|
|
|
|
fresh
Feb 14, 2008, 11:43 PM
Post #1 of 36
(9076 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
This past fall I trained pretty hard. Twice a day twice a week, once a day one or two other times a week, with easy days in between and at least one off day. Running, circuits, climbing, kettlebelling, biking, everything I enjoyed. I read gym jones and this forum and pushed myself hard. I kept a log and tried to take sensible amounts of rest. This past month I had to move out of my apartment pretty quickly, and didn't have much time for training because of a longer commute. I still climb twice a week and try to get out for ice climbing every other weekend or so. But I haven't done a pull-up or a dead hang in about a month. Yet, last week I sent 5.12 for the first time (on TR, at the gym, boohoo, whatevs). Yesterday I onsighted 5.12a (on TR, at the gym, boohoo, suck a hog). I might be crazy. maybe this is just my body finally feeling the benefits of a lot of hard work. but I'm not feeling so compelled to get up at 5:00 for a cold morning workout. In fact I think I might just climb from now on, go running when I feel like it. maybe I'll never do another sit up. OK, so I do want to stay in shape for the low-level alpine climbs that I want to do, so I might start getting up early again. But I'm interested to hear if anyone's had any similar experiences. Does it pay off to work out only, say, twice a week? Are rest days (i.e. do-nothing days) normally this beneficial?
|
|
|
|
|
dudemanbu
Feb 14, 2008, 11:52 PM
Post #2 of 36
(9049 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2005
Posts: 941
|
I've made more rapid progress in the last 6 months (5.10b to 5.12a redpoints) than i have ever before, and i think the reason why is rest days. I'm climbing less often (twice a week on average, spread evenly) and doing much less actual training.
|
|
|
|
|
aerili
Feb 15, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #3 of 36
(9034 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166
|
fresh, You should easily be able to maintain your cardiovascular gains on 2 days per week. Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. Congrats on your gains. I do think your hard work paid off, but perhaps it's true you weren't allowing enough recovery time before. Maybe your mental state is different now too. Who knows. Try it out.
|
|
|
|
|
hopperhopper
Feb 15, 2008, 6:51 AM
Post #4 of 36
(8933 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 475
|
aerili wrote: You should easily be able to maintain your cardiovascular gains on 2 days per week. Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. do you have references for these
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Feb 15, 2008, 7:08 AM
Post #5 of 36
(8921 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
The only exercises I do on purpose away from climbing is just some pretty basic core stuff. Other than that, I just climb and still manage lots of improvements. They key is to climb a lot and to listen to your body for when you shouldn't climb. That and I'm a muthafukkin animal.
|
|
|
|
|
WVUCLMBR
Feb 15, 2008, 1:17 PM
Post #6 of 36
(8832 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 20, 2007
Posts: 668
|
There is 5.12 and 5.12a @ climbing gyms? Please excuse my ignorance as I have only been to one climbing gym before (we are poor here in WV and as such are forced to climb real rock). I just wondered if the holds are labeled or something and you use some mathmatic formula to determine grade? P.s Train more Core!
|
|
|
|
|
subantz
Feb 15, 2008, 2:40 PM
Post #7 of 36
(8776 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247
|
Forget all that go have fun with it. You should stay strong with 2 or 3 days in a gym. sit ups suck anyway. but to each is own
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Feb 15, 2008, 3:42 PM
Post #8 of 36
(8722 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
beep beep boop ahhhhh...
|
|
|
|
|
cchas
Feb 15, 2008, 3:56 PM
Post #9 of 36
(8704 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344
|
So you were training hard, and taking time off allowed you to climb harder. Could it be that a) you might have been overtraining and taking the time off allowed your body to recover. or b) that your body was getting stronger while you were training, but you didn't notice the pay off until recently Even though you said that you tried to take "sensible amounts of rests", what one person needs may be very diffent then what another person may need. Even what one person may need may change over a period of time, or be dependent on your last workout. Whereas one person may take a day off and come back completely rested, another person may have to take several days off. Or after one specific workout, you may need to take multiple days off, whereas another workout, you may feel great after one rest day. I'd say try training again (if you enjoy it) but make your rests longer and see if you can benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
aerili
Feb 15, 2008, 4:11 PM
Post #10 of 36
(8688 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166
|
hopperhopper wrote: aerili wrote: You should easily be able to maintain your cardiovascular gains on 2 days per week. Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. do you have references for these No, I just made it up, of course. This is apparently what has been determined in studies of both aerobic and anaerobic training over the years. You can ask my prior professors of ex phys and strength training about specific study references, but I figure they did their legwork appropriately.
|
|
|
|
|
rockclimbergabor
Feb 15, 2008, 4:14 PM
Post #11 of 36
(8686 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 18, 2003
Posts: 131
|
it all depends on how you define "training". a lot of strong climbers dont 'train' in the sense that you see it. clmbing at your max level (like 12a onsight for you) can be more effective then doing x number of sit-ups or deadhangs. a lot of climbers have a system set up that includes a period of muscular, aerobic, and aneorobic training (power workouts, circuits, laps on routes, four by fours, etc etc) followed by a period of max level performance (trying to redpoint or onsight your hardest). the training prepares you for improvement, but the period of max level climbing builds up your syke and pushes your body in newer, harder ways, allowing even more improvement. to me it seems like you're following this system - if not purposefully - and it probably explains your sudden improvements. my advice to you is to do training cycles of 2-4 months, depending on what you have time for, and then when you feel you reach your peak do max level climbing until you feel like youre plateauing. then after that, 1-3 weeks of rest, depending on how worked you are, then time to start the cycle again!
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Feb 15, 2008, 4:27 PM
Post #12 of 36
(8667 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
aerili wrote: hopperhopper wrote: aerili wrote: You should easily be able to maintain your cardiovascular gains on 2 days per week. Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. do you have references for these No, I just made it up, of course. When a 17 year old asks you for references, you give them, that's the rulz. BTW, can you recommend any pre climb stretches to warm up with?
|
|
|
|
|
hopperhopper
Feb 15, 2008, 5:34 PM
Post #13 of 36
(8610 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 475
|
aerili wrote: This is apparently what has been determined in studies of both aerobic and anaerobic training over the years. You can ask my prior professors of ex phys and strength training about specific study references, but I figure they did their legwork appropriately. i was hoping for a link, but ok. not saying i don't believe you, i would just like to read it.
|
|
|
|
|
Climbnkev
Feb 15, 2008, 6:50 PM
Post #14 of 36
(8570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 28, 2008
Posts: 32
|
aerili wrote: fresh, Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. Could you give us an example of what this one training day might look like without charging a hundred dollars?
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Feb 15, 2008, 6:53 PM
Post #15 of 36
(8567 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Climbnkev wrote: aerili wrote: fresh, Strength maintenance should require one day a week of maximal training. Could you give us an example of what this one training day might look like without charging a hundred dollars? I'm starting to figure out all this cross board posting. 8 posts? n00b. Wanna go climb Far Reaches and Arch Nemesis with us tomorrow? I think I may have a redpoint (not pink) in me.
|
|
|
|
|
aerili
Feb 15, 2008, 8:10 PM
Post #16 of 36
(8521 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166
|
angry wrote: When a 17 year old asks you for references, you give them, that's the rulz. Doh!
angry wrote: BTW, can you recommend any pre climb stretches to warm up with? Hey mister, are you cross-site posting now?!
|
|
|
|
|
aerili
Feb 15, 2008, 8:19 PM
Post #17 of 36
(8510 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166
|
h.h., Ufortunately, I have no links for you. Some things I rely on my education for since, as far as I was told at the time, my classroom lectures were based on empirical evidence.
Climbnkev wrote: Could you give us an example of what this one training day might look like without charging a hundred dollars? Well, my response wasn't ever meant to be one of "what" to do, rather only a response to the OP's question: "Does it pay off to work out only, say, twice a week?" Since strength and cardiovascular don't respond exactly the same, I simply tried to answer his question for both. He already has his own training plan. Edited to add: the key to reducing one's aerobic training yet still maintain the same levels of fitness, you must only reduce either FREQUENCY or DURATION by 1/3 to 2/3 and you must keep your intensity absolutely the same as before, plus keep the other variable the same as well. Ergo: Intensity (same) + Frequency (same) + Duration (less) OR Intensity (same) + Frequency (less) + Duration (same) = Maintenance (I also remember hearing that you can decrease both Freq and Dur by up to 2/3 simul and still not suffer losses, so, that may in fact be the actual case.) BUT Intensity (less) + Frequency (same) + Duration (same) = Decreases in fitness Likewise, resistance training requires MAXIMAL effort of all muscle groups to maintain existing strength on one day per week.
(This post was edited by aerili on Feb 16, 2008, 12:33 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
hopperhopper
Feb 16, 2008, 1:17 AM
Post #18 of 36
(8432 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 475
|
aerili wrote: = Maintenance does this apply to everybody? i mean, can ronnie coleman maintain his mass with one workout per week? seems like when you get that huge it might take more.
|
|
|
|
|
hyongx
Feb 16, 2008, 2:53 AM
Post #19 of 36
(8393 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 17, 2004
Posts: 209
|
lol@ronnie coleman lol@getting huge lol@ronnie coleman rock climbing
|
|
|
|
|
aerili
Feb 16, 2008, 7:11 AM
Post #20 of 36
(8335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166
|
hopperhopper wrote: i mean, can ronnie coleman maintain his mass with one workout per week? seems like when you get that huge it might take more. I said to maintain strength, not mass. There's a difference, and it's about maintaining the same level of neural recruitment.
|
|
|
|
|
slavetogravity
Feb 16, 2008, 8:38 AM
Post #21 of 36
(8321 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 1114
|
fresh wrote: OK, so I do want to stay in shape for the low-level alpine climbs that I want to do, so I might start getting up early again. But I'm interested to hear if anyone's had any similar experiences. Does it pay off to work out only, say, twice a week? Are rest days (i.e. do-nothing days) normally this beneficial? Don't worry. Some day, maybe soon, you'll be out climbing and despite you're best effort you'll find your self get shut down on a 5.10a, or equivalent grade of humiliation. After that, you'll find all the motivation you'll need to train. Or you'll be like all the other burnouts I've ever known, start Mt. biking, and never look back.
|
|
|
|
|
corson
Feb 16, 2008, 11:59 AM
Post #22 of 36
(8308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 16, 2005
Posts: 193
|
aerili wrote: hopperhopper wrote: i mean, can ronnie coleman maintain his mass with one workout per week? seems like when you get that huge it might take more. I said to maintain strength, not mass. There's a difference, and it's about maintaining the same level of neural recruitment. An important note. In order to maintain strength, there has to be at least one session of maximal nueral recruitment per week( that is why 10-5's and 10-10's are so effective and BTW often used by body builders for both strength and mass maintenence,especcially during cutting phases)However I have found that with only one day a week it often leads to diminishing returns in the long run.Physiologies differ,but for me that is usually about 8-12 weeks.Then you have to start building again or at least put in an extra day.
|
|
|
|
|
supersonick
Feb 16, 2008, 4:08 PM
Post #23 of 36
(8272 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 18, 2002
Posts: 157
|
rockclimbergabor wrote: it all depends on how you define "training". a lot of strong climbers dont 'train' in the sense that you see it. clmbing at your max level (like 12a onsight for you) can be more effective then doing x number of sit-ups or deadhangs. a lot of climbers have a system set up that includes a period of muscular, aerobic, and aneorobic training (power workouts, circuits, laps on routes, four by fours, etc etc) followed by a period of max level performance (trying to redpoint or onsight your hardest). the training prepares you for improvement, but the period of max level climbing builds up your syke and pushes your body in newer, harder ways, allowing even more improvement. to me it seems like you're following this system - if not purposefully - and it probably explains your sudden improvements. my advice to you is to do training cycles of 2-4 months, depending on what you have time for, and then when you feel you reach your peak do max level climbing until you feel like youre plateauing. then after that, 1-3 weeks of rest, depending on how worked you are, then time to start the cycle again! bingo
|
|
|
|
|
fresh
Feb 16, 2008, 9:04 PM
Post #24 of 36
(8213 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
The most important thing to me is to love what I'm doing at all times, and in honesty I kinda like waking up at 5 to go running in the bitter cold (well, on some days). However I'm not interested in doing that if it has a limiting effect on my progress. I'll just keep on trying new things, so far as I'm loving every minute of it. Thanks so much for the responses.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Feb 16, 2008, 10:41 PM
Post #25 of 36
(8185 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
aerili wrote: h Edited to add: the key to reducing one's aerobic training yet still maintain the same levels of fitness, you must only reduce either FREQUENCY or DURATION by 1/3 to 2/3 and you must keep your intensity absolutely the same as before, plus keep the other variable the same as well. Ergo: Intensity (same) + Frequency (same) + Duration (less) OR Intensity (same) + Frequency (less) + Duration (same) = Maintenance (I also remember hearing that you can decrease both Freq and Dur by up to 2/3 simul and still not suffer losses, so, that may in fact be the actual case.) BUT Intensity (less) + Frequency (same) + Duration (same) = Decreases in fitness Likewise, resistance training requires MAXIMAL effort of all muscle groups to maintain existing strength on one day per week. Something seems odd with this. I can decrease one of those three by 1/3 this week and then decrease one of the others by 1/3 next week, and so on and so on until eventually I think the series will end up with me only doing 1/3 of my initial workout but still having the same results. That would be great, but I don't buy it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|