 |

lukebrown607
Jan 28, 2010, 6:49 PM
Post #1 of 90
(6632 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think?
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Jan 28, 2010, 7:04 PM
Post #2 of 90
(6619 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2805
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? I think my girlfriend is hot, chicken isn't as tasty as beef, and that you are a silly man.
|
|
|
 |
 |

irregularpanda
Jan 28, 2010, 7:32 PM
Post #3 of 90
(6600 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: 1364
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? I think that yellow is a nice color, and I think my truck needs a camper shell, but not as badly as I need a real job.
|
|
|
 |
 |

meanandugly
Jan 28, 2010, 7:34 PM
Post #4 of 90
(6600 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 20, 2004
Posts: 249
|
I agree tha beef is tastier, but chicken is easier flavoured. Silly man yes. Don't know about your girlfriend...send a pic.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 7:35 PM
Post #5 of 90
(6599 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
I’m disappointed with both. I hate this new trend of putting teeth on belay devices and wish they would come out with an option that didn’t have them in a reverso type device.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lukebrown607
Jan 28, 2010, 7:40 PM
Post #6 of 90
(6591 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
I have found the teeth to make no difference. the anodizing on the reverso3 makes the device extra slippery, especially on newer ropes. I do notice that when belaying a second, the BD version and the reverso when clipped in to the anchor are oriented perpendicular to each other, not sure which is better, since I only have the one. I prefer chicken ramen noodles over the beef.
|
|
|
 |
 |

moose_droppings
Jan 28, 2010, 7:40 PM
Post #7 of 90
(6591 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3301
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? I think you ought to send the Reverso3 to me. Problem solved.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lukebrown607
Jan 28, 2010, 7:44 PM
Post #8 of 90
(6587 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
sounds good, one condition, you send me a brand new BD ATC Guide. I'll send you my used reverso
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 7:50 PM
Post #9 of 90
(6580 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I have found the teeth to make no difference. the anodizing on the reverso3 makes the device extra slippery, especially on newer ropes. I do notice that when belaying a second, the BD version and the reverso when clipped in to the anchor are oriented perpendicular to each other, not sure which is better, since I only have the one. I prefer chicken ramen noodles over the beef. My wife is way too light, I have to feed the rope when I lower her or other lighter people. I have purposely avoided devices with teeth for this reason, it’s completely unnecessary unless you have no grip strength or a limp wrist. I even went out and bought the fattest locker I could find to make it run smoother and it helped but not enough. If you want or need teeth fine I just wish there was an option without.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scottek67
Jan 28, 2010, 7:55 PM
Post #10 of 90
(6569 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2008
Posts: 515
|
why not turn the device around?
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 7:56 PM
Post #11 of 90
(6567 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
I used the original reverso for years and liked the orientation and decided on the ATC guide because of that.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 7:57 PM
Post #12 of 90
(6565 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
scottek67 wrote: why not turn the device around? Is that a serious question?
|
|
|
 |
 |

lukebrown607
Jan 28, 2010, 8:05 PM
Post #14 of 90
(6549 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
why don't i just turn around, or just turn my head, and leave the device as is, or bring a mirror, and look only at my belay device through that
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 8:20 PM
Post #15 of 90
(6541 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
Oh I see what you’re saying. Yeah I could do that for regular belay but I also don’t like the amount of friction in the autoblock mode. Maybe I’m just bitching about something that doesn’t matter but personally I really don’t like it and would rather think about other things like eating or enjoying the scenery then fighting with my belay device when I’m three four pitches up. I’ve only used it in autoblock mode a couple of times so far and really don’t like the resistance compared to my original reverso but that’s too worn out now and I don’t think they sell them anymore. Maybe I’ll just make my own (don’t tell my wife I just said that, I told her today I wanted to make my own skis, she’s ok with the craziness so far but I don’t want to push it).
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 28, 2010, 8:21 PM
Post #16 of 90
(6539 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
lukebrown607 wrote: why don't i just turn around, or just turn my head, and leave the device as is, or bring a mirror, and look only at my belay device through that I think he was referring to my comment about lowering and too much friction with the teeth.
(This post was edited by rschap on Jan 28, 2010, 8:25 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Jan 29, 2010, 2:56 AM
Post #18 of 90
(6450 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
What about the Kong Ghost or Trango B-52?
|
|
|
 |
 |

granite_grrl
Jan 29, 2010, 5:44 AM
Post #19 of 90
(6397 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14051
|
rschap wrote: lukebrown607 wrote: I have found the teeth to make no difference. the anodizing on the reverso3 makes the device extra slippery, especially on newer ropes. I do notice that when belaying a second, the BD version and the reverso when clipped in to the anchor are oriented perpendicular to each other, not sure which is better, since I only have the one. I prefer chicken ramen noodles over the beef. My wife is way too light, I have to feed the rope when I lower her or other lighter people. I have purposely avoided devices with teeth for this reason, it’s completely unnecessary unless you have no grip strength or a limp wrist. I even went out and bought the fattest locker I could find to make it run smoother and it helped but not enough. If you want or need teeth fine I just wish there was an option without. So you're saying that you should be using it on the low friction side and your wife should use it on the high friction side?
|
|
|
 |
 |

granite_grrl
Jan 29, 2010, 5:47 AM
Post #20 of 90
(6396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14051
|
rschap wrote: Oh I see what you’re saying. Yeah I could do that for regular belay but I also don’t like the amount of friction in the autoblock mode. Maybe I’m just bitching about something that doesn’t matter but personally I really don’t like it and would rather think about other things like eating or enjoying the scenery then fighting with my belay device when I’m three four pitches up. I’ve only used it in autoblock mode a couple of times so far and really don’t like the resistance compared to my original reverso but that’s too worn out now and I don’t think they sell them anymore. Maybe I’ll just make my own (don’t tell my wife I just said that, I told her today I wanted to make my own skis, she’s ok with the craziness so far but I don’t want to push it). Too much friction in auto-block mode? The whole point is that the rope won't move....it's blocked. Perhaps just give the Guide to your wife and learn to use a munter.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Jan 29, 2010, 6:46 AM
Post #21 of 90
(6365 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25319
|
irregularpanda wrote: lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? I think that yellow is a nice color, and I think my truck needs a camper shell, but not as badly as I need a real job. I think that I love my camper shell on my truck, and if you get one, you won't need a real job because you won't need to pay rent as often. I think yellow is a colour for nancy boys and small children.
|
|
|
 |
 |

jakedatc
Jan 29, 2010, 7:37 AM
Post #23 of 90
(6344 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11053
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

mrtristan
Jan 29, 2010, 8:15 AM
Post #24 of 90
(6322 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 21, 2002
Posts: 596
|
I've used both and I think each has its own merits. When belaying the second in autoblock mode, you can clip a Petzl Spirit biner through the hole on the bottom of the Reverso if you need to and use that to lower out/give slack. The hole is there on the BD, but you have to tie cord to it to get a biner through. It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know.
|
|
|
 |
 |

coolcat83
Jan 29, 2010, 8:39 AM
Post #25 of 90
(6257 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1006
|
mrtristan wrote: It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know. yes, and it's easy enough to just loops a skinny sling or cord through the hole in the guide. if yu are lowering your second that much get a cinch (my favorite singe rope belay device after the guide) or a grigri
|
|
|
 |
 |

currupt4130
Jan 29, 2010, 11:16 AM
Post #26 of 90
(2417 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 515
|
mrtristan wrote: I've used both and I think each has its own merits. When belaying the second in autoblock mode, you can clip a Petzl Spirit biner through the hole on the bottom of the Reverso if you need to and use that to lower out/give slack. The hole is there on the BD, but you have to tie cord to it to get a biner through. It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know. The nose of a hotwire works well in there too. I had to bring seconds up at the same time with two 10.2's with my Reverso 3. It was a workout.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

vegastradguy
Jan 29, 2010, 12:51 PM
Post #28 of 90
(2386 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
you mean the device that's a cheap ripoff of the old petzl reverso- the one that tends to turn into a knife over time? there's a reason petzl changed the design- even if they wont actually say that in press releases.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 29, 2010, 11:11 PM
Post #30 of 90
(2336 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
granite_grrl wrote: So you're saying that you should be using it on the low friction side and your wife should use it on the high friction side? My wife has her own belay device.
granite_grrl wrote: Too much friction in auto-block mode? The whole point is that the rope won't move....it's blocked. Perhaps just give the Guide to your wife and learn to use a munter. Do you know how these devices work? Or perhaps you don’t understand what I mean; I’m not talking about lowering in autoblock mode I’m talking about pulling slack. I’ve used an autoblock for years, I just don’t care for the way these devices work. I’m sure some people find it useful I personally don’t like it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 29, 2010, 11:21 PM
Post #31 of 90
(2333 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
I can’t buy Kong, I don’t have a rational reason for it I just can’t. Is the B52 and autoblock? I didn’t know that. Madrock has the same downfall the old reverso had. And I don’t care for the Toucan either. A friend of mine has one and I’ve used it once, I just didn’t like it. I think the ATC guide without teeth is exactly what I want but it’s just not made. Edit: I just read up on the B52 and see how it’s an autoblock. I like the ability to lower that petzl and BD have put on their devices and the B52 does not have this. Edit: I never looked at the Madlock before, is it even an autoblock? It doesn’t look like it has an autoblock mode just a bottle opener.
(This post was edited by rschap on Jan 31, 2010, 6:31 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

steple
Jan 30, 2010, 12:30 AM
Post #32 of 90
(2319 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 11, 2008
Posts: 67
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? The main difference is that the attachment point that you use in 'reverso mode' is angled 90° differently. The way I built anchors and hook it up doesn't work with the BD, but works well with the Petzl. But this might be the other way around for you.
|
|
|
 |
 |

colatownkid
Jan 30, 2010, 4:53 AM
Post #33 of 90
(2310 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 509
|
mrtristan wrote: I've used both and I think each has its own merits. When belaying the second in autoblock mode, you can clip a Petzl Spirit biner through the hole on the bottom of the Reverso if you need to and use that to lower out/give slack. The hole is there on the BD, but you have to tie cord to it to get a biner through. It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know. Not necessarily. Usually you can just use a carabiner, but it has to keylock instead of notched.
|
|
|
 |
 |

possum2082
Jan 30, 2010, 5:31 AM
Post #34 of 90
(2304 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 218
|
In reply to: you mean the device that's a cheap ripoff of the old petzl reverso- the one that tends to turn into a knife over time? there's a reason petzl changed the design- even if they wont actually say that in press releases. yeah? but it opens beer bottles.
|
|
|
 |
 |

I_do
Jan 30, 2010, 6:30 AM
Post #35 of 90
(2289 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
possum2082 wrote: In reply to: you mean the device that's a cheap ripoff of the old petzl reverso- the one that tends to turn into a knife over time? there's a reason petzl changed the design- even if they wont actually say that in press releases. yeah? but it opens beer bottles. Dude, the newspaper opens beer bottles other bottles open botlles, rocks, knives, lighters and teeth. This has been discussed at length a 100 times do a search you NooB!
|
|
|
 |
 |

possum2082
Jan 30, 2010, 6:36 AM
Post #36 of 90
(2287 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 218
|
teach me more.
|
|
|
 |
 |

I_do
Jan 30, 2010, 6:45 AM
Post #37 of 90
(2283 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
possum2082 wrote: teach me more. Samurai sword? Don't use your teeth I once popped a filling, my dentist was not amused.
|
|
|
 |
 |

currupt4130
Jan 30, 2010, 7:52 AM
Post #38 of 90
(2264 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 515
|
rschap wrote: I think the ATC guide without teeth is exactly what I want but it’s just not made. So why not just clean the teeth off of it? A bastard file will take care of it in no time. Just go slow and be careful.
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Jan 30, 2010, 9:18 AM
Post #39 of 90
(2250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
rschap wrote: I can’t but Kong, I don’t have a rational reason for it I just can’t. That's funny. I'd buy more Kong stuff if it was readily available.
|
|
|
 |
 |

tomtom
Jan 30, 2010, 9:56 AM
Post #40 of 90
(2232 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2004
Posts: 366
|
rschap wrote: I think the ATC guide without teeth is exactly what I want but it’s just not made. I 'made' my own by rappelling on wet gritty ropes. The teeth on mine are gone. So far gone that I bought a new Reverso 3 so that raps on icy 8 mm ropes wouldn't be so sporty.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Khoi
Jan 30, 2010, 1:15 PM
Post #41 of 90
(2214 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2008
Posts: 285
|
rschap wrote: I can’t buy [fixed?] Kong, I don’t have a rational reason for it I just can’t. Why can't you buy Kong? What are you non-rational reasons?
rschap wrote: Edit: I never looked at the Madlock before, is it even an autoblock? It doesn’t look like it has an autoblock mode just a bottle opener. Yes, it is an autoblock. It is marketed as having a very simple "lower the second" function. From their website: "The innovative 45 degree loading design allows for the belay to lower the second climber without creating a leverage advantage. " I was thinking that the Kong Gigi might be what you're looking for, but you refuse to buy Kong. Why don't you check out Gary D. Storrick's site? http://storrick.cnchost.com/...e/BelayDevices.shtml He has write-ups for virtually every single belay device that has come on the market. There's at least a dozen or so other belay devices out there with an autoblock function. Unfortunately, almost all of the other ones are somewhat hard to find outside of Europe.
|
|
|
 |
 |

avalon420
Jan 30, 2010, 2:11 PM
Post #42 of 90
(2208 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 275
|
rschap wrote: I’m disappointed with both. I hate this new trend of putting teeth on belay devices and wish they would come out with an option that didn’t have them in a reverso type device. Perhaps, my friend,you should try the Kong ghost. Wife got me one for christmas and it is da bees knees. Oh yeah, and thats MY favorite.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Khoi
Jan 30, 2010, 2:30 PM
Post #43 of 90
(2202 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2008
Posts: 285
|
avalon420 wrote: rschap wrote: I’m disappointed with both. I hate this new trend of putting teeth on belay devices and wish they would come out with an option that didn’t have them in a reverso type device. Perhaps, my friend,you should try the Kong ghost. Wife got me one for christmas and it is da bees knees. Oh yeah, and thats MY favorite. He refuses to buy Kong products. I look forward to hearing his reasons why.
|
|
|
 |
 |

