 |

j_ung
Feb 23, 2012, 10:12 AM
Post #1 of 81
(20819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos.
|
|
|
 |
 |

traddad
Feb 23, 2012, 10:49 AM
Post #2 of 81
(20808 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7125
|
j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Worthless w/o photos.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lena_chita
Moderator
Feb 23, 2012, 11:13 AM
Post #3 of 81
(20797 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809
|
j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Allfred
Feb 23, 2012, 11:42 AM
Post #4 of 81
(20791 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 29, 2011
Posts: 416
|
traddad wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Worthless w/o photos. I'll check back to see the photos.
|
|
|
 |
 |

caughtinside
Feb 23, 2012, 12:10 PM
Post #5 of 81
(20780 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30107
|
I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun.
|
|
|
 |
 |

macherry
Feb 23, 2012, 2:23 PM
Post #7 of 81
(20732 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15520
|
j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. i think those are girl scouts
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Feb 23, 2012, 3:39 PM
Post #8 of 81
(20722 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5169
|
Allfred wrote: traddad wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Worthless w/o photos. I'll check back to see the photos. courtesy of Jay's google link:
(This post was edited by Toast_in_the_Machine on Feb 23, 2012, 5:46 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 23, 2012, 5:05 PM
Post #9 of 81
(20715 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
Well, I am a heterosexual male and I didn't find to many of those pictures all that exciting to be honest. They were just plain bad photography of what should have been great images. Tattoo and tongue rings tend to ruin for me in most cases. (Sexually speaking)
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 23, 2012, 5:10 PM
Post #10 of 81
(20713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
Yeah, that's a horrible image. Totally unsexy. So, are you lying or gay?
(This post was edited by j_ung on Feb 23, 2012, 5:13 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

jt512
Feb 23, 2012, 6:41 PM
Post #11 of 81
(20694 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792
|
j_ung wrote: What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) . . . That's pretty naive. Jay
|
|
|
 |
 |

lena_chita
Moderator
Feb 23, 2012, 7:01 PM
Post #12 of 81
(20688 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809
|
j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Feb 23, 2012, 8:06 PM
Post #13 of 81
(20680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
lena_chita wrote: Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. This is news to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Feb 23, 2012, 8:06 PM
Post #14 of 81
(20678 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571
|
j_ung wrote: And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Or is so burnout by excessive porn consumption that these are entirely too pedestrian for such a person's tastes. Not that there's anything wrong with that...
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 23, 2012, 8:31 PM
Post #15 of 81
(20672 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 23, 2012, 8:34 PM
Post #16 of 81
(20665 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Allfred wrote: traddad wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Worthless w/o photos. I'll check back to see the photos. courtesy of Jay's google link:  As a recreational diver, I approve!
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 23, 2012, 10:17 PM
Post #17 of 81
(20651 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
j_ung wrote: Yeah, that's a horrible image. Totally unsexy. So, are you lying or gay?  Actually, yes, totally un-sexy. These two look like they are middle school age. I do agree with the above post, men like two women because they want to be part of it. As for gay, I've never been with another man, so I can't be sure. How sure are you?
(This post was edited by guangzhou on Feb 23, 2012, 10:22 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 23, 2012, 10:38 PM
Post #18 of 81
(20638 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it. You watch bisexual orgy porn? Thats hot.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 23, 2012, 10:39 PM
Post #19 of 81
(20636 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. Pun intended?
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 4:02 AM
Post #20 of 81
(20620 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
petsfed wrote: j_ung wrote: And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Or is so burnout by excessive porn consumption that these are entirely too pedestrian for such a person's tastes. Not that there's anything wrong with that... Fine. Throw a goat (or whatever gets you past your current arousal threshold) into the mix.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 4:04 AM
Post #21 of 81
(20619 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. Ah, lying. Check.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 4:05 AM
Post #22 of 81
(20618 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
guangzhou wrote: j_ung wrote: [image]http://img5.visualizeus.com/thumbs/98/9d/girl,kissing,lesbians,nude,woman-989da311092eb929c59033c9332fd4a1_h.jpg[/image] Yeah, that's a horrible image. Totally unsexy. So, are you lying or gay?  Actually, yes, totally un-sexy. These two look like they are middle school age. I do agree with the above post, men like two women because they want to be part of it. As for gay, I've never been with another man, so I can't be sure. How sure are you?  You're lying and curious. Got it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 4:09 AM
Post #23 of 81
(20617 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
Men, what the hell is so hard to admit about this? How about if I add another, not necessarily mutually exclusive possibility to the list? Intimidated. Here's one more: SO in room. Although, that definitely qualifies as lying.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 4:11 AM
Post #24 of 81
(20616 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it. I didn't miss that at all. It's just irrelevant.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Feb 24, 2012, 5:08 AM
Post #25 of 81
(20609 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5169
|
Ahh - you want serious answers on homosexuality from hetero men. I gotta admit, that's kinda gay, but here it goes. I'm heterosexual. There I said it. It isn't something that I say often, because, well, I don't think it is important to qualify myself that way. But I am straight. Men’s bodies and men’s parts simply don’t excite me. One of my side businesses is building athletic cups out of Kevlar. I did research on historical athletic cups, codpieces, as well as comparative market research. My searches were done without the “safe” filter on. I have probably seen, as a result, more images of crotches than everyone in this forum combined. In all of my searches, it did nothing for me sexually. I wasn’t grossed out or wiered out by any of them and it did get a little tiring after a while, but then again by the end of “Showgirls” I was tired of seeing boobs for a while (about 2 days). Comparatively, I have seen over the course of my life thru the great value that is the internet, many images of nude or semi-nude women. Not all excite me, many do. In that category of images I have seen includes images of women in various positions with other women. Some excited me, some did not. I’m sure that unless I post a comparative image listing of what I think is hot and not then the specifics my porn preference is boring to y’all. However, the “lesbian” aspect isn’t necessarily one of the parts that either adds or detracts. But then, I can also add that 3 ways, pegging, and cosplay generally don’t add to an image for me. As for people who don’t share my sexual orientation. That is fine with me. If you don’t find me sexually attractive because of my gender, I’m cool with that. If you are male and you do find me sexually attractive, then, thanks.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 24, 2012, 6:07 AM
Post #26 of 81
(1228 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
j_ung wrote: pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. Ah, lying. Check. Really? Lying? Which part am I lying about? Because my post is 100% factual.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 8:49 AM
Post #27 of 81
(1209 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
pinktricam wrote: j_ung wrote: pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. Ah, lying. Check. Really? Lying? Which part am I lying about? Because my post is 100% factual. You can't publicly admit to seeing porn. Hence, lying.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 24, 2012, 8:51 AM
Post #28 of 81
(1207 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
Though it may seem counter intuitive, only the men who responded to this thread, "Worthless without pictures," even remotely understood it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 24, 2012, 12:34 PM
Post #29 of 81
(1173 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
Who said anything about nudity or genitalia? J_ung is asking about a tender, yet passionate kiss between two beautiful women. IMO, if we're talking about a single frame image, I think the kiss is sexier than someones crotch (male or female) 98.677% of the time.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 24, 2012, 5:17 PM
Post #30 of 81
(1146 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
notapplicable wrote: Who said anything about nudity or genitalia? J_ung is asking about a tender, yet passionate kiss between two beautiful women. IMO, if we're talking about a single frame image, I think the kiss is sexier than someones crotch (male or female) 98.677% of the time. Very very true. Using the same wisdom as above, women should be attracted by two men making out too.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 24, 2012, 7:55 PM
Post #31 of 81
(1127 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
guangzhou wrote: notapplicable wrote: Who said anything about nudity or genitalia? J_ung is asking about a tender, yet passionate kiss between two beautiful women. IMO, if we're talking about a single frame image, I think the kiss is sexier than someones crotch (male or female) 98.677% of the time. Very very true. Using the same wisdom as above, women should be attracted by two men making out too. Perhaps. Maybe some of the straight women can comment. For me personally, while I am attracted to men, I don't think two men kissing has nearly the same aesthetic appeal as the women.
|
|
|
 |
 |

camhead
Feb 25, 2012, 1:15 PM
Post #32 of 81
(1099 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20413
|
Here's a question to take it into the realm of too-serious. If a man catches his wife cheating on him with another woman (lesbian), he is less likely to divorce her than if he were to find her cheating with another man. If a woman catches her husband cheating on her with another man (gay), she is MORE likely to divorce him than if she were to find him cheating with another woman. (can't remember the citation) Why is this? The fact that dudes find female on female makeouts so hot might be part of the reason.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 25, 2012, 1:17 PM
Post #33 of 81
(1098 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
Part of the reason?
|
|
|
 |
 |

wjca
Feb 25, 2012, 4:33 PM
Post #35 of 81
(1074 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7527
|
One of my personal favorites. It has something for everyone.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 25, 2012, 8:40 PM
Post #36 of 81
(1050 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
wjca wrote: One of my personal favorites. It has something for everyone.  Don't drink or smoke. Kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray.This shot doesn't do much for me. While I have fantasized about two women, I am also smart enough to know that me with two women will mean at least one of them will be unsatisfied. One woman is much more capable of satisfying two men than the other way around.
More appealing by far than two women making out on the Beer kegs. Stale beer taste doesn't do much for me, silk sheets, well.
An invitation to things to come, enough left over for my imagination of what I'll find.
Again, an invitation. No doubt where things are headed, but some definite foreplay coming first.
Not an invitation, but certain willingness to let things develop. In this case, the shirt is what does it, says I willing to be a spur of the moment kind of person. The most seductive of the above for me. The other day, my wife and I decided to watch these adult movies passed on to us. After about ten minutes, we moved on. They were devoid of anything. What causes me to see a woman as attractive is partially the anticipation of what's to come, and something in her spirit. The way she carries herself, not sexually, but confidently.
(This post was edited by guangzhou on Feb 26, 2012, 2:23 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 26, 2012, 12:03 AM
Post #37 of 81
(1033 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
rrrADAM wrote: pinktricam wrote: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude... I am amazed at how often "good behavior" gets the credit that is really due to "lack of oportunity". And, some are actually sexually frustrated and jealous of lesbians, since they get more pussy than they do. I know you have a kid, so you've probably had sex at least once.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sungam
Feb 27, 2012, 12:34 AM
Post #39 of 81
(975 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26352
|
wjca wrote: One of my personal favorites. It has something for everyone. [image]http://highlatencylife.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/drunkgirlskissing.jpg[/image] MOWZ???
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 27, 2012, 6:47 AM
Post #40 of 81
(959 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
curt wrote: guangzhou wrote: While I have fantasized about two women, I am also smart enough to know that me with two women will mean at least one of them will be unsatisfied... Good thing you're only speaking for yourself. Curt Heck, even I can understand curt's point.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lena_chita
Moderator
Feb 27, 2012, 8:18 AM
Post #41 of 81
(942 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 4809
|
j_ung wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it. I didn't miss that at all. It's just irrelevant. it is extremely relevant, becuase your question was:
In reply to: What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And my answer is, it is because any heterosexual man who looks is likely not turned on by the thought that these two girls are LESBIAN, e.i. want nothing to do with men, when it comes to sex, but is turned on because he thinks of having sex with the two of them, e.i. them NOT being homosexual.
|
|
|
 |
 |

camhead
Feb 27, 2012, 8:33 AM
Post #42 of 81
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20413
|
lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it. I didn't miss that at all. It's just irrelevant. it is extremely relevant, becuase your question was: In reply to: What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And my answer is, it is because any heterosexual man who looks is likely not turned on by the thought that these two girls are LESBIAN, e.i. want nothing to do with men, when it comes to sex, but is turned on because he thinks of having sex with the two of them, e.i. them NOT being homosexual. I actually think that, in the fantasy that you describe above, a man would be just as "turned on" by thinking that he is the special case who could just "turn" lesbians into cock-craving hetero-females. There is also the whole thing with female sexuality being more fluid, females are more likely to be bi than males, blablabla.
|
|
|
 |
 |

drivel
Feb 27, 2012, 8:34 AM
Post #43 of 81
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2391
|
pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. GU all over my face on this one I"M SURE, but you admire his... spunk. awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |

drivel
Feb 27, 2012, 8:41 AM
Post #44 of 81
(932 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2391
|
camhead wrote: Here's a question to take it into the realm of too-serious. If a man catches his wife cheating on him with another woman (lesbian), he is less likely to divorce her than if he were to find her cheating with another man. If a woman catches her husband cheating on her with another man (gay), she is MORE likely to divorce him than if she were to find him cheating with another woman. (can't remember the citation) Why is this? The fact that dudes find female on female makeouts so hot might be part of the reason. not the reason. if a man is caught cheating with a man he's likely to just be gay. as in- not interested in women, NEVER WAS interested in women, and the wife feels horribly betrayed because every time they've ever fucked was a lie. feeling desired is such an important component of many if not all women's sexuality, and to find out that it was all a fake must be devastating. on the other hand, if a woman is caught cheating with another woman... well... research shows that women's sexuality is "more fluid" than mens. as in... she's probably just bi. many women are somewhat bi.
|
|
|
 |
 |

drivel
Feb 27, 2012, 8:44 AM
Post #46 of 81
(928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2391
|
guangzhou wrote: While I have fantasized about two women, I am also smart enough to know that me with two women will mean at least one of them will be unsatisfied. One woman is much more capable of satisfying two men than the other way around. durpity.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 27, 2012, 8:52 AM
Post #47 of 81
(923 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
drivel wrote: pinktricam wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: Hey pinktricam, I know you don't care for homosexuality, call it a sin against God and believe that there's a homosexual agenda beyond simple equality, but what do you think about lesbians? I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. Pinky cannot publicly admit that he has ever seen porn, so he cannot say that he knows what they look like. What she said. And here's a public FYI: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude, but just so you know I'm open-minded enough that I'm currently reading The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk. Although I don't condone his self-destructive lifestyle, I do admire his spunk. GU all over my face on this one I"M SURE, but you admire his... spunk. awesome. Yes, apparently he had a LOT of it! The book's also been a colorful and insightful tale of the political and historical foundation of the modern "gay agenda," as well as California politics. All in all, a pretty entertaining read actually.
|
|
|
 |
 |

