Seems the Frost Fundies can't stomach the sexytime good looks of one of their legislators:

What's missing in the official photo?
[image]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/360330/RATHIKA-SITSABAIESAN-CLEAVAGE.jpg[/image]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...hopped_n_981042.html

The Photoshop giveth, and the Photoshop taketh away.

What buggs me is, given that she's rather...um... endowed, how that endowment would be shaped w/o the cleavage.

I don't get it.

Quit looking at the smile.

In my suburban neighbourhood a lot of folks walk about a kilometer or two for shopping, socializing. There's a lot of bars and restaurants handy, even a library. Plus folks can meet at each-others homes, or walk to the train to go elsewhere.

This past summer, we've enjoyed beautiful weather. Sun and wind, never too hot. Great for walking and meeting outdoors.

Well a lot of girls show a lot of skin. Bun-huggers and short-shorts. Skimpy tops, the shoulderless style with spaghetti straps, and neckline down to here. I'm talking "revealing".

But around here, half-naked is the new normal. I mean, these girls certainly look comfortable and airy, and nobody can say that they aren't modest, even though they're all mostly bare.

Not sayin' I mind, either

The guys, on the other hand, seem damn repressed.

...
So you're saying you want to see more man flesh?

Well Chad, I'm looking at your avatar, the little man running free and naked,



he's not repressed.

A former New Democrat MLA is coming under fire for questioning whether B.C. Premier Christy Clark showed too much cleavage Wednesday afternoon in the provincial legislature.

The backlash began after political pundit David Schreck posed a query on his Twitter account during question period.

"Is Premier Clark's cleavage revealing attire appropriate for the legislature?" Schreck Tweeted.

The premier, who has not commented on the controversy, was wearing a black V-neck underneath a blazer.

I'm embarrassed.