|
saxfiend
Nov 28, 2006, 4:05 PM
Post #1 of 2
(941 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 1208
|
I'm not sure if this is a bug, but it looks that way. Threads posted in the Regional Discussions forum do not show any indication of what region or area they're referring to.
On the old rc.com, you would see something next to the topic along the lines of "this thread refers to Stone Mountain" or whatever area the person posted to. Now, there's no indication whatsoever, so you see replies asking "WTF are you talking about?"
For an example of this, see the thread titled "mythical?" in Regional Discussions.
JL
|
|
|
|
|
thomasribiere
Nov 28, 2006, 6:02 PM
Post #2 of 2
(939 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
|
This is known and it's not a bug. There's must be a thread about that in this forum or in the SUggestions Forum.
It's not a current feature but must become one pretty quick as it is very annoying not to see to what Region/Area/Section the thread is referring to.
My opinion is that the best solution would to see the name of the Region/Area/Section in the title of the thread, so I don't even have to open the thread if the crag doesn't interest me...
The new way to post in that forum (from the route DB and not directly) is a step to avoid unlinked threads, but of course if the link doesn't appear, it's not worth!
|
|
|
|
|
|