coolcat83
Jan 30, 2010, 3:13 PM
Post #44 of 90
(2195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1006
|
currupt4130 wrote: rschap wrote: I think the ATC guide without teeth is exactly what I want but it’s just not made. So why not just clean the teeth off of it? A bastard file will take care of it in no time. Just go slow and be careful. I was going to suggest that...besides the teeth will smooth out a bit over time, just climb a lot...maybe in sandy areas
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Jan 30, 2010, 9:26 PM
Post #45 of 90
(2174 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25319
|
rschap wrote: granite_grrl wrote: So you're saying that you should be using it on the low friction side and your wife should use it on the high friction side? My wife has her own belay device. granite_grrl wrote: Too much friction in auto-block mode? The whole point is that the rope won't move....it's blocked. Perhaps just give the Guide to your wife and learn to use a munter. Do you know how these devices work? Or perhaps you don’t understand what I mean; I’m not talking about lowering in autoblock mode I’m talking about pulling slack. I’ve used an autoblock for years, I just don’t care for the way these devices work. I’m sure some people find it useful I personally don’t like it. I drew this for you. I hope it helps.
|
|
Attachments:
|
ATC.bmp
(67.5 KB)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Travis_22
Jan 31, 2010, 5:53 PM
Post #46 of 90
(2139 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 11, 2009
Posts: 29
|
I haven't used a reverso, but the BD guide isn't too smooth with the fatter ropes. I was just messing around with it in guide mode using a 10.5 rope. Seems like it would be quite the workout. I threw in another biner just to see if it would be smoother, not too much...
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradrenn
Jan 31, 2010, 6:27 PM
Post #47 of 90
(2124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
lukebrown607 wrote: I bought the Reverso3, but i like the ATC guide better. What do you guys think? Hey Luke, how are you dude ? How is New York treating ya ? Reverso 3 or BD Guide. Seriously: Reverso 3 is way better and yes your question is silly. V.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Jan 31, 2010, 6:45 PM
Post #48 of 90
(2114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
Travis_22 wrote: I haven't used a reverso, but the BD guide isn't too smooth with the fatter ropes. I was just messing around with it in guide mode using a 10.5 rope. Seems like it would be quite the workout. I threw in another biner just to see if it would be smoother, not too much... That's all I was saying. I don't buy Kong and I don't shop at Kmart. Maybe Kong has improved their products since the last time I looked at their catalog but it always looked like cheap shit to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Khoi
Jan 31, 2010, 9:01 PM
Post #49 of 90
(2090 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2008
Posts: 285
|
rschap wrote: I don't buy Kong and I don't shop at Kmart. Maybe Kong has improved their products since the last time I looked at their catalog but it always looked like cheap shit to me. Have you ever handled or used any of Kong's products? Or are you only going by nothing more than what you've looked at in their catalogue? Wiregate biners look like cheap shit to a lot of people, but most of them are anything but. Take a look at the Kong Ghost: http://storrick.cnchost.com/...otBlockBelay862.html It appears to have the characteristics you are looking for. If you think it looks like cheap shit, then I'll be superlatively curious on what you think make the Black Diamond ATC Guide and the Petzl Reverso 3 any different. BTW, do you shop at Wal-Mart?
|
|
|
 |
 |

Travis_22
Jan 31, 2010, 11:09 PM
Post #50 of 90
(2081 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 11, 2009
Posts: 29
|
The Kong looks okay, it does somehow look cheap. Biggest thing for me is I am not a big fan of metal on metal. You could use something like a dmm belay master, but the metal there might pop that plastic spacer right out. I would hate to see some of the twist action that thing could do on a gate. May not be a problem, but it does remind me on an eight. Does the kong have any sort of lowering feature for belaying a second?
(This post was edited by Travis_22 on Jan 31, 2010, 11:11 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Khoi
Feb 1, 2010, 12:24 AM
Post #51 of 90
(2473 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2008
Posts: 285
|
Travis_22 wrote: The Kong looks okay, it does somehow look cheap. ??? I do not see how it looks any different in quality compared to the Black Diamond ATC Guide or the Petzl Reverso 3. Perhaps it's the non-studio quality of the photos on Storrick's site? For comparison, here's how the the Black Diamond ATC Guide looks on his site: http://storrick.cnchost.com/...es/BelayTube676.html and the Petzl Reverso 3: http://storrick.cnchost.com/...es/BelayTube894.html I can't be the only one who doesn't SEE a difference in quality when looking at these photos.
Travis_22 wrote: Biggest thing for me is I am not a big fan of metal on metal. Like the original Petzl Reverso, Mad Rock Mad Lock, Omega Pacific SBG and SBGII, Mammut Smart, Petzl Grigri, Trango Cinch, and every other "auto-locking" belay device? My climbing partner is the opposite. After have a keeper cord break on him, he prefers to have a metal loop. When the original Petzl Reverso first came out he happily switched over to it and has been using it ever since.
Travis_22 wrote: You could use something like a dmm belay master, but the metal there might pop that plastic spacer right out. How does using a DMM Belay Master, or the DMM Belay Master 2, avoid the metal on metal scenario?
Travis_22 wrote: I would hate to see some of the twist action that thing could do on a gate. May not be a problem, but it does remind me on an eight. Sorry, you've lost me.
Travis_22 wrote: Does the kong have any sort of lowering feature for belaying a second? I don't know for sure. But from looking at the photos of the Kong Ghost, I think it would be easy to use the metal loop (where the belay biner goes - the part that usually a coated wire on other belay devices) for leverage.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Travis_22
Feb 1, 2010, 6:59 AM
Post #52 of 90
(2445 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 11, 2009
Posts: 29
|
I didn't say it was cheap, just looked it, to me. Well, the grigri and most all the auto locking are a little different, with its smaller slot. The revers(ino?) has a wider metal piece. What i was talking about with the belay biner, there had been some bad things going on with the figure eight belay. Seems that someone died because the metal eye got positioned over the gate and the metal on metal (twist action I suppose) broke the twisty ring to lock the biner. Apparently, with most biners it only takes a few hundred pounds to break the gate with an inward force. This couldn't happen with a regular atc. Kinda scared me from using my 8, but I probably still will, I just need to watch it. I have noticed a few times using the figure 8 that the eye can easily be positioned over the gate. It just seems to me that a soft connection is a much better idea. I am allowed to have my own opinion, I hope. The kong (and other models) have wider eyes, which would make it a lot safer methinks. Yeah, I guess you could use that loop to lower someone. Just girth a sling on her. Alright, think i'm done talking.
(This post was edited by Travis_22 on Feb 1, 2010, 7:03 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

