|
camjammer
Feb 4, 2012, 1:04 AM
Post #1 of 13
(5670 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 8
|
I purchased some CAMP USA Compact Oval Carabiners to rack gear on. They are great for that. My question regards their use for any other climbing purpose. The gate does not fully engage the keylock nose. The gate travel stops before the gate becomes parallel to the spine. The gate/nose engagement really looks compromised. Anyone agree/disagree? Opinions?
|
|
|
|
|
Colinhoglund
Feb 4, 2012, 2:11 AM
Post #2 of 13
(5654 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338
|
You sir brought a defective biner! Google images shows the biner with full gate function.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Feb 4, 2012, 11:33 AM
Post #3 of 13
(5575 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
Colinhoglund wrote: You sir brought a defective biner! Google images shows the biner with full gate function. Not necessarily. Due to the construction, the gate has to be a tad offset. But its hard to tell from a description alone if that is the case, or if there is indeed something wrong. OP, can you post a picture? qwert
|
|
|
|
|
Colinhoglund
Feb 4, 2012, 1:34 PM
Post #5 of 13
(5556 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 5, 2008
Posts: 338
|
Exactly what I meant ^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
camjammer
Feb 4, 2012, 6:10 PM
Post #6 of 13
(5497 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 8
|
In reply to: Colinhoglund wrote: Exactly what I meant ^^^^^ They do not look like that. The gate is not parallel and the nose is much more exposed. I'm exchanging them with the vendor. I'll post the result.
|
|
|
|
|
camjammer
Feb 5, 2012, 2:35 AM
Post #7 of 13
(5445 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 8
|
[quote "qwert"][quote "Colinhoglund"]You sir brought a defective biner! Google images shows the biner with full gate function.[/quote] Not necessarily. Due to the construction, the gate has to be a tad offset. But its hard to tell from a description alone if that is the case, or if there is indeed something wrong. OP, can you post a picture? qwert[/quote] [url]http://flic.kr/p/boFRKc [/url]http://flic.kr/p/boFSf6 Obviously I don't know how to post. Hope this works.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Feb 5, 2012, 11:32 AM
Post #8 of 13
(5396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
camjammer wrote: qwert wrote: Colinhoglund wrote: You sir brought a defective biner! Google images shows the biner with full gate function. Not necessarily. Due to the construction, the gate has to be a tad offset. But its hard to tell from a description alone if that is the case, or if there is indeed something wrong. OP, can you post a picture? qwert http://flic.kr/p/boFRKc http://flic.kr/p/boFSf6 Obviously I don't know how to post. Hope this works. Yes. Very obvious! How did you get the dots in the markup? Those make the code show up literally, so that it gets ignored by the forum software. Normally people just fuck up a quote, or an url, but yours is new. Great work! Back to the biner: The links dont work for me. I get to a flicker login page. Do you have those pics private or something? Yoou can also attach them to your post here, no need for flickr. But from your description you might indeed have a defective biner. qwert
|
|
|
|
|
jae8908
Feb 5, 2012, 8:09 PM
Post #9 of 13
(5336 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270
|
They should be closing all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
sp115
Feb 5, 2012, 9:26 PM
Post #10 of 13
(5316 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
camjammer wrote: [quote "qwert"][quote "Colinhoglund"]You sir brought a defective biner! Google images shows the biner with full gate function.[/quote] Not necessarily. Due to the construction, the gate has to be a tad offset. But its hard to tell from a description alone if that is the case, or if there is indeed something wrong. OP, can you post a picture? qwert[/quote] [url]http://flic.kr/p/boFRKc [/url]http://flic.kr/p/boFSf6 Obviously I don't know how to post. Hope this works. These don't look correct to me. They should be returned to the place you bought them.
(This post was edited by sp115 on Feb 5, 2012, 9:27 PM)
|
Attachments:
|
6820307301_89e3e204e2.jpg
(112 KB)
|
|
6820308977_9811dcd5e9.jpg
(73.3 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Feb 6, 2012, 9:49 AM
Post #11 of 13
(5254 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Yeah....those don't look good.
|
|
|
|
|
Rmsyll2
Feb 8, 2012, 2:35 AM
Post #12 of 13
(5114 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2010
Posts: 266
|
A photo from the gate side, showing the key that is not aligned, might show what is blocking it. This may be an example of poor "quality control", since they were made that way and were shipped out. That has been a general complaint or anxiety about anything made particularly in China. .
|
|
|
|
|
camjammer
Feb 8, 2012, 5:34 AM
Post #13 of 13
(5087 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 8
|
Rmsyll2 wrote: A photo from the gate side, showing the key that is not aligned, might show what is blocking it. This may be an example of poor "quality control", since they were made that way and were shipped out. That has been a general complaint or anxiety about anything made particularly in China. . The gate and key are aligned fine. I should have compared it with other keylock biners I have. I just realized that all my other keylocks have an arc cut out of the back side of the nose to allow the nose to enter the gate completely. The biners in question are missing this feature and that is what is preventing the gate from closing. Wish I could post pics but I returned them. And yes, they are made in China. Thanks for all the feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
|