|
MS1
Sep 9, 2010, 7:11 PM
Post #51 of 71
(8234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
This thread is such a waste of time that I don't even feel good about this PTFTW.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Sep 9, 2010, 7:27 PM
Post #52 of 71
(8225 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
MS1 wrote: You are the least interesting troll this site has seen in some time. Your posts are worthless, long, and unfunny. Seriously, I never thought I would say this, but you are making me appreciate subantz. Go read some of the classic majid threads and then try again. ps: If you "lol" one more time, it is good cause for a cock punching. zzzzzzzzzzzzz ....lol did u have anything to contribute on hanging belays ... lol
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Sep 9, 2010, 7:55 PM
Post #53 of 71
(8218 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
COCKPUNCHES
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Sep 9, 2010, 8:09 PM
Post #54 of 71
(8207 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Sep 9, 2010, 8:19 PM
Post #55 of 71
(8201 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
What's the capital of Thailand? I'll give you a hint:
|
|
|
|
|
gmggg
Sep 9, 2010, 8:31 PM
Post #56 of 71
(8193 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099
|
Please use the NSFW tag when appropriate. Several of my coworkers became aroused at that dose of ursine paw-love.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Sep 9, 2010, 9:37 PM
Post #57 of 71
(8182 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
gmggg wrote: Please use the NSFW tag when appropriate. Several of my coworkers became aroused at that dose of ursine paw-love. R yu a bare?
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Sep 9, 2010, 10:26 PM
Post #58 of 71
(8176 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
spikeddem wrote: gmggg wrote: Please use the NSFW tag when appropriate. Several of my coworkers became aroused at that dose of ursine paw-love. R yu a bare? lol sorry
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Sep 9, 2010, 10:27 PM
Post #59 of 71
(8174 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
MS1 wrote: You are the least interesting troll this site has seen in some time. Your posts are worthless, long, and unfunny. Seriously, I never thought I would say this, but you are making me appreciate subantz. Go read some of the classic majid threads and then try again. ps: If you "lol" one more time, it is good cause for a cock punching. So that's why subantz can't get bannzed. We need him as a metric.
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Sep 9, 2010, 10:35 PM
Post #60 of 71
(8169 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
bill413 wrote: MS1 wrote: You are the least interesting troll this site has seen in some time. Your posts are worthless, long, and unfunny. Seriously, I never thought I would say this, but you are making me appreciate subantz. Go read some of the classic majid threads and then try again. ps: If you "lol" one more time, it is good cause for a cock punching. So that's why subantz can't get bannzed. We need him as a metric. Indeed. By comparison to our young bear-baiter, "Pull test this" is comedy gold.
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Sep 9, 2010, 10:36 PM
Post #61 of 71
(8168 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
bill413 wrote: spikeddem wrote: gmggg wrote: Please use the NSFW tag when appropriate. Several of my coworkers became aroused at that dose of ursine paw-love. R yu a bare? lol sorry Your use was acceptable, but don't push it. I have a whole sack full of these things for excessive lolling. It's a slippery slope and someone has to stand against the tide.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Sep 9, 2010, 10:47 PM
Post #62 of 71
(8163 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
jipstyle
Sep 9, 2010, 10:56 PM
Post #64 of 71
(8157 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 27, 2003
Posts: 482
|
MS1 wrote: ps: If you "lol" one more time, it is good cause for a cock punching. Truth. Can we say that another "lol .. stoopid" is worth a cock punch AND some big bro intimacy? (You choose whether the bro is pro or a fellow inmate)
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Sep 9, 2010, 11:05 PM
Post #65 of 71
(8150 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
MS1 wrote: bearbreeder wrote: lol I guess you are one of those weirdos who enjoy cockpunches. Well I'm not going to play that kinky game with you, so lol it up, freak. I'm out. u always wanna reach out and touch what ya dun have ... lol
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Sep 10, 2010, 12:44 AM
Post #66 of 71
(8140 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
jipstyle wrote: MS1 wrote: ps: If you "lol" one more time, it is good cause for a cock punching. Truth. Can we say that another "lol .. stoopid" is worth a cock punch AND some big bro intimacy? (You choose whether the bro is pro or a fellow inmate) Clearly, there is a strong desire. Not that there is anything wrong with that. As long as it's not _my_ pro.
|
|
|
|
|
tisakson
Oct 19, 2010, 3:03 AM
Post #67 of 71
(8017 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 75
|
Simple is key. Daisy or PAS yourself at a good distance for comfort off of one bolt. Use your climbing rope tied to your harness and clove hitch that to a biner on the other bolt, equalizing it with the PAS/daisy. Then belay your partner off of two draws hung through the bolts or biners that you are on. Then you're all tied in and ready to go when you dismantle it all to follow your partner up the second pitch...Simple. Or just use two slings..it doesn't matter as long as your equal on two anchors. I butterfly rope over my right foot or the slings in front of your off your harness.
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Oct 19, 2010, 4:07 AM
Post #68 of 71
(8008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
Uh no. You just had to go and interject "daisy" into this mess.
|
|
|
|
|
DarenBowel
Feb 23, 2011, 11:59 AM
Post #69 of 71
(7781 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 23, 2011
Posts: 1
|
I think it's not easy.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Feb 23, 2011, 2:12 PM
Post #70 of 71
(7760 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
spikeddem wrote: With two draws there are four carabiners. This is plenty for two people to build two anchors without sharing sharing carabiners. The only criticism I have of that is that you have essentially taken away 2 draws from the leader on the next pitch. This may or may not matter. I will often use a locker on one bolt, clove to it, put a draw on the other clove to the top. This works perfect if you are switching leads. Your way is slightly more efficient if you are doing all the leading, but I will sacrifice a few seconds to if they are long pitches and I want as much gear as possible for the next pitch. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
EuroFreeBase
Jun 11, 2011, 4:23 AM
Post #71 of 71
(7589 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 11, 2011
Posts: 4
|
use one bolt above one bolt then get your base shoot ready in case it tears out because static rope is lighter than dynamic rope so use that for multi pitching
|
|
|
|
|
|