|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 4:42 AM
Post #1 of 56
(18124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
when you need to get off belay to help the messed up leader, this is one way (out of so many other ways) you could escape belay and assist the down leader. 1- make sure you always have few biner and a prusik hanging on your harness 2-set up an anchor near or belay belay 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 4-put another fig 8 , two feet below the first fig 8 5- take the remaining rope below the last fig 8 and attach the rope to a solid anchor. 6- put a prusik above belay 7- take the 5 feet of slack below the belay and run it at least once between two fig 8(biner) to get 2:1 or twice to get 4:1 mechanical advantage. 8- let some slack from the belay device till load is transferred between the two biner 9-once load is on the two fig 8, take the belay off and do your thing(help, cry,rescue,whatever). to put yourself back on belay 1- attach belay to your harness and take off all slack 2- tension on MA 2:1 or 4:1 and till prusik is near belay then lock off belay. 3-undo the tension on 2:1/4:1 MA till load is back on belay 4-once load is back on belay, take fig 8 out /undo anchor and then lower wabitt nomax is on please start the flame
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Dec 3, 2010, 6:43 AM
Post #2 of 56
(18057 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
majid_sabet wrote: when you need to get off belay to help the messed up leader, this is one way (out of so many other ways) you could escape belay and assist the down leader. 1- make sure you always have few biner and a prusik hanging on your harness 2-set up an anchor near or belay belay 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 4-put another fig 8 , two feet below the first fig 8 5- take the remaining rope below the last fig 8 and attach the rope to a solid anchor. 6- put a prusik above belay 7- take the 5 feet of slack below the belay and run it at least once between two fig 8(biner) to get 2:1 or twice to get 4:1 mechanical advantage. 8- let some slack from the belay device till load is transferred between the two biner 9-once load is on the two fig 8, take the belay off and do your thing(help, cry,rescue,whatever). to put yourself back on belay 1- attach belay to your harness and take off all slack 2- tension on MA 2:1 or 4:1 and till prusik is near belay then lock off belay. 3-undo the tension on 2:1/4:1 MA till load is back on belay 4-once load is back on belay, take fig 8 out /undo anchor and then lower wabitt nomax is on please start the flame Since you asked for it........
|
|
|
|
|
aquadood
Dec 3, 2010, 7:01 AM
Post #3 of 56
(18047 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2009
Posts: 37
|
majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method?
|
|
|
|
|
airscape
Dec 3, 2010, 8:02 AM
Post #4 of 56
(18025 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Majid can tie a monkey fist with one hand.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 3, 2010, 2:13 PM
Post #5 of 56
(17960 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Yes he should. Against my better judgment, I will give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just an oversight to not mention it. I actually do like the additions of the 4:1, which will take force off of the prussik. I hate to state the obvious, but this is not necessary if the climber can be lowered back to the belay. In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Dec 3, 2010, 2:39 PM
Post #6 of 56
(17943 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
majid_sabet wrote: when you need to get off belay to help the messed up leader, this is one way (out of so many other ways) you could escape belay and assist the down leader. 1- make sure you always have few biner and a prusik hanging on your harness 2-set up an anchor near or belay belay 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 4-put another fig 8 , two feet below the first fig 8 5- take the remaining rope below the last fig 8 and attach the rope to a solid anchor. 6- put a prusik above belay 7- take the 5 feet of slack below the belay and run it at least once between two fig 8(biner) to get 2:1 or twice to get 4:1 mechanical advantage. 8- let some slack from the belay device till load is transferred between the two biner 9-once load is on the two fig 8, take the belay off and do your thing(help, cry,rescue,whatever). to put yourself back on belay 1- attach belay to your harness and take off all slack 2- tension on MA 2:1 or 4:1 and till prusik is near belay then lock off belay. 3-undo the tension on 2:1/4:1 MA till load is back on belay 4-once load is back on belay, take fig 8 out /undo anchor and then lower wabitt nomax is on please start the flame Interesting setup and a nice trick for the bag, majid. Is the MA in the picture really a 4:1 though?
In reply to: 9-once load is on the two fig 8, take the belay off and do your thing(help, cry,rescue,whatever). Hah! Cracks me up! Can just imagine... do all that and then sit there at the belay and cry... awesome!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sherpa79
Dec 3, 2010, 3:53 PM
Post #8 of 56
(17890 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 108
|
Interesting idea, but overcomplicated. I can see the benefit of installing an advantage and using that to remove the belay if you forsee the need to raise, but this advantage doesn't function quite the way it should, i.e. it isn't a true ratchet. You'd have to do some more to it to get there. That and its range is extremely limited. Also, if you are treating biners like pulleys why not slap another 2:1 in the mix for the piece that held the leader's fall? After a certain point, carabiners tend to make the advantage very "theoretical" and can even drag it back the other way. Mike's method (and the one I've seen most often) I think is better. I can see using the tail of the line only if you don't have a loop long enough to make a prussik with a munter/mule, or you need that longer loop to ascend the rope after escaping the belay. Also, it's much easier with this method to achieve az drag with a longer working range as well as a 4:1 by adding a simple counterweight 2:1 from the anchor to the rope below the prussik. However, I think there's a good idea in there somewhere, for something.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 6:00 PM
Post #9 of 56
(17851 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
sherpa79 wrote: Interesting idea, but overcomplicated. I can see the benefit of installing an advantage and using that to remove the belay if you forsee the need to raise, but this advantage doesn't function quite the way it should, i.e. it isn't a true ratchet. You'd have to do some more to it to get there. That and its range is extremely limited. Also, if you are treating biners like pulleys why not slap another 2:1 in the mix for the piece that held the leader's fall? After a certain point, carabiners tend to make the advantage very "theoretical" and can even drag it back the other way. Mike's method (and the one I've seen most often) I think is better. I can see using the tail of the line only if you don't have a loop long enough to make a prussik with a munter/mule, or you need that longer loop to ascend the rope after escaping the belay. Also, it's much easier with this method to achieve az drag with a longer working range as well as a 4:1 by adding a simple counterweight 2:1 from the anchor to the rope below the prussik. However, I think there's a good idea in there somewhere, for something. I used my shoe laces as prusik and the same climbing rope so things look ugly. if you have separate cord and prusik then it would be much cleaner.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 6:01 PM
Post #10 of 56
(17850 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Yes he should. Against my better judgment, I will give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just an oversight to not mention it. I actually do like the additions of the 4:1, which will take force off of the prussik. I hate to state the obvious, but this is not necessary if the climber can be lowered back to the belay. In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Josh if leader is decked on the ledge 100 feet up you can't lower him
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 6:02 PM
Post #11 of 56
(17849 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? first you have to lock off belay and once you do that, you got two free hands to rig it.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Dec 3, 2010, 7:52 PM
Post #12 of 56
(17802 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Yes he should. Against my better judgment, I will give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just an oversight to not mention it. I actually do like the additions of the 4:1, which will take force off of the prussik. I hate to state the obvious, but this is not necessary if the climber can be lowered back to the belay. In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Josh if leader is decked on the ledge 100 feet up you can't lower him Really?! I had no idea! That's why I said IF the climber CAN be lowered, because a lot of people are so gung-ho about self-rescue, that they will undoubtedly do something unnecessarily. Btw, if a climber is decked on a ledge, you wouldn't need to do any of that because they are not weighting the rope. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
rocknice2
Dec 3, 2010, 8:24 PM
Post #13 of 56
(17790 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2006
Posts: 1221
|
I think Majid is trying to haul the leader back to the belay, through all the pro.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Dec 3, 2010, 8:47 PM
Post #14 of 56
(17779 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
Majid, I can't think of a single problem involved in self-rescue that this set-up solves. Everything I can think of is accomplished more easily with one of the standard procedures. I can't see any use for the improvised pulley, at least none that can't be done more easily with one of the standard system. The theoretical mechanical advantage of the depicted improvised pulley is 2:1. But after carabiner friction, it will offer essentially no mechanical advantage. Because of the combination of friction and theoretical mechanical advantage, such things are very good for letting out slack, but they are essentially pointless for trying to tension a system. And putting another wrap in to get a theoretical 4:1 will give you a stuck mess with so much friction you won't be able to pull anything up at all with it. I'm saying if there is a real use for that pulley that involves pulling in slack, it isn't going to work in the real world. This seems to leave us with a system that isn't needed and that won't work anyway so I'd say back to the drawing boards. But before we get Version 1.1, could you please say explicitly what problems the standard methods have that are eliminated or at least ameliorated in your new system?
|
|
|
|
|
areyoumydude
Dec 3, 2010, 8:52 PM
Post #15 of 56
(17766 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 28, 2003
Posts: 1971
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Really?! I had no idea! That's why I said IF the climber CAN be lowered, because a lot of people are so gung-ho about self-rescue, that they will undoubtedly do something unnecessarily.Josh Really?! You think someone is going to try and escape a belay when they could lower the victim back to the belay? Hmmmm.
(This post was edited by areyoumydude on Dec 3, 2010, 8:54 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
shimanilami
Dec 3, 2010, 9:17 PM
Post #16 of 56
(17746 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043
|
I just let go of my Gri-Gri, slap an Ushba on the line, tether the Ushba to my anchor, and then unload the Gri-Gri until the weight is on the Ushba. And then I smoke two joints.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 10:07 PM
Post #17 of 56
(17718 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Yes he should. Against my better judgment, I will give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just an oversight to not mention it. I actually do like the additions of the 4:1, which will take force off of the prussik. I hate to state the obvious, but this is not necessary if the climber can be lowered back to the belay. In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Josh if leader is decked on the ledge 100 feet up you can't lower him Really?! I had no idea! That's why I said IF the climber CAN be lowered, because a lot of people are so gung-ho about self-rescue, that they will undoubtedly do something unnecessarily. Btw, if a climber is decked on a ledge, you wouldn't need to do any of that because they are not weighting the rope. Josh not really the leader must be secure so you still need to lock off belay and start plan B by either climbing the rope or whatever so the treatment is the same Also, what if leader was resting on fifi and got hit by rock. how are you going to lower him ? i got you
(This post was edited by majid_sabet on Dec 3, 2010, 10:07 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Dec 3, 2010, 10:11 PM
Post #18 of 56
(17713 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
rgold wrote: Majid, I can't think of a single problem involved in self-rescue that this set-up solves. Everything I can think of is accomplished more easily with one of the standard procedures. I can't see any use for the improvised pulley, at least none that can't be done more easily with one of the standard system. The theoretical mechanical advantage of the depicted improvised pulley is 2:1. But after carabiner friction, it will offer essentially no mechanical advantage. Because of the combination of friction and theoretical mechanical advantage, such things are very good for letting out slack, but they are essentially pointless for trying to tension a system. And putting another wrap in to get a theoretical 4:1 will give you a stuck mess with so much friction you won't be able to pull anything up at all with it. I'm saying if there is a real use for that pulley that involves pulling in slack, it isn't going to work in the real world. This seems to leave us with a system that isn't needed and that won't work anyway so I'd say back to the drawing boards. But before we get Version 1.1, could you please say explicitly what problems the standard methods have that are eliminated or at least ameliorated in your new system? Doctor gold I will be happy to take notes from your SR V 1.1
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Dec 3, 2010, 11:58 PM
Post #19 of 56
(17656 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: majid_sabet wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: aquadood wrote: majid_sabet wrote: 3- lock off belay and take min 5 feet of rope below belay device and put a fig 8 First thing that comes to mind is how do you tie a F8-on-a-bight with one hand. Shouldn't you first get hands-free with the classic mule-overhand method? Yes he should. Against my better judgment, I will give him the benefit of the doubt that it was just an oversight to not mention it. I actually do like the additions of the 4:1, which will take force off of the prussik. I hate to state the obvious, but this is not necessary if the climber can be lowered back to the belay. In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Josh if leader is decked on the ledge 100 feet up you can't lower him Really?! I had no idea! That's why I said IF the climber CAN be lowered, because a lot of people are so gung-ho about self-rescue, that they will undoubtedly do something unnecessarily. Btw, if a climber is decked on a ledge, you wouldn't need to do any of that because they are not weighting the rope. Josh not really the leader must be secure so you still need to lock off belay and start plan B by either climbing the rope or whatever so the treatment is the same Also, what if leader was resting on fifi and got hit by rock. how are you going to lower him ? i got you Majid, you're as bad as kenr.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Dec 3, 2010, 11:59 PM
Post #20 of 56
(17654 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: In case of an emergency, though, it's always a good idea to go hands-free, just to think. Taking a few minutes to decide on your best course of action will save time in the long run. Way too often overlooked. A critical point to remember.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Dec 4, 2010, 12:36 AM
Post #21 of 56
(17621 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
That's pretty much the standard load transfer. The only substantial difference between that and what I do is that I back the whole thing up with a hard knot.
|
|
|
|
|
sherpa79
Dec 4, 2010, 1:03 AM
Post #22 of 56
(17603 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 108
|
rgold wrote: But before we get Version 1.1, could you please say explicitly what problems the standard methods have that are eliminated or at least ameliorated in your new system? Well if he won't I will. Clearly existing systems: 1)Don't have enough figure eight knots. 2)Work in more than one application. 3)Keep clustermuckage to a minimum. 4)Involve Common Sense. Gosh. I feel safer already.
|
|
|
|
|
jeepnphreak
Dec 4, 2010, 4:52 PM
Post #23 of 56
(17419 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259
|
majid_sabet wrote: sherpa79 wrote: Interesting idea, but overcomplicated. I can see the benefit of installing an advantage and using that to remove the belay if you forsee the need to raise, but this advantage doesn't function quite the way it should, i.e. it isn't a true ratchet. You'd have to do some more to it to get there. That and its range is extremely limited. Also, if you are treating biners like pulleys why not slap another 2:1 in the mix for the piece that held the leader's fall? After a certain point, carabiners tend to make the advantage very "theoretical" and can even drag it back the other way. Mike's method (and the one I've seen most often) I think is better. I can see using the tail of the line only if you don't have a loop long enough to make a prussik with a munter/mule, or you need that longer loop to ascend the rope after escaping the belay. Also, it's much easier with this method to achieve az drag with a longer working range as well as a 4:1 by adding a simple counterweight 2:1 from the anchor to the rope below the prussik. However, I think there's a good idea in there somewhere, for something. I used my shoe laces as prusik and the same climbing rope so things look ugly. if you have separate cord and prusik then it would be much cleaner. My shoe laces are 5 mm ne tech cord
|
|
|
|
|
rangerrob
Dec 4, 2010, 6:26 PM
Post #24 of 56
(17392 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641
|
Has anyone here actually practiced this scenario in the last 6 months? My partner and I set up just this scenario last week and worked through it. Escaping the belay is the simplest part of the whole process. What gave us the most work was putting the leader on a seperate anchor built above the last piece, and rapping down the fixed line to free the bottom of the rope. When you escape the belay, do not tie the rope off to an anchor that is anywhere away from the cliff. The first go around we tied it to a tree about 8 feet away. The resulting angle caused problems both prussiking, and then tying off the rope on the anchor above after the weight was taken off of it. This is a no brainer if you are off the ground and belaying from an anchor on the wall. If the belayer is still on the ground....get that bottom anchor as close to the wall as you can get it. If you're a beginner and you are thinking to yourself...hmm....I don't REALLY know how to prussik a rope or get out of a loaded belay.....then I highly receommend you go out an spend a few hours monkeying around with it. It is time well spent. RR
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Dec 4, 2010, 7:09 PM
Post #25 of 56
(17373 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
Rob is absolutely right; escaping the belay by itself is just the first step of a much longer process and is of almost no value by itself. The fact that it has a name and is spoken of and taught as some kind of useful action in itself is pretty misleading. It will be what you do after you escape the belay that is meaningful. Although typically not mentioned when rope choices are discussed, some of the problems Rob alludes to may be eased if the party is using double ropes, since there will be a rope to available that isn't under tension. If the party is on a single rope, it is easier, if possible, to get the leader on an anchor built below the top piece rather than above it. Rob, did you by any chance time how long it was from the moment you started the exercise to the time when the leader was no longer hanging?
(This post was edited by rgold on Dec 4, 2010, 7:16 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|