 |

j_ung
Oct 13, 2009, 9:19 AM
Post #27 of 32
(1491 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
^^ That's what I pictured when I first read the OP. I've done similar things before involving loose-but-semi-fixed flakes in cracks, but I confess, I have no idea if it would have worked if needed. At the time, I imagined it might come down to leverage (were the cams placed so as not to simply see-saw the flake out) and the degree to which they were actually equalized, rather than just in theory. Edit: This might be an interesting experiment next time I see a similar situation low enough to the ground to bounce test over a crash pad.
(This post was edited by j_ung on Oct 13, 2009, 9:21 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

csproul
Oct 13, 2009, 9:26 AM
Post #28 of 32
(1482 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1694
|
I recently read a big-wall trip report where the climber didn't have a large enough cam to aid up a wide section. He used a board up against the side of the crack to effectively make the crack smaller such that the cam he did have would fit. It worked for aiding, but I am not sure I'd trust it for fall protection.
|
|
|
 |
 |

altelis
Oct 13, 2009, 9:28 AM
Post #29 of 32
(1480 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2166
|
All PTFW claims that are part of an edited post will be held as suspect.
|
|
|
 |
 |

altelis
Oct 13, 2009, 9:45 AM
Post #31 of 32
(1465 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 2166
|
Worthless without screen shots!
|
|
|
 |
|
|