|
iknowfear
Jul 2, 2012, 6:44 AM
Post #1 of 5
(684 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 587
|
Hi there,
Was that thread really so unsalvagable, that a mod had to recycle (or more appropriately trash) it entirely?
and if, yes, what where the specific reasons?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
xmesox
Administrator
Jul 2, 2012, 7:12 AM
Post #2 of 5
(679 views)
Shortcut
|
While I wasn't the one who sent it to the recycling bin, I just had a look at the thread and it would be my assumption that it was removed because the last 20 odd posts were merely people calling each other names. I think it's fair to say the thread has degenerated into an unrecoverable position.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Jul 2, 2012, 6:58 PM
Post #3 of 5
(654 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 26, 2004
Posts: 3388
|
Good job mobs.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Jul 5, 2012, 11:21 PM
Post #4 of 5
(623 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 5, 2007
Posts: 2571
|
Indeed there wasent much useful information in the last two pages on that thread. But I supposed a more appropriate option would have been to just scrap the last two pages and ban the guy that seemingly joined the forum simply to complain about the thread. The first few pages had some good and accurate history about Hawaii's indoor climbing scene.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Jul 7, 2012, 10:52 AM
Post #5 of 5
(594 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 14536
|
USnavy wrote: Indeed there wasent much useful information in the last two pages on that thread. But I supposed a more appropriate option would have been to just scrap the last two pages and ban the guy that seemingly joined the forum simply to complain about the thread. The first few pages had some good and accurate history about Hawaii's indoor climbing scene.
agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
