 |

Oldfatrad
Aug 16, 2012, 5:06 PM
Post #1 of 34
(1423 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 40
|
SOCIALISM -is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill- Sure sounds like Obama is a socialist.
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Aug 16, 2012, 5:52 PM
Post #2 of 34
(1411 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

ubu
Aug 16, 2012, 6:06 PM
Post #3 of 34
(1402 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1475
|
Oldfatrad wrote: SOCIALISM -is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill- Sure sounds like Obama is a socialist. "When Catholicism goes bad it becomes the religion of amulets and holy places and priestcraft: Protestantism, in its corresponding decay, becomes a vague mist of ethical platitudes” -C.S. Lewis Sure sounds like Romney is a Protestant. While this is also an obvious non sequitur, it actually makes more sense than yours.
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Aug 16, 2012, 6:32 PM
Post #4 of 34
(1396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie
(This post was edited by pinktricam on Aug 16, 2012, 6:33 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Aug 16, 2012, 6:44 PM
Post #5 of 34
(1387 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie Leading a country into war, yes. In the area of economics and finance--not so much. Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Aug 16, 2012, 6:53 PM
Post #6 of 34
(1379 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie I can play that game too.
Albert Einstein wrote: I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Einstein >> Churchill
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Aug 16, 2012, 8:19 PM
Post #7 of 34
(1364 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
veganclimber wrote: pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie I can play that game too. Albert Einstein wrote: I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Einstein >> Churchill Oh, yeah? Jesus >>> Einstein [Boo-YA!] I may like the "principle", but I don't trust the institution. The "helping your fellows is" best met at the local level; from society up, not from the top down.
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Aug 16, 2012, 8:30 PM
Post #8 of 34
(1359 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
pinktricam wrote: veganclimber wrote: pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie I can play that game too. Albert Einstein wrote: I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Einstein >> Churchill Oh, yeah? Jesus >>> Einstein [Boo-YA!] Even accepting that at face value, Jesus was a revolutionary socialist. Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

pinktricam
Aug 16, 2012, 8:36 PM
Post #9 of 34
(1348 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
curt wrote: pinktricam wrote: veganclimber wrote: pinktricam wrote: curt wrote: Andrew Carnegie wrote: I believe Socialism is the grandest theory ever presented, and I am sure it will someday rule the world. Then we will have attained the Millennium.… Then men will be content to work for the general welfare and share their riches with their neighbors. Andrew Carnegie in New York Times (1 January 1885) "A Millionaire Socialist" Curt Churchill > Carnegie I can play that game too. Albert Einstein wrote: I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society. Einstein >> Churchill Oh, yeah? Jesus >>> Einstein [Boo-YA!] Even accepting that at face value, Jesus was a revolutionary socialist. Curt Hence, my liking the "principle." It's my distrust of our government's means of bringing this about in an efficient and equitable manner that lends me pause.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Kartessa
Aug 17, 2012, 11:46 AM
Post #10 of 34
(1296 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7152
|
Pinkie makes my head spin
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Aug 17, 2012, 8:56 PM
Post #11 of 34
(1257 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8571
|
Based solely on what Obama's critics have said over the last four years, I think I've come up with the most concise definition of socialism for today's political landscape. Socialism is when people poorer than the speaker benefit from tax expenditures. When it benefits people richer than the speaker, its called "Job Creation".
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Aug 18, 2012, 6:57 AM
Post #12 of 34
(1243 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
Oldfatrad wrote: SOCIALISM -is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. -Winston Churchill- Sure sounds like Obama is a socialist. Wow... In all the years you have posted the same tired stuff on more than one site, and the response it gets, each and every time, from everyone, I am suprised you haven't figured out yet that you are all noise and no signal. What does that say about YOUR thinking process?
|
|
|
 |
 |

Oldfatrad
Aug 18, 2012, 11:30 AM
Post #13 of 34
(1227 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2006
Posts: 40
|
rrrAdam, There is plenty of signal, you are merely to0 unsophisticated to understand the concepts or it's possible that you are on the receiving end of the socialism and desire more. TheTool
|
|
|
 |
 |

rrrADAM
Aug 18, 2012, 12:16 PM
Post #14 of 34
(1220 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17535
|
Wow... You sure told me. BTW... Again, you need to do some research... Israel is democratic and is home to several political parties which stretch across the political spectrum. However, since its establishment in 1948, Israel has followed an economic model that resembles liberal socialism. Not that I think you will actually try to expand your world-view to something that doesn't fit nicely into your little box, but it's worth leading the horse to water especially since I'm stupid enough to think that it might drink:
In reply to: If socialism is evil, does that make Israel bad? Israel is, at least in part, a socialist country. From their policies on healthcare, welfare, daycare, free benefits for immigrants, nationalization of banks and other industries, it cannot be argued that Israel does not employ socialism. Healthcare: while Americans argue about the evils or benefits of universal healthcare, Israel enjoys their own universal, compulsory system. A state-run collection agency collections a membership fee from every employer, and distributes it to one of four different HMOs. Each person must choose one of these HMOs, and in turn, these HMOs cannot turn anyone down for healthcare. Prescription drugs were actually given free of charge until recently. Now a nominal (small) fee is charged. . . . Stipends (read: welfare) are given to ultra-Orthodox males who choose to study at religious yeshivas. The majority of ultra-orthodox males do not work their entire lives - at least 65% of males choose to study the Torah as their main occupation, and Israel has always had a policy of encouraging this practice. In addition, many ultra-orthodox females do not work outside of the home for religious reasons. As a result, more than half of all Ultra-Orthodox families live in poverty and receive government assistance. . . . http://bonosrama.newsvine.com/...that-make-israel-bad Note that we (USA) give ~$3 BILLION a year to Israel, so the taxpayers here also pay into the welfare state that is Israel. The article above cites many sources, and gives lots of info on all the other ways in which they employ socialism. Or, you can research it on your own... If you choose to look outside your little box, that is.
(This post was edited by rrrADAM on Aug 19, 2012, 1:20 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Kartessa
Aug 18, 2012, 9:16 PM
Post #15 of 34
(1190 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7152
|
Oldfatrad wrote: rrrAdam, There is plenty of signal, you are merely to0 unsophisticated to understand the concepts or it's possible that you are on the receiving end of the socialism and desire more. TheTool Its funny... people bitch about those on the receiving end until they realize they may need it. Imagine you or someone you love was diagnosed with cancer or some other disease that can be expensive and long to treat? Would you appreciate socialized health care then? How about financial safety nets to help make ends meet while missing work due to treatment? How about families with a disabled child? (Maybe even one they knew was going to be disabled before birth but didnt want an abortion) Are they freeloaders? Should foster kids quit whining and get jobs to support themselves? I mean if their families aren't going to take care of them, they sure as hell shouldnt depend on tax payers, am I right? You're right. Government has no place protecting society's most vulnerable. Children, the sick, the disabled, and the old shouldn't assume that the rest of your country cares enough to take care of them. That's why the bible says not to take care of each other, because socialism is evil and brotherhood is blasphemy. YAY GREED!
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Aug 19, 2012, 9:15 PM
Post #16 of 34
(1162 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5169
|
The problem that the Reptilian (accidental spell check that I'll leave in) party is making is that I don't vote against someone, I vote FOR someone. Sure Obama has his faults, but shit, Romney looks a fuck of a lot worse. I have yet to hear a compelling arguement to vote FOR Romney. If you have one I'd be delighted to hear it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Kartessa
Aug 20, 2012, 6:31 AM
Post #17 of 34
(1141 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7152
|
My favourite part of the Christian right is the whole bit about "Love thy neighbour" (unless he needs help, then screw him).
|
|
|
 |
 |

tradpuppy
Aug 20, 2012, 8:49 AM
Post #18 of 34
(1117 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2002
Posts: 720
|
"You're all a bunch of slaves!" ~Jim Morrison
|
|
|
 |
 |

rmsusa
Aug 20, 2012, 10:32 AM
Post #19 of 34
(1101 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2004
Posts: 1017
|
Here 'ya go: The tremendous financial firepower they bring to the table in troubling economic times. Romney spent years buying and selling businesses. He's an astute financial statement decoder with an eye for improvement. Ryan had the stones to make a proposal and knows more about government finance than possibly anybody in government today. Whatever else you have against them, their financial acumen is just awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |

curt
Aug 20, 2012, 10:42 AM
Post #20 of 34
(1097 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 18043
|
rmsusa wrote: Here 'ya go: The tremendous financial firepower they bring to the table in troubling economic times. Romney spent years buying and selling businesses. He's an astute financial statement decoder with an eye for improvement. Ryan had the stones to make a proposal and knows more about government finance than possibly anybody in government today. Whatever else you have against them, their financial acumen is just awesome. One of the funniest (incorrect) things I've ever read. Curt
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Aug 20, 2012, 10:49 AM
Post #21 of 34
(1092 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5169
|
Is divesting Texas is on the table?
|
|
|
 |
 |

Kartessa
Aug 20, 2012, 10:56 AM
Post #22 of 34
(1088 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7152
|
rmsusa wrote: Here 'ya go: The tremendous financial firepower they bring to the table in troubling economic times. Romney spent years buying and selling businesses. He's an astute financial statement decoder with an eye for improvement. Ryan had the stones to make a proposal and knows more about government finance than possibly anybody in government today. Whatever else you have against them, their financial acumen is just awesome. Of course you'll get rich if you don't pay your taxes
|
|
|
 |
 |

dr_feelgood
Aug 20, 2012, 1:06 PM
Post #23 of 34
(1073 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 25311
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Is divesting Texas is on the table? Please! Give them to Mexico as a colony!
|
|
|
 |
 |

veganclimber
Aug 20, 2012, 2:25 PM
Post #24 of 34
(1053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 2773
|
rmsusa wrote: Here 'ya go: The tremendous financial firepower they bring to the table in troubling economic times. Romney spent years buying and selling businesses. He's an astute financial statement decoder with an eye for improvement. Ryan had the stones to make a proposal and knows more about government finance than possibly anybody in government today. Whatever else you have against them, their financial acumen is just awesome. Romney sure knows a lot about making money, for himself. He's good at hanging on to it too. The last thing I want is for somebody to run the country like Romney ran Bain. I'm not at all impressed with Ryan's budget either. It's a massive tax cut for the rich, while increasing taxes on the poor and middle class. It would result in an estimated $4.3 trillion loss in revenue over 10 years. He makes up for this loss of revenue by cutting spending. Of course his spending cuts primarily hurt the poor. The one thing he won't cut is defense spending. Who cares if people are sick and don't have access to health care. Who cares if people are starving. As long as we maintain the ability to police the world. Just more republican bullshit from these two. Give more to the rich while taking from the poor and middle class. One more thing. You might want to look into Ryan's past before praising him as a fiscal conservative.
|
|
|
 |
 |

ubu
Aug 20, 2012, 4:29 PM
Post #25 of 34
(1040 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2008
Posts: 1475
|
rmsusa wrote: Here 'ya go: The tremendous financial firepower they bring to the table in troubling economic times. Romney spent years buying and selling businesses. He's an astute financial statement decoder with an eye for improvement. Ryan had the stones to make a proposal and knows more about government finance than possibly anybody in government today. Whatever else you have against them, their financial acumen is just awesome. Paul Ryan's budget plan in a nutshell: step 1. lower taxes, offset with closing loopholes in step 2. step 2. step 3. profit! Yes, he's clearly a budget genius.
|
|
|
 |
|
|