|
climbingtrash
Jun 7, 2011, 4:18 AM
Post #3026 of 3255
(8874 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114
|
kobaz wrote: kachoong wrote: kobaz wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: It's a pretty bad picture, man. Thanks. It was from my second year of climbing. And your first of taking pictures? I didn't take the picture... the picture is OF me 
This isn't my first taking of a PTFTW!
|
|
|
|
|
climbingtrash
Jun 7, 2011, 4:22 AM
Post #3027 of 3255
(8871 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114
|
climbingtrash wrote: kobaz wrote: kachoong wrote: kobaz wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: It's a pretty bad picture, man. Thanks. It was from my second year of climbing. And your first of taking pictures? I didn't take the picture... the picture is OF me This isn't my first taking of a PTFTW!
Better keep it OT but with a smidgen of pro...
|
|
|
|
|
wwalt822
Jun 7, 2011, 3:19 PM
Post #3028 of 3255
(8799 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2010
Posts: 116
|
donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: http://www.rockclimbing.com/...tle_Soup_113776.html [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/5/453045-largest_climm.jpg[/image] Holy SHIT! Not only is this a REAL LIVE photo of the same route ridiculed in the actually FIRST EVER worst photo, but it's currently rated at 5 stars! WHOAHS! funny how live comes around. But it looks like in this photo the leader didn't bother to clip the first two way too low bolts.
It looks like the original photo was a bit of camera trickery and the ground drops off. From this view the first bolt doesnt look that unreasonably low. But only 1 out of the first two is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Jun 7, 2011, 5:10 PM
Post #3029 of 3255
(8754 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
wwalt822 wrote: donald949 wrote: funny how live comes around. But it looks like in this photo the leader didn't bother to clip the first two way too low bolts. It looks like the original photo was a bit of camera trickery and the ground drops off. From this view the first bolt doesnt look that unreasonably low. But only 1 out of the first two is needed.
Here's the origonal photo. And there may be some trickery going on, as they titled their picture tonge in check as A desperate clip:
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...rate_Clip_68216.html 
edit cause I cheesetitted the url and image tags somehow
(This post was edited by donald949 on Jun 7, 2011, 5:13 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
wwalt822
Jun 7, 2011, 5:13 PM
Post #3030 of 3255
(8745 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2010
Posts: 116
|
NVM he fixed it first
(This post was edited by wwalt822 on Jun 7, 2011, 5:14 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
TarHeelEMT
Jun 7, 2011, 5:15 PM
Post #3031 of 3255
(8738 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724
|
From that view, a fall clipping the first bolt really could suck.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Jul 4, 2011, 9:28 AM
Post #3034 of 3255
(8360 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Alright, 768x1024 pixels of....blur!
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Jul 4, 2011, 11:35 AM
Post #3035 of 3255
(8338 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
sbaclimber wrote: Alright, 768x1024 pixels of....blur! [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/0/471970-work-272165_10150248464388887_760568886_7308048_1304052_o.jpg[/image]
Or maybe its an aerial cableway in the background, its kinda hard to tell.
qwert
|
|
|
|
|
airscape
Jul 4, 2011, 7:41 PM
Post #3036 of 3255
(8299 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
qwert wrote: sbaclimber wrote: Alright, 768x1024 pixels of....blur! [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/0/471970-work-272165_10150248464388887_760568886_7308048_1304052_o.jpg[/image] But at least there is a girl in a bikini in that pic. Or maybe its an aerial cableway in the background, its kinda hard to tell. qwert
Most girls I know would kill you if you mistook them for an aerial cableway.
Hell they would probably kill you for just trying to buy the ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 5, 2011, 2:41 AM
Post #3037 of 3255
(8252 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
Edit cuz I CT Images.
(This post was edited by Kartessa on Jul 5, 2011, 2:42 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
Learner
Jul 5, 2011, 5:39 AM
Post #3039 of 3255
(8210 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2011
Posts: 187
|
climbingtrash wrote: Kartessa wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/5/471965-work-195508_23107398_4445774_n.jpg[/image] Edit cuz I CT Images. Meh. Pics not that great...but not THAT bad either. 
|
|
|
|
|
airscape
Jul 5, 2011, 6:24 AM
Post #3040 of 3255
(8203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
Learner wrote: climbingtrash wrote: Kartessa wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/5/471965-work-195508_23107398_4445774_n.jpg[/image] Edit cuz I CT Images. Meh. Pics not that great...but not THAT bad either. I'd have to see the front first, but there's some potential there.
WAAAAHAHAHA.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 6, 2011, 5:10 AM
Post #3041 of 3255
(8112 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
climbingtrash wrote: Kartessa wrote: Edit cuz I CT Images. Meh. Pics not that great...but not THAT bad either.
Not just about the girl... the pic is washed out, looks like she has no head, her hair just blends into the rock.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 11, 2011, 6:22 PM
Post #3042 of 3255
(8019 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Okay, y'all are slacking on the job, so I'll step up.
I always love it when horrible shots are submitted at a massive size. As if we wanted to be able to see every little detail of the photographer's work of art. Or every grain of dirt and munge? In these cases, it's even more funny since the pixelation is so bad:
I'll give you one guess as to the title of the photo, the name of the person submitting the photo, and the username. One hint, they're all the same:
This one's not so terrible, really. It's included here just because it's so wonderfully goofy:
GO
|
|
|
|
|
climbingtrash
Jul 20, 2011, 12:51 AM
Post #3043 of 3255
(7855 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114
|
Another for the butt-shot category...
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Jul 29, 2011, 7:19 AM
Post #3044 of 3255
(7709 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
I had to take a screenshot of this photo for full effect:
Edit: good thing I took a screenshot, it's gone already...
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Jul 29, 2011, 5:20 PM)
|
|
Attachments:
|
hall.JPG
(49.5 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
airscape
Jul 29, 2011, 7:50 AM
Post #3045 of 3255
(7698 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
sbaclimber wrote: I had to take a screenshot of this photo for full effect:
HAHA
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Aug 5, 2011, 11:49 AM
Post #3046 of 3255
(7559 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Good stuff. I think the weird body position does it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Aug 5, 2011, 12:08 PM
Post #3047 of 3255
(7551 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Oh how I lurv this thread!
Does she have matching shin tats?
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
Aug 5, 2011, 1:30 PM
Post #3048 of 3255
(7514 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
Those are some nice soft crash pads she has there. And they move themselves!
|
|
|
|
|
Learner
Aug 5, 2011, 4:53 PM
Post #3049 of 3255
(7455 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2011
Posts: 187
|
j_ung wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/473791-largest_049.JPG[/image] Good stuff. I think the weird body position does it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
airscape
Aug 10, 2011, 2:46 PM
Post #3050 of 3255
(7320 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 26, 2001
Posts: 4240
|
boymeetsrock wrote: Those are some nice soft crash pads she has there. And they move themselves!
Organic pads you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