rschap
Feb 1, 2010, 4:53 PM
Post #53 of 90
(2411 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 590
|
The last time I looked at Kong gear was about 8-9 years ago when I first started climbing and was building my rack. I had friends that had some of their cams, nuts, bineers, and even a funky ass belay device and all of it looked like shit kinda like Gear4Rocks does now. I ended up buying Trango Flex cams which the old school cams didn’t look as clean and professional as other cams or as they do now but after buying one and using it I didn’t care. After playing with a Kong cam I was convinced I’d never own one. I’ve never had anyone defend Kong when I said it was shit before so I never looked at their stuff since but I just went to their web site and I admit it looks a hell of a lot better than it used to. So now my complaint against the Kong Ghost is it doesn’t have a built in way to lower. I guess Harbor Freight would be a better example than Kmart but I do shop at Harbor Freight for some things, the difference is I don’t hang my life on them. Someone said above that I should grind the teeth off and I’ve thought about that but I think I’ll just make a device that has everything I want rather than try to modify one that exist.
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Feb 1, 2010, 7:08 PM
Post #54 of 90
(2392 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
Travis_22 wrote: I didn't say it was cheap, just looked it, to me. Well, the grigri and most all the auto locking are a little different, with its smaller slot. The revers(ino?) has a wider metal piece. What i was talking about with the belay biner, there had been some bad things going on with the figure eight belay. Seems that someone died because the metal eye got positioned over the gate and the metal on metal (twist action I suppose) broke the twisty ring to lock the biner. Apparently, with most biners it only takes a few hundred pounds to break the gate with an inward force. This couldn't happen with a regular atc. Kinda scared me from using my 8, but I probably still will, I just need to watch it. I have noticed a few times using the figure 8 that the eye can easily be positioned over the gate. It just seems to me that a soft connection is a much better idea. I am allowed to have my own opinion, I hope. The kong (and other models) have wider eyes, which would make it a lot safer methinks. Yeah, I guess you could use that loop to lower someone. Just girth a sling on her. Alright, think i'm done talking. Thank goodness. I don't think I've ever read so much by someone who doesn't really know what he's talking about.
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Feb 1, 2010, 7:21 PM
Post #55 of 90
(2388 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
Avalon420 got one for Christmas. You might ask him how well it lowers. I think the ring on the bottom is for tilting it to lower but I'm not sure.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

