Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
opinions on trad rack "completeness"
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


8flood8


Feb 28, 2007, 7:02 PM
Post #1 of 41 (3451 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1436

opinions on trad rack "completeness"
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Barring climbing in the desert...

at what depth do you feel your rack is "complete" enough to take almost everywhere in the US and feel that you could cover most of what you needed to.

let me give you more a more specific question --as of right now will this range do well for me while i travel?

according to the spadout rack simulator

i have 4 choices of pro between 12mm and 88mm

then 2 selections under 11mm and 2 over 91mm

this is cams only - not counting nuts and hexes

the largest selection i have is in the handcrack range 9 choices at the 40mm range.

Do people see single pitch routes taking more than 9 pieces ?

i haven't approached the point in climbing where i enjoy climbing offwidth cracks (i'm not that good yet) but i am wondering where you draw the line. Of course if we go to the desert i'm sure i'll need 15 gold camalots.


edited to be more specific*


(This post was edited by 8flood8 on Feb 28, 2007, 7:24 PM)


anthonycuskelly


Feb 28, 2007, 7:33 PM
Post #2 of 41 (3416 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 4, 2007
Posts: 51

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's far more than I've got, and I haven't noticed much in the way of problems. Though a rack can never really be called complete...


Partner epoch
Moderator

Feb 28, 2007, 7:44 PM
Post #3 of 41 (3406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It depends. <<< The typical answer regarding things like this. Ultimately it depends on your confidence in different situations. My go-anywhere do-anything rack is, for me, what I need in most all situations. To share this is what I take when I travel (Not what I have):

1 full set `o nuts
Pink - navy blue tricams
0 - 2 metolous tcu
.04 - 4 C4 (doubled .5 - 2) (have the option to have .4 - 6 if the situation may call for it)
Throw in 13 slings and some biners and I'm good for anywhere.

I've placed more than 9 pieces on a 200' route. At the same time I've placed as few as one.... Depends.


deltav


Feb 28, 2007, 7:48 PM
Post #4 of 41 (3404 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: [anthonycuskelly] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

At the moment I have...
1 full set of nuts (1-13)
1 full set of hexes (1-11)
doubles of .5 & 1 tri-cams, 1.5, 2, 2.5
doubles of camalots .5-2
(1)3 & 3.5
about 12 trad draws
like stated above, is it ever complete? Dunno, but I have stopped buying, for the momentSly


coastal_climber


Feb 28, 2007, 7:52 PM
Post #5 of 41 (3399 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 2542

Re: [deltav] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Why don't you tell us what you actually have instead of giving us partial info.

>Cam


8flood8


Feb 28, 2007, 8:01 PM
Post #6 of 41 (3392 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1436

Re: [coastal_climber] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lol ok --

tcu 00, 0, 1,2,2,3,3,4,4
powercams 10, 1
UL powercams 5,6,7,8
c4 1,2,2,3,4
camalot .75
wc tech friend 2.5

i just look at my cams as what they could potentially protect


Partner epoch
Moderator

Feb 28, 2007, 8:06 PM
Post #7 of 41 (3386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

8flood8 wrote:
lol ok --

tcu 00, 0, 1,2,2,3,3,4,4
powercams 10, 1
UL powercams 5,6,7,8
c4 1,2,2,3,4
camalot .75
wc tech friend 2.5

i just look at my cams as what they could potentially protect

Passive pro??? That's where you can shave wieght and still have two pieces for a given range. Cams are good, but expensive to leave (bail on), especially if you're traveling and probably aren't going to be back to an area for a good while...


Partner climbinginchico


Feb 28, 2007, 8:09 PM
Post #8 of 41 (3381 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 3032

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's never complete!!

That does seem like a decent selection, however. I've placed as many as 14 pieces on a full 70m pitch, and this was on a multi pitch climb.

I just looked at the graphs for the first time in a while- I've got 16 pieces in a few sizes... and I still don't feel my rack is quite there. Need more big stuff and quintuples up to 4.


flying_dutchman


Feb 28, 2007, 8:11 PM
Post #9 of 41 (3377 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 708

Re: [epoch] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

my rack is as complete as it ever will be. Am I satisfied yet? Nah, never will be. Wait, that sounds like an addiction now.


rockprodigy


Feb 28, 2007, 8:56 PM
Post #10 of 41 (3339 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You would be far better off worrying about whether or not your skills are complete, than your rack. Thirty years ago people climbed hard stuff with only nuts and slings...they depended on themselves, not gear!

Skill will get you up far more climbs than gear will, and as such, nobody could possibly give you a good answer to your question without knowing what your skills are.


dlintz


Feb 28, 2007, 9:13 PM
Post #11 of 41 (3322 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2002
Posts: 1982

Re: [rockprodigy] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockprodigy wrote:
You would be far better off worrying about whether or not your skills are complete, than your rack. Thirty years ago people climbed hard stuff with only nuts and slings...they depended on themselves, not gear!

Skill will get you up far more climbs than gear will, and as such, nobody could possibly give you a good answer to your question without knowing what your skills are.

I agree to a point, gear won't "get him up a route" however much is based upon one's comfort level. That said, he doesn't have to rely on only nuts and slings. IMO his question refers to what it takes to generally protect most routes he would encounter. I think his question is valid.

d.


8flood8


Feb 28, 2007, 11:05 PM
Post #12 of 41 (3277 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1436

Re: [epoch] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i mentioned earlier that this is just my active pro.

for passive i have

2 sets of nuts with half a set of random specialty (curve nuts etc.)

set of hexes 1-11 with doubles in 7,8,9,10

and 1 tricam i can't remember... red i think.. one of the smaller ones.

thanks for all the thread life yo, and please keep your opinions coming

dlintz hit the nail on the head.

i do realize that i need skills more than gear, i am developing both! heh


legion


Feb 28, 2007, 11:22 PM
Post #13 of 41 (3262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2003
Posts: 86

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You have this all backwords. You like handcracks, who doesn't, but you don't need 19 gold Camalots because only gumbies fall out of handcracks. What you do need are some #6 cams to protect those offwidths you hate so much. Guess what, they hate you, too, and one of them is going to creep up on you while you are on your road trip and $hit all over your rack of #2 Camalots. You will bleed, you will cry, and then you will go to the nearest gear shop and buy some big cams. You have been warned, now get out there and learn to leavitate.


bandidopeco


Mar 1, 2007, 12:15 AM
Post #14 of 41 (3234 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2004
Posts: 257

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

After using them a little in granite (they wouldn't be as nice in Sandstone) I couldn't consider my rack complete without Alien offsets. Yeah, they're the proverbial shit, more versitile then normal cams. Yosemite, J-Tree or here up in Tahoe they kick ass.
(no i don't work for CCH)


stymingersfink


Mar 1, 2007, 7:55 AM
Post #15 of 41 (3166 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 7250

Re: [bandidopeco] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the "complete" rack, as if such a thing actually existed. but it will protect you on pretty much anything... if you make intelligent selections.


granite_grrl


Mar 1, 2007, 1:37 PM
Post #16 of 41 (3148 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [stymingersfink] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A rack is never truely complete.

I would consider my typical rack a take almost anywhere to climb routes 5.8 and under rack. Single set of cams, s#0 TCU to #4 BD, single set of nuts (doubles are nice though) and the first 3 tri-cams. Hexes are okay, but I haven't used them too many places.

Single set of cams and nuts will get you up most 5.8 and under climbs. But there will always be exceptions.


Partner epoch
Moderator

Mar 1, 2007, 2:17 PM
Post #17 of 41 (3122 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163

Re: [granite_grrl] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

More often than not, my travel rack is nothing more than 5 cams, small set of nuts, tricams, and 8 trad draws. Hasn't failed to get me up anything yet. You'll find that your rack can and will be trimmed or beefed up depending on where you are going. Research as to where you are heading next will help immensely with your decision as to what you may need where you are going.

For instance. Out where I live and climb the most, I only need a handful of nuts, tricams, and cams up to C4 #2, singled. Small and effective. When I go visit my parents and climb near there, I bring just about everything due to most of the climbs requiring doubles and big crap.

Your rack will always be dependant on your objective.

If you are planning on building up something for which to draw from when you travel, then doubles of everything standard is a good start.


swede


Mar 1, 2007, 2:33 PM
Post #18 of 41 (3105 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 1, 2003
Posts: 133

Re: [epoch] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would say that you might have a too large rack already....

If you must add something I would say small tricams. They are cheaper and lighter than cams, but can in many cases replace them.


markc


Mar 1, 2007, 2:55 PM
Post #19 of 41 (3090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

8flood8 wrote:
tcu 00, 0, 1,2,2,3,3,4,4
powercams 10, 1
UL powercams 5,6,7,8
c4 1,2,2,3,4
camalot .75
wc tech friend 2.5

2 sets of nuts with half a set of random specialty (curve nuts etc.)
set of hexes 1-11 with doubles in 7,8,9,10
and 1 tricam (red?)

I took the liberty of listing all your pro in one place. At a glance, I'd say you have a rack that will travel well to most places. To be honest, it's probably more pro you want to carry on many routes.

You have 22 cams listed, and probably an equal number of nuts. Despite an abundance of cams, you also have 15 hexes. I'd guess you're between 55 - 60 pieces. I know it's not the popular opinion on rc.com, but there is such a thing as carrying too much gear.

Here's what I usually carry, which has served me fairly well on easy/moderate multipitch routes:

1 set of ABC nuts (4 - 13) - been wanting to add to that
BD hexes 4 - 11
RE micro-robots .25 - .5 - thinking about upgrading
BD camalots .4 - 4
2 smallest tricams

29 pieces, with 15 slings and one screamer. I have RE Robots 1 - 5, as well, but don't often carry them. On occasion we'll pool gear to have a second set of nuts or carry doubles in cams rather than hexes. I'm the first to admit I don't climb hard, but I'm pretty content with what I carry.


dlintz


Mar 1, 2007, 3:11 PM
Post #20 of 41 (3071 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2002
Posts: 1982

Re: [markc] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think the OP is interested in whether he has a complete enough rack to take just about anywhere.....that doesn't mean he'll take the whole thing up each route.

d.


markc


Mar 1, 2007, 3:16 PM
Post #21 of 41 (3063 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481

Re: [dlintz] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dlintz wrote:
I think the OP is interested in whether he has a complete enough rack to take just about anywhere.....that doesn't mean he'll take the whole thing up each route.

d.

Understood. I said I thought it was good for that purpose (with the exception of places like Indian Creek). You'll have to excuse the rest, which was just my personal rant against buying more gear than you're likely to need.


dan2see


Mar 1, 2007, 3:17 PM
Post #22 of 41 (3060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 1497

Re: [markc] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

markc wrote:
... On occasion we'll pool gear...

That is the neatest trick that can work anywhere.

I prefer "hard" passive gear, my buddy prefers "soft" cams. Some of that stuff will stay in the car. Together we're comfortable on the routes we share.

Except the run-outs.Shocked


(This post was edited by dan2see on Mar 1, 2007, 4:59 PM)


Partner brent_e


Mar 1, 2007, 3:41 PM
Post #23 of 41 (3047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111

Re: [8flood8] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

8flood8 wrote:
lol ok --

tcu 00, 0, 1,2,2,3,3,4,4
powercams 10, 1
UL powercams 5,6,7,8
c4 1,2,2,3,4
camalot .75
wc tech friend 2.5

i just look at my cams as what they could potentially protect

that looks pretty solid to me. Although you'll likely NEVER carry 20+ cams.

i'd say if you can't climb all over with a rack like that you should sell it all to me for a low low price. Smile


Partner j_ung


Mar 1, 2007, 3:44 PM
Post #24 of 41 (3043 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [rockprodigy] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockprodigy wrote:
You would be far better off worrying about whether or not your skills are complete, than your rack. Thirty years ago people climbed hard stuff with only nuts and slings...they depended on themselves, not gear!

Skill will get you up far more climbs than gear will, and as such, nobody could possibly give you a good answer to your question without knowing what your skills are.

Yes, indeedy.


dingus


Mar 1, 2007, 4:18 PM
Post #25 of 41 (3019 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [j_ung] opinions on trad rack "completeness" [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I submit your rack is ALWAYS complete.

You don't go to climb with the rack you want. No,

You go to climb with the rack you have.

As a kid I used to have 'run away' fantasies. No ill feeling toward parents or anything I just wanted adventure. My dream was to move to Alaska and live off the land.

Hours were spent combing Cabelas catalogs and such, building lists of the complete wilderness kit. I wisht Ida kept those lists the laugh would be precious now.

You don't need a list of Cabelas shit to runaway, no. You don't run away with the gear you want. You run away with the gear you have.

Now get to it floody. The Open Road is calling your name. Spending more dough in advance won't change a thing.

DMT


(This post was edited by dingus on Mar 1, 2007, 4:18 PM)

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook