Forums: Climbing Information: The Lab:
Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for The Lab

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 30 Next page Last page  View All


gothcopter


May 20, 2009, 8:18 PM
Post #26 of 747 (12030 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 145

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Failure 1: Red Alien- Date stamp of 0702, which is more than 2 years prior to the date range of the earlier recall (which covered 11-04 to 12-05 per the expanded date range once more failed units were discovered)
adatesman wrote:
Failure 2: Purple Alien- Date stamp of 0105, which is right at the end of the recall period. Seeing as post-recall units are supposedly all stamped Tensile Tested this one either was subject to the recall or was tested and didn't get the stamp.

Just thought I'd point out that these two statements contradict each other. 0105 is near the beginning of the recall period, but well within it. Doesn't affect the validity of your results in any way, but you might want to correct the original post just to avoid confusion.

I have 3 non-dimpled Aliens from the recall range (1104, 1204, 0105). They are in good condition and I can attest to their history. If enough people wish it, maybe I'll send them to you for destructive testing.

What say you all?


spikeddem


May 20, 2009, 8:23 PM
Post #27 of 747 (12004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [gothcopter] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gothcopter wrote:

I have 3 non-dimpled Aliens from the recall range (1104, 1204, 0105). They are in good condition and I can attest to their history. If enough people wish it, maybe I'll send them to you for destructive testing.

What say you all?

Well since you asked "all," I'll chime in. Aric has said that he'd prefer to have a certified company do any (serious) further testing. Makes sense to me.


k.l.k


May 20, 2009, 8:29 PM
Post #28 of 747 (11990 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2007
Posts: 1190

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
After almost 3 full days of calling and emailing CCH about this they're finally doing something... questioning my credentials, background, impartiality and test procedures.

What did you expect? That one failure, where the poor fucker posted pictures of the thing actually exploding in a real fall, Waggoner got on board and publicly accused the guy of faking the incident. Don't take it personally.

I don't expect any of this to change anything. We have what looks like a braze failure-- a modality we've seen many times before --and what looks like a sourcing problem.

The question now is, would anyone really be surprised?

Folks who are going to climb on Aliens are going to climb on them. Everyone else made up their minds long ago.


(This post was edited by k.l.k on May 20, 2009, 8:29 PM)


bandycoot


May 20, 2009, 8:29 PM
Post #29 of 747 (11987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Aric,

I want to say thank you for what you're doing. You're donating time, effort, and risking getting flamed by detractors, and all the while it looks like you're trying to do the best that you can do with what you have. What you're doing isn't easy, but it's awesome!

Sincerely,

Josh


notapplicable


May 20, 2009, 8:32 PM
Post #30 of 747 (11975 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

We all know that CCH has had serious issues with their brazing procedures so pre-recall units exhibiting that mode of failure is IMO less of a significant development than the possibility that CCH has been purchasing and using subpar material for the construction of their cams.

Obviously more testing and investigation needs to be done to understand the scope of the problem, or if a problem even exists, but I'm very concerned that CCH's QC problems appear to be systemic.


dynosore


May 20, 2009, 8:35 PM
Post #31 of 747 (11959 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
patto wrote:
Have a look a the rest of the guys work and realise he is thorough and knows what he is doing.

Thanks Patto, I needed that right about now. After almost 3 full days of calling and emailing CCH about this they're finally doing something... questioning my credentials, background, impartiality and test procedures.

Sigh. Unsure

What I mess I've created for myself. Its important to get the word out though, and I'd do it all again in a heartbeat.

-a.

IMO it's clear that CCH has no business manufacturing anything, let alone a device people depend on for their lives. But they have a good point. Having spent years in QC, how you're testing is extremely relevant. If you're going to present data on a public forum like this, you need to give more information about your equipment and method. In industry, you would expect to have details like this with every test report.


notapplicable


May 20, 2009, 8:38 PM
Post #32 of 747 (11944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [bandycoot] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

bandycoot wrote:
Aric,

I want to say thank you for what you're doing. You're donating time, effort, and risking getting flamed by detractors, and all the while it looks like you're trying to do the best that you can do with what you have. What you're doing isn't easy, but it's awesome!

Sincerely,

Josh

+1

And not just in this thread but the entire lab. This has become a very interesting place to lurk as of late.

Thank you.


kennoyce


May 20, 2009, 8:39 PM
Post #33 of 747 (11941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338

Re: [dynosore] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you read the OP you'll notice that Aric stated that in order to be brief he wouldn't include his equipment or methods because that information can all easily be found in the lab forum.

Good work on the testing Aric, and I will continue to not climb on aliens.


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 8:40 PM
Post #34 of 747 (11940 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  

 


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 8:43 PM
Post #35 of 747 (11933 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


Gmburns2000


May 20, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #36 of 747 (11899 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
shoo wrote:
patto wrote:
This is going to be hard fight to keep this thread clean from the bickering about aliens that we have already have had.

Don't worry. I've started my very own bickering session here:

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...6;page=unread#unread

Let's leave this thread for discussion of this particular test.

Oy. I'm not even going to look.

Don't worry. It didn't turn out the way he intended.


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 9:07 PM
Post #37 of 747 (11867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


moose_droppings


May 20, 2009, 9:38 PM
Post #38 of 747 (11812 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
moose_droppings wrote:
Aric, I'm not gonna jump CCH, but you.........

That is the most jury rigged trigger wire I've ever seen, totally amateur for sure.

Laugh

Yeah.... But what's the point of doing a pretty repair on something you're going to break anyway? Wink

Well then you didn't need a wire at all just for that.
TongueWink


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 9:47 PM
Post #39 of 747 (11796 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  

 


healyje


May 20, 2009, 10:11 PM
Post #40 of 747 (11755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

CHORUS:
The beat goes on, the beat goes on
Drums keep pounding a rhythm of denial to the brain
La de da de de, la de da de da

Aliens were once the rage, uh huh
History has turned the page, uh huh
The mini skirts the current thing, uh huh
Teenybopper is our newborn king, uh huh


blondgecko
Moderator

May 20, 2009, 10:12 PM
Post #41 of 747 (11750 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So basically, maybe a quarter of the wires in the cable were brazed well enough for the wire to break before the braze. Maybe.


That's just plain scary.


blondgecko
Moderator

May 20, 2009, 10:20 PM
Post #42 of 747 (11732 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
patto wrote:
Have a look a the rest of the guys work and realise he is thorough and knows what he is doing.

Thanks Patto, I needed that right about now. After almost 3 full days of calling and emailing CCH about this they're finally doing something... questioning my credentials, background, impartiality and test procedures.

Sigh. Unsure

What I mess I've created for myself. Its important to get the word out though, and I'd do it all again in a heartbeat.

-a.

Oh, and I also wanted to say that it's perfectly clear here that, whatever your background and credentials (and even impartiality), you've done a great job here. Doesn't matter who you are or what you think. What matters is the evidence you've provided, and that speaks volumes.


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 10:21 PM
Post #43 of 747 (11732 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


blondgecko
Moderator

May 20, 2009, 10:25 PM
Post #44 of 747 (11720 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Well, it appears to be 7x7 wire (7 bundles of 7 strands) which makes for a total of 49 stands and by my count there are ~20 full length strands remaining. Knowing that at least 3 strands were visibly broken before the test that gives us.... ?

Interesting side note this brings up though... Current "generation" (I use the term loosely since there seems to be wide variation in how they're put together judging by the washer issue and changes to the drigger) use 7x19 cable (7 bundles of 19 stands). I hadn't noticed the difference earlier.

A little over half, then. My mistake.


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 10:30 PM
Post #45 of 747 (11714 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


mtnjohn


May 20, 2009, 11:13 PM
Post #46 of 747 (11662 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2002
Posts: 230

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Is anyone doing independent testing of any other cams? Do we really want to know the results of those test?


adatesman


May 20, 2009, 11:40 PM
Post #47 of 747 (11636 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


spikeddem


May 20, 2009, 11:59 PM
Post #48 of 747 (11609 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
Question 1. CCH has some of their current, post-recall testing process documented on their website. At the moment they take a double length of cable, braze a head on each end, pull it from head to head between pins on a test fixture to X pounds (varies based on size), cut the thing in half to get 2 tested stems and then mark them both. I do not know if this is 100% testing or spot checks.

Aliencamsbycch.com says every main cable since January 2006 has been tested in this manner. This makes me believe that nowadays the issue with poor "braze wicking" would be prevented from reaching the market. You said "X" pounds, and of course it does vary based on stem size, but they always test to at least 7.77 kN.

I'm interested in hearing about the hardness testing results. Have you found a place to test that yet?

edit: Clarity.


(This post was edited by spikeddem on May 21, 2009, 1:27 AM)


adatesman


May 21, 2009, 12:10 AM
Post #49 of 747 (11906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


mtnjohn


May 21, 2009, 12:12 AM
Post #50 of 747 (11903 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2002
Posts: 230

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks for the update. I guess it's finally time to retire the U stems. I'm down to only one left anyway!

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 30 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : The Lab

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook