 |

adatesman
Jan 20, 2010, 8:38 PM
Post #2 of 16
(2201 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3413
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradrenn
Jan 20, 2010, 8:42 PM
Post #3 of 16
(2191 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
How about saving it with the rest of all the good stuff you have around here.
|
|
|
 |
 |

adatesman
Jan 20, 2010, 8:49 PM
Post #4 of 16
(2180 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3413
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

currupt4130
Jan 20, 2010, 9:17 PM
Post #5 of 16
(2151 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 515
|
Very cool.
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Jan 21, 2010, 8:26 AM
Post #6 of 16
(2074 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2804
|
Figure 22 is awesome:
(This post was edited by acorneau on Jan 21, 2010, 8:26 AM)
|
|
Attachments:
|
Picture 3.png
(24.8 KB)
|
|
|
 |
 |

bandycoot
Jan 21, 2010, 9:30 AM
Post #7 of 16
(2020 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2020
|
In reply to: Using the established maximum loading scenario for a two-hundred pound climber falling from a height of thirty feet with seven percent rope-stretch, a maximum impact loading of 2,850 pounds was established. Most ropes stretch close to 30% dynamically. Where are they getting 7% from?
(This post was edited by bandycoot on Jan 21, 2010, 9:33 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

currupt4130
Jan 21, 2010, 9:43 AM
Post #8 of 16
(2008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 515
|
I caught that too when I was reading it. I think 7% is the max allowable for static ropes, but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Jan 21, 2010, 9:54 AM
Post #9 of 16
(1996 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2804
|
bandycoot wrote: Most ropes stretch close to 30% dynamically. Where are they getting 7% from? 7% could be the static elongation of a dynamic rope.
|
|
|
 |
 |

bandycoot
Jan 21, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #10 of 16
(1990 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2020
|
It could be, but that's irrelevant since they are evaluating, "falling from a height of thirty feet"
|
|
|
 |
 |

jeremy11
Jan 21, 2010, 10:25 AM
Post #11 of 16
(1961 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2004
Posts: 597
|
Great read, thanks! Very interesting. I had an aid fall similar to that falling climber diagram, except the belayer was a big rock (solo aid) and the pro was a #2 frost sentinel, sideways in a shallow placement. I landed upside down, about 10 feet off the ground
|
|
|
 |
 |

ptlong
Jan 21, 2010, 11:58 AM
Post #12 of 16
(1898 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2007
Posts: 418
|
bandycoot wrote: In reply to: Using the established maximum loading scenario for a two-hundred pound climber falling from a height of thirty feet with seven percent rope-stretch, a maximum impact loading of 2,850 pounds was established. Most ropes stretch close to 30% dynamically. Where are they getting 7% from? It's probably a typo. The force doesn't match a 7% stretch but is more or less what you'd get if you assumed a 30% stretch.
|
|
|
 |
 |

agdavis
Jan 21, 2010, 12:38 PM
Post #13 of 16
(1857 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
I'm not sure if this is your original work, but if so, do you have an abstract? I am way too lazy to read through it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradrenn
Jan 21, 2010, 8:06 PM
Post #14 of 16
(1798 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
bandycoot wrote: In reply to: Using the established maximum loading scenario for a two-hundred pound climber falling from a height of thirty feet with seven percent rope-stretch, a maximum impact loading of 2,850 pounds was established. Most ropes stretch close to 30% dynamically. Where are they getting 7% from? 30 % refers to dynamic elongation 7 % refers to static elongation.
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradrenn
Jan 21, 2010, 8:25 PM
Post #15 of 16
(1787 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
Did you notice what it says under the drawing ? "Maximum force"
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradrenn
Jan 21, 2010, 8:28 PM
Post #16 of 16
(1785 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
agdavis wrote: I'm not sure if this is your original work, but if so, do you have an abstract? I am way too lazy to read through it. It's not my work, it's just something I found while researching something else on Google.
|
|
|
 |
|
|