Forums: Rockclimbing.com: Suggestions & Feedback:
Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Suggestions & Feedback

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


Toast_in_the_Machine


Apr 1, 2011, 3:58 PM
Post #101 of 137 (3222 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [kachoong] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ceebo wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

Getting busy with a man's fanny to most English speakers, by definition is impossible.

Perhaps you should define English.

If by the possessive you imply ownership of his mate's parts, then it is not impossible at all.

I'm not sure you understand what he means.

Please assume I do.


Arrogant_Bastard


Apr 1, 2011, 3:58 PM
Post #102 of 137 (3222 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [kachoong] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kachoong wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ceebo wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

Getting busy with a man's fanny to most English speakers, by definition is impossible.

Perhaps you should define English.

If by the possessive you imply ownership of his mate's parts, then it is not impossible at all.

I'm not sure you understand what he means.

Fixied. And Woo!


Arrogant_Bastard


Apr 1, 2011, 3:59 PM
Post #103 of 137 (3220 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ceebo wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

Getting busy with a man's fanny to most English speakers, by definition is impossible.

Perhaps you should define English.

If by the possessive you imply ownership of his mate's parts, then it is not impossible at all.

I'm not sure you understand what he means.

Please assume I do.

Mad


Toast_in_the_Machine


Apr 1, 2011, 4:45 PM
Post #104 of 137 (3214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
kachoong wrote:
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
ceebo wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

Getting busy with a man's fanny to most English speakers, by definition is impossible.

Perhaps you should define English.

If by the possessive you imply ownership of his mate's parts, then it is not impossible at all.

I'm not sure you understand what he means.

Please assume I do.

Mad

Your down with OPP.


Gmburns2000


Apr 4, 2011, 8:58 AM
Post #105 of 137 (3169 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15152

Re: [jt512] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

I'm late, but this is completely false.


Toast_in_the_Machine


Apr 4, 2011, 9:10 AM
Post #106 of 137 (3165 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Gmburns2000] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gmburns2000 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

I'm late, but this is completely false.

You are of course taking into consideration that most engrish speakers are in China.

That, and since you are late, you're not his first mate. And since you are the fourth one you are not a prime mate either.


Gmburns2000


Apr 4, 2011, 9:30 AM
Post #107 of 137 (3158 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15152

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Toast_in_the_Machine wrote:
Gmburns2000 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
blondgecko wrote:
ceebo wrote:
In reply to:
A post that consists in its entirety of a personal attack will almost certainly be hidden - unless, in context, it's obvious that it's harmless ribbing between friends.

At some point, while lining them up to knock them down.. each person unknowingly signed his friendship form?. In that case, HI M8!.

Mostly their are good topics at RC, and people giving their opinions, even if wrong. But every time he steps in he has to make it ALL personal. As a result the topic from their on out falls apart.. at least until they give up and let him have his childish last word.

Every 10 topics he destroys that could have generated countless more debate and info.. he makes one fucking post about how to eat well?. And you think that is worth putting up with the bs he dishes out daily?.

How many people do you think would like to post a question, but decide not too because they anticipate the likes of jay ( And a few others) will completely rip them apart. Sounds counter productive to the purpose of this place to me.

From a M8 to a M8, you are a joke! Laugh

Speaking of going off topic and making things personal... physician, heal thyself.

As for the sentence of mine you quoted, I do not think it means what you think it means.

I would just like to point out—in a completely non-judgmental manner—that to most English speakers, people who are "mates," by definition, are people who have sex with each other.

That said, carry on (so to speak).

Jay

I'm late, but this is completely false.

You are of course taking into consideration that most engrish speakers are in China.

That, and since you are late, you're not his first mate. And since you are the fourth one you are not a prime mate either.
I'm taking into account that most english speakers, including those in North America who primarily use the word "mate" in a sexual context, realize that most of the English-speaking countries primarily use the word in a completely non-sexual manner. And regardless of how informal that use may be, one will still find that informal use in the dictionary.

Now, whether or not he meant to imply that a ship's first mate may be the top sexual interest of the crew is completely up for debate.


USnavy


Mar 14, 2012, 4:33 AM
Post #108 of 137 (2866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2007
Posts: 2661

Re: [jt512] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
Anonymous post ratings do not work, and the system should either be changed such that raters are held publicly accountable for their ratings, or post ratings should be discontinued altogether.

Here I posted a link to a professional-quality video of two climbers doing one of the most famous and infamous routes of all time: the Bachar–Yerian—and it gets three votes, all one-star.

Enough is enough. Either hold people publicly accountable for their post ratings, or do away with post ratings altogether. The current system does not work.

Jay
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:



Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly


(This post was edited by USnavy on Mar 14, 2012, 4:41 AM)


mojomonkey


Mar 14, 2012, 4:43 PM
Post #109 of 137 (2838 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 843

Re: [USnavy] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

USnavy wrote:
So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

This post from you is amusing, given how much time you spent one-starring adatesman once upon a time.


USnavy


Mar 16, 2012, 10:03 AM
Post #110 of 137 (2807 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2007
Posts: 2661

Re: [mojomonkey] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

mojomonkey wrote:
USnavy wrote:
So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

This post from you is amusing, given how much time you spent one-starring adatesman once upon a time.
I was one staring adatesman? No you got it backwards. I dont one star much of anyone, especially now, I have better to things to do. He on the other hand spent days going through every single post I ever made and one stared them all. Hows that for nerd rage? Kind of a waste of his time considering my browser doesent even load the stars anymore...


(This post was edited by USnavy on Mar 16, 2012, 10:11 AM)


TonyB3


Mar 19, 2012, 12:46 PM
Post #111 of 137 (2754 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2011
Posts: 32

Re: [USnavy] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

USnavy wrote:
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:


Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

The point of the star rating is to rate a post based on it's validity, not to stroke your personal ego. You can pull an ostrich move and hide your head in the sand, but virtually all of your posts get one starred and it alerts everyone else reading it to the fact that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are dangerous to take any sort of advice from.


Partner j_ung


Mar 21, 2012, 10:37 AM
Post #112 of 137 (2704 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18687

Re: [TonyB3] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

TonyB3 wrote:
USnavy wrote:
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:


Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

The point of the star rating is to rate a post based on it's validity, not to stroke your personal ego. You can pull an ostrich move and hide your head in the sand, but virtually all of your posts get one starred and it alerts everyone else reading it to the fact that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are dangerous to take any sort of advice from.

Bullshit. If the point is to rate posts based on the post's validity (and it is), not the user's popularity, then blanket 1-starring of anybody's posts is thoroughly counterproductive. I just saw one of usnavy's posts in another thread that was spot on... with one star.


shotwell


Mar 22, 2012, 10:09 AM
Post #113 of 137 (2669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 5, 2009
Posts: 366

Re: [j_ung] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
TonyB3 wrote:
USnavy wrote:
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:


Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

The point of the star rating is to rate a post based on it's validity, not to stroke your personal ego. You can pull an ostrich move and hide your head in the sand, but virtually all of your posts get one starred and it alerts everyone else reading it to the fact that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are dangerous to take any sort of advice from.

Bullshit. If the point is to rate posts based on the post's validity (and it is), not the user's popularity, then blanket 1-starring of anybody's posts is thoroughly counterproductive. I just saw one of usnavy's posts in another thread that was spot on... with one star.

Yea, but...but....but...TonyB3 just wants everyone to know he thinks USNavy and JT512 are big mean dummy heads. What good is a star system if it isn't used for this?

Seriously though, I see lots of great posts 1 starred. USNavy, JT512, Curt, and Lena Chita are all perpetually 1 starred. I don't value USNavy's opinion with those others, but the others are all quite high in my esteem. The system is worthless because the ratings are populated by fools and noobs.

Of course, I get a lot of 1 star posts as well. Especially when I'm right. Laugh


notapplicable


Mar 23, 2012, 7:44 PM
Post #114 of 137 (2640 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17766

Re: [shotwell] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

shotwell wrote:
j_ung wrote:
TonyB3 wrote:
USnavy wrote:
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:


Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

The point of the star rating is to rate a post based on it's validity, not to stroke your personal ego. You can pull an ostrich move and hide your head in the sand, but virtually all of your posts get one starred and it alerts everyone else reading it to the fact that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are dangerous to take any sort of advice from.

Bullshit. If the point is to rate posts based on the post's validity (and it is), not the user's popularity, then blanket 1-starring of anybody's posts is thoroughly counterproductive. I just saw one of usnavy's posts in another thread that was spot on... with one star.

Yea, but...but....but...TonyB3 just wants everyone to know he thinks USNavy and JT512 are big mean dummy heads. What good is a star system if it isn't used for this?

Seriously though, I see lots of great posts 1 starred. USNavy, JT512, Curt, and Lena Chita are all perpetually 1 starred. I don't value USNavy's opinion with those others, but the others are all quite high in my esteem. The system is worthless because the ratings are populated by fools and noobs.

Of course, I get a lot of 1 star posts as well. Especially when I'm right. Laugh

The system should be tweaked so that only users with 10K+ posts can rate other posts. That way only the most experienced folks are doing the rating.


(This post was edited by notapplicable on Mar 23, 2012, 7:45 PM)


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:17 AM
Post #115 of 137 (2618 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [notapplicable] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

notapplicable wrote:
shotwell wrote:
j_ung wrote:
TonyB3 wrote:
USnavy wrote:
Its pretty easy to remove the rating system. Just KillFile it. Or more specifically, Ad-Block Plus it away. Here is the new improved version of rc.com:


Problem solved.

So the haters that one star you just to one star you, they are wasting their time, you wont even see their vote. Sly

The point of the star rating is to rate a post based on it's validity, not to stroke your personal ego. You can pull an ostrich move and hide your head in the sand, but virtually all of your posts get one starred and it alerts everyone else reading it to the fact that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and are dangerous to take any sort of advice from.

Bullshit. If the point is to rate posts based on the post's validity (and it is), not the user's popularity, then blanket 1-starring of anybody's posts is thoroughly counterproductive. I just saw one of usnavy's posts in another thread that was spot on... with one star.

Yea, but...but....but...TonyB3 just wants everyone to know he thinks USNavy and JT512 are big mean dummy heads. What good is a star system if it isn't used for this?

Seriously though, I see lots of great posts 1 starred. USNavy, JT512, Curt, and Lena Chita are all perpetually 1 starred. I don't value USNavy's opinion with those others, but the others are all quite high in my esteem. The system is worthless because the ratings are populated by fools and noobs.

Of course, I get a lot of 1 star posts as well. Especially when I'm right. Laugh

The system should be tweaked so that only users with 10K+ posts can rate other posts. That way only the most experienced folks are doing the rating.
Don't you


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:18 AM
Post #116 of 137 (2616 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [notapplicable] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mean


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:19 AM
Post #117 of 137 (2614 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

biggest


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:20 AM
Post #118 of 137 (2612 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

post whores or


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:21 AM
Post #119 of 137 (2610 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Scummunity


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:22 AM
Post #120 of 137 (2607 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dregs


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:23 AM
Post #121 of 137 (2605 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

who


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:24 AM
Post #122 of 137 (2602 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

play games


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:25 AM
Post #123 of 137 (2593 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

with posts


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:26 AM
Post #124 of 137 (2591 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

like going for,


Toast_in_the_Machine


Mar 24, 2012, 5:28 AM
Post #125 of 137 (2589 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5184

Re: [Toast_in_the_Machine] Anonymous post ratings: enough is enough [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you know, those posts that

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Rockclimbing.com : Suggestions & Feedback

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook