Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
(This post was edited by spikeddem on Jun 24, 2011, 8:45 PM)
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
lame
I'm not the one that said "your person."
But you are the one who follows professional wrestling.
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
lame
I'm not the one that said "your person."
But you are the one who follows professional wrestling.
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
lame
I'm not the one that said "your person."
But you are the one who follows professional wrestling.
Says who?
Says me.
Oh and it's been over 10 posts and no one has brought up religion.
Since hypnosis is real, this is an important question. Mods, keep an eye on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if the debate gets heated and has to be moved to the Soapbox.
How many posts until we're talking about religion? I say ten.
Hypnosis is nothing more than the power of suggestion. If you allow yourself to be hypnotized, then you will act the fool. No one has control over your person merely by suggesting it.
This video suggests otherwise. I have evidence. Where's yours?
lame
I'm not the one that said "your person."
But you are the one who follows professional wrestling.
Says who?
Says me.
Oh and it's been over 10 posts and no one has brought up religion.
I was praying for the whole thread to go away, does that count?
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
A slippery slope!
Precisely. If I linked to a page that had Chan photographed in a compromising position with 4 spoons, some dymma slings, and a jet boil, then bring on the banz hammer. But just because I imply that such a photo exists is a non offense.
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
A slippery slope!
Precisely. If I linked to a page that had Chan photographed in a compromising position with 4 spoons, some dymma slings, and a jet boil, then bring on the banz hammer. But just because I imply that such a photo exists is a non offense.
Sort of like implying that a climbing picture of Chan (?)exists?
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
A slippery slope!
Precisely. If I linked to a page that had Chan photographed in a compromising position with 4 spoons, some dymma slings, and a jet boil, then bring on the banz hammer. But just because I imply that such a photo exists is a non offense.
Sort of like implying that a climbing picture of Chan (?)exists?
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
A slippery slope!
Precisely. If I linked to a page that had Chan photographed in a compromising position with 4 spoons, some dymma slings, and a jet boil, then bring on the banz hammer. But just because I imply that such a photo exists is a non offense.
Sort of like implying that a climbing picture of Chan (?)exists?
It would have if you'd mentioned prayer four posts ago.
It was implied, as was a facepalm.
Implied don't get you moderated. For example, I could imply that chad is an incontinent sewer rat, (how I'm not sure yet), but it wouldn't be harassing until I actually said so.
So what you are saying is, if you implied that Chad was a snotty nosed heap of parrot droppings but didn't actually write that, then there is nothing we moderators could do about it?
A slippery slope!
Precisely. If I linked to a page that had Chan photographed in a compromising position with 4 spoons, some dymma slings, and a jet boil, then bring on the banz hammer. But just because I imply that such a photo exists is a non offense.
Actually I've heard a photo like that exists but it was of edge and it was taken by MA.
0 /
0%
1