avalon420
Feb 1, 2010, 8:41 PM
Post #58 of 90
(2374 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 275
|
rschap wrote: The last time I looked at Kong gear was about 8-9 years ago when I first started climbing and was building my rack. I had friends that had some of their cams, nuts, bineers, and even a funky ass belay device and all of it looked like shit kinda like Gear4Rocks does now. I ended up buying Trango Flex cams which the old school cams didn’t look as clean and professional as other cams or as they do now but after buying one and using it I didn’t care. After playing with a Kong cam I was convinced I’d never own one. I’ve never had anyone defend Kong when I said it was shit before so I never looked at their stuff since but I just went to their web site and I admit it looks a hell of a lot better than it used to. So now my complaint against the Kong Ghost is it doesn’t have a built in way to lower. I guess Harbor Freight would be a better example than Kmart but I do shop at Harbor Freight for some things, the difference is I don’t hang my life on them. Someone said above that I should grind the teeth off and I’ve thought about that but I think I’ll just make a device that has everything I want rather than try to modify one that exist. ALL of these type auto blocking belay devices have the simplest of lowering methods intrinsic to their nature. And here it is, clip a sling to the blocking carabiner, thread sling through a higher anchor, KEEP BREAK HAND ON BREAK SIDE, KEEP BREAK HAND ON BREAK SIDE, pull down on sling and lower.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rtwilli4
Feb 1, 2010, 9:21 PM
Post #59 of 90
(2363 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
I read a lot of responses and was surprised to see that no one has mentioned the weight. The Petzl Reverso is much lighter than the ATC Guide. I believe it's 105g for the ATC and 75 for the Reverso, or something like that. Also, as a few people have mentioned, you can stick the nose of pretty much any keylock biner in the lowering hole of the Reverso... not sure it's that easy with the guide, although you could use a nut tool for either. They are oriented differently in AB mode... 90* difference but I can't see why that would make any difference. The middle of the ATC sticks out lower than the outer two walls, so it "rocks" on the biner when belaying two seconds. The Reverso doesn't do this and I've heard that it is easier to lower one person when belaying two seconds with the ATC but I've never actually done it so I can't be sure. Both suck w/ fat ropes. I have both and use the Reverso pretty much all the time .
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
Feb 2, 2010, 11:19 AM
Post #60 of 90
(2333 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
Guide...I know it's heavier and more difficult to break, but I think it feeds much smoother. The Reverso feeds lousy with even moderately thick ropes. But again...chicken or beef.
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Feb 3, 2010, 5:03 AM
Post #62 of 90
(2258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
scotty1974 wrote: Guide...I know it's heavier and more difficult to break, but I think it feeds much smoother. The Reverso feeds lousy with even moderately thick ropes. But again...chicken or beef. I think that being difficult to break your belay device is probably a good thing.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
Feb 3, 2010, 6:35 AM
Post #63 of 90
(2228 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
I'm sure that's sarcasm (I think), but what I meant is difficult to "unbreak" in autoblock mode when a second has fallen. ie., that little hole that you take a carabiner or cord to release the tension.
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on Feb 3, 2010, 7:06 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

shoo
Feb 3, 2010, 6:59 AM
Post #65 of 90
(2223 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1498
|
rschap wrote: scottek67 wrote: It must be nice being a machinist having access to the equipment to make your own gear! Why not try building a funky belay device with your own twist. howabout these... I've considered that. Edit: Sorry about the thread jack. Combo rescue 8 and anchor plate? Cool!
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
Feb 3, 2010, 7:11 AM
Post #66 of 90
(2216 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
Wow...I don't know if I'm more impressed that you can look up a word, or the fact that your able to pick apart a post for my using verbage that doesn't exactly correlate with Webster's definition. No one in the history of man has ever used a word in a fashion that differs from it's original definition. That's why dictionaries are never updated and colloquialism doesn't exist. I would imagine there's a thread somewhere that urgently needs you to contribute nothing to it...
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on Feb 3, 2010, 7:13 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

shoo
Feb 3, 2010, 7:24 AM
Post #67 of 90
(2209 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1498
|
scotty1974 wrote: Wow...I don't know if I'm more impressed that you can look up a word, or the fact that your able to pick apart a post for my using verbage that doesn't exactly correlate with Webster's definition. No one in the history of man has ever used a word in a fashion that differs from it's original definition. That's why dictionaries are never updated and colloquialism doesn't exist. I would imagine there's a thread somewhere that urgently needs you to contribute nothing to it... Yeah, that, ooooor, I'm explaining why people were previously giving you crap for it. In any case, MY FIRST SIG! WOOHOO!!
|
|
|
 |
 |

shoo
Feb 3, 2010, 8:15 AM
Post #69 of 90
(2198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1498
|
Meh, I'll go ahead and actually add something to this thread, since I own and have used both thoroughly (the reverso3 was a gift). My advice is to get whichever one is cheaper. Honestly. There is very, very little difference between the two. That being said, I have a slight preference for the ATC-Guide for a couple of reasons. 1. I've had it longer. It's been loved, and it shows. I don't like shiny gear. 2. It feeds slightly more smoothly in both modes. 3. The reverso3 has this weird tendency for the brake side of the rope to flip over the side rail, rather than stay in its groove, when being used in normal mode belaying. Even more so with twisty ropes. 4. Contrary to popular belief, you can actually get quite a bit of stuff into that little brake release tab/slot, including some very small 'biner noses, cord, skinny slings, etc. And even if you couldn't, do you really need to? You just don't use it in guide mode if you expect to have to lower someone. In a few years using this device, I can only recall one time where I needed to briefly release tension on a weighted ATC-Guide in guide mode. It was exceedingly easy. That being said, if I'm going to be using super skinny lines (sub 9.5 singles) all day long, I might whip out the reverso3. It does tend to have a little more braking power with skinny ropes. Anything above 9.5, though and it's just a little stickier in comparison to the guide, which can be annoying.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
Feb 3, 2010, 11:39 AM
Post #70 of 90
(2172 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
Apparently I was a bit too cavalier in assuming that everyone was familiar with the technique and venacular associated with the device...or at least what I am familiar with. Edited and submitted for approval... "In the event of the device "braking" a second's fall, it is easier to "break" the tension created by the device" in autoblock mode". Hopefully that adds clarity for anyone that experience confusion. No belay devices were intentionally or accidently harmed.
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on Feb 3, 2010, 11:43 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

JimTitt
Feb 3, 2010, 12:17 PM
Post #71 of 90
(2159 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 866
|
In reply to: That being said, if I'm going to be using super skinny lines (sub 9.5 singles) all day long, I might whip out the reverso3. It does tend to have a little more braking power with skinny ropes. Anything above 9.5, though and it's just a little stickier in comparison to the guide, which can be annoying. Sort of interesting that, it is a perception thing I guess! I´ve done lot of pull tests with both the XP Guide and Reverso ³. Holding falls the ATC is the more powerful of the two for all sizes of rope by about 5% and when you get to really thick (10,5 and up ) ropes the Reverso falls away badly as the V slots are so narrow the rope can´t get in and brake properly. By then it doesn´t really matter anyway as there is plenty of power for most situations. Abseiling the situation is reversed and the Reverso³ is more powerful unti 10mm where the V problem occurs again, in real life this is probably irrelevant. Pull through the Reverso is the stickier on average of 8% especially over 9.5mm. Neither is as powerful as the ATC XP. (And after a lot of abuse you will notice the centre rib of the Reverso is too narrow and starts to become damaged by the karabiner).
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Feb 4, 2010, 6:11 AM
Post #72 of 90
(2124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25319
|
scotty1974 wrote: Wow...I don't know if I'm more impressed that you can look up a word, or the fact that your able to pick apart a post for my using verbage that doesn't exactly correlate with Webster's definition. No one in the history of man has ever used a word in a fashion that differs from it's original definition. That's why dictionaries are never updated and colloquialism doesn't exist. I would imagine there's a thread somewhere that urgently needs you to contribute nothing to it... trying to pass off a misspelling as a revolution in the English language... interesting tactic. A simple whoops would have sufficed.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
Feb 4, 2010, 6:24 AM
Post #73 of 90
(2119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
I didn't realize this was scrutinizemypostsformispellingsthensayi'msorry.com. Next time I'll run any posts through a proofreader so I can avoid the public shame. Can we return this thread to actually talking about climbing? I clarified my original post, I didn't ask for a lesson on spelling or the application of words, I just wanted to talk about the ATC/ Reverso.....Jeezzzz
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on Feb 4, 2010, 6:35 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

shockabuku
Feb 4, 2010, 6:35 AM
Post #74 of 90
(2113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4762
|
scotty1974 wrote: I didn't realize this was scrutinizemypostsformispellingsthensayi'msorry.com. Next time I'll run any posts through a proofreader so I can avoid the public shame. Can we return this thread to actually talking about climbing? I clarified my original post, I didn't ask for a lesson on spelling or the application of words. Jeezzzz Good grief, take the criticism and quit whining. Spelling matters when you communicate in the written form. I read your post and didn't understand your point because you used the wrong word. So I called you out on it. Deal with it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

avalon420
Feb 4, 2010, 3:42 PM
Post #75 of 90
(2086 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 275
|
kachoong wrote: shockabuku wrote: What about the Kong Ghost or Trango B-52? [image]http://www.gearexpress.biz/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/kong%20ghost.jpg[/image] Anything that looks like the Enterprise is bound to perform well! "Beam me up!" I luvs the thing, and hate anything (well, belay device) w/ a wire loop.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lukebrown607
May 12, 2010, 4:34 PM
Post #76 of 90
(1662 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
Scotty1974. This is a forum on gear. So if you have nothing to contribute, you should go post somewhere else. You obviously are not suited for this discussion. Actually don't care what you have to say, but thought it comical that Shoo actually had some usefull input, and you are the one that is wasting everyone's time. Not that this thread makes any difference in the world. It's more for people with a mechanical background, obviously you do not understand.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
May 13, 2010, 11:33 AM
Post #77 of 90
(1602 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
I actually have to laugh...are you trash talking me 3 months after the last post?? I ran back into this thread and forgot that there was even a internet battle I was involved in!! I guess we just all moved on with our lives.... That's great!!! Keep up the good work and keep the love alive!!
(This post was edited by scotty1974 on May 13, 2010, 11:36 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

airscape
May 14, 2010, 4:02 AM
Post #78 of 90
(1547 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
lukebrown607 wrote: Scotty1974. This is a forum on gear. So if you have nothing to contribute, you should go post somewhere else. You obviously are not suited for this discussion. Actually don't care what you have to say, but thought it comical that Shoo actually had some usefull input, and you are the one that is wasting everyone's time. Not that this thread makes any difference in the world. It's more for people with a mechanical background, obviously you do not understand.
Welcome! You sure are going to fit in nicely... Edit: Never mind.
(This post was edited by airscape on May 14, 2010, 4:04 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

shoo
May 14, 2010, 6:19 AM
Post #79 of 90
(1522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1498
|
Dear Luke, Scotty and I have long reconciled our differences. Since then, we have discovered a mutual love for small furry animals. They are delicious. To cut a long story short, we got married and have had two children. They're about your age, now. -Shoo
|
|
|
 |
 |

airscape
May 14, 2010, 7:06 AM
Post #80 of 90
(1505 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
shoo wrote: Dear Luke, Scotty and I have long reconciled our differences. Since then, we have discovered a mutual love for small furry animals. They are delicious. To cut a long story short, we got married and have had two children. They're about your age, now. -Shoo Haha hehe tee hee.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scotty1974
May 14, 2010, 2:28 PM
Post #81 of 90
(1474 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 30, 2006
Posts: 248
|
Dude! I almost choked on a piece of food!!! The only thing that made it come out is the fact I was lauging so hard!!!
|
|
|
 |
 |

lukebrown607
May 18, 2010, 5:49 PM
Post #82 of 90
(1396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 10
|
I love it! I knew there was something weird going on. Don't want anyone to choke on small animals. Sorry if i offended you lovebirds. These forums get ridiculous sometimes (plus most everyone up here is a little nuts!).
|
|
|
 |
 |

gdstorrick
Jul 25, 2010, 8:59 AM
Post #83 of 90
(1210 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 2, 2009
Posts: 15
|
Khoi wrote: I do not see how it looks any different in quality compared to the Black Diamond ATC Guide or the Petzl Reverso 3. Perhaps it's the non-studio quality of the photos on Storrick's site? <SNIP> I can't be the only one who doesn't SEE a difference in quality when looking at these photos. When I still maintained my site, I reduced all photos to 72dpi. Reducing their size allowed me to keep the web site within the size limits that I was paying for. Now that my site is gone, I feel that the "non-studio quality" issue is irrelevant. Photos aside, I don't see an obvious "quality" difference in the "looks" of my samples of these two devices. Gary
|
|
|
 |
 |

amyas
Jul 25, 2010, 6:09 PM
Post #84 of 90
(1180 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2009
Posts: 80
|
i have tried both and prefer the guide as i seem to get bigger diameter ropes through with more ease. could just be me though.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pilot4life
Jul 26, 2010, 12:58 PM
Post #85 of 90
(1116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 5, 2007
Posts: 16
|
I own three of the above mentioned devices, purchased about a year apart from each other. The BD is heaviest and I didn't like the orientation as much as the other two for belaying up the second(s). I find both the BD and Reverso3 suck with bigger ropes, so I went and tried the Ghost with slightly better results. The one thing about the Ghost I don't like, is the annoying cowbell sound it creates when not in use, and a slightly higher likely hood of it getting dropped if I am not careful. On smaller ropes (sub 10mm) I prefer the Rev3, larger ropes the Ghost wins.
|
|
|
 |
 |

amyas
Jul 26, 2010, 9:29 PM
Post #86 of 90
(1076 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2009
Posts: 80
|
hey pilot who makes the ghost? and where did you pick it up?
|
|
|
 |
 |

pilot4life
Jul 27, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #87 of 90
(1053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 5, 2007
Posts: 16
|
amyas wrote: hey pilot who makes the ghost? and where did you pick it up? I picked mine up at ClimbMax (www.climbmaxmountaineering.com) in Portland, OR, but they don't appear to sell on-line anymore. It is made by Kong.
|
|
|
 |
 |

ajkclay
Jul 29, 2010, 6:19 AM
Post #88 of 90
(1005 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 8, 2002
Posts: 1559
|
mrtristan wrote: I've used both and I think each has its own merits. When belaying the second in autoblock mode, you can clip a Petzl Spirit biner through the hole on the bottom of the Reverso if you need to and use that to lower out/give slack. The hole is there on the BD, but you have to tie cord to it to get a biner through. It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know. You don't need to tie anything through it... thread a #6 stopper through and clip a biner to that.
|
|
|
 |
 |

vegastradguy
Jul 29, 2010, 9:16 AM
Post #89 of 90
(977 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
ajkclay wrote: mrtristan wrote: I've used both and I think each has its own merits. When belaying the second in autoblock mode, you can clip a Petzl Spirit biner through the hole on the bottom of the Reverso if you need to and use that to lower out/give slack. The hole is there on the BD, but you have to tie cord to it to get a biner through. It is hard to belay up two seconds using fat ropes with the Reverso. I've heard it's easier with the BD but haven't used it for that purpose so I don't know. You don't need to tie anything through it... thread a #6 stopper through and clip a biner to that. or use any of the mini-biners made post-atc-guide, the new Nano, FS Mini, and Neutrino all fit in there. Id suspect quite a few others do as well. or your nut tool. or a 8mm sling from mammut.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Cadmus
Jan 14, 2013, 6:22 AM
Post #90 of 90
(259 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2010
Posts: 11
|
rschap wrote: I’m disappointed with both. I hate this new trend of putting teeth on belay devices and wish they would come out with an option that didn’t have them in a reverso type device. I have really liked the Simond Toucan. it does everything my reverso did with no teeth. I have not used the Toucan 2. It does cause a lot of rope twist when rapping but they all do. Sorry for the bump.
|
|
|
 |
|
|