 |

chadnsc
Mar 29, 2012, 7:05 AM
Post #51 of 87
(1449 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4403
|
blondgecko wrote: pinktricam wrote: Wherever you're from rightarm, feel free and welcomed to visit and enjoy our beautiful and majestic country. It's warm and generous nature will pleasantly surprise you. Not to mention its excellent grasp of grammar. Pffft! We no need grammar. We have gunz.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Mar 29, 2012, 9:08 AM
Post #52 of 87
(1438 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2006
Posts: 1491
|
pinktricam wrote: Wherever you're from rightarm, feel free and welcomed to visit and enjoy our beautiful and majestic country. It's warm and generous nature will pleasantly surprise you. Partly true. I have lived and worked with Americans at home and in their own country, and I can tell you that, as individuals, Americans are friendly and generous a pleasure to know. But in business, government, and social support, their manners break down, their ethics take a dive, and their policies are destructive. Americans talk as if their law is a product of logic, and forget to focus on the social outcomes. I don't understand this dichotomy, but it's ubiquitous (ha! 2 long words in one sentence). So it's not surprising that you don't understand Zimmerman's role in this murder, or the black community's dis-satisfaction with how the State's is mis-managing the whole tragedy.
|
|
|
 |
 |

superchuffer
Mar 29, 2012, 9:19 AM
Post #53 of 87
(1428 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2011
Posts: 294
|
This is because americans, esp. Republicans, see themselves as individuals not answerable to society. Remember, guns don't kill people; hoodies kill people.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 29, 2012, 1:47 PM
Post #54 of 87
(1405 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
rightarmbad wrote: And tell me again why it is that Americans, of all of the developed world, seem to feel the need to carry personal firearms? Responsible firearms use is easy, there is no reason for a normal citizen to own/carry/have access to one. You guys are just so frucked up over there. Canadians love their guns as much as USAmericans, we're just more public about it. Maybe it's a continental thing?
|
|
|
 |
 |

scrapedape
Mar 30, 2012, 6:18 AM
Post #55 of 87
(1375 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 2389
|
squierbypetzl wrote: rightarmbad wrote: And tell me again why it is that Americans, of all of the developed world, seem to feel the need to carry personal firearms? Responsible firearms use is easy, there is no reason for a normal citizen to own/carry/have access to one. You guys are just so frucked up over there. Canadians love their guns as much as USAmericans, we're just more public about it. Maybe it's a continental thing? As a dual Canadian/American citizen who has lived in the US for the last 8 years and in Canada for the 16 years before that, I can confidently say that this is incorrect. Guns are much less pervasive in the minds and lives of most people that I have known in Canada - and I am someone who occasionally hunts. Moreover, gun control in Canada is much more strict. Owning a handgun is difficult, and carrying one is all but impossible except in very rare circumstances. Edit to add: *legally* that is
(This post was edited by scrapedape on Mar 30, 2012, 2:40 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 30, 2012, 2:12 PM
Post #56 of 87
(1352 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
I knew there was a reason the US should've invaded and annexed Canada back in 1862-64.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scrapedape
Mar 30, 2012, 2:38 PM
Post #57 of 87
(1347 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 2389
|
pinktricam wrote: I knew there was a reason the US should've invaded and annexed Canada back in 1862-64. Because at that point they'd had 50 years to forget what happened the last time they tried it?
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Mar 30, 2012, 6:52 PM
Post #58 of 87
(1335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571
|
scrapedape wrote: pinktricam wrote: I knew there was a reason the US should've invaded and annexed Canada back in 1862-64. Because at that point they'd had 50 years to forget what happened the last time they tried it? That's the American way! As soon as we forget how much it hurt the last time we got kicked in the nuts, we start using the same pickup line again!
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Mar 31, 2012, 5:36 AM
Post #59 of 87
(1313 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life."
(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Mar 31, 2012, 5:38 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 31, 2012, 6:20 AM
Post #60 of 87
(1305 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." For the record, your post has some merit.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Mar 31, 2012, 7:46 AM
Post #61 of 87
(1297 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
chadnsc wrote: blondgecko wrote: pinktricam wrote: Wherever you're from rightarm, feel free and welcomed to visit and enjoy our beautiful and majestic country. It's warm and generous nature will pleasantly surprise you. Not to mention its excellent grasp of grammar. Pffft! We no need grammar. We have gunz. If an erroneously placed apostrophe was his worst complaint, I can live with that.
|
|
|
 |
 |

chadnsc
Mar 31, 2012, 8:36 AM
Post #62 of 87
(1282 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4403
|
rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? I have, and unfortunately I have the scars to prove it. Real fights (beat your opponent until he/she doesn't get up) suck and are scary.
rrrADAM wrote: Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." You have a very good point. Heck if you're carrying a firearm you should actually be working even harder to avoid any confrontations because they can unintentionally turn deadly very quickly. (ie, You get in a fist fight and now have to worry about your opponent getting the handgun you're carrying.)
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Mar 31, 2012, 10:31 AM
Post #63 of 87
(1275 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
rrrADAM wrote: And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." Oh, come on. The law couldn't be that bad. http://criminallawbook.com/assets/stand-ground.pdf
In reply to: Aug. 05--A gang of young street thugs drove into a rival gang's turf, guns at the ready, looking for a fight. Thirty shots were fired that day in 2008. A 15-year-old kid was killed. Two of the invading gang members faced homicide charges. But the case fell apart this spring, lost in the chasm between gun reality and the gun myths promulgated by the Florida Legislature. Never mind.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Mar 31, 2012, 12:21 PM
Post #64 of 87
(1261 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
scrapedape wrote: squierbypetzl wrote: rightarmbad wrote: And tell me again why it is that Americans, of all of the developed world, seem to feel the need to carry personal firearms? Responsible firearms use is easy, there is no reason for a normal citizen to own/carry/have access to one. You guys are just so frucked up over there. Canadians love their guns as much as USAmericans, we're just more public about it. Maybe it's a continental thing? As a dual Canadian/American citizen who has lived in the US for the last 8 years and in Canada for the 16 years before that, I can confidently say that this is incorrect. Guns are much less pervasive in the minds and lives of most people that I have known in Canada - and I am someone who occasionally hunts. Moreover, gun control in Canada is much more strict. Owning a handgun is difficult, and carrying one is all but impossible except in very rare circumstances. Edit to add: *legally* that is I was exagerating. Nobody loves guns as much as the USA. It's insane. However, Canada is among a small number of developed countries where one can own a firearm just because you want to. Unless the laws have changed in the past year, the 1995 Firearms Act establishes 3 requirements for acquiring a firearm (of the "unrestricted" category): 1) firearms possession and acquisistion license, 2) completion of the Canadian Firearm Management Safety Course and exam (which I think is a great idea btw), 3) filling out written application. Countries like France, England and Australia require one to have a genuine, valid or similarly qualified reason to own a firearm ("I want to have one at home for hypothetical self-defense" doesn't cut it). So really, in the global context, Canada has a pretty liberal gun policy.
|
|
|
 |
 |

base_jumpx
Mar 31, 2012, 5:36 PM
Post #65 of 87
(1249 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2012
Posts: 5
|
squierbypetzl wrote: veganclimber wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...artin_n_1340358.html So here's the cliff notes version of the story: George Zimmerman is a community watch captain in a gated community in Florida. He sees a black teenager walking down the street and calls to report a "suspicious person". The police tell him to stay in his car, as a cop is on the way. He gets out of his car and confronts the teenager. Zimmerman winds up shooting the kid, killing him. Kid was unarmed by the way. Now this guy has had several complaints about him in the past for aggressive behavior. According to the lawyer: In reply to: Benjamin Crump, the Martin family’s attorney, filed a public records lawsuit last week seeking the 911 recordings for the night of the shooting. Crump said people with access to the tapes told him Zimmerman made a comment about Martin’s race during the call and said he had no intention of letting the youth get away because, “they always get away.” The guy has not been arrested. Reason: In reply to: “In this case Mr. Zimmerman has made the statement of self defense," Lee said. "Until we can establish probable cause to dispute that, we don’t have the grounds to arrest him.” What the fuck? If you claim self defense the prosecutor has to prove that it wasn't? How is that ever possible if there are no witnesses? In this particular case the kid was walking down the street minding his own business. The wannabe cop confronts him and then winds up shooting him in self defense? I've heard several other cases of this "Stand Your Ground" law that allows you to kill anybody you think is threatening you. This country is just getting more fucked up every day it seems. Florida. There's really no word that can fully encompass the level of stupid there. Hopefully he'll wind up in the chair (wonder if he'll still agree with the death sentence when he's on the list). Sounds like he probably has some type of insanity defense , ( he has called 911- 46 times and for the record he is not white, he's hispanic , shouldn't make any difference) but somehow it seems not to be racially motivated. Until we ban guns in the U.S and keep things legal nothing will ever change!
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Mar 31, 2012, 6:19 PM
Post #66 of 87
(1242 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5169
|
base_jumpx wrote: Until we ban guns in the U.S and keep things legal nothing will ever change! I'm not quite following this point. Can you elaborate?
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Apr 1, 2012, 1:58 PM
Post #67 of 87
(1222 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
pinktricam wrote: rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." For the record, your post has some merit.
No shit!!! Thanx, Eric.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Apr 1, 2012, 4:33 PM
Post #68 of 87
(1203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
rrrADAM wrote: pinktricam wrote: rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." For the record, your post has some merit. No shit!!! Thanx, Eric.
Screw you! Don't mention it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Apr 2, 2012, 4:22 AM
Post #69 of 87
(1176 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
pinktricam wrote: rrrADAM wrote: pinktricam wrote: rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." For the record, your post has some merit. No shit!!! Thanx, Eric. Screw you! Don't mention it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

hobgoblin11
Apr 3, 2012, 2:20 PM
Post #70 of 87
(1118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 10, 2011
Posts: 48
|
base_jumpx wrote: Sounds like he probably has some type of insanity defense , ( he has called 911- 46 times and for the record he is not white, he's hispanic , shouldn't make any difference) but somehow it seems not to be racially motivated. Until we ban guns in the U.S and keep things legal nothing will ever change! If it just wasnt for that damn constitution!! You know they've tried banning guns in other countries.. for some unknown reason the criminals didnt get the memo.. you know your 5 times more likely to get mugged in London than in the US. You chances of dying or being injued due to gun violence in Austrailia are higher than most cities in the US. "guns" are one of the reasons why this country even exists. You have SO MANY options.. wonderful places you could move to where no law abiding citizen has a gun.. you'd love it there. For the rest of us.. considering there are 330 million Americans and you chances of dying due to gun violence and a hell of a lot slimmer than your chances of killing yourself at some crag.. you really have little to worry about. Certainly not enough to void that damn annoying constitution for whatever inconvenience has your panties all bunched up on a given day.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Apr 3, 2012, 3:42 PM
Post #71 of 87
(1112 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25315
|
hobgoblin11 wrote: base_jumpx wrote: Sounds like he probably has some type of insanity defense , ( he has called 911- 46 times and for the record he is not white, he's hispanic , shouldn't make any difference) but somehow it seems not to be racially motivated. Until we ban guns in the U.S and keep things legal nothing will ever change! If it just wasnt for that damn constitution!! You know they've tried banning guns in other countries.. for some unknown reason the criminals didnt get the memo.. you know your 5 times more likely to get mugged in London than in the US. You chances of dying or being injued due to gun violence in Austrailia are higher than most cities in the US. "guns" are one of the reasons why this country even exists. You have SO MANY options.. wonderful places you could move to where no law abiding citizen has a gun.. you'd love it there. For the rest of us.. considering there are 330 million Americans and you chances of dying due to gun violence and a hell of a lot slimmer than your chances of killing yourself at some crag.. you really have little to worry about. Certainly not enough to void that damn annoying constitution for whatever inconvenience has your panties all bunched up on a given day. I just came. Anyone else?
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Apr 3, 2012, 5:56 PM
Post #72 of 87
(1099 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
I can't help but smile inside when someone proclaims that people who don't agree with them should move someplace else, as if they owned the place.
|
|
|
 |
 |

squierbypetzl
Moderator
Apr 3, 2012, 8:54 PM
Post #73 of 87
(1081 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3428
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...-shot_n_1399834.htmlf Black off-duty cop gets pulled over for driving the wrong way on a 1 way street near his home. Ends up getting shot 28 times by 4 white cops. Quite a story. whoops, forgot to add that he's facing an 80 year sentence for attempted murder, after a possible double jeopardy trial by jury found him guilty even though the prosecution didn't produce the key hard evidence against him.
(This post was edited by squierbypetzl on Apr 3, 2012, 8:56 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

binkus
Apr 4, 2012, 12:23 PM
Post #74 of 87
(1042 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 11, 2010
Posts: 28
|
chadnsc wrote: rrrADAM wrote: veganclimber wrote: styndall wrote: I think the point is that you shouldn't be allowed to stalk and harass someone, start a fight, then shoot them in self defense. Exactly. This is pretty much the inevitable result of these "Stand Your Ground" laws. Yep... Guns give people balls... How many do you think would have the confidence to confront someone without the gun in their pocket... Their 'ace in the hole'? I have, and unfortunately I have the scars to prove it. Real fights (beat your opponent until he/she doesn't get up) suck and are scary. rrrADAM wrote: Now, if you confront someone BECAUSE you have the confidence that gun affords you, you cannot claim self defense... It's no difference than some punked and bullied kid talking smack on the playground when he is standing next to the teacher. And, even a gang member could use the same argument... "I was in my own hood, mind'n my own bid'ness, when I saw a rival in a hoodie up to no good on my street, tagging my turf... I confronted him, and had to shoot him because I was in fear of my life." You have a very good point. Heck if you're carrying a firearm you should actually be working even harder to avoid any confrontations because they can unintentionally turn deadly very quickly. (ie, You get in a fist fight and now have to worry about your opponent getting the handgun you're carrying.) Chadnsc, I am glad you mentioned up the additional responsibility about avoiding confrontation. Concealed Carry laws vary from state to state but I do believe that the first responsibility taught to anyone applying for a carry permit should be avoiding confrontation. I am not apposed to concealed carry in anyway but if a person does carry he should also have the common sense and/or training to understand avoidance and escalation. As you mentioned if you are carrying you do not have the luxury of allowing yourself to get into a physical altercation just because some guy cut you off on the road, things escalate to easily. Just because you are carrying does not mean you should walk down a dark alleyway you normally would not enter. If you go looking for trouble and you find it then you failed in self defense regardless of who walked away from it. If you are given the right to carry, in otherwords given the right to use lethal force in self defense you should also at all times practice avoidance and understand how improper avoidance can lead to unnecessary escalation. I do not know what happened in this case and I will leave it to the courts to decide, but I do know that with the practice of a little avoidance it would have never escalated to this.
|
|
|
 |
 |

scrapedape
Apr 4, 2012, 1:46 PM
Post #75 of 87
(1035 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 2389
|
binkus wrote: Chadnsc, I am glad you mentioned up the additional responsibility about avoiding confrontation. Concealed Carry laws vary from state to state but I do believe that the first responsibility taught to anyone applying for a carry permit should be avoiding confrontation. I am not apposed to concealed carry in anyway but if a person does carry he should also have the common sense and/or training to understand avoidance and escalation. As you mentioned if you are carrying you do not have the luxury of allowing yourself to get into a physical altercation just because some guy cut you off on the road, things escalate to easily. Just because you are carrying does not mean you should walk down a dark alleyway you normally would not enter. If you go looking for trouble and you find it then you failed in self defense regardless of who walked away from it. If you are given the right to carry, in otherwords given the right to use lethal force in self defense you should also at all times practice avoidance and understand how improper avoidance can lead to unnecessary escalation. I do not know what happened in this case and I will leave it to the courts to decide, but I do know that with the practice of a little avoidance it would have never escalated to this. This is an eminently reasonable position. Too bad Florida's stand-your-ground law institutionalizes precisely the opposite attitude.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|