Forums: Climbing Information: Regional Discussions:
Ratings (not Complaining.....)
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Regional Discussions

Premier Sponsor:

 


calfcramp


Aug 5, 2004, 9:46 AM
Post #1 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Ratings (not Complaining.....)  (North_America: United_States: New_Hampshire: Grafton_County: Rumney)
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hi.

So I was out climbing a little while ago and was doing routes that I had never tried before. We started with a 5.7, then did a long 5.6, another 5.7, then a 5.8, 5.6, 5.9.... No falls except on the first move of the 5.9, but we had stick clipped so no big deal...

So at this point, we figure we've more or less got a feeling for the ratings at this area. We should be able to handle 5.8s as we usually do.

Having done 6 routes already, we were getting a little tired. The weather was starting to turn on us and we still had to set up camp. Being excited about our climbing thus far, we decide to 'just do one more' before packing it it for the day.

We check the guidebook and find a 5.7+ that seems good. It was my partner's turn to lead. We spot the bolts on the wall (4 then anchor), and he proceeds to climb to the first bolt about 3 moves up. He manages the first two moves and sort of gets stuck. Not sure what to do, he stepped off the route onto a boulder. 'Man! I don't know where to go!'.

Re-assessing, he steps back on and make the 3rd move to the first bolt to a good rest position. Then he goes for the 2nd bolt which is a good 15ft away. Makes one move and freezes up again. He lost his nerve and came off the route. I say: 'Come on, man! You can do this! It's a 7!' To no avail, he quit anyway. Fair enough, we had had a good day.

So now it's my turn. I make the moves to the first bolt. Hmmm, a little tough. Then I'm about halfway between the 1st and 2nd and start getting stuck too. Internal dialogue:

'Sh$%$%t!!!!!' I can DO this... just calm down. The rock is good.... breathe....good. Now get going.

Proceed, and make it to the 2nd bolt and clip in. Whew! This is a tough 5.7+! But having gotten as far as I had, it seemed a shame to quit now. I could see a pretty good jug between the 2nd and 3rd bolt and the climbing looked like it was easing up toward the top. A couple easy moves and made the 3rd clip.

This was a slabby climb with few handholds, so my hands weren't tired or anything. My calves on the otherhand....

So now I'm at the 3rd bolt and feeling good. Look up and spot the 4th bolt. Jeez. That's pretty far away. Had to be 20 feet minimum, 25 maximum. I figure to myself that whoever set the route knew what they were doing and put the bolts where they belong. Not too many, not too little...it must get easier up there...

So I set off for the 4th bolt. Having figured out the angle of the slab, and what I could get away with in terms of footholds, I proceed. 2 to 3 easy moves, then... STUCK AGAIN!!!! Inner dialogue:

"Dammit!!!! If...I...can....just..get to....that....little... crimper...uggghhhh.!!!!! GOT IT! ahhhhh...... Man this is a tough 5.7!!!!"

Now my feet are a good 10 feet above the 3rd bolt and I have a good 5 to 6 feet over my hands to the 4th and final bolt. They way I started to figure it, if I wasn't already in a groundfall position, I was damn close to it. Progressing further seemed like I would just dig the hole deeper (so to speak) but retreat was not an option becase I didn't feel like using the cheese grater rock like a slip and slide!

I make one more desperation move and look up. The 4th bolt is in reach. I grab my quickdraw and sttttrrrrrrrrrretch for it. Damnmit!!! I'm 3/4 of an inch shy of being able to clip.

My one good foothold is starting to grease off (with the drizzle starting to get worse), my other foot is just smeared on the rock, and the hold I"m using for my left hand I would never normally qualify as "a hold". I flip the quickdraw around so the tight side of the webbing is the end I will use to clip, reeeeeeeaaaaach down to grab the rope, bite it, reeeaaaaaach down again cause I needed the slack. Now I"m POSITIVE I was in a groundfall position and quite petrified. Reach up...Just a another second.....and CLIP! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!.......THANK GOD!!!!!!! OH THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU thank you......ahhhhh......

WAY TO GO! Says my partner.

"Goddmammit!!!! There is NO WAY this is a 5.7+!!!!!" I reply

"Good job! Keep going!"

Quite relieved I had made that 4th clip, I make the easy moves to the achors and check the view and lower to the ground.

I felt great. I had flashed the route. Fantastic. BUT I HAD NO IDEA WHAT I WAS GETTING MYSELF INTO. Why the Hell was there such a huge gap between the 3rd and 4th bolts? I was so sure I was in a groundfall position. The other routes we had done had clips a maximum of 10 feet apart, cruised them, and did a 5.9 without a problem????

I was scared sh!tless on a 5.7+ and actually was fearing for my health.

You'd think the guidebook would have had a comment on it or something. It wasn't comparable to the other routes at all. And yes, I'm sure the route was listed as a 5.7+. What a pisser. The nature of a subjective rating system I guess. Plus it gave us lots to talk about around the fire.

Any comments?


edge


Aug 5, 2004, 10:00 AM
Post #2 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Knowing that you recently visited Rumney, and from your description, I am guessing you mean Truth in Advertising.

First, I have seen many mini-epics on that route. I'm not sure why, but you are not alone. I even saw one girl fall off after the first bolt and dislocate her shoulder.

Second, it's a Shimberg route. He is a tall guy and likes to make shorter people stretch to clip. I have no problem, but my 5' 3" daughter never climbs one of his routes unless she is assured that the bolts can be clipped for her height.

Third, New Hampshire has a long, proud tradition when it comes to the + added to a numerical rating! On Cathedral Ledge in particular, the infamous number of 5.9+ are all most certainly solid tens, maybe even harder. Beware the New Hampshire +'s! It's code for sandbag...

Of course if you were talking about another route, then ignore half of what I just said.


calfcramp


Aug 5, 2004, 10:16 AM
Post #3 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Why Edge... - I don't know what you're talking about.......

You got me. I still can't believe it though.... No more taken lightly for me.

But my question remains: I can climb certain 5.10 a's b's and c's on toprope. I can lead 5.9s. But the moves on that route have got to be 5.8s at least!

I can see how the routes are created in the frame of mind that the leader does not use any of the gear to aid him in his ascent, it's just there for safety. So, it shouldn't matter how far apart the bolts are, it won't affect the rating.

But at Rumney, er, uh, I mean "the area in question".... I notice that the guidebook has a little heart with wings to show that it's a "scary" route and a gun to show that the route is "dangerous" meaning a fall will put you in the hospital at best.

I vote that T I A should at least be given the little heart with wings. I likely wouldn't have attempted it, but I guess I'm glad I did. But if I'd fallen off, I would have been pretty P.O'd. It kind of lures you up to where you can't turn back. Then what? It's not like it was the first route I'd attacked. It caugt my way off guard.


calfcramp


Aug 5, 2004, 1:26 PM
Post #4 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

BUMP.


shakylegs


Aug 5, 2004, 3:33 PM
Post #5 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh, don't bump on the same day, it's tacky.
But, yeah, I'll go to my grave swearing that Book of Solemnity is way harder than a 9. OTOH, Thin Air doesn't rate more than a 5.


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 5:43 AM
Post #6 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Apologies for the bump. It's been a slow week at work....

I'll have to check those routes out when I go back. What wall?


overlord


Aug 6, 2004, 6:03 AM
Post #7 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

man, you have to be carefull with "easy" slab climbs.

i once did one (it was actually quide well bolted) that had a section where you were about 3ft above the last bolt with your feet, the next one was about 4-5ft above me and there was absolutely no hold. i mean, it looked like somebody ironed it or something. so i sucked it up, moved my feet (thank god for .10s), stretched a bit and got over it. and that section was almost vertical. and the route was graded 5.10b.

on such climbs you have to know who put the route up. the one i wrote about was put up by an oldschool local thats known for hes sandbags (some 5.10 are actually solid .11). never ever underestimate a slab. those olldshool boys who put them up can climb them like goats.


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 6:17 AM
Post #8 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Agreed. But at what point is a climb qualified as "a slab". When the angle softens, or when the holds disappear down to virtually nothing?

The route I wrote about looked a lot easier from the ground, although a slab. I was sure the holds looked decent. Funny how quickly that changes when you aren't 40' away from the chalkmark... :D


overlord


Aug 6, 2004, 6:22 AM
Post #9 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

slab means less tan vertical and poor holds. and once youre off it your legs hurt like hell. and its scary.


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 6:31 AM
Post #10 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That's what I thought. Just thought I'd confirm.

Slabs do deliver a different kind of thrill. I get more of a "I'd better not fall" sensation on slabs than on face climbs (or the few steep ones I've managed).

Was out hiking a couple weeks ago in VT and hiked up a slab with a buddy of mine. He just charged right up....to a point. Then he got sorta stuck and worried. He reverted to the old inchworm technique on his belly. Worked for him. I'd have to say that it probably would have been rated a 5.3 maybe a 5.4 if it were a climbing route. We both made it, but definitely not without the "I'd better not fall" sensation.

He went first by the way....just happened that way. Again, it looked easy from the ground.

Good times...good times...


uasunflower


Aug 6, 2004, 6:38 AM
Post #11 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2003
Posts: 1563

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Oh, don't bump on the same day, it's tacky.
But, yeah, I'll go to my grave swearing that Book of Solemnity is way harder than a 9. OTOH, Thin Air doesn't rate more than a 5.

agreed. First pitch of the book felt harder than 10a for me, both before the roof (it was wet), and at the roof (i'm 5'1). Same for the 2nd pitch, I fell at the "5.9" roof traverse, also might have been a height factor, but i never came back that way to recheck...Pine Tree Eliminate is also a 5.8, and will gobble up the last of your sweat on lead. Calfcramp, those are classics on cathedral, North Conway, NH.

On the other hand at Rumney i feel like many 5.10a are often rather 9ish, it gets to the normal 10 level at 10c/10d. But again, it's all subjective, height-dependent etc. Although IMHO if a concensus has it to be a groundfall poetential sport climb, it should have some kind of an indication to that respect in the guidebook.


cerikpete


Aug 6, 2004, 6:55 AM
Post #12 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 22, 2002
Posts: 4043

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
On the other hand at Rumney i feel like many 5.10a are often rather 9ish

Yeah I heard that overall it's kinda soft there.

Guess I'll find out the truth in October. :)


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 7:11 AM
Post #13 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

haha Edge... i was thinking he might have got on Easily aroused instead of Easily amused... but those have 5 bolts :P (you're so smart)

anyway.. from another board, when grades have a (+) you may want to pay more attention and realize that it's probably there for a reason and quite possibly harder than the (-) or full grade of the next one up hehe I don't remember T I A being that horrible but maybe i'll do it again this weekend and pay attention to the places you talk about

OH calf did you clip the piton? that might have saved you a bunch of run out? Also at the meadows and alot of rumney also alot of the easier routes can be made really hard if you are not route finding well.. and can sometimes miss a really good hold if you're not telling urself "this is 5.7 there should be a good enough hold here"

Cerik some of them are soft.. some are not.. it depends on where else you climb i suppose.. cya in Oct!

Julia every route has ground fall potential on lead until you get to at least the 2nd or sometimes 3rd bolt so putting it in the guidebook isnt reeeeeally necessary.. just should be thought about everytime you get above the first bolt

calf the Book and Thin air are at Cathedral not Rumney and are both multipitch trad
Jake


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 7:25 AM
Post #14 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey,

I`m pretty sure I didn`t see a piton anywhere. I definitely would have clipped it if I had. Maybe I had tunnel vision...

And yeah, I probably wasn`t route finding very well. Just following the bolts and trying not to go off route...

I gotta let my toe heal and get out on those 'easy' .10s....


uasunflower


Aug 6, 2004, 7:31 AM
Post #15 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2003
Posts: 1563

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Julia every route has ground fall potential on lead until you get to at least the 2nd or sometimes 3rd bolt so putting it in the guidebook isnt reeeeeally necessary.. just should be thought about everytime you get above the first bolt

I thought we were talking about 3d and 4th bolts.

Also, I do not think it's that common to have a ground fall potential after the 1st or 2nd bolt or piece. i.e. at the gunks we were once set up on Absurdland, on the slabby part near NeverNeverLand, and the climb to the left of us was a slabby 5.10X, the first bolt is like 15 feet up, and the 2nd piece is around 20 feet further after the bolt. Not on topic, a guy climbing it fell while clipping the 2nd piece head down first, and had decked, and survived, to make me dizzy for a couple of weeks afterwards. But the climb was clearly marked X, so there was no surprise - although it was also pretty obvious from looking at it. So i do not see why if a climb is that dangerous it should not be mentioned in the guidebook. Disclaimer - i have not done TIA, so all this might be irrelevant.


edge


Aug 6, 2004, 7:42 AM
Post #16 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
haha Edge... (you're so smart)

Jake, you make a very good point here.

In reply to:
OH calf did you clip the piton? that might have saved you a bunch of run out? Also at the meadows and alot of rumney also alot of the easier routes can be made really hard if you are not route finding well.. and can sometimes miss a really good hold if you're not telling urself "this is 5.7 there should be a good enough hold here"

Wow, two for Jake in one day!

The best thing to do when you start to feel anxious about a route is to take a few deep breaths, calm down, and look around at all of your options. I find that this particularly applies to Rumney, where many of the good holds may be hard to spot from below, particularly with this year's rains washing off the chalk (which is a good thing aesthetically, but not so good if you're searching for options).

And yes, there is a pin. I forget exactly where, though.


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 7:46 AM
Post #17 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

well if we are then i dont think it's an issue on T I A it only has 4 bolts total and the pin in the horizontal. hehe get better and we'll go see whats up :)

Julia you're talkin apples and oranges now... 5._R/X on trad is marked for the lack of gear causing the run outs and splat potential. and if they have bolts. at the gunks.. then there is *definitely* not gear there.. even tiny stuff

in general sport climbs should not ever be bolted that dangerously.. the whole point is to bolt to protect from ground falls and protect the crux of the route


shakylegs


Aug 6, 2004, 7:55 AM
Post #18 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

by the same token, what's that 5."easy" on the right side of bonzai? it's got rusty pitons and all. scary climb, that one.


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 8:20 AM
Post #19 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Bombs away 5.8? gear and pins ? it says old pins... so you should probly take that to heart and back them up with something made in this century ;)

after reading alot of descriptions in Ward's book and then climbing the routes it's funny how small pieces come into play the most.. Also realize some routes are put in at the last minute.. like Dave quinn's 10b route on bonsai was put in at the last minute at 5.9 in the first book.. said ya call it Jugline (as he chuckles while telling me the story)


uasunflower


Aug 6, 2004, 8:31 AM
Post #20 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2003
Posts: 1563

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, and War and Piece next to it used to be a 10, is there a story behind that as well?


shakylegs


Aug 6, 2004, 8:35 AM
Post #21 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hee, jugline. I remember someone offering me beta on it and, being arrogant and stupid, i replied that i would try it first. after nearly decking, i humbly accepted the beta.
yeah, this is getting away from bf, isn't it?


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 8:37 AM
Post #22 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i dont know any story with that one but it's not a 10.. 9 is a fair rating

shaky you're right.... BEGINNERS.. moral of this story... read the guidebook description.. don't think light hearted jokes about it being scary, stiffer than the grade, "fun in the rain", "good for cold days" aka i wouldnt do it when it's 90 out etc are just comments to make you laugh. think of the route as a cross word and the descriptions are the clues.. not the direct answer to the problem but if you think about it it makes sense


edge


Aug 6, 2004, 10:37 AM
Post #23 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

edge moved this thread [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

edge moved this thread from Beginners to Regional Discussions.


edge


Aug 6, 2004, 10:39 AM
Post #24 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread had too much good info about Rumney to remain in Beginners. Thanks, calfcramp!


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 10:51 AM
Post #25 of 47 (5190 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

RIGHT ON :)


uasunflower


Aug 6, 2004, 10:59 AM
Post #26 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2003
Posts: 1563

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

yeah, jugline is actually not that bad with the right beta, i fell off it a couple of times on TR, and then led it w/o a problem when moving in the right direction. Bolts are sometimes confusing, as Jake said, you have to get out of the box, and look for the next hold, not the next bolt.


dingus


Aug 6, 2004, 11:26 AM
Post #27 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17392

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

When you see a route with a plus after the rating it might be useful to better understand the use of that plus...

5.7 plus tells you the route is harder than 5.7. Many automatically assume that is it harder than 5.7, not as hard as 5.8.

NOPE! That may occasionally be the case, but not often in my experience. A plus route is harder than its advertised rating, but you will not know how much harder till you get on it.

5 doet anything, PLUS... watch out!

DMT


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 11:35 AM
Post #28 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
When you see a route with a plus after the rating it might be useful to better understand the use of that plus...

5.7 plus tells you the route is harder than 5.7. Many automatically assume that is it harder than 5.7, not as hard as 5.8.

NOPE! That may occasionally be the case, but not often in my experience. A plus route is harder than its advertised rating, but you will not know how much harder till you get on it.

5 doet anything, PLUS... watch out!

DMT

Hence the name `Truth in Advertising`I guess.... But I would still put it in the 8`s rather than the 7`s. How bout a 5.8-? Why have an overlap in a ratings system anyway? Just confuses matters. Especially since there is the + and - to use.

And why do the a, b, c, etc... only start at 5.10?


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 11:44 AM
Post #29 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i don't see many routes with minus's outside of the gym...

plus's is what dingus said.. it gives you a bit of a mystery... why is it not just an 8.. or not an easy 9... alot of the time you can make it a 9 by missing a key hold or getting a sequence messed up.. and especially at rumney trying to get anchor hungry and trying to go straight up instead of how the route flows


calfcramp


Aug 6, 2004, 12:24 PM
Post #30 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
i don't see many routes with minus's outside of the gym...

plus's is what dingus said.. it gives you a bit of a mystery... why is it not just an 8.. or not an easy 9... alot of the time you can make it a 9 by missing a key hold or getting a sequence messed up.. and especially at rumney trying to get anchor hungry and trying to go straight up instead of how the route flows

Oh I believe it...

But in the case of the route I was ranting about, it was 5.7+. Having climbed other 5.7s at Rumney as well as more difficult routes that day, this 5.7+ was way out in left field in terms of total difficulty compared to the others.

It just strikes me as strange that within a rating system there can be so much variability. Mind you, I suppose there are 1001 factors that affect the difficulty of routes depending on the climber, knowledge of the route, fitness, favorite style, etc...

But I still don`t get what the point is of being stingy on the bolts. The moves of the route remain exactly the same, but it's less risky.

Perhaps a separate rating for the protection of the route. Like say, a weighted average of the distance between bolts (rounded to the nearest foot) along with a min and a max. I know this isn`t going to be attractive to the harcore purists out there, but it`s just a simple calculation afterall.

I mean, a 40 foot 5.6 route is a 5.6 route whether there 2 bolts on it, or 10 bolts on it, right? But I think we would all agree that the one with 2 is WAAAAAAY different from the one with 10 right?

AGAIN: I'm not complaining here, just picking the brains of those in the know. I'm pretty new to climbing but have an interest in how routes are developed. Especially after the events described in my original post. :angel:


jakedatc


Aug 6, 2004, 1:06 PM
Post #31 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

like i said .. i'll do it either tomorrow or sunday and see what i think again...

plus you have to factor in that it was the last route of the day.. you were rushing due to the rain... it was probably a tad slick

i didnt find the bolts stingy on TIA when there is a bunch of easy moves for like 15 feet.. i dont expect there to be a bolt.. it's not necessary and is more trouble than it's worth.. bolting takes time, money and work.. also alot of bolts showing up on easy ground looks horrible... example
go to Main cliff.. Armed and dangerous 10b... and look at where those are bolted... you get 3ish bolts through the crux.. then after the crux it's like 5.4 climbing up to the roof.. there is not a bolt for 20 feet(if there had been bolts in this section i would have laughed and possibly skipped it ) then a bolt under the roof before you pull the first roof move.. then i think 1 more before the anchors

there is a grading system for Trad routes for amount of protection.. it's G, PG, PG-13 (sometimes) , R, X so anything from good.. lots of placements to don't fall or you're in big trouble


jakedatc


Aug 8, 2004, 5:25 PM
Post #32 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Calfcramp! hehe ok so i led the route twice this weekend.. on a good day and a bad day.. i still think it's a solid 7+.. use all the feet, remember it's slab.. dont over grip.. dont forget to clip the piton .. hopefully your next time on it will be better... on your side of harder is Edge and his daughter.. on my side is Shakylegs
anyway... it doesnt much matter.. if you feel it's harder then its harder for you.. oh well.. im sure you've found routes that are easier for the grade too so it all balances out :)
lata
jake


redpoint73


Aug 8, 2004, 7:54 PM
Post #33 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2002
Posts: 1717

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
But at Rumney, er, uh, I mean "the area in question".... I notice that the guidebook has a little heart with wings to show that it's a "scary" route and a gun to show that the route is "dangerous" meaning a fall will put you in the hospital at best.

I vote that T I A should at least be given the little heart with wings.

The fluttering heart basically means an "R" rated climb, and the gun means "X". Only poorly protected trad routes gain these symbols in the guide.


sustainedclimber


Aug 8, 2004, 8:43 PM
Post #34 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 134

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As someone who has climbed the route in question, I feel that it's my duty to respond. I too climbed T I A at the end of a day when I was thoroughly exhausted. I was questioning the rating the entire time, and upon completion would compare it in difficulty to Bolt Line (5.8) which is further to the right on the meadows wall. I shoud mention that I used the pin in the horizontal crack and I cannot imagine how ridiculous the runout you are describing is...there's a very good reason that pin is there!! Also, I think the 5.8 at Bonsai that someone was talking about with rusty pins is Kamikaze. Not hard, just a little eye opening for 5.8. I wish I lived closer to Rumney!!!


edge


Aug 9, 2004, 6:57 AM
Post #35 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Calfcramp, you must have some serious cojones to have climbed that route without clipping the pin!

It is in the big horizontal crack between the third and fourth bolts, a 1" angle sort of straight in and back about 6-8 inches, so I can see where you might have missed it if you weren't looking for it. I sent my daughter up on it first, but we told her to look for it. As Jake mentioned, both she and I thought it was closer to an 8 (she didn't know the rating when she climbed it), but then again I was having a horrible day and everything was feeling hard to me.


calfcramp


Aug 9, 2004, 11:09 AM
Post #36 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Calfcramp, you must have some serious cojones to have climbed that route without clipping the pin!

I guess that's one way of looking at it.... :lol:

I'm glad I'm not alone in thinking it's at least a little harder than the rating.

I'll be clipping that pin next time for dang sure though if I can find it.

I still like my bolt distance index idea, anyone else consider this a decent idea?


jakedatc


Aug 9, 2004, 11:31 AM
Post #37 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

calf it would vary every route and never be a consistant way to grade things..
especially when you get into different areas weather it's rap bolted or on lead..
run out between bolts is usually an indication of easy climbing for the grade.. like my example of Armed and dangerous.. it's a 10b but there is probably at least 20 feet or more between 2 of the bolts in the middle.. probably a ground fall if you were to screw up but it's like 5.4 climbing so anyone attempting to lead a 10b should never have an issue with 5.4 no matter if there is a bolt there or not..

either way.. get more routes under your belt and i bet you'll become more comfortable being above your last bolt... if not... well.. you'll just have things be a little scary sometimes but i guess that could be fun too..


dgkula


Aug 9, 2004, 12:46 PM
Post #38 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 6, 2004
Posts: 73

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you folks want another runout slab climb, check out the first pitch of Bombardment, up the road at Cathedral. It checks in at 5.6R and, as such, picks up the fluttering heart in the guidebook which, I though from the ground, wouldn't be such a big deal as it is only 5.6 and I onsight 5.7 trad.

Wrong! Especially as I got offroute and tried to go straight up and not diagonal right to the quartz dike. Man, the King lives. I danced myself back down that nice and slowly, legs a'quaking.


edge


Aug 9, 2004, 12:50 PM
Post #39 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9118

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yep, you really want to hit the faint dike out right for that one.

I top roped the direct line years ago and thought it felt about 5.9.


shakylegs


Aug 9, 2004, 1:49 PM
Post #40 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dg, i so understand. you get in your head that slab 5.6 will be easy, and then, on bombardment, you're looking at a groundfall, and suddenly escaping 10 feet to your right just doesn't feel like cheating anymore.
Back to TIA; for an area that's only recently been developed, I'm surprised that the + exists for climbs in Rumney, even for what was obviously a 7. (hee)


calfcramp


Aug 10, 2004, 4:59 AM
Post #41 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Back to TIA; for an area that's only recently been developed, I'm surprised that the + exists for climbs in Rumney, even for what was obviously a 7. (hee)

Doh! :deadhorse:


kman


Aug 10, 2004, 6:06 AM
Post #42 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2001
Posts: 2561

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Watch out for those routes with a + behind the grade. Out here for example a 5.9+ does not mean it's between a 5.9 and 5.10. It means back in the day the old schoolers didn't want to be the first to claim a 5.10 or up so they call it 5.9 and throw a + in their :lol: If you come up to the Canadian Rockies watch out for 5.9 A2 routes.


wonder1978


Aug 11, 2004, 10:44 PM
Post #43 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2002
Posts: 250

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Calf,
As I'm also a climber from Mtl, I'm quite surprised that you would find a route at Rumney rough at the grade. As was already mentionned, Rumney is known to be pretty soft on grades, and especialy compared with nearby areas like Val-David (an excessively sandbagged crag). You're probably having a hard time finding stuff to lead around here right?
I was at Rumney with a couple of friends 2 weeks ago and we did TIA on our warm up day. It felt like a fun .7 slab to me. Slabs always feel a bit harder because the fall prospect is grim and the holds are smaller, two factors that often lead to a lot of overgripping and wasted energy. If you want to keep on climbing low angled routes, I think you'll have to find a way to relax yourself and forget about the potential fall. Either that or just forget about anything below 5.9 when you go to Rumney, that way you won't have to deal with slab routes and you will enjoy clean falls all day long.


calfcramp


Aug 12, 2004, 8:52 AM
Post #44 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Calf,
As I'm also a climber from Mtl, I'm quite surprised that you would find a route at Rumney rough at the grade. As was already mentionned, Rumney is known to be pretty soft on grades, and especialy compared with nearby areas like Val-David (an excessively sandbagged crag). You're probably having a hard time finding stuff to lead around here right?
I was at Rumney with a couple of friends 2 weeks ago and we did TIA on our warm up day. It felt like a fun .7 slab to me. Slabs always feel a bit harder because the fall prospect is grim and the holds are smaller, two factors that often lead to a lot of overgripping and wasted energy. If you want to keep on climbing low angled routes, I think you'll have to find a way to relax yourself and forget about the potential fall. Either that or just forget about anything below 5.9 when you go to Rumney, that way you won't have to deal with slab routes and you will enjoy clean falls all day long.

Well, like I said, it wan't necessarily the difficulty of the moves. I flashed the route. It was just excessively scary due to the distance between the bolts. Specifically between the 3rd and 4th. Apparently I missed a piton.


I've never been to Val David. I go to Mtn. d'Argent though. TIA was harder than 5.8+ routes I've done there. I guess Mtn d'Argent is super soft?


jakedatc


Aug 12, 2004, 12:19 PM
Post #45 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

well the route was bolted with the intention of clipping the piton... were you looking at Ward smiths book? if so u shoulda been looking for the pin especially if you didnt see a bolt coming up for a long time
if you want to add freaking out into the grade you gotta move to the Font boulder system.. it adds in all kinds of factors..

also the other bolts are pretty evenly spaced for 5.7 slab
also.2 the FAist is around 6'1 so if you're shorter then reaching each bolt from a good stance maybe more difficult (this was part of edge's daughters thinking)


calfcramp


Aug 12, 2004, 1:06 PM
Post #46 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2003
Posts: 391

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
well the route was bolted with the intention of clipping the piton... were you looking at Ward smiths book? if so u shoulda been looking for the pin especially if you didnt see a bolt coming up for a long time
if you want to add freaking out into the grade you gotta move to the Font boulder system.. it adds in all kinds of factors..

also the other bolts are pretty evenly spaced for 5.7 slab
also.2 the FAist is around 6'1 so if you're shorter then reaching each bolt from a good stance maybe more difficult (this was part of edge's daughters thinking)

I'm 5'8". I guess that's significant.

Why would someone not remove the piton and place a bolt when bolting the route?


jakedatc


Aug 13, 2004, 8:00 PM
Post #47 of 47 (3527 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: Ratings (not Complaining.....) [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Because the piton is bomber and in a great horizontal crack there is no need for a bolt

i'm 5'7 and had no troubles.. edge's daughter is 5'3 that is significant but got around it fine(disclaimer.. she climbs .11-12 so 7+ should not ever be an issue)

i dunno hehe i think you just got psyched out thats all


Forums : Climbing Information : Regional Discussions

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook