Forums: Climbing Information: Access Issues & Closures:
Draper's Bluff access
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Access Issues & Closures

Premier Sponsor:

 


ericulner


May 17, 2009, 3:55 PM
Post #1 of 46 (17246 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2003
Posts: 54

Draper's Bluff access
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Date: May 17, 2009
To: An Open Letter to the Climbing Community
From: Eric and Kathy Ulner
Re: Draper's Bluff access

It is with great regret that we announce the immediate closure of our Draper's Bluff property to climbing and any general recreational use. We had allowed the general public open (day) access to our property from the date of our purchasing it in October, 1996 through autumn of 2008. In the latter part of 2008, due to ongoing annoyances caused by non-climbers, we posted signage indicating No Access to non-climbers. We had experienced several occasions where non-climbers were acting irresponsibly and had endangered the physical wellbeing of climbers.

Just this past week, we were informed that (unbeknownst to us) the Legislature of the State of Illinois had made a significant change in the language of the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act. The Act can be read in its entirety here:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2081&ChapAct=745%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B65%2F&ChapterID=58&ChapterName=CIVIL+IMMUNITIES&ActName=Recreational+Use+of+Land+and+Water+Areas+Act.

For many many years, the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act protected private landowners from liability by essentially stating that as long as a property owner did not charge admission, they would have a greatly limited liability if the entrant was present for recreation or conservation purposes. This language has been changed to hunting or recreational shooting only.

With this change, any private property owner in Illinois can be held liable for a hiker's sprained ankle, an equestrian's injury from being thrown from a horse, a drowning from a fishing accident, or a climber's groundfall injury. Whoever the lawmakers are that voted for this change should be held responsible in the next election cycle. We can think of only one reason that such a change in this Act would take place...money. There are dollar signs in they eyes of trial lawyers who would stand to gain from the increase in lawsuits. No one can convince us that there was no lobbying taking place by trial lawyers for this change.

We never thought we would see the day that we would have to close Draper's Bluff to climbing. It has been a pleasure to meet new climbers from the area and those passing through. Many of our friendships have been forged in this way. We are left with no choice, though, but to close our property to anyone. We have but one house to live in and are not willing to risk it to pay off the grieving family of a climbing fatality or lifelong rehab expenses of a spinal injury. Unfortunately, there are people out there who will not take responsibility for their own actions, trial lawyers who smell money, and legislators who cater to both.

We encourage the climbing community to become active in seeing a change in this legislation. We wish to be able to re-open our property to the climbing community. More information regarding this and what can be done will be posted at www.ilclimbers.org


guangzhou


May 17, 2009, 5:26 PM
Post #2 of 46 (17219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Eric,

Wow, who would have ever guessed it would come to this for Drappers. At least while you owned it. I wonder, would it be possible to insure the property to protect you. Maybe with climbers donating the fund to cover the insurance. Drapers is such a valued recourse in that part of the country.

I'll help you spread the word.
Good Luck
Eman
In Indonesia now. We have no access problems here.


veganclimber


May 17, 2009, 6:35 PM
Post #3 of 46 (17199 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2775

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Frown

Thanks for letting us play in your backyard for so long. Too bad the lawyers had to ruin it.

In reply to:
With this change, any private property owner in Illinois can be held liable for a hiker's sprained ankle, an equestrian's injury from being thrown from a horse, a drowning from a fishing accident, or a climber's groundfall injury.

What is this country coming to?


shrug7


May 17, 2009, 6:49 PM
Post #4 of 46 (17185 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 866

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Eric,

I've met you a couple times in my years climbing at Drapers, Thank you for the years of fun that you allow us all to have.

Hopefully maybe, they change this.

~Mike


czo


May 17, 2009, 6:53 PM
Post #5 of 46 (17178 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 46

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've never climbed in Illinois, but I appreciate the well written and genuine letter you've presented here. Thank you for being rational and hopefully the climbers in the area can work towards changing the laws.


guangzhou


May 17, 2009, 7:17 PM
Post #6 of 46 (17170 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388

Re: [czo] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

czo wrote:
I've never climbed in Illinois, but I appreciate the well written and genuine letter you've presented here. Thank you for being rational and hopefully the climbers in the area can work towards changing the laws.

Not sure you know, but Eric is a very pro-active climber. In both new routes and access issues.

Eric, we did get the law changed in TN when I was dealing with some of the King's Bluff Access issues.

We also had a lawyer look in a access card that required a liability waiver. The law was amended before we finished exploring that option.

How does this effect other area like Cedar, Giant, and Jackson Falls?

Again, let me know if I can help somehow.

Eman


potreroed


May 17, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #7 of 46 (17169 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2001
Posts: 1440

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't have time right now to read the whole law but wouldn't it be possible to have climbers sign a release of liability and not allow non-climbers access at all?


klong


May 17, 2009, 11:56 PM
Post #8 of 46 (17118 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 19, 2003
Posts: 28

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
Bill HB4175 was sponsored by: Michael W. Tryon does ammends the ILCS to include "snow mobiling"

Bill HB0494 which would include "Excercise" as a form of recreation amongst other things.

The bill HB0494 is prefered version since it includes "excercise" as recreation.

Both of these are bills in the IL house.

Hope the information provides assistance.


(This post was edited by klong on May 18, 2009, 12:29 AM)


guangzhou


May 18, 2009, 12:18 AM
Post #9 of 46 (17111 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388

Re: [klong] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

klong wrote:
Bill HB4175 was sponsored by: Michael W. Tryon

His contact information is as follows:

Springfield Office:
201-N Stratton Office Building
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-0432
(217) 782-3189 FAX

District Office:
1 N. Virginia St.
Crystal Lake, IL 60014
(815) 459-6453
(815) 455-8284 FAX
McHenry County

Bill HB0494 which was the precursor was benign and did include "Excercise" as a form of recreation amongst other things.

I would contact the above representative and make sure he knows your stand on the issue.

Hope the information provides assistance.

Exercise doesn't count as recreation? Just curious, nothing more.

We have become a lawsuit nation.

E


lostparrot


May 18, 2009, 1:02 AM
Post #10 of 46 (17106 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 28, 2007
Posts: 149

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sorry to hear this great place is now closed due to the stupidity of our elected officials. We were just at Draper's a month ago and had a GREAT TIME. Hopefully, we can do something to get this law changed. Maybe Access Fund could help?
My condonlences Eric, and to all climbers. Hope to see you at Jackson's.


ericulner


May 18, 2009, 5:23 AM
Post #11 of 46 (17067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2003
Posts: 54

Re: Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Regarding the House Bills that call for further amendment of the language, yes there are a few legislators who have tried to return the Act to a sensible read. I've been informed that it is indeed the lobbyists representing the IL Trial Lawyers Association who are at the forefront of keeping the scope of the Act so limited.

Kathy and I are completely willing and open to entertain all options that may allow us to return to the open-for-climbing-access once had. We took a stroll along the cliff yesterday. It did seem very strangely quiet. The calls for rope, belay on/off, etc. that we can hear from the house often would give me a warm, fuzzy feeling, being a climber.

I've got feeling that this issue may take a while to sort out. Hoping not too long for the climbing community's sake. What an irony I felt yesterday- I'm the president of the Illinois Climbers Association and I posted a no-climbing sign...


jbroom


May 18, 2009, 5:56 AM
Post #12 of 46 (17057 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 31, 2008
Posts: 55

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A sad day for So Ill indeed. I have spent quite a few days in the past climbing in the coolest backyard ever. Thank you Eric, Kathy and Lucas for letting us all enjoy it while it lasted. Hopefully change can happen down the road.
Jeremy


ClimbitToday


May 18, 2009, 7:33 AM
Post #13 of 46 (17012 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 13

Re: [jbroom] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think I am going to need therapy. I am depressed from learning of this and hope something will be done to change the law!


ClimbitToday


May 18, 2009, 8:53 AM
Post #14 of 46 (16940 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 13

Re: [ClimbitToday] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Everyone should send an e-mail to the state rep http://michaeltryon.com/index.php?option=com_contact&task=view&contact_id=1&Itemid


boondock_saint


May 18, 2009, 9:23 AM
Post #15 of 46 (16901 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [klong] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

klong wrote:
Bill HB4175 was sponsored by: Michael W. Tryon does ammends the ILCS to include "snow mobiling"

Bill HB0494 which would include "Excercise" as a form of recreation amongst other things.

The bill HB0494 is prefered version since it includes "excercise" as recreation.

Both of these are bills in the IL house.

Hope the information provides assistance.

Small correction:

HB4175 is CRIM CD-SEXUAL RELATION-FAMILY (makes some amendments to definition of "family member" in cases of sexual assault, etc.)

HB4176 is RECR LAND USE-SNOWMOBILING

I'm not sure if there is any point in non-residents writing to the sponsor of the bill as we cannot really affect them with votes.

One thing I find interesting, is that Michael W. Tyron, along with three other legislators, has been added as a co-sponsor of the HB0494 bill. The original sponsor of the HB0494 bill is John A. Fritchey, so I encourage everyone to contact him as well, and thank him for introducing a bill that makes a bit more sense. Also let him know there there are lot of people out there who care deeply about the outcome of this bill. Eric's case may be a great example of how the other version of the bill would affect citizens throughout the state of Illinois and beyond!

I would really like to know who introduced the original version that left hunting and shooting (or any combination thereof) but removed EVERY OTHER activity ... I guess the NRA had some input on this bill as well?

Anyway John A. Fritchey's contact info:

Springfield Office:
200-7S Stratton Office Building
Springfield, IL 62706
(217) 782-2458
(217) 557-7214 FAX
District Office:
2539 North Southport Avenue
Chicago, IL 60614
(773) 871-4000
(773) 871-4012 FAX
Cook County


boondock_saint


May 18, 2009, 9:42 AM
Post #16 of 46 (16873 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [ClimbitToday] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ClimbitToday wrote:
Everyone should send an e-mail to the state rep http://michaeltryon.com/index.php?option=com_contact&task=view&contact_id=1&Itemid

Easy there John, for all I can tell he just added snowmobiling. I'm still trying to find out who made the original change that removed everything else. Or if this was this a new bill? This is somewhat confusing: There are two bills in the Civil Immunities section:
745 ILCS 65/Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act.
745 ILCS 67/State of Illinois Recreational Use of Leased Land Act.

745 ILCS 65 states that "Recreational or conservation purpose" means entry onto the land of another to conduct hunting or recreational shooting or a combination thereof or any activity solely related to the aforesaid hunting or recreational shooting.

745 ILCS 67 states that "Recreational use" means any activity undertaken for conservation, resource management, exercise, or recreation on leased land.

Any lawyers care to explain what is up? How can there be two bills that have such different wording?

65: http://www.ilga.gov/...and+Water+Areas+Act.
67: http://www.ilga.gov/...+of+Leased+Land+Act.


Capt_Dirty_Pantaloons


May 18, 2009, 9:43 AM
Post #17 of 46 (16872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 14, 2008
Posts: 37

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boondock_saint wrote:


I'm not sure if there is any point in non-residents writing to the sponsor of the bill as we cannot really affect them with votes.

From a non-resident perspective the loss of possible revenue from tourist dollars may have a little sway in the matter. Not enough to make anyone say"Oh crap what was I thinking, I am a dumb monkey", but how much extra revenue do lawyers winning lawsuits generate for local business?


gasherbrum


May 18, 2009, 9:56 AM
Post #18 of 46 (16838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 7

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

John Fritchey is my state rep. I sent him the following email today:

I live in Ravenswood, Chicago, in your district. I have voted for you consistently.

I understand you were responsible for a bill involving the use of recreational lands in Illinois. I am a rock climber of 30 years, having built two climbing gyms in your district, and an architect working in Illinois, and Chicago.

I believe the act forces a liability on a private landowner for climbing and hiking accidents incurred on their land. This has resulted in the closure of one of the best known and used areas in Illinois, Draper's Bluff in Southern Illinois.

Access to these areas is difficult at best, and the use of legislation to increase the difficulty of use is one of the greatest problems we face now and in the future. Climbing is one of the most benign, statistically safe, and eco friendly uses of private and public lands. We are looking at a future in which use and access will be restricted to those who can afford the cost of restrictions, or afford the cost of lobbying to protect a special interest.

I count on you to repair, ammend, or rescind the language in the legislation that results in this form of access restriction.

Yours truly,

Erol Altay
4746 N. Virginia
Chicago, Illinois 60625


gasherbrum


May 18, 2009, 9:59 AM
Post #19 of 46 (16833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 7

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

However, as a further note, I got the following reply from John Fritchey immediately:

Mr. Altay,


Just to clarify, I am the sponsor of legislation which would re-open lands for these purposes, and have been working with Openlands and numerous other groups in an effort to pass the bill in order to address issues just like those which you raise. Thank you for reaching out to me on this matter.


- Rep. John Fritchey


annecy007


May 18, 2009, 10:25 AM
Post #20 of 46 (16795 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2009
Posts: 1

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 Eric and Kathy,

Your kindness and efforts regarding Drapers have been above and beyond for many years. Your back yard is a special place, but your family's security and your contributions to this community are far more precious. Thank you for all you have done for our area in SoIL and I hope we as a community can give back by contacting the legislators. I never took a full moon on the cliff for granted.

Anne


climberjevans


May 18, 2009, 10:40 AM
Post #21 of 46 (16782 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2007
Posts: 5

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I urge everyone who lives in Illinois call their Representatives and let them know you want protection put back into the bill for recreation. I just got off the phone with Hoffman and Flitchey's offices. Please don't hesitate, call now!
In reply to:


boondock_saint


May 18, 2009, 11:30 AM
Post #22 of 46 (16729 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [climberjevans] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberjevans wrote:
I urge everyone who lives in Illinois call their Representatives and let them know you want protection put back into the bill for recreation. I just got off the phone with Hoffman and Flitchey's offices. Please don't hesitate, call now!

Jeff what did they say? Has anyone asked about how this bill got started/who introduced it/why everything except for guns-related activities was not included?

Please let us know what the representatives said if you do not mind.


(This post was edited by boondock_saint on May 18, 2009, 11:54 AM)


rock_fencer


May 18, 2009, 11:55 AM
Post #23 of 46 (16699 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 7, 2005
Posts: 752

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Very very sad considering Drapers is the premier Trad crag of IL.

Eric has done a phenomenal job of allowing us access to his back yard.

Perhaps this is a chance for the access fund to help out legaly with rectifying this.


boondock_saint


May 18, 2009, 1:29 PM
Post #24 of 46 (16602 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [rock_fencer] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I spent some time looking around the Illinois legislature site and it is very confusing. I've tried to trace bills to other bills, and see what happened where. I'm not a lawyer and not very familiar with the categorization and archiving of the bills that have been introduced. I've stumbled upon numerous introductions to amendments and whatnot like this one from the 95th assembly.

In reply to:
95TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2007 and 2008
SB0146


Introduced 1/31/2007, by Sen. Deanna Demuzio


SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:

745 ILCS 65/2 from Ch. 70, par. 32

Amends the Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act. Provides that the definition of "recreational or conservation purpose" is enlarged to include: hiking, operating an off-highway vehicle, rock climbing, trapping, horseback riding on the rider's own horse, fishing, swimming, boating, camping, picnicking, water or snow skiing, sledding, snowmobiling, engaging in an activity with an educational or conservation purpose, a combination of any of those activities, or any activity solely related to any listed activity (at present, only hunting, recreational shooting, a combination of those 2 activities, or any activity solely related to hunting or shooting are included in the definition). Effective immediately.

Where's Reno when you need him? Could use some input on just wtf is going on? Would anyone care to contact their rep and find out how long this language has been in its current form? Is that indeed the current form?

Rather than everyone shooting from the hip, we should find out what exactly the current language of the law says and what the bills mentioned in the above posts intend to do.


jkasmann


May 18, 2009, 2:23 PM
Post #25 of 46 (16560 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 31, 2007
Posts: 7

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boondock_saint wrote:
Easy there John, for all I can tell he just added snowmobiling. I'm still trying to find out who made the original change that removed everything else. Or if this was this a new bill? This is somewhat confusing: There are two bills in the Civil Immunities section:
745 ILCS 65/Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act.
745 ILCS 67/State of Illinois Recreational Use of Leased Land Act.

745 ILCS 65 states that "Recreational or conservation purpose" means entry onto the land of another to conduct hunting or recreational shooting or a combination thereof or any activity solely related to the aforesaid hunting or recreational shooting.

745 ILCS 67 states that "Recreational use" means any activity undertaken for conservation, resource management, exercise, or recreation on leased land.

Any lawyers care to explain what is up? How can there be two bills that have such different wording?

65: http://www.ilga.gov/...and+Water+Areas+Act.
67: http://www.ilga.gov/...+of+Leased+Land+Act.

My interpretation of the IL statutes is that "745 ILCS 67/State of Illinois Recreational Use of Leased Land Act" only applies to land that is leased by an owner to the state - not the case with Draper's.

I see two current proposed modifications to 745 ILCS 65, with different language:
http://www.ilga.gov/...6/HB/09600HB4176.htm - submitted by Michael W. Tryon, to add snowmobiling
http://www.ilga.gov/...6/HB/09600HB0494.htm - submitted by John A. Fritchey, to add "conservation, restoration, resource management, education, nature study and exploration, exercise, outdoor recreational use, any combination thereof"

It looks like the status of both of these bills is "Re-referred to Rules Committee". Would it help to contact the members of the rules committee? Here they are: http://www.ilga.gov/...tteeID=602&GA=96.


waynebock


May 18, 2009, 6:27 PM
Post #26 of 46 (4145 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2005
Posts: 15

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Eric,

I am disheartened to hear about the closure...
we were heading down this weekend with your book in hand...

I (we) want to be of any help that I can...
I will await the post on http://www.ilclimbers.org
as to what I can do...

All: For those of you that don't know...
Eric wrote a guidebook for Southern Illinois called Vertical Heartland...
http://www.verticalheartland.com/VerticalHeartland.html

(Shameless plug, but well deserved...) Tongue


guangzhou


May 18, 2009, 8:06 PM
Post #27 of 46 (4123 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388

Re: [waynebock] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's been a long time since my last trip to Drapers. I do remember, some boulderer were developing some new problems. They had a water compressor up there to help clean the boulders.

Ant Killer and the 5.7 to the left who's name escapes me now are awesome lines. I did my first 5.13 at Drapper's Bluff too.

Eric, Are Cedar, Jackson, and Giant under closure threats too.

Again, let me know how I can help,
Eman


boondock_saint


May 18, 2009, 9:33 PM
Post #28 of 46 (4105 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [guangzhou] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You're thinking of the "C" Crack which is left of Ant Killer. I don't think this will affect the other areas as they are not located on private property.


MS1


May 19, 2009, 6:00 AM
Post #29 of 46 (4083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

boondock_saint wrote:
ClimbitToday wrote:
Everyone should send an e-mail to the state rep http://michaeltryon.com/index.php?option=com_contact&task=view&contact_id=1&Itemid

Easy there John, for all I can tell he just added snowmobiling. I'm still trying to find out who made the original change that removed everything else. Or if this was this a new bill? This is somewhat confusing: There are two bills in the Civil Immunities section:
745 ILCS 65/Recreational Use of Land and Water Areas Act.
745 ILCS 67/State of Illinois Recreational Use of Leased Land Act.

745 ILCS 65 states that "Recreational or conservation purpose" means entry onto the land of another to conduct hunting or recreational shooting or a combination thereof or any activity solely related to the aforesaid hunting or recreational shooting.

745 ILCS 67 states that "Recreational use" means any activity undertaken for conservation, resource management, exercise, or recreation on leased land.

Any lawyers care to explain what is up? How can there be two bills that have such different wording?

65: http://www.ilga.gov/...and+Water+Areas+Act.
67: http://www.ilga.gov/...+of+Leased+Land+Act.

Two different statutes can define similar terms differently; that's pretty normal in statutory drafting. You just use the definition in each only with respect to that statute, and not with respect to the other.


MS1


May 19, 2009, 6:21 AM
Post #30 of 46 (4077 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [jkasmann] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jkasmann wrote:
My interpretation of the IL statutes is that "745 ILCS 67/State of Illinois Recreational Use of Leased Land Act" only applies to land that is leased by an owner to the state - not the case with Draper's.

This is my read as well. So I think that under current law, there would be two options to reopen access w/ limited liability: Either work out a nominal lease to the DNR that preserves climber access, or else use an approach like that applied to Muir Valley in the RRG: Post signs indicating that anyone who enters the land without first signing a liability waiver (made available online) is a trespasser. The only shortcoming of the second option is that, in Illinois, there is a "frequent trespasser" doctrine, under which landowners can become liable for hazards on their land if they know that trespassers regularly enter it. So the liability-waiver approach could work only so long as most climbers cooperate by actually filling out the waivers.


(This post was edited by MS1 on May 19, 2009, 9:45 AM)


boondock_saint


May 19, 2009, 7:08 AM
Post #31 of 46 (4068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [MS1] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ok so after some searching I think I've finally got it.

The current statute 745 ILCS 65 references Public Act (P.A. 94-0625 effective 8-18-2005). I looked up the PA which can be found in the 94th Assembly and then I found the bill with which it originated. The bill was SB0251 and was introduced by Sen. Deanna Demuzio. One of the purposes of this bill was to change ".. the definition of "recreational or conservation purpose" to include hunting, hiking, recreational shooting, operation of an off-highway vehicle, rock climbing, trapping, horseback riding of an entrant's own horse or horses, fishing, swimming, boating, camping, picnicking, water or snow skiing, sledding, and snowmobiling."

I don't know what it said before that as very little data is available for the sources in the 85th Assembly.

Anyway, it was all fine and dandy until House Amendment 001 introduced by the Agriculture and Conservation Committee. Here is the relevant change:

(c) "Recreational or conservation purpose" means entry onto the land of another to conduct hunting or recreational shooting or a combination thereof or any activity solely related to the aforesaid hunting or recreational shooting any activity undertaken for conservation, resource management, exercise, education, relaxation, or pleasure on land owned by another.
(Underlined parts were added, bolds parts were deleted.) Link to Amendment: http://www.ilga.gov/...;GAID=8&Session=

The members of the Agriculture and Conservation Committee in the 94th assembly were the following individuals:
Chairperson : Kurt M. Granberg D
Vice-Chairperson : Brandon W. Phelps D
Republican Spokesperson : Donald L. Moffitt R
Member: Mike Boland D
Member: Shane Cultra R
Member: Lisa M. Dugan D
Member: Robert F. Flider D
Member: Jack McGuire D
Member: Richard P. Myers R
Member: Robert W. Pritchard R
Member: David Reis R
Member: Dan Reitz D
Member: Jim Sacia R
Member: Keith P. Sommer R
Member: Patrick J Verschoore D

Link to Committee: http://www.ilga.gov/...&committeeID=209

Now before you go on sending angry emails, please don't take what I've posted here as gospel. I've done some research into when and how this started and this is what I found. Feel free to check what I did an follow up yourself as I make no claim to know what I'm doing in regards to laws and statutes.

That said, I think the smartest action would be to contact Rep. John Fritchey (http://www.fritchey.com/) and tell him how important his amendment is people in Illinois as well as out-of-state visitors. Probably a good idea to ask on what we as a community should do, rather the emailing committees and subcommittees at random. If you're just tuning in, Fritchey introduced a bill that would put other activities besides shooting and hunting into the statute.

I hope this helps everyone understand a little bit about what is going on and you can do to help open this area for climbing again, without putting Eric and his family in danger of losing everything because of some frivolous lawsuit.


wonderwoman


May 19, 2009, 7:40 AM
Post #32 of 46 (4049 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4269

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Moved from General to Access Issues & Closures by WW.


Becknology


May 19, 2009, 7:42 AM
Post #33 of 46 (4047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2009
Posts: 44

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This is awful! Eric, I am so sorry to hear of this tremendous loss. Although I have not climbed at Draper's, I still appreciate all you have done for the climbing community over the years.

I second the hope that the Access Fund can help. Becknology Rock Climbing Guides will also help spread the word through our online marketing. I pray that this will be a temporary closure.

-Adam


montgomerywick


May 19, 2009, 9:38 AM
Post #34 of 46 (4018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 60

Re: [MS1] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

MS1 wrote:

This is my read as well. So I think that under current law, there would be two options to reopen access w/ limited liability: Either work out a nominal lease to the DNR that preserves climber access, or else use an approach like that applied to Muir Valley in the RRG: Post signs indicating that anyone who enters the land without first signing a liability waiver (made available online) is a trespasser. The only shortcoming of the second option is that, in Illinois, there is a "frequent trespasser" doctrine, under which landowners can become liable for hazards on their land if they know that trespassers regularly enter it. So the liability-waiver approach could work only so long as most climber's cooperate by actually filling out the waivers.

OR short term solution is to parcel out the cliff face, top-put and area 10-20' downslope and convey to a nonprofit corp holding company who leases out to ICA to manage and implement a waiver system. Youc could, if desired, charge a nonimal fee for administration of system and cost of insurance to indemnify lessor and D&O of lessor. I am sure the Access Fund would provide a grant to cover cost of such, if an to the extent ICA could not raise funds to cover.

As far as amending 745 ICLS 65/1, if Fritchey is authoring the most liberal bill, someone (ICA) should contact the Sierra Club, Access Fund, etc, to have them lobby him as well. He touts the support of the Sierra Club on his website.

If and when the bill is amended, you would then drop the charge of a nominal fee or scrap the system entirely...

As far as trying to reduce premises liability to the duties owed a trespasser by posting trespassing signs, you (MS1) brought up the (easy) argument to counter that.


MS1


May 19, 2009, 9:49 AM
Post #35 of 46 (4011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [montgomerywick] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, the frequent trespasser exception only applies if the landowner has notice of frequent trespassers. Since climbers who sign the liability waivers would NOT be trespassers, the exception would only apply if the landowners learned that climbers were frequently climbing without filling out the waivers. So if the climbing community mostly behaves itself, this could still be a workable solution.

Or am I missing something?


(This post was edited by MS1 on May 19, 2009, 9:52 AM)


boondock_saint


May 19, 2009, 10:07 AM
Post #36 of 46 (4001 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [MS1] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

MS1 wrote:
So if the climbing community mostly behaves itself, this could still be a workable solution.

Or am I missing something?

It would be nice if one could trust people to behave themselves, but there's always that 1%.

Anyway, there is a sign in booth at Draper's so it wouldn't be a problem to make it easy for people to sign the waver as they enter. The question is how to enforce it? Post a big sign that says you're trespassing unless you sign the waiver, etc.


MS1


May 19, 2009, 10:13 AM
Post #37 of 46 (3998 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

People seem to be pretty good about signing the forms at Muir in RRG. I guess we might get into tricky questions about how frequent it really has to be. But it seems to be working for the Webers. http://www.muirvalley.com/warnings-rules.php


(This post was edited by MS1 on May 19, 2009, 10:14 AM)


klong


May 19, 2009, 11:32 AM
Post #38 of 46 (3974 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 19, 2003
Posts: 28

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hi Z,

I think this is probably best left up to the ICA or access fund to lobby the representatives. If I were in Eric's shoes I'd want the language to specifically include "Rock Climbing" vs something general like "excercise".

This is truely a profound loss for the southern IL climbing community. Many thanks to Eric and Kathy for the years of usage and development of Drapers Bluf. I'm looking forward to the day it will be open again to climbers.

Ken Long


montgomerywick


May 19, 2009, 11:54 AM
Post #39 of 46 (3968 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 60

Re: [MS1] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

MS1 wrote:
People seem to be pretty good about signing the forms at Muir in RRG. I guess we might get into tricky questions about how frequent it really has to be. But it seems to be working for the Webers. http://www.muirvalley.com/warnings-rules.php

If the waiver system is enforced, then those who buck it, trespass and are injured would have a tough time being treated as other than a trespasser. But a half hearted waiver system may not work as it is foreseeable that a crag with a guidebook and internet directions would have many visitors and it would be harder to argue they were trespassers.

responding to Ken, I don't think it hurts to lobby any state rep to amend 745 ICLS 65/1 and ask that it be expanded to include specifically climbing & hiking. The more of us they hear from, the better....So long as an email, letter or call is done in a mature and professional manner. For example, don't lobby your point and argue an irrelevant issue such as "trial lawyers just want to be able to sue landowners." Fritchey is a lawyer, as are most state representatives...


Upperlimits


May 19, 2009, 1:48 PM
Post #40 of 46 (3934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 42

Re: [montgomerywick] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow, Shocked and disappointed I am.

I've been working a trad project there for a while. I'm really disappointed that I won't ever get to send that one as it's an absolute classic.

Really have been impressed that this area has been open to climbers. My thanks to Eric and Kathy for the access I did have.

After reading the bill here..... hhmmmm..

"Recreational or conservation purpose" means entry onto the land of another to conduct hunting or recreational shooting or a combination thereof or any activity solely related to the aforesaid hunting or recreational shooting

Perhaps if I promise to shoot something while there. I can just add my Glock Pistol to my rack and we should be covered. Right? ;)

I'll contact my friends in IL to do what I can.


(This post was edited by Upperlimits on May 19, 2009, 1:49 PM)


boondock_saint


May 19, 2009, 2:47 PM
Post #41 of 46 (3917 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157

Re: [montgomerywick] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

montgomerywick wrote:
The more of us they hear from, the better....So long as an email, letter or call is done in a mature and professional manner. For example, don't lobby your point and argue an irrelevant issue such as "trial lawyers just want to be able to sue landowners." Fritchey is a lawyer, as are most state representatives...

I agree 100%. The reason I went through all the trouble of finding out where and how the changes originated is because I saw several things about "contact this guy (Tryon) immediately ..." and as it turns out the guy just added snowmobiling (which is a really interesting addition in its own right - i mean .. illinois and snowmobiling just doesn't seem right.)


Access_Fund


May 20, 2009, 1:24 PM
Post #42 of 46 (3847 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2009
Posts: 13

Re: [boondock_saint] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

We just wanted to let everyone know that the Access Fund has reached out to Eric and Kathy to discuss some potential risk management strategies for Draper’s Bluff. We're also looking to coordinate with Eric and the Illinois Climbers Association, as well as the local Access Fund regional coordinator in Illinois, to begin putting together a political advocacy strategy to address this issue at the state legislative level. Part of our collective strategy will definitely need to be a letter writing campaign to harness the voices of the climbing community. Please stay tuned to Illinois Climbers Association/Access Fund news and action alerts to learn how you can contribute to an organized effort to address this legislative issue.

If you’re not already signed up for Access Fund action alerts, you can do so at http://www.accessfund.org/enews. Or if you’re only interested in this issue, feel free to contact us and we’ll add you to our communications list for this particular issue.


Keithb2461


Jun 2, 2009, 2:39 PM
Post #43 of 46 (3588 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 2, 2009
Posts: 1

Re: [waynebock] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It looks like at the least we should be contacting our local elected officials and letting them know that they should change the wording of 745ILCS to INCLUDE "Rock Climbing" and Hiking.....

I agree that the letters should be penned such that the inference to the trail lawyers being a part of this is downplayed.

I am the liaison for our climbing club, the CMC, to the Access Fund and contacted Amy Anssari the Grass Roots Coordinator and she said they are working on this issue.

I am going to send out an e-mail to all of those in our club to contact their elected officials....a sample wording will be included..


mccarthykm


Jul 7, 2009, 5:24 AM
Post #44 of 46 (3355 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 16, 2004
Posts: 194

Re: [Keithb2461] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Excellent posts everyone I was feeling completely devastated when I learned of the closure. I'm sure I'm not the only Missouri resident feeling a little helpless right now but I will continue to check in and help with any letter writing or action events that I can.


shanz


Sep 6, 2009, 9:28 PM
Post #45 of 46 (3156 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 18, 2004
Posts: 702

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

very depressing news though it has been a year or so since i have been to drapers, this is a place i called home. Eric and Kathy im sorry to hear that this has happened i know how hard you both have worked to keep drapers alive and the countless days you have spent working on it. Ive spent so much time at drapers and miss the place. Ive met so many great people and having the place close is just not right. Ill say some prayers and write some letters, hopefully that will help. Thank you again


climberjevans


May 5, 2010, 12:31 PM
Post #46 of 46 (2483 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 17, 2007
Posts: 5

Re: [ericulner] Draper's Bluff access [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Help us get Drapers Bluff reopened. The Illinois General Assembly has a bill in the House, HB 6072, that will provide protection to private landowners, Drapers Bluff and Holy Boulders, if passed. Whether you live in Illinois or are out of state, you can help!

1. Visit the ICA's http://www.ilclimbers.org website to read more about what to do.

2. The Access Fund has an action alert http://www.accessfund.org/...208267&aid=14216 that simplifies the process.

Please help us once again establish protection for private landowners from lawsuits!

Illinois Climbers Association


Forums : Climbing Information : Access Issues & Closures

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook