Forums: Community: Campground:
You are not wanted here.
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Campground

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 ... 3856 3857 3858 3859 3860 3861 3862 3863 3864 ... 4143 Next page Last page  View All


lena_chita
Moderator

Jan 28, 2013, 8:00 AM
Post #96476 of 103554 (1671 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 5752

Re: [granite_grrl] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

To be fair, the photos taken from above with a woman flexing/squeezing her arms really accentuate the boobies. Even my completely-flat-chested self can look like I am spotting at least B-cups from the right angle/position.

And I didn't think the photos themselves were offensive. the girls in those photos have boobs, and that's it. It is the fact that the ONLY reason they are posted and liked by guys was because of the cleavage, and ALSO the fact that the women (at least most of them) were not deliberately posting for cleavage photos, but the guys are acting all drooly about it that is offensive.


granite_grrl wrote:
The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

Yeah, a major dick... and no, not in a sense he should be proud of.

LOL, my favorite partner once remarked, when the discussion was on subject that most guys like "softer" women with big boobs and ass, that, well, to each his own. he said something along the lines of, "Cows are admired for big udders, and sows are prized on fat rolls, but he never heard anyone saying that a cheetah was not beautiful, because it lacked big mammary glands, or that a mare was not pretty because you could see all the muscles under the skin." He preferred to think of himself as a cat or a stallion, not a boar or a steer, so he kinda liked agility and muscles over soft fat.

Hmmm... fond memories...


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 8:06 AM
Post #96477 of 103554 (1665 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [lena_chita] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

To be fair, the photos taken from above with a woman flexing/squeezing her arms really accentuate the boobies. Even my completely-flat-chested self can look like I am spotting at least B-cups from the right angle/position.

And I didn't think the photos themselves were offensive. the girls in those photos have boobs, and that's it. It is the fact that the ONLY reason they are posted and liked by guys was because of the cleavage, and ALSO the fact that the women (at least most of them) were not deliberately posting for cleavage photos, but the guys are acting all drooly about it that is offensive.


granite_grrl wrote:
The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

Yeah, a major dick... and no, not in a sense he should be proud of.

LOL, my favorite partner once remarked, when the discussion was on subject that most guys like "softer" women with big boobs and ass, that, well, to each his own. he said something along the lines of, "Cows are admired for big udders, and sows are prized on fat rolls, but he never heard anyone saying that a cheetah was not beautiful, because it lacked big mammary glands, or that a mare was not pretty because you could see all the muscles under the skin." He preferred to think of himself as a cat or a stallion, not a boar or a steer, so he kinda liked agility and muscles over soft fat.

Hmmm... fond memories...


smooth motherfucka


granite_grrl


Jan 28, 2013, 8:08 AM
Post #96478 of 103554 (1663 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14829

Re: [camhead] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


caughtinside


Jan 28, 2013, 8:31 AM
Post #96479 of 103554 (1658 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30424

Re: [camhead] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
camhead wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
New Zealand to banz devl kat!
http://www.slate.com/...ies_and_shouldn.html

Dogz winz!!Angelic

Hmm, makes me feel better about keeping Feisty as an inside cat.

Catz are killers, they can't seem to help themselves.

Well, except for Calvin. If he ever caught a mouse he would try to lick it to death.


I have been considering getting a cat. If i do, I really need the killer kind, to preemptively deal with any mouse problems. How do I find a kitten who will become a nice friendly neighborhood rodent killer?

Ewe thinking inside or outside mouse control? If you want mostly an outside cat, maybe check on craigslist for farmcats?

I would think that baby munkey will be psyched about you getting a cat.

Inside. And yeah, baby munkey would be psyched.

If you want inside kitteh, most any cat would be fine.

Hell, Feisty is a half blind softie who would probably starve within a few days of being let outside, and even she probably keeps mice away, just with her presence.

I would probably not get too focused on finding a great mouser, because that would probably run the risk of winding up with a cat who breaks stuff, jumps up on counters, and isn't cuddly enough.

Just get the best, cutest kitten who comes up to you when you check it out.

I sort of have a feeling if mice decided to get up in our condo, they would just laugh at our cat.

I was just wondering....where does pet tawk live on the scale of popular BET topics of conversation.

It's up there. We've also established that in BE-land, cats > dogs. Apologies to Louie and Brian.

I'm afraid this just isn't the case. Sure, cats are great. But I haven't seen any cats at a meatup.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 8:39 AM
Post #96480 of 103554 (1648 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [caughtinside] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

caughtinside wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
camhead wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
caughtinside wrote:
New Zealand to banz devl kat!
http://www.slate.com/...ies_and_shouldn.html

Dogz winz!!Angelic

Hmm, makes me feel better about keeping Feisty as an inside cat.

Catz are killers, they can't seem to help themselves.

Well, except for Calvin. If he ever caught a mouse he would try to lick it to death.


I have been considering getting a cat. If i do, I really need the killer kind, to preemptively deal with any mouse problems. How do I find a kitten who will become a nice friendly neighborhood rodent killer?

Ewe thinking inside or outside mouse control? If you want mostly an outside cat, maybe check on craigslist for farmcats?

I would think that baby munkey will be psyched about you getting a cat.

Inside. And yeah, baby munkey would be psyched.

If you want inside kitteh, most any cat would be fine.

Hell, Feisty is a half blind softie who would probably starve within a few days of being let outside, and even she probably keeps mice away, just with her presence.

I would probably not get too focused on finding a great mouser, because that would probably run the risk of winding up with a cat who breaks stuff, jumps up on counters, and isn't cuddly enough.

Just get the best, cutest kitten who comes up to you when you check it out.

I sort of have a feeling if mice decided to get up in our condo, they would just laugh at our cat.

I was just wondering....where does pet tawk live on the scale of popular BET topics of conversation.

It's up there. We've also established that in BE-land, cats > dogs. Apologies to Louie and Brian.

I'm afraid this just isn't the case. Sure, cats are great. But I haven't seen any cats at a meatup.

don't dare me to bring back cragcat.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 8:42 AM
Post #96481 of 103554 (1645 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [granite_grrl] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 8:52 AM
Post #96482 of 103554 (1638 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 9:08 AM
Post #96483 of 103554 (1632 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

so what's the deal with quoting on MP? You can't have more than one quote string in your post? Or you just can't break up someobody's quote into multiples?

It seems that you can't alter a quote at all, or the site will remove the quote formatting?


Partner cracklover


Jan 28, 2013, 9:08 AM
Post #96484 of 103554 (1631 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10030

Re: [dr_feelgood] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
drivel wrote:
cracklover wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
cracklover wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
pc++

Well done, sir. My Franchise folds.

GO

Now fuck off. We're talking about tango dancing, and don't want to hear from you.

You can tell me to fuck off etc all you like.

Anyway, I don't know any of you personally, so most of what you chat about here I have nothing to say about. In other words, no - you won't hear from me, not often. I speak up when I *do* have something to say, which is rarely.

Cheers,

GO

awwww seriouscat, you were doing so good.

He just wants to be accepted....

Meh... nah, I more or less get the idea of the thread, and like I said, I don't know you, so I expect the whack-a-mole whenever I pipe up.

Although if the beatings were more specific and less of a generic GTFO, that would certainly be more entertaining for all, n'est-ce pas?

Had a decent weekend at Shelf - got myself good and thrashed at Shelf. Sent one climb I thought would be kind of a long-term project on my first go after my partner worked out all the beta for me (sweet!) Then flailed pretty miserably on everything else.

GO


camhead


Jan 28, 2013, 9:18 AM
Post #96485 of 103554 (1626 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20760

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 9:25 AM
Post #96486 of 103554 (1623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [camhead] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.
You know, at first I was like fuck. Shoulda changed the pic. But I kinda like where it's going.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 9:34 AM
Post #96487 of 103554 (1619 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.
You know, at first I was like fuck. Shoulda changed the pic. But I kinda like where it's going.

yeah, the thread is actually kinda interesting at this point.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 9:39 AM
Post #96488 of 103554 (1615 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.
You know, at first I was like fuck. Shoulda changed the pic. But I kinda like where it's going.

yeah, the thread is actually kinda interesting at this point.
It's making me appreciate the hole we have over here.

Can we start posting pictures of fact people now?


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 9:42 AM
Post #96489 of 103554 (1613 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.
You know, at first I was like fuck. Shoulda changed the pic. But I kinda like where it's going.

yeah, the thread is actually kinda interesting at this point.
It's making me appreciate the hole we have over here.

Can we start posting pictures of fact people now?

yeah. it tarnishes your high horse a li'l though.


granite_grrl


Jan 28, 2013, 9:42 AM
Post #96490 of 103554 (1611 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 14829

Re: [camhead] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.

It makes me crazy that in so many threads like these men come up with all sorts of justifications for their actions. And the people who point it out to them are the gerks.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 9:44 AM
Post #96491 of 103554 (1610 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

I might have just blown that dude's mind.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 9:45 AM
Post #96492 of 103554 (1608 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
camhead wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
camhead wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
drivel wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
lawd, the mountaiprodger banz hammer is in a full-on wack-a-mole battle royale with that clausti chica. Serious!


Yeah, for some reason calling out sexism is not O.K. with the boys in charge.

Glad you and cla are calling them out.

Link?


in my post above this one.

most telling moderashuns:

In a post by clausti with a bunch of questions like "why do you keep deleting my posts," she also included a photo of her leading atman, captioned, "here: me, with no shirt on, leading trad, in the desert. i hear that makes y'alls dicks hard around here." because she thought they could only delete whole posts and that if there was a picture they'd have to leave it.

turns out they can edit posts, too. They removed the questions about deleted posts and left ONLY the photo with the caption about hard dicks.

later, clausti posted something "camhat knows I'm a chick, he's putting his dick in me later." The "putting his dick in me later" line was removed.

to recap: photos and words intended to make men's dicks hard= allowed. any discussion of a voluntary dicking that a woman might enjoy= not allowed.

Yup, went and found the thread. First post was okay in it, it was the next couple with their photos that were terrible. Look, boobies! If we want to talk offensive then those two posts should have been deleted.

The that one dude saying how he didn't like the photos of the strong chicks because they looked too strong, wtf? Personally, when I saw the photo camhed posted of Josune I thought "well finally someone is posting photos of truely hawt chicks".

The Josune pic was completely premeditated, and not to pat myself on the back, but I knew that it would open the conversation in the direction it went, since #1, she's a badass, and #2 she does not fit the standard of beauty. If someone who looked like Sasha or Lauren Lee had been the only woman to have climbed 9a for 8 years before anyone else, the climbing media would have exploded. Instead, most people don't know who the fuck she is, and they just go, "EWWWWW, she has too many muscles!"

Dipshits.

Ewe did good with that pic.


i feel like in general we're doing a decent job of making it more of a pain in the ass for them to have let that sexist garbage thread persist than it would have been to remove it.
wunce I remember my login, I'll be there.

That guy trying to "call out" your profile pic pretty much demonstrates how clueless the folks over there are.
You know, at first I was like fuck. Shoulda changed the pic. But I kinda like where it's going.

yeah, the thread is actually kinda interesting at this point.
It's making me appreciate the hole we have over here.

Can we start posting pictures of fact people now?

yeah. it tarnishes your high horse a li'l though.
I'll do ice climbing pics instead, nothing in the threads title said anything about sexy or hawt.

Besides, looks like be cs got it covered.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 10:03 AM
Post #96493 of 103554 (1600 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

haha that ben guy just asked if it was my time of the month, in french.

i replied, in french: "Yes, I am covered in blood. Too bad you're not, too?"


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 10:09 AM
Post #96494 of 103554 (1595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
haha that ben guy just asked if it was my time of the month, in french.

i replied, in french: "Yes, I am covered in blood. Too bad you're not, too?"
I know, I speak enough french to get that lol...looks like his was deleted?


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 10:16 AM
Post #96495 of 103554 (1593 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
haha that ben guy just asked if it was my time of the month, in french.

i replied, in french: "Yes, I am covered in blood. Too bad you're not, too?"
I know, I speak enough french to get that lol...looks like his was deleted?

I had to google translate, but I got the point.

they were both mod-deleted. I'm kinda bummed, actually. I thought "I'm covered in blood" was a pretty funny response to being asked if it was my time of the month.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 10:21 AM
Post #96496 of 103554 (1590 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
haha that ben guy just asked if it was my time of the month, in french.

i replied, in french: "Yes, I am covered in blood. Too bad you're not, too?"
I know, I speak enough french to get that lol...looks like his was deleted?

I had to google translate, but I got the point.

they were both mod-deleted. I'm kinda bummed, actually. I thought "I'm covered in blood" was a pretty funny response to being asked if it was my time of the month.
He came back sheepish. I accepted.

Hot damn, I've got this going on and a polictical/bull shit debate going on on Mal's facespace page. Nothing is getting done this morning.

Paul, we need you to talk to the dummy again, