 |

curt
Mar 26, 2012, 11:01 PM
Post #26 of 87
(1260 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18059
|
pinktricam wrote: I'm not so sure I've been able to trust the mainstream media about anything for some time now. Yeah. To someone as loony as you, the mainstream no doubt seems quite scary. Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 27, 2012, 3:13 AM
Post #27 of 87
(1247 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
There you go again. Assuming.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 27, 2012, 8:52 AM
Post #28 of 87
(1228 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
Not to derail your discussion about not trusting the media . . . . I heard a report this morning on NPR that according to several witnesses: Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. There was an argument. Zimmerman was heading back to his car when Trayvon assaulted him. Trayvon punched and kicked Zimmerman in the head. Zimmerman then shot and killed Trayvon. I have no idea if this is accurate but the NPR report said that the witness’s statements are backing up the injuries sustained by Zimmerman and the police report. I have a feeling that this is going to be one hell of a grey area for both the prosecution and defense in this case. I hope they get this figured out and some good comes out of this horrible mess.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 27, 2012, 9:14 AM
Post #29 of 87
(1223 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
chadnsc wrote: I hope they get this figured out and some good comes out of this horrible mess. I hope so, too. I live less than hour away from where the incident took place and I can tell you that apart from ramping up racial tensions, this is really polarizing the community. I'm trying to remain as neutral as possible and wait until all the facts come out. Let me tell you, the national media has done very little but demonize and sensationalize people and events.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 27, 2012, 9:30 AM
Post #30 of 87
(1218 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
pinktricam wrote: chadnsc wrote: I hope they get this figured out and some good comes out of this horrible mess. I'm trying to remain as neutral as possible and wait until all the facts come out. Let me tell you, the national media has done very little but demonize and sensationalize people and events. I wouldn't be surprised if they honestly thought that was their job. As facts come out, it seems that Treyvvon (sp?) was a 6' 3", 140 lbs 17yr. old wearing a hoodie while walking down a street at dusk/night in a neighborhood where he's not known. Honestly, black or white or latino or whatever, I'd keep an eye on him if I were walking down the same street. I really hate the Rev. Jackson. The guy disgusts me.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 27, 2012, 9:34 AM
Post #31 of 87
(1214 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
petsfed wrote: The way the Florida law is written, the judge can decide its self-defense before jury selection even begins. Thus, this may never go to trial. Innocent until proven guilty, sure, but there's no doubt in anyone's mind who did the killing here, so the reason he hasn't been arrested is because the DA can't get a judge who wants to try him. Unfortunately, it will take a juried trial to determine if a crime has occurred, but all it takes is a single judge to decide a crime hasn't (for self-defense incidents in Florida) for a murderer to walk free. And since the law passed some 7 years ago, this has happened several times. As far as a problem with the "stand your ground" law, I think it has a lot less to do with the way the law was written than it has to do with the way it's been historically applied.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 27, 2012, 9:44 AM
Post #32 of 87
(1210 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
squierbypetzl wrote: I really hate the Rev. Jackson. The guy disgusts me. Though I'll refrain from going so far as to "hate" him, I strongly dislike both Jackson and Sharpton. Not because of the color of their skin, but because I believe them both to be nothing but self-aggrandizing opportinists that will only inflame an already volatile situation. But you're right, it's disgusting.
|
|
|
 |
 |

styndall
Mar 27, 2012, 10:35 AM
Post #33 of 87
(1196 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
squierbypetzl wrote: pinktricam wrote: chadnsc wrote: I hope they get this figured out and some good comes out of this horrible mess. I'm trying to remain as neutral as possible and wait until all the facts come out. Let me tell you, the national media has done very little but demonize and sensationalize people and events. I wouldn't be surprised if they honestly thought that was their job. As facts come out, it seems that Treyvvon (sp?) was a 6' 3", 140 lbs 17yr. old wearing a hoodie while walking down a street at dusk/night in a neighborhood where he's not known. Honestly, black or white or latino or whatever, I'd keep an eye on him if I were walking down the same street. I really hate the Rev. Jackson. The guy disgusts me. You should definitely do that. Maybe carry a gun, just in case. Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. The other conclusion is what? That a high school kid walking home just decides to beat up a much bigger dude? EDIT: It's also important to look at the people involved. Look at PTC's photo from last page, where people might think that Trayvon looks scary because of the hoody (hint, it's code for calling all young black men scary). Martin had also been suspended from school for having a plastic bag that had probably once contained marijuana. Meanwhile, Zimmerman has a history of unhinged calls to 911, reporting black males, has arrests for domestic violence and assaulting a police officer.
(This post was edited by styndall on Mar 27, 2012, 10:46 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Mar 27, 2012, 10:37 AM
Post #34 of 87
(1195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
chadnsc wrote: Not to derail your discussion about not trusting the media . . . . I heard a report this morning on NPR that according to several witnesses: Zimmerman confronted Trayvon. There was an argument. Zimmerman was heading back to his car when Trayvon assaulted him. Trayvon punched and kicked Zimmerman in the head. Zimmerman then shot and killed Trayvon. I have no idea if this is accurate but the NPR report said that the witness’s statements are backing up the injuries sustained by Zimmerman and the police report. I have a feeling that this is going to be one hell of a grey area for both the prosecution and defense in this case. I hope they get this figured out and some good comes out of this horrible mess. Well, the family might may a lot of money out of this. http://news.yahoo.com/...stice-142131528.html
In reply to: According to applications filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by the family's attorney last week, Fulton wants to trademark "I am Trayvon" and "Justice for Trayvon" for use in DVDs and CDs memorializing the slain teenager.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 27, 2012, 12:04 PM
Post #35 of 87
(1160 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
styndall wrote: Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. See my post above, it may very well be that's what happened. IE Zimmerman flollowed Trayvon, one of them started yelling at the other, Trayvon beat up Zimmerman, Zimmerman tried to get away, couldn't and shot Trayvon. I think the hole thing will hinge on who started it (yelling and fight) and IF Trayvon did in fact follow Zimmerman back to his car before the fight broke out.
|
|
|
 |
 |

styndall
Mar 27, 2012, 1:28 PM
Post #36 of 87
(1147 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
chadnsc wrote: styndall wrote: Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. See my post above, it may very well be that's what happened. IE Zimmerman flollowed Trayvon, one of them started yelling at the other, Trayvon beat up Zimmerman, Zimmerman tried to get away, couldn't and shot Trayvon. I think the hole thing will hinge on who started it (yelling and fight) and IF Trayvon did in fact follow Zimmerman back to his car before the fight broke out. I don't think even that makes much difference. If the two got into a fist fight, Zimmerman still wouldn't have much reasonable fear of dying or serious injury. Also, people in the housing development had complained to both the neighborhood HOA and the local police about Zimmerman being aggressive before he killed Martin. I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Next up in Florida - convenience store robber sees that shop clerk has a gun, kills clerk in self defense.
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Mar 27, 2012, 2:32 PM
Post #37 of 87
(1134 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 27, 2012, 3:02 PM
Post #38 of 87
(1131 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
styndall wrote: You should definitely do that. Maybe carry a gun, just in case. Get off your high horse. An unknown man wearing a hoody jacket at night in a residential area is gonna get second looks, whether he's in Martha's Vineyard or the Bronx (in the latter case, the real local hoodlums will personally investigate). Frankly, I think only a fool would completely disregard such a person if they were walking down the same street at night, no matter what race either of them is. I'm a white male and have been stopped by the cops for walking around at night with my hoody up, just 3 city blocks from where I live. I wasn't otherwise acting suspiciously, and of course I was annoyed at the inconvenience, but I can totally understand that the cops were just doing their job. Heck, I'm grateful that they stopped to investigate.
In reply to: Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. The other conclusion is what? That a high school kid walking home just decides to beat up a much bigger dude? Did you mean "at him"? We can spend all month speculating over what happened, so let's not? And it wouldn't be the 1st time a much taller person takes a shot at a shorter, heavier opponent, so it's not that unbelievable.
styndall wrote: EDIT: It's also important to look at the people involved. Look at PTC's photo from last page, where people might think that Trayvon looks scary because of the hoody (hint, it's code for calling all young black men scary). Martin had also been suspended from school for having a plastic bag that had probably once contained marijuana. I agree with your point about the unease certain people feel towards young black men. And about the weed, there are reports saying that he was in fact suspended for repeated tardiness and was caught in an unauthorized area (on school grounds). The media has fudged this case up so bad, the only way anyone could formulate a valid opinion is by conducting a thorough police investigation. Until that's done, it's all speculation.
In reply to: Meanwhile, Zimmerman has a history of unhinged calls to 911, reporting black males, has arrests for domestic violence and assaulting a police officer. Just 'cuz the guys a nut doesn't mean he killed Treyvon in cold blood. I'm not defending his actions, nor do I agree with them; in fact I think he was stupid to confront the kid, and my heart goes out to the people affected by this whole mess. However, innocence until proven guilty is a pretty big thing for me. He says it was in self-defense, we don't have any evidence to the contrary, it's up to the prosecutors office to make a case that will prove him wrong; otherwise, who are we to say that he's a murderer? I really am sorry for Treyvon and his family. It's tragic, just tragic. Hopefully the stand your ground law gets a thorough review to avoid situations such as this in the future. And resisting arrest and assaulting an officer are pretty easy offenses to commit. If you so much as touch a cop you can get arrested for battery and/or assaulting a police officer. Hypothetically, if when he was being put under arrest during the domestic dispute, he turned around and put his hands on the officers arms or chest saying "wait, wait a second", that's resisting arrest and assault.
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Mar 27, 2012, 3:11 PM
Post #39 of 87
(1126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
squierbypetzl wrote: styndall wrote: You should definitely do that. Maybe carry a gun, just in case. Get off your high horse. An unknown man wearing a hoody jacket at night in a residential area is gonna get second looks, whether he's in Martha's Vineyard or the Bronx (in the latter case, the real local hoodlums will personally investigate). Frankly, I think only a fool would completely disregard such a person if they were walking down the same street at night, no matter what race either of them is. I guess I'm a fool then. Not that it even matters, but it was raining that night.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 27, 2012, 3:20 PM
Post #40 of 87
(1126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. I agree.
styndall wrote: Next up in Florida - convenience store robber sees that shop clerk has a gun, kills clerk in self defense. Your analogy is flawed. 1) the robber is commiting a crime, thus falls out of the protection of the stand your ground statutes. 2) Force, even lethal force, can be used legitimately against an excessive "self-defensive" force. (in many jurisdictions*; individual laws vary) A court clerk once told me about a case where a burglar killed a person in self defense. He had broken into a house, the owners came home, he tried to escape by climbing up the backyard wall but the family (4 people) chased him down and started beating him. He managed to disarm one of them (hammer) and fought back. The court found him guilty on several charges but innocent of the death, since he was not putting the family's lives at risk and they used potentially lethal force against him unduly.
(This post was edited by squierbypetzl on Mar 27, 2012, 3:27 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 27, 2012, 3:25 PM
Post #41 of 87
(1120 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
veganclimber wrote: I guess I'm a fool then. Not that it even matters, but it was raining that night. Didn't know that it was raining, of course it matters. And you seem to trust strangers a good deal more than I do, that's fine, I hope you can continue to do so without any negative repercusions.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 28, 2012, 6:26 AM
Post #42 of 87
(1080 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
styndall wrote: chadnsc wrote: styndall wrote: Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. See my post above, it may very well be that's what happened. IE Zimmerman flollowed Trayvon, one of them started yelling at the other, Trayvon beat up Zimmerman, Zimmerman tried to get away, couldn't and shot Trayvon. I think the hole thing will hinge on who started it (yelling and fight) and IF Trayvon did in fact follow Zimmerman back to his car before the fight broke out. I don't think even that makes much difference. If the two got into a fist fight, Zimmerman still wouldn't have much reasonable fear of dying or serious injury. Also, people in the housing development had complained to both the neighborhood HOA and the local police about Zimmerman being aggressive before he killed Martin. I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Next up in Florida - convenience store robber sees that shop clerk has a gun, kills clerk in self defense. According to witnesses the beating Zimmerman took was started by Trayvon and happened while Zimmerman was trying to leave. Trayvon supposedly hit Zimmerman in the head, then when he was down repeatedly kicked him in the head as Zimmerman was trying to get to his car. There are also witness reports that after kicking him in the head Trayvon was positioning Zimmermans head onto a curb to 'curb stomp' him just prior to Zimerman shooting him. That last point could be the reasonable threat of death, IF it is proven to be true. I also believe that IF Trayvon swung first and IF Zimmerman only attempted to flee (didn’t swing back) then it may be harder to find Zimmerman guilty.
|
|
|
 |
 |

styndall
Mar 28, 2012, 4:17 PM
Post #43 of 87
(1049 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
chadnsc wrote: styndall wrote: chadnsc wrote: styndall wrote: Honestly, the only reasonable way this event went down was Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, probably yelling at home, initiates a scuffle, then shoots the kid. See my post above, it may very well be that's what happened. IE Zimmerman flollowed Trayvon, one of them started yelling at the other, Trayvon beat up Zimmerman, Zimmerman tried to get away, couldn't and shot Trayvon. I think the hole thing will hinge on who started it (yelling and fight) and IF Trayvon did in fact follow Zimmerman back to his car before the fight broke out. I don't think even that makes much difference. If the two got into a fist fight, Zimmerman still wouldn't have much reasonable fear of dying or serious injury. Also, people in the housing development had complained to both the neighborhood HOA and the local police about Zimmerman being aggressive before he killed Martin. I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Next up in Florida - convenience store robber sees that shop clerk has a gun, kills clerk in self defense. According to witnesses the beating Zimmerman took was started by Trayvon and happened while Zimmerman was trying to leave. Trayvon supposedly hit Zimmerman in the head, then when he was down repeatedly kicked him in the head as Zimmerman was trying to get to his car. There are also witness reports that after kicking him in the head Trayvon was positioning Zimmermans head onto a curb to 'curb stomp' him just prior to Zimerman shooting him. That last point could be the reasonable threat of death, IF it is proven to be true. I also believe that IF Trayvon swung first and IF Zimmerman only attempted to flee (didn’t swing back) then it may be harder to find Zimmerman guilty. I'm pretty sure this isn't actually true. Also, here's some video of Zimmerman just a few minutes after he was supposed beaten so severely by a high school kid he was stalking that he feared for his life: http://abcnews.go.com/...urveillance-16024475 You can by his pristine condition that Martin must have really brutalized him. Good thing he had a gun. Much more beating, and his clothes might have gotten rumpled.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Mar 28, 2012, 10:09 PM
Post #44 of 87
(1027 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 1491
|
Fact: Zimmerman shot and killed Treyvon. How do we know that? Because after the confrontation, Treyvon was dead. Police analysis: They weren't sure what happened or why, and they neglected to do a proper investigation. Certainly not the kind of investigation called for by a kid getting shot to death. Law: Ha ha what law! The sheriff thought that the district attorney might not agree to a murder charge, so he gave up right away.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 28, 2012, 11:01 PM
Post #45 of 87
(1015 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
dan2see wrote: Fact: Zimmerman shot and killed Treyvon. How do we know that? Because after the confrontation, Treyvon was dead. Police analysis: They weren't sure what happened or why, and they neglected to do a proper investigation. Certainly not the kind of investigation called for by a kid getting shot to death. Law: Ha ha what law! The sheriff thought that the district attorney might not agree to a murder charge, so he gave up right away. You don't know what you're talking about.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rightarmbad
Mar 29, 2012, 5:31 AM
Post #46 of 87
(995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 21, 2005
Posts: 215
|
And tell me again why it is that Americans, of all of the developed world, seem to feel the need to carry personal firearms? Responsible firearms use is easy, there is no reason for a normal citizen to own/carry/have access to one. You guys are just so frucked up over there.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 29, 2012, 5:59 AM
Post #47 of 87
(990 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
Wherever you're from rightarm, feel free and welcomed to visit and enjoy our beautiful and majestic country. It's warm and generous nature will pleasantly surprise you.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 29, 2012, 6:02 AM
Post #48 of 87
(989 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
styndall wrote: I'm pretty sure this isn't actually true. Also, here's some video of Zimmerman just a few minutes after he was supposed beaten so severely by a high school kid he was stalking that he feared for his life: http://abcnews.go.com/...urveillance-16024475 You can by his pristine condition that Martin must have really brutalized him. Good thing he had a gun. Much more beating, and his clothes might have gotten rumpled. Never said I belived the reports, just passing along what I'd heard on NPR. Hence the IF's I threw in there.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 29, 2012, 6:08 AM
Post #49 of 87
(985 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
rightarmbad wrote: And tell me again why it is that Americans, of all of the developed world, seem to feel the need to carry personal firearms? Responsible firearms use is easy, there is no reason for a normal citizen to own/carry/have access to one. You guys are just so frucked up over there. Your trolling skills suck.
|
|
|
 |
 |

blondgecko
Moderator
Mar 29, 2012, 6:32 AM
Post #50 of 87
(981 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 2, 2004
Posts: 7666
|
pinktricam wrote: Wherever you're from rightarm, feel free and welcomed to visit and enjoy our beautiful and majestic country. It's warm and generous nature will pleasantly surprise you. Not to mention its excellent grasp of grammar.
|
|
|
 |
|
|