|
pinktricam
Jan 8, 2013, 8:24 PM
Post #1 of 28
(950 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me.
I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Jan 9, 2013, 6:46 AM
Post #2 of 28
(875 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 27, 2005
Posts: 31870
|
Name them names. I dare you.
|
|
|
|
|
iknowfear
Jan 9, 2013, 12:03 PM
Post #3 of 28
(853 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2004
Posts: 587
|
pinktricam wrote: Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me. I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
unless you invented GPS or EPIRB, I doubt that claim.
cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 11, 2013, 2:52 AM
Post #4 of 28
(813 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you.
The Minnesota moron for one. She knows who she is.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Jan 11, 2013, 10:35 AM
Post #5 of 28
(801 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15547
|
pinktricam wrote: epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you. The Minnesota moron for one. She knows who she is.
the love affair continues
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 11, 2013, 1:09 PM
Post #6 of 28
(793 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8572
|
I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 13, 2013, 2:50 PM
Post #7 of 28
(755 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
I guess pinkies desperate for attention Ma.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 13, 2013, 2:52 PM
Post #8 of 28
(748 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
epoch wrote: Name them names. I dare you.
He's too scared to; it's the internet and all he has to use are his words.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Moderator
Jan 18, 2013, 1:04 PM
Post #9 of 28
(701 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4240
|
holy moly. 10 years here. who woulda thought?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 18, 2013, 1:23 PM
Post #10 of 28
(694 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself.
You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 18, 2013, 8:03 PM
Post #11 of 28
(679 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8572
|
chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants.
Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 19, 2013, 5:38 PM
Post #12 of 28
(660 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
petsfed wrote: chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants. Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then?
Nope. He's more of a gunz and duck tape kind of guy.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 21, 2013, 11:07 AM
Post #13 of 28
(638 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7240
|
chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: chadnsc wrote: petsfed wrote: I hope I made the list. Otherwise, I don't know what I'd do with myself. You didn't make the list. Don't worry though, it's really just a ploy for PCT to try and get in your pants. Well, that's flattering. I guess pink isn't a roses and chocolate kind of guy then? Nope. He's more of a gunz and duck tape kind of guy.
Ooohh! I wanna play too!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 21, 2013, 8:44 PM
Post #14 of 28
(616 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
2003? Pfft...
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 22, 2013, 3:46 AM
Post #15 of 28
(603 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: 2003? Pfft...
Hey, jules....long time.
There are some scientists looking for an adventurous woman to have a Neanderthal baby. That's right up your ally!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 22, 2013, 11:04 AM
Post #16 of 28
(587 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 22, 2013, 12:47 PM
Post #17 of 28
(577 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 7240
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Ewwww.... I dont like where this is going
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 23, 2013, 2:40 PM
Post #18 of 28
(558 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 6:03 AM
Post #19 of 28
(544 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
Classy to the end. Could you please not be such a crass jerk?
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Jan 24, 2013, 8:17 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 6:07 AM
Post #20 of 28
(541 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility?
Five stars!
|
|
|
|
|
jules
Jan 24, 2013, 10:57 AM
Post #21 of 28
(522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 1, 2001
Posts: 3099
|
pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher?
You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Jan 24, 2013, 11:37 AM
Post #22 of 28
(519 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 8572
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
trophy
Its the Groucho Marx of the 2010s
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 24, 2013, 11:42 AM
Post #23 of 28
(515 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4408
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
Jules you win. PCT, you loose.
|
|
|
|
|
pinktricam
Jan 29, 2013, 9:41 PM
Post #24 of 28
(476 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 7947
|
jules wrote: pinktricam wrote: jules wrote: It just wouldn't be ethical to do that without an appropriately-primitive adoptive father lined up to raise the little buckaroo. Do you think you could handle that kind of responsibility? Depends, are you still a dedicated carpet muncher? You know, I never have been before, but for you, I'd consider it.
So you're not the lesbian (bi?) amateur entomologist then?
|
|
|
|
|
clymbrchk
Feb 25, 2013, 1:34 PM
Post #25 of 28
(382 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2007
Posts: 115
|
pinktricam wrote: Ten years (and counting) today and some of you assholes would be lost without me. I could name names, but I'm a better person than that.
Damn, that makes it sound like a long time. Did I make the list? I <3 lists.
Editted to observe that my register date is in 2007. Weird. I'm pretty sure that I went out on my first climbing trip with you suckers in 2002.
Hmm, maybe I've been hacked.
(This post was edited by clymbrchk on Feb 25, 2013, 1:36 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