drivel
Feb 27, 2012, 8:53 AM
Post #48 of 81
(923 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2391
|
lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: lena_chita wrote: j_ung wrote: caughtinside wrote: I know a bunch of the ladies who like ladies, and I can tell you that they are very cool and generally pretty fun. Of the 10 or so weddings I have been to in the last 3 years, the lesbian wedding was the most fun. Yeah, whatever. Yawn. What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... https://www.google.com/...tGT76yE6jr0gGe07i1Dg ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And let's be serious for a moment. Any heterosexual male who isn't turned on by this kind of thing is either lying about it or not really heterosexual. Edit: screwed the tags. trying again. O.K., serious answer. What you are missing here is the fact that a) the majority of those girls in the photos are probably straight, and doing the whole kissing thing for the purpose of arousing that heterosexual guy. (profoundly annoying, IMO, but this is off-topic...) b) many heterosexual guys find the idea of more than one girl at a time very appealing, if not in the real world of their personal lives, then definitely in the realm of fantasy. So they are not looking at those pictures and thinking: ooohhh, two lesbians, how hot is it that these two girls are having sex with each other, and never want anything to do with the guys? Awesome! They are thinking ohhh, two hot girls kissing, I want to be in the middle of THAT action, totally, I'd do them both, ohhh... It is sort of like some women finding gay porn to be hot, NOT because they are homosexual themselves, but because gay or bi- porn is the only situation where you would see some good-looking guys. Let's face it, the guys in regular porn are, on average, rather ugly. Since porn consumption by men is much higher than porn consumption by women, what "regular" heterosexual porn showcases is hot girl(s), and any random guy(s) who have working equipment of reasonable size, and are capable of using it. I didn't miss that at all. It's just irrelevant. it is extremely relevant, becuase your question was: In reply to: What I'm trying to figure out is, how can any heterosexual male (taking pinky at his word here) look at this... ...and be entirely against homosexuality?! And my answer is, it is because any heterosexual man who looks is likely not turned on by the thought that these two girls are LESBIAN, e.i. want nothing to do with men, when it comes to sex, but is turned on because he thinks of having sex with the two of them, e.i. them NOT being homosexual. this. i'd also argue that the guys in fact KNOW that the two girls kissing (in porn, in public at parties, ect) are straight. and while the girls might legit get turned on while they're kissing the other girl... they may or may not be getting turned on BY kissing the other girl. but rather the idea that they're being seen as highly desirable to the nearby het guys. it's also a power thing, because it's like, look at this sexy thing i'm doing NOT with you, no touchee, but isn't this hot? and the guys are turned on at least in part because they KNOW the girls are straight and are putting on a show. there's no real fear that the women will *actually* exclude them from sexual activity, because they're not really lesbians. they're straight girls who are putting on a show. so the guys are turned on by the idea of being catered to, and the girls by the idea of being desired, and this idea is just as present in most of those images as it is in real time, at-a-party-blah.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Feb 27, 2012, 11:08 AM
Post #49 of 81
(904 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 1491
|
It's not difficult to understand. It's the "Rooster Effect": - When one rooster is in a hen-house, he can strut for the hens. Everybody is at peace. - When a second rooster comes into the hen-house, the guys have to assert their dominance, strut and crow, and maybe fight. It's the same with men: - If a guy is kissing a girl, he's OK. - If another guy is kissing the girl, that's the time and place for his macho maleness to strut and crow, and maybe fight. But the girl-on-girl scenario is not another guy kissing the girl, so his macho maleness doesn't have to assert itself, and he can watch without the need for dominance.
|
|
|
 |
 |

cracklover
Feb 27, 2012, 12:03 PM
Post #50 of 81
(879 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9676
|
If Drivel is right, then it has nothing to do with homosexuality. In fact, confronted with real lesbian girl-on-girl, a hetero guy might feel excluded, which is not a turn-on. As for me, images like that aren't about homo- or hetero- they're just pictures of hot (or not) girls being sensual. Which is typically a turn-on (duh). GO
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 27, 2012, 6:15 PM
Post #51 of 81
(1142 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
drivel wrote: camhead wrote: Here's a question to take it into the realm of too-serious. If a man catches his wife cheating on him with another woman (lesbian), he is less likely to divorce her than if he were to find her cheating with another man. If a woman catches her husband cheating on her with another man (gay), she is MORE likely to divorce him than if she were to find him cheating with another woman. (can't remember the citation) Why is this? The fact that dudes find female on female makeouts so hot might be part of the reason. not the reason. if a man is caught cheating with a man he's likely to just be gay. as in- not interested in women, NEVER WAS interested in women, and the wife feels horribly betrayed because every time they've ever fucked was a lie. feeling desired is such an important component of many if not all women's sexuality, and to find out that it was all a fake must be devastating. on the other hand, if a woman is caught cheating with another woman... well... research shows that women's sexuality is "more fluid" than mens. as in... she's probably just bi. many women are somewhat bi. So, men who are attracted to man are homosexual, and woman who are attracted to women are bi-sexual? Another-word, homosexual is only for the male gender. Translation, a woman has to like men, even if she also likes women because men are the center of the world when it come to sex.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 28, 2012, 1:10 AM
Post #52 of 81
(1126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
guangzhou wrote: Another-word, homosexual is only for the male gender. No, it is the same nomenclature and abomination with either same-gender sexual relationship, whether male or female. The term "lesbian" has its etymological roots stemming back to the heathen perversities going on during certain Greek female vernal rites on the island of Lésvos, in the E Aegean, off the NW coast of Turkey. This island was annexed by Greece in 1913. I hope that helps.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 28, 2012, 2:54 AM
Post #53 of 81
(1119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
pinktricam wrote: guangzhou wrote: Another-word, homosexual is only for the male gender. No, it is the same nomenclature and abomination with either same-gender sexual relationship, whether male or female. Your faith clouds your judgement once more. Years from now, readers will enjoy the stories of the Bible and the god it portrays much like we enjoy Greek Mythology today. A fun and entertaining read.
(This post was edited by guangzhou on Feb 28, 2012, 3:01 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 28, 2012, 4:26 AM
Post #54 of 81
(1112 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
pinktricam wrote: guangzhou wrote: Another-word, homosexual is only for the male gender. No, it is the same nomenclature and abomination with either same-gender sexual relationship, whether male or female. The term "lesbian" has its etymological roots stemming back to the heathen perversities going on during certain Greek female vernal rites on the island of Lésvos, in the E Aegean, off the NW coast of Turkey. This island was annexed by Greece in 1913. I hope that helps. Yeah, that's it. Lie to me, baby.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Feb 28, 2012, 4:31 AM
Post #55 of 81
(1109 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18681
|
What if it were these two, Eric?
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Feb 28, 2012, 1:07 PM
Post #58 of 81
(1051 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
guangzhou wrote: Years from now, readers will enjoy the stories of the Bible and the god it portrays much like we enjoy Greek Mythology today. A fun and entertaining read. I don't think so. It's been well over 2000 years and the Word is still changing lives. It's a living thing.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sungam
Feb 28, 2012, 2:40 PM
Post #59 of 81
(1032 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26352
|
pinktricam wrote: guangzhou wrote: Years from now, readers will enjoy the stories of the Bible and the god it portrays much like we enjoy Greek Mythology today. A fun and entertaining read. I don't think so. It's been well over 2000 years and the Word is still changing lives. It's a living thing. I wonder how long Greek/Roman mythology (and egyptian etc.) were the major religions in their respective empires. It's pretty stupid to say something is correct just because it has been believed for a long time. In fact it's incredibly stupid.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Feb 28, 2012, 2:48 PM
Post #60 of 81
(1026 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week.
|
|
|
 |
 |

camhead
Feb 28, 2012, 6:13 PM
Post #61 of 81
(992 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20413
|
sungam wrote: pinktricam wrote: guangzhou wrote: Years from now, readers will enjoy the stories of the Bible and the god it portrays much like we enjoy Greek Mythology today. A fun and entertaining read. I don't think so. It's been well over 2000 years and the Word is still changing lives. It's a living thing. I wonder how long Greek/Roman mythology (and egyptian etc.) were the major religions in their respective empires. It's pretty stupid to say something is correct just because it has been believed for a long time. In fact it's incredibly stupid. Well, the nature of more syncretic polytheisms make it difficult to say when exactly all those religions began and ended, especially because all of them evolved even more than Christianity/Islam/Judaism have. The Greco-Roman pantheon, however, lasted for well over 2,000 years. Egyptian gods were worshiped more or less consistently from before 3500 BCE to the Roman period as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Feb 28, 2012, 7:49 PM
Post #62 of 81
(985 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25321
|
camhead wrote: j_ung wrote: What if it were these two, Eric?  Throw in a couple strap-ons, some guns, and Anne Coulter, and PTC's head would explode. JEOMK!!! Whoops. Another abortion on my keyboard.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 28, 2012, 8:17 PM
Post #63 of 81
(981 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
cracklover wrote: As for me, images like that aren't about homo- or hetero- they're just pictures of hot (or not) girls being sensual. Which is typically a turn-on (duh). GO Exactly. No need to over think something so simple.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Feb 28, 2012, 8:28 PM
Post #64 of 81
(976 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17628
|
drivel wrote: guangzhou wrote: While I have fantasized about two women, I am also smart enough to know that me with two women will mean at least one of them will be unsatisfied. One woman is much more capable of satisfying two men than the other way around. durpity. It seems to me that this whole line of thinking misses the point of a threesome. If one person is being tasked with satisfy the other two, I would say you're doing it wrong.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Feb 28, 2012, 8:39 PM
Post #65 of 81
(971 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
Option One: 2 women willing to go down on each other while still enjoying a man's touch. Two bi women Option two: 2 men willing to pitch and catch for each other while still being interested in the woman. two bi men Option three: 1 straight woman with two men.
(This post was edited by guangzhou on Feb 28, 2012, 8:42 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Feb 28, 2012, 9:06 PM
Post #66 of 81
(959 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 1491
|
guangzhou wrote: Option One: 2 women willing to go down on each other while still enjoying a man's touch. Two bi women Option two: 2 men willing to pitch and catch for each other while still being interested in the woman. two bi men Option three: 1 straight woman with two men. Option four: Your fantasy.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Mar 1, 2012, 1:43 AM
Post #67 of 81
(903 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
pinktricam wrote: rrrADAM wrote: pinktricam wrote: I know a couple folks here think I'm a bit of a prude... I am amazed at how often "good behavior" gets the credit that is really due to "lack of oportunity". And, some are actually sexually frustrated and jealous of lesbians, since they get more pussy than they do. I know you have a kid, so you've probably had sex at least once. Actually, I have two, and they both have been posted about many times on this site, even with pics, so again we have confirmation that "what you know" is a very limited and skewed view of the world, even when the evidence is all around you. In fact, I'll bet that I can find just such a thread that shows I have two where you have even replied, showing that even what you "should know", you don't. "Oblivious"
(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 1, 2012, 1:44 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Mar 1, 2012, 1:54 AM
Post #68 of 81
(900 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. Busy month. As for homosexuality being an abomination... Another inconvenient question/point for Eric to ignore: Seeing as how God, according to the nut-jobs, created all life on the planet, and he doesn't make mistakes, and gave Man "free will", for them to choose to be homo or straight... How does this account for some chimpanzees and most gibons who regularly practice homesexual behavior? Point, if it is a choice (free will) and not nature (made by God), then how do you account for homosexual behaviour of those primates?
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Mar 1, 2012, 7:51 AM
Post #69 of 81
(878 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25321
|
rrrADAM wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. Busy month. As for homosexuality being an abomination... Another inconvenient question/point for Eric to ignore: Seeing as how God, according to the nut-jobs, created all life on the planet, and he doesn't make mistakes, and gave Man "free will", for them to choose to be homo or straight... How does this account for some chimpanzees and most gibons who regularly practice homesexual behavior? Point, if it is a choice (free will) and not nature (made by God), then how do you account for homosexual behaviour of those primates? Primates are not homosexual. I have video evidence to prove it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVE60zwXx1k&noredirect=1
|
|
|
 |
 |

camhead
Mar 1, 2012, 8:01 AM
Post #70 of 81
(869 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20413
|
dr_feelgood wrote: rrrADAM wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. Busy month. As for homosexuality being an abomination... Another inconvenient question/point for Eric to ignore: Seeing as how God, according to the nut-jobs, created all life on the planet, and he doesn't make mistakes, and gave Man "free will", for them to choose to be homo or straight... How does this account for some chimpanzees and most gibons who regularly practice homesexual behavior? Point, if it is a choice (free will) and not nature (made by God), then how do you account for homosexual behaviour of those primates? Primates are not homosexual. I have video evidence to prove it: http://www.youtube.com/...x1k&noredirect=1 The beauty of God's creation in this special world never ceases to amaze me. Praise be to the frog-mouthrapers!
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Mar 1, 2012, 8:01 AM
Post #71 of 81
(868 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571
|
squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Mar 1, 2012, 8:15 AM
Post #72 of 81
(866 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 1491
|
rrrADAM wrote: ... Seeing as how God, according to the nut-jobs The Bible, created all life on the planet, and he doesn't make mistakes, and gave Man "free will", for them to choose to be homo or straight... ... and to re-write the Bible in the post-Babylon language of choice. Folks involved with the text know how serious is problem of mis-interpreting and mis-spelling the text. They know how God is infallible, but men are not.
rrrADAM wrote: ... How does this account for some chimpanzees and most gibons who regularly practice homesexual behavior? Point, if it is a choice (free will) and not nature (made by God), then how do you account for homosexual behaviour of those primates? Hey! We are not chimpanzees or gibbons. And we don't have to account for the behavior of anybody -- we were born this way. So now, I accuse all you guys of mis-interpreting the OP in the first place:
j_ung wrote: ... I'm talking about hot-as-hell, porn-style lesbos. And since then, you've been squawking like squirrels about ... about what? porn-style lesbos? Or your own attitudes? Uhh... BTW... male squirrels are like roosters. They squawk a lot, but it's not about the girls, it's about their own selves.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Mar 1, 2012, 3:04 PM
Post #73 of 81
(831 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." She laughed, and said, "You're old!"
|
|
|
 |
 |

jt512
Mar 1, 2012, 5:02 PM
Post #74 of 81
(821 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21792
|
rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay
|
|
|
 |
 |

macherry
Mar 1, 2012, 6:11 PM
Post #75 of 81
(802 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15520
|
jt512 wrote: rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay heh!
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Mar 1, 2012, 6:15 PM
Post #76 of 81
(558 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
macherry wrote: jt512 wrote: rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay heh! 45? Hell, I can hardly even remember back when I was 45. Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

macherry
Mar 1, 2012, 7:24 PM
Post #77 of 81
(545 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15520
|
curt wrote: macherry wrote: jt512 wrote: rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay heh! 45? Hell, I can hardly even remember back when I was 45. Curt ah youth!!
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 1, 2012, 11:09 PM
Post #78 of 81
(527 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
curt wrote: macherry wrote: jt512 wrote: rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay heh! 45? Hell, I can hardly even remember back when I was 45. Curt Must be the scotch.
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Mar 2, 2012, 7:59 AM
Post #79 of 81
(497 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571
|
Or the senility
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Mar 2, 2012, 8:30 AM
Post #80 of 81
(490 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
rrrADAM wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. Busy month. As for homosexuality being an abomination... Another inconvenient question/point for Eric to ignore: Seeing as how God, according to the nut-jobs, created all life on the planet, and he doesn't make mistakes, and gave Man "free will", for them to choose to be homo or straight... How does this account for some chimpanzees and most gibons who regularly practice homesexual behavior? Point, if it is a choice (free will) and not nature (made by God), then how do you account for homosexual behaviour of those primates? Have to correct myself here... Bonobos, not gibons.
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Mar 3, 2012, 12:06 PM
Post #81 of 81
(432 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: macherry wrote: jt512 wrote: rrrADAM wrote: petsfed wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: Not a single post from Adam since this thread devolved into religion. Must be a busy week. It usually takes me between 45 minutes and 4 hours to fully recover. Adam's older, so it probably takes him longer still. I'm old. Ironically enough... I was telling Karen the other day... "Ya know, even though I'm only 45, I realized that in less than 5 years I'll be 50... Doesn't sound good that way." Shut up. Jay heh! 45? Hell, I can hardly even remember back when I was 45. Curt Must be the scotch. No, I remember the scotch. Curt
|
|
|
 |
|
|