 2007, 3:12 PM
Post #7 of 33 (17691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7535

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

You just don't like naked breasts, do you Phil? Not that there's anything wrong with that.


Partner philbox
Moderator

Jul 11, 2007, 3:18 PM
Post #8 of 33 (17686 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [wjca] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

wjca wrote:
You just don't like naked breasts, do you Phil? Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Ya seen one naked breast ya wanna see them all. Laugh Just link em is all I am saying.


wjca


Jul 11, 2007, 3:56 PM
Post #9 of 33 (17670 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7535

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

philbox wrote:
wjca wrote:
You just don't like naked breasts, do you Phil? Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Ya seen one naked breast ya wanna see them all. Laugh Just link em is all I am saying.

Dude, I try to lick 'em every chance I get, or at least I did before I got married. Now I only got one pair to lick, and I have to compete with a 10 month old for that. Life ain't always fair. Wait, you said link, didn't you?


carabiner96


Jul 11, 2007, 4:03 PM
Post #10 of 33 (17666 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12520

     Re: [wjca] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

(.)(.)


Partner philbox
Moderator

Jul 11, 2007, 4:23 PM
Post #11 of 33 (17659 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [carabiner96] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

carabiner96 wrote:
(.)(.)

Fuscia spotted tarpit for you missy. You should have licked them, um, linked them, yeah that's the one. Now how can I draw an ascii licker. Lemme see.

(.)(.)-<

Doesn't quite work.


darkside


Jul 17, 2007, 12:01 AM
Post #12 of 33 (17502 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 14, 2001
Posts: 1687

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

 

:P(.)(.)


carabiner96


Jul 17, 2007, 9:55 PM
Post #13 of 33 (17448 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12520

     Re: [darkside] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Pearl Necklace?



8===D --- (.)(.)


Partner cracklover


Jul 20, 2007, 1:03 PM
Post #14 of 33 (17368 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9973

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

I think I need an example of what threads are good/bad?

GO


the_climber


Jul 20, 2007, 11:56 PM
Post #15 of 33 (17343 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2003
Posts: 6142

     Re: [cracklover] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

cracklover wrote:
I think I need an example of what threads are good/bad?

GO

Hmmm, bad.... Brent_e thread and guy's forum...errr thread....


Good... I think you may be logged into the wrong website.... Tongue


(This post was edited by the_climber on Jul 20, 2007, 11:57 PM)


NSFW


Aug 24, 2007, 11:10 AM
Post #16 of 33 (16916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2007
Posts: 2005

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

I have my own tag.

Suck it, beeches. Oh wait:




Partner cracklover


Aug 24, 2007, 10:25 PM
Post #17 of 33 (16887 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9973

     Re: [NSFW] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Hey, what happened to the reference to some bikini site, a couple posts up. I just noticed it was gone. Did that get modded out of existence? If so, why?

GO


Partner philbox
Moderator

Aug 26, 2007, 3:44 PM
Post #18 of 33 (16862 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [cracklover] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

cracklover wrote:
Hey, what happened to the reference to some bikini site, a couple posts up. I just noticed it was gone. Did that get modded out of existence? If so, why?

GO
That post bordered on the edge of soft/hard porn. Links to porn are not tolerated. Mind you I did not mod it but was going to and noticed that someone beat me to it.


If you really must find it then simply google it. It was microkinis or some such site. Way too much money for such teeny weeny bits of cloth. Tongue Laugh


Partner cracklover


Aug 27, 2007, 10:36 AM
Post #19 of 33 (16836 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9973

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

philbox wrote:
cracklover wrote:
Hey, what happened to the reference to some bikini site, a couple posts up. I just noticed it was gone. Did that get modded out of existence? If so, why?

GO
That post bordered on the edge of soft/hard porn. Links to porn are not tolerated. Mind you I did not mod it but was going to and noticed that someone beat me to it.


If you really must find it then simply google it. It was microkinis or some such site. Way too much money for such teeny weeny bits of cloth. Tongue Laugh

Nah, don't need to see it. Just happy to note that I'm not losing my mind.

GO


summitseeker


Sep 29, 2007, 4:16 AM
Post #20 of 33 (16519 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 2, 2006
Posts: 119

     Re: [cracklover] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

So, where's all the nekkid pics???


dr_feelgood


Sep 29, 2007, 5:52 AM
Post #21 of 33 (16511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25720

     Re: [summitseeker] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

summitseeker wrote:
So, where's all the nekkid pics???

Google the word porn...


tongueinbarbie


Oct 7, 2007, 9:33 AM
Post #22 of 33 (16441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 239

     Re: [dr_feelgood] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

I haven't found them either. I have to photograph gils nude to see any photos at all of them.


clausti


Oct 28, 2007, 8:39 PM
Post #23 of 33 (16245 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2004
Posts: 5690

Adult Content
This post contains nudity or adult content. To protect the innocent we require that you register and turn off your Adult Content Filter to read it.


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 28, 2007, 9:00 PM
Post #24 of 33 (16238 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [clausti] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

The thing is would you want the boss to be leaning over your shoulder when you oepened those pics. How about a ten year old opening up a thread in here in front of his teacher while he was researching rock climbing.

If in doubt link it.

If you doubt that the link will cover it because it is far too much like porn then don't link it at all.

Hope this clears things up.

You will never get a straight answer from any of us in management as to what exactly constitutes acceptable images here on rc.com. It is always far too subjective to be assigning the letter of the law to this discussion. Want to sail too close to the wind then expect to be banned for a few weeks then as we have zero tolerance for those trying to push the boundaries. We would far rather the users self censor their own pics by keeping things as simple as possible and merely following the guidelines.

When in doubt, don't, otherwise link it, or not whatever the case may be. Up to you guys to get it right and not for us to be playing the baddy censor guys. We'll merely react to those pushing the envelope, wanna try, we'll always win in the end. I wish it were not so but someone has to do it. Best it be a self regulating thing though as I hate to be the baddy. Hate it with a passion but I will do it.

I still ascribe to the grassroots level of users self regulating this website but on occasion we do have to act to keep things clean and simple.

Do remember to put the NSFW tag on pics that may or may not comply with the above, at least it will give a warning to those not wanting to have a surprise on their screen. I have noticed more than one user complaining that others are forgetting to place the NSFW on doubtful pic posts.

Do the right thing eh. I'll leave it to your own conscience to work out whether you need the NSFW tag on the above pics clausti, you are a big girl now and should be able to work it out eh. Feel free to discuss if you are not able to work it out.


clausti


Oct 28, 2007, 9:07 PM
Post #25 of 33 (16231 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 4, 2004
Posts: 5690

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

dont banz me bro!

dont banz me!



PS your thread is now NSFW. how ironic is that?


snoopy138


Oct 28, 2007, 9:23 PM
Post #26 of 33 (2973 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28727

     Re: [clausti] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

just sitting here, the ptftw


Partner cracklover


Oct 29, 2007, 7:51 PM
Post #27 of 33 (2952 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9973

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

philbox wrote:
Want to sail too close to the wind then expect to be banned for a few weeks then as we have zero tolerance for those trying to push the boundaries.

Really?! For overstepping a boundary that is admittedly impossible to define? That sounds rather draconian. Draconian or not, it's certainly news, so thanks for sharing - good to know!

In reply to:
We would far rather the users self censor their own pics by keeping things as simple as possible and merely following the guidelines.

Indeed - give the dog a powerful enough electric shock if it touches the fence, and it will never get close to any fence ever again. Is that what you want - users to be gunshy of anything that anyone might think of as "too far"?

GO


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 30, 2007, 2:24 PM
Post #28 of 33 (2938 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [cracklover] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

cracklover wrote:
philbox wrote:
Want to sail too close to the wind then expect to be banned for a few weeks then as we have zero tolerance for those trying to push the boundaries.

Really?! For overstepping a boundary that is admittedly impossible to define? That sounds rather draconian. Draconian or not, it's certainly news, so thanks for sharing - good to know!

In reply to:
We would far rather the users self censor their own pics by keeping things as simple as possible and merely following the guidelines.

Indeed - give the dog a powerful enough electric shock if it touches the fence, and it will never get close to any fence ever again. Is that what you want - users to be gunshy of anything that anyone might think of as "too far"?

GO

On the contrary, this has been discussed many times. Yes the boundaries are virtually impossible to define thus the need for self censorship. Generally speaking users know when they are trying to push the boundaries and it becomes somewhat of a game trying to provoke a reaction from management. We have in place several methods of placing material into posts which should cater for almost all tastes. All we ask is that if users are in doubt then simply escalate the placement of that material into the apropriate place i/e either the NSFW for directly placed images or link the material. We do not have any sort of tolerance for hard core porn. Don't even think about linking that material.

I have seen some very creative ways for people to direct other users to the material that they wish others to view even hard core porn without it having to be linked or otherwise viewable from this website. It's not that hard to get your message across if you are that way inclined. We ask this only so that this site is available to the widest cross section of the community and also so that it does not devolve down to the lowest common denominator.


thomasribiere


Oct 30, 2007, 2:31 PM
Post #29 of 33 (2935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

philbox wrote:
cracklover wrote:
philbox wrote:
Want to sail too close to the wind then expect to be banned for a few weeks then as we have zero tolerance for those trying to push the boundaries.

Really?! For overstepping a boundary that is admittedly impossible to define? That sounds rather draconian. Draconian or not, it's certainly news, so thanks for sharing - good to know!

In reply to:
We would far rather the users self censor their own pics by keeping things as simple as possible and merely following the guidelines.

Indeed - give the dog a powerful enough electric shock if it touches the fence, and it will never get close to any fence ever again. Is that what you want - users to be gunshy of anything that anyone might think of as "too far"?

GO

On the contrary, this has been discussed many times. Yes the boundaries are virtually impossible to define thus the need for self censorship. Generally speaking users know when they are trying to push the boundaries and it becomes somewhat of a game trying to provoke a reaction from management. We have in place several methods of placing material into posts which should cater for almost all tastes. All we ask is that if users are in doubt then simply escalate the placement of that material into the apropriate place i/e either the NSFW for directly placed images or link the material. We do not have any sort of tolerance for hard core porn. Don't even think about linking that material.

I have seen some very creative ways for people to direct other users to the material that they wish others to view even hard core porn without it having to be linked or otherwise viewable from this website. It's not that hard to get your message across if you are that way inclined. We ask this only so that this site is available to the widest cross section of the community and also so that it does not devolve down to the lowest common denominator.

Like googling images of daisy chains without filters?


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 30, 2007, 2:48 PM
Post #30 of 33 (2934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [thomasribiere] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Ah, yup Thomas, ceppin I ain't ever going there mate.

Google is an awesome tool for finding images and other stuff so ifn youse are wanting to let everyone know your adolescent fantasies, don't bring em in here just let everyone know how to find it for themselves. Gotta keep a bit of mystery happening eh.


thomasribiere


Oct 30, 2007, 2:58 PM
Post #31 of 33 (2929 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9305

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

philbox wrote:
Ah, yup Thomas, ceppin I ain't ever going there mate.

Google is an awesome tool for finding images and other stuff so ifn youse are wanting to let everyone know your adolescent fantasies, don't bring em in here just let everyone know how to find it for themselves. Gotta keep a bit of mystery happening eh.

This idea was brought to me by another poster in the daisy-chains thread that I started in the gear forum. I always turn my filter on. Wink


Partner cracklover


Oct 30, 2007, 5:06 PM
Post #32 of 33 (2922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9973

     Re: [philbox] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Phil, I honestly don't understand. You say:

philbox wrote:
...expect to be banned for a few weeks then as we have zero tolerance for those trying to push the boundaries.

But isn't that exactly what clausti was doing earlier? Trying to push the boundaries? I'm not aiming to get her banned, I'm trying to clarify what is to me a very confusing and new regulation.

And when I say "new", I should clarify. The last time I saw the issue of nudity on rc.com discussed and clarified was in the aftermath of the singles of rc.com thread. What you are describing above is definitely not what was stated at that time. If I missed an important announcement in the intervening time period, forgive me, and please point me to it.

And for whatever it's worth, as a contributor to this site in many ways, I don't agree that pushing boundaries (as Clausti did earlier in ths thread) is a good reason to be banned, unless it becomes disruptive to the operation of this site.

Thanks,

GO


Partner philbox
Moderator

Oct 30, 2007, 5:36 PM
Post #33 of 33 (2917 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 13104

     Re: [cracklover] Nekkid pics and the NSFW tag [In reply to]
Report this Post
 

Notice that she wasn't banned. clausti in fact corrected her post with the NSFW tag.

What we are talking about here is the blow ins who drop in a drive by shooting type of penish pics that violate our policy of NSFW images. Yes we do have a zero tolerance for those just wanting to push our buttons as mods. That statement was more aimed at the blow ins though. We do however extend the curtesy of allowing the long term members more latitude to fix issues that we bring to their notice. This may seem totally confusing but there is method to our madness.

We do discuss this sort of stuff in the mods and eds forum and do not simply ban people on a whim. It does take a lot to get banned here on rc.com. Of course the blow ins get short shifted outta here with very little discussion. You'll notice that missus foofanga of Nigeria with her scams doesn't long at all. Another issue entirely I know but it demonstrates that not all users are treated the same.

If you have a long and valued post history here then we are far less inclined to drop the hammer on you for whatever transgression may raise our hackles. I would hope that by the time one has gotten a long history here that one would know the conventions that one posts by.


The above pronouncements were in fact an attempt to clarify the existing policies of how we treat offensive or borderline images embedded in posts. It has always been a problematic issue and it seems the issue goes around and around in ever diminishing circles until someone gets banned or otherwise leaves the site in a huff. As I said more an attempt to clarify and also to reiterate.


Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?
$1.35 (10% off)
$26.96 (10% off)
$49.46 (10% off)
$35.96 (10% off)



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook