|
TheShyTed
Feb 20, 2013, 9:24 PM
Post #1 of 61
(1557 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Feb 20, 2013, 10:02 PM
Post #2 of 61
(1537 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 8830
|
TheShyTed wrote: I had a trad belaying accident last year where the first piece of protection came out and the climber basically landed on my head. Severe back and whiplash type pain since on the right hand side. I cant belay now for more than a few minutes without feeling discomfort. I cant go on trips with my dad climbing now - unless there are other people to belay. Pretty annoying. I saw the add for Belaggles belay glasses - has anyone tried them? They are $80 so not too bad but still its a big investment for me.
It's generally considered bad form to make a second account pretending to be a curious third party to hawk your product.
Just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 20, 2013, 10:18 PM
Post #3 of 61
(1522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 20, 2013, 10:19 PM
Post #4 of 61
(1521 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
gblauer
Moderator
Feb 20, 2013, 10:21 PM
Post #5 of 61
(1518 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2002
Posts: 2598
|
I just purchased a pair. Once I test them, I will write a review.
|
|
|
|
|
Syd
Feb 21, 2013, 4:25 PM
Post #7 of 61
(1381 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 200
|
We bought a pair ages ago. I wear prescription glasses and the belay glass have a metal edge that would scratch my glasses, so I can't use them ... they'd be impractical for me anyway. My wife used them for a little while but they seemed to much of a hassle.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Feb 21, 2013, 4:51 PM
Post #8 of 61
(1374 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2804
|
I saw a guy using them in a gym once (Momentum in SLC). Seemed odd but c'est la vie.
I guess if you're used to wearing glasses they might be OK, but as someone who only wears sunglasses they'd be a royal PITA for me.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 21, 2013, 8:41 PM
Post #9 of 61
(1343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
Belay glasses
Good god, climbing is hitting the toilet far faster than I feared. Now we're in the septic tank.
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 21, 2013, 9:05 PM
Post #10 of 61
(1331 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 21, 2013, 9:14 PM
Post #11 of 61
(1325 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
What an idiot...
My response has nothing to do with climbing 5.14. It has everything to do with the complete pussification of climbing by people like you.
(This post was edited by socalclimber on Feb 21, 2013, 9:15 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 21, 2013, 9:22 PM
Post #12 of 61
(1316 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 21, 2013, 9:31 PM
Post #13 of 61
(1309 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Feb 21, 2013, 9:36 PM
Post #14 of 61
(1302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4186
|
Belay glasses represent a solution to one of the world's most pressing first world problems.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 21, 2013, 9:38 PM
Post #15 of 61
(1302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21781
|
TheShyTed wrote: Yes. Why would people who are not 100% able bodied even want to climb. Loosers. If you are not climbing 5.14 barefoot then you are just bringing the sport into disrepute. Similarly, I saw a guy climbing with one leg the other day and he had tried to overcome his disability by sticking a piece of plastic on the end with a shoe on - urrgggh - climbing is really in the toilet - septic tank no less. [EXTREME SARCASM AND DIRE DISTASTE FOR THIS QUOTED COMMENT FOR ANYONE WHO CANNOT PICKUP THEREON] Crack lover - that you are because your head is right up one - whether you are tied in or not. I hope please I can be removed from this forum. I have tried to suspend/delete the account but its seemingly impossible.
I, too, "hope please that [you] can be removed from this forum."
In general, I'm opposed to a person being able to request the wholesale obliteration of his or her posts to a forum, but in your case I'd argue that an exception should be made.
Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Feb 21, 2013, 9:39 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 21, 2013, 9:48 PM
Post #16 of 61
(1294 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
Yes - if [you] support comments such as 'complete pussification of the sport' we really do not belong in the same space.
(This post was edited by TheShyTed on Feb 21, 2013, 9:48 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 22, 2013, 3:55 AM
Post #17 of 61
(1260 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
TheShyTed wrote: Yes - if [you] support comments such as 'complete pussification of the sport' we really do not belong in the same space.
That's the first accurate thing you have said. Do everybody a favor and stay in the gym. It's safer there.
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 22, 2013, 4:17 AM
Post #18 of 61
(1234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
socalclimber wrote: TheShyTed wrote: Yes - if [you] support comments such as 'complete pussification of the sport' we really do not belong in the same space. That's the first accurate thing you have said. Do everybody a favor and stay in the gym. It's safer there.
You are that old guy from j tree. I just checked your profile. I know you. And you know all the people I climb with. Very well in fact. Will be interesting when we meet. I wonder if you will abuse me to my face. Probably. Also - the glasses - got them - they are great. At potosi today belaying on that gigantic roof and they work a treat. I recommend them who anyone who can take a bit tong lashing from our mr nasty. Mr nasty - swap your keyboard for a fingerboard as you have a lot of strength gains to make if you are who you say you are.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 22, 2013, 4:28 AM
Post #19 of 61
(1225 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
Yup, I'm the old bastard from josh.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Feb 22, 2013, 6:24 AM
Post #20 of 61
(1205 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14041
|
socalclimber wrote: What an idiot... My response has nothing to do with climbing 5.14. It has everything to do with the complete pussification of climbing by people like you.
What abou the pussification of the sport by people like Lynn Hill, Josune Bereziartu and Ines Parpert?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Feb 22, 2013, 6:52 AM
Post #21 of 61
(1195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7160
|
socalclimber wrote: Yup, I'm the old bastard from josh.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 22, 2013, 9:06 AM
Post #22 of 61
(1171 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
granite_grrl wrote: socalclimber wrote: What an idiot... My response has nothing to do with climbing 5.14. It has everything to do with the complete pussification of climbing by people like you. What abou the pussification of the sport by people like Lynn Hill, Josune Bereziartu and Ines Parpert?
Don't confuse product endorsements for reality. Sponsored climbers are just that. Sponsored.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Feb 22, 2013, 9:59 AM
Post #23 of 61
(1150 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14041
|
socalclimber wrote: granite_grrl wrote: socalclimber wrote: What an idiot... My response has nothing to do with climbing 5.14. It has everything to do with the complete pussification of climbing by people like you. What abou the pussification of the sport by people like Lynn Hill, Josune Bereziartu and Ines Parpert? Don't confuse product endorsements for reality. Sponsored climbers are just that. Sponsored.
While I fully understand what you're saying about sponsered climbers you have either fully missed the point of what I was getting at or just don't give a fuck about your misogynistic language.
I am looking forward to this weekend where I'll continue to do my part to contribute to the pussification of climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
jeepnphreak
Feb 22, 2013, 10:17 AM
Post #24 of 61
(1145 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 1240
|
TheShyTed wrote: [image]Pussy - well yes, but actually no.
She is cute
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 22, 2013, 12:26 PM
Post #25 of 61
(1114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 9675
|
In reply to: Crack lover - that you are because your head is right up one - whether you are tied in or not. I hope please I can be removed from this forum. I have tried to suspend/delete the account but its seemingly impossible.
TheShyTed wrote: Crack lover - get lost - really. Even injured - I can probably out climb you most days.
Dude, fuck off. I didn't even post in this retarded thread of yours. Get a clue - your friend socalclimber has a quote of mine as his tag line. He and I are different people.
Oh, and for the record, I'm "pussy" enough to wear belay glasses (the CU Belay ones), and I have no problem with that. But I will personally warn everyone against buying your brand of begoggles or whatever stupid name you call them.
As for removing yourself from the forum - it's easy, just stop posting. Oh, and don't start posting as another new pseudo-user.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 22, 2013, 12:43 PM
Post #26 of 61
(480 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
Sorry - i didnt realise i was responding to the wrong person. I havent used an online forum. I posted a simple question asking for product feedback and I honestly didnt even expect any one would reply. I didnt bargain at being abused for being injured ('people who need belay glasses are responsible for pussification of the sport') and thereafter being further abused with misogynistic comments - which I find very offensive. I know now these comments didn't come from you and thus I apologise for having used the wrong name to respond.
As for plugging a brand - I have no affiliation with any brand and I borrowed a pair to use of the CU's from another climber. I didnt even know there was multiple brands until after seeing the first advertised and then seeing someone at the crag. So i don't know what you are driving at with that.
As for removing myself - gladly - because I don't speak to people in the manner people speak on here - its really upsetting to have people say such nasty things for no reason further to a simple enquiry. I dont want to be involved with this. I dont have energy or inclination for fighting in chat rooms. Whats the point. I know some people thrive of this type of interaction judging by the thousands of previous (mostly even more nasty) comments.
SO - PLEASE TELL ME HOW I CAN TURN OFF EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS - THANKS. I CANNOT FIND ANY OPTION TO DO THIS.
(This post was edited by TheShyTed on Feb 22, 2013, 12:50 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Feb 22, 2013, 1:00 PM
Post #27 of 61
(464 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2009
Posts: 1847
|
why how RUDE everyone is on this thread ... over a pair of glasses ...
can't blame me for that one 
bottom line ... wear em if you want, dont wear em if you dont want ... its not going to kill you ...
everyone is a pussy at one point or another when climbing 
|
|
|
|
|
JimTitt
Feb 22, 2013, 1:01 PM
Post #28 of 61
(459 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 865
|
If you donīt post you wonīt get a reply or a notification.
|
|
|
|
|
JimTitt
Feb 22, 2013, 1:02 PM
Post #29 of 61
(458 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 865
|
See, it worked. You posted and got a reply.
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 22, 2013, 2:34 PM
Post #31 of 61
(432 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
bearbreeder wrote: why how RUDE everyone is on this thread ... over a pair of glasses ... can't blame me for that one bottom line ... wear em if you want, dont wear em if you dont want ... its not going to kill you ... everyone is a pussy at one point or another when climbing
I promise you I've had my fair share of moments...
|
|
|
|
|
socalclimber
Feb 22, 2013, 2:57 PM
Post #32 of 61
(425 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 2374
|
csproul wrote: socalclimber wrote: Belay glasses Good god, climbing is hitting the toilet far faster than I feared. Now we're in the septic tank. I know, look at this "pussy". I think you might know who that is. [image]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f340/johnbachar/BelayGlassesWeb.jpg[/image] He didn't like them either: http://www.supertopo.com/...CU-Belay-Glasses-wow
It's amazing what part of sponsored climber you people seem to completely not understand.
Please continue to be distracted by shiny objects.
(This post was edited by socalclimber on Feb 22, 2013, 2:59 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
csproul
Feb 22, 2013, 3:58 PM
Post #33 of 61
(411 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1690
|
socalclimber wrote: csproul wrote: socalclimber wrote: Belay glasses Good god, climbing is hitting the toilet far faster than I feared. Now we're in the septic tank. I know, look at this "pussy". I think you might know who that is. [image]http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f340/johnbachar/BelayGlassesWeb.jpg[/image] He didn't like them either: http://www.supertopo.com/...CU-Belay-Glasses-wowIt's amazing what part of sponsored climber you people seem to completely not understand. Please continue to be distracted by shiny objects.
(This post was edited by csproul on Feb 22, 2013, 4:03 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
BillyCrook
Feb 22, 2013, 5:44 PM
Post #35 of 61
(377 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 16, 2012
Posts: 25
|
bearbreeder wrote: bottom line ... wear em if you want, dont wear em if you dont want ... its not going to kill you ...
It doesn't sound smart to keep large chunks of glass directly in-front of your eyes though. Glasses are bad enough. I much prefer soft contacts.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 10:03 AM
Post #37 of 61
(323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
TheShyTed wrote: Sorry - i didnt realise i was responding to the wrong person. I havent used an online forum. I posted a simple question asking for product feedback and I honestly didnt even expect any one would reply. I didnt bargain at being abused for being injured ('people who need belay glasses are responsible for pussification of the sport') and thereafter being further abused with misogynistic comments - which I find very offensive. I know now these comments didn't come from you and thus I apologise for having used the wrong name to respond. As for plugging a brand - I have no affiliation with any brand and I borrowed a pair to use of the CU's from another climber. I didnt even know there was multiple brands until after seeing the first advertised and then seeing someone at the crag. So i don't know what you are driving at with that. As for removing myself - gladly - because I don't speak to people in the manner people speak on here - its really upsetting to have people say such nasty things for no reason further to a simple enquiry. I dont want to be involved with this. I dont have energy or inclination for fighting in chat rooms. Whats the point. I know some people thrive of this type of interaction judging by the thousands of previous (mostly even more nasty) comments. SO - PLEASE TELL ME HOW I CAN TURN OFF EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS - THANKS. I CANNOT FIND ANY OPTION TO DO THIS.
I think I just found a fun, new way to inflate my PC
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 10:04 AM
Post #38 of 61
(321 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes.
Day 1
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 23, 2013, 10:09 AM
Post #39 of 61
(317 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Feb 23, 2013, 10:42 AM
Post #40 of 61
(314 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2009
Posts: 1847
|
I would say we got a live one!
But that would be plain RUDE
|
|
|
|
|
JimTitt
Feb 23, 2013, 11:20 AM
Post #41 of 61
(302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 865
|
TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory.
You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user."
And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! "
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 11:28 AM
Post #42 of 61
(294 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory.
1. Your username is Ted, so don't get all excited because I thought you were a dudebro.
2. For a lawyer, you're grammar is particularly appalling. Was that an online degree you received?
3. This is the second time I have been threatened with legal action by another user on this site. I'm trying to decide if I should just be proud or ecstatically so.
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 23, 2013, 11:36 AM
Post #43 of 61
(290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! "
Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 23, 2013, 11:41 AM
Post #44 of 61
(284 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21781
|
TheShyTed wrote: Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. .
Are you the lawyer or the one she is climbing?
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Feb 23, 2013, 11:49 AM
Post #45 of 61
(278 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 14399
|
TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website.
considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 11:49 AM
Post #46 of 61
(276 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website.
Shoot me a PM if you want my contact info. I'd be happy to fly out there and watch you get laughed out of court. Should only take a few minutes and then I can head to J Tree for the rest of the week. I've always wanted to take a trip there.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 11:50 AM
Post #47 of 61
(273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Feb 23, 2013, 12:03 PM
Post #48 of 61
(263 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 14399
|
notapplicable wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse.
amateurs
|
|
|
|
|
TheShyTed
Feb 23, 2013, 12:16 PM
Post #49 of 61
(257 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 20, 2013
Posts: 12
|
notapplicable wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse.
Worked it out - thanks for the heads up. I no longer have to be subjected to stupid email pings.
Please - slag me for all you are worth. I offer up my profile particularly for this purpose. If iife is too hard for you and the bitterness is overflowing, if you cant get outside, if you are chained to you pc and have to read this thread for want of something better to do, - write a nasty comment below to purge yourself and make yourself feel better.
I can see that some people have spent hundreds of hours on this site writing thousands of comments - (what a complete and utter waste of time and energy) but keep going. On your deathbed you can look back and see how all the time spent online, chatting the brown, brought fulfilment and success.
All my love.
mwahh x x
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 1:04 PM
Post #50 of 61
(239 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse. Worked it out - thanks for the heads up. I no longer have to be subjected to stupid email pings. Please - slag me for all you are worth. I offer up my profile particularly for this purpose. If iife is too hard for you and the bitterness is overflowing, if you cant get outside, if you are chained to you pc and have to read this thread for want of something better to do, - write a nasty comment below to purge yourself and make yourself feel better. I can see that some people have spent hundreds of hours on this site writing thousands of comments - (what a complete and utter waste of time and energy) but keep going. On your deathbed you can look back and see how all the time spent online, chatting the brown, brought fulfilment and success. All my love. mwahh x x
Archived
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 1:05 PM
Post #51 of 61
(202 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
We are sad to see you go, Ted. We could've had such fun together. Please come back anytime. We love you longtime.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 1:07 PM
Post #52 of 61
(200 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
Here a ++
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 1:07 PM
Post #53 of 61
(198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
There a ++
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 23, 2013, 1:07 PM
Post #54 of 61
(195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17626
|
Everywhere a ++
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Feb 23, 2013, 1:38 PM
Post #55 of 61
(185 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7160
|
Here, put this on:
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Feb 23, 2013, 1:38 PM
Post #56 of 61
(182 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12416
|
TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Feb 23, 2013, 1:40 PM
Post #58 of 61
(178 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7160
|
carabiner96 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. It's not the user's fault you suck at the Internet.
Can you pursue that cross-border?
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Feb 23, 2013, 1:43 PM
Post #59 of 61
(173 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12416
|
Kartessa wrote: carabiner96 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. It's not the user's fault you suck at the Internet. Can you pursue that cross-border?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Feb 23, 2013, 1:50 PM
Post #60 of 61
(170 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7160
|
TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. considering there is a way to not receive notifications, and considering how easy it is to do so, I'm going to go ahead and laugh when the judge hears your excuse. Worked it out - thanks for the heads up. I no longer have to be subjected to stupid email pings. Please - slag me for all you are worth. I offer up my profile particularly for this purpose. If iife is too hard for you and the bitterness is overflowing, if you cant get outside, if you are chained to you pc and have to read this thread for want of something better to do, - write a nasty comment below to purge yourself and make yourself feel better. I can see that some people have spent hundreds of hours on this site writing thousands of comments - (what a complete and utter waste of time and energy) but keep going. On your deathbed you can look back and see how all the time spent online, chatting the brown, brought fulfilment and success. All my love. mwahh x x
I don't know if its possible, but has a user ever had their settings "magically" change back on them?
Mods?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Feb 23, 2013, 1:51 PM
Post #61 of 61
(166 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7160
|
carabiner96 wrote: Kartessa wrote: carabiner96 wrote: TheShyTed wrote: JimTitt wrote: TheShyTed wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder how many days in a row Ted will need to find a "notapplicable has replied to your post..." notification before his head explodes. Day 1 Ask around who the young female lawyer is climbing in san diego. Then you will know who I am. Or just harass me through the internet and wait for my writ. I am already quite interested in the fact that I cannot unsubscribe from this forum and I have to be subjected to language that is highly discriminatory. You agreed to the terms and conditions when you signed up. "The user specifically acknowledges that Rockclimbing.com is not liable for the defamatory, offensive or illegal conduct of other the users or third-parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user." And yes, itīs like Facebook, the Catholic Church, the Freemasons and Hotel California;- "You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave! " Yes, rockclimbing.com will not be liable - the user is liable for their action. There is no anonymity for the user by hiding behind the website. It's not the user's fault you suck at the Internet. Can you pursue that cross-border? EXTRADITE DIS BITCH!!!
Free trip to America?
Do I need to renew my passport?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
