Dec 4, 2006, 12:25 PM
Post #2 of 9
(1053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2002
Posts: 6909
Re: [jt512] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
I've gotta go with "much worse, but it has potential" as I'm sure they'll fix the worse parts in time. Currently, however, it's lame. If we're given back what was taken away with the new code and owner decisions, that and the advantages and features that come with the new site will make it much better. We'll see.
Dec 4, 2006, 11:32 PM
Post #4 of 9
(943 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
Re: [jt512] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
I must admit, I'm very surprised! It seems users who think the new site is much betteroutnumber ay other single opinion by almost two to one. Does this validate the theory that those who don't like it are vocal, but a minority?
Dec 5, 2006, 7:21 AM
Post #6 of 9
(897 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2002
Posts: 6909
Re: [climbsomething] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
climbsomething wrote:
Much "faster" is not the same as much "better." Nor does "potential" equal "actual product."
Indeed. I don't think even the owners would say that right now the site is much better. It's a work in progress, starting almost from scratch, so it'll take time to get there, if it does. The potential is there, for sure, but right now, it's not much fun.
Dec 5, 2006, 11:47 AM
Post #7 of 9
(886 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 24, 2002
Posts: 9306
Re: [coldclimb] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
coldclimb wrote:
It's a work in progress, starting almost from scratch, so it'll take time to get there, if it does. The potential is there, for sure, but right now, it's not much fun.
Dec 5, 2006, 5:27 PM
Post #8 of 9
(866 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
Re: [j_ung] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
j_ung wrote:
I must admit, I'm very surprised! It seems users who think the new site is much betteroutnumber ay other single opinion by almost two to one. Does this validate the theory that those who don't like it are vocal, but a minority?
Even I didn't pick "much better."
Further along and things have reversed somewhat. This is more in line with what I thought I'd see, but still a little surprising to me.
(This post was edited by j_ung on Dec 5, 2006, 5:28 PM)
Dec 5, 2006, 6:05 PM
Post #9 of 9
(849 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
Re: [j_ung] Overall, how do you feel the new website compares with the old website?
[In reply to]
Report this Post
Average:
(0 ratings)
Can't Post
j_ung wrote:
j_ung wrote:
I must admit, I'm very surprised! It seems users who think the new site is much betteroutnumber ay other single opinion by almost two to one. Does this validate the theory that those who don't like it are vocal, but a minority?
Even I didn't pick "much better."
Further along and things have reversed somewhat. This is more in line with what I thought I'd see, but still a little surprising to me.
Probably the best way to analyze these 5-point scales is to compare the top 2 boxes vs the bottom 2. So, at present, 45% of respondents think the new site is better, versus 55% who think it is worse.
Unfortunately, rrrAdam's discovery that, until ddt fixed it yesterday, people could vote repeatedly, makes it too likely that the results could have been biased by fraudulent votes.
18 /
33%
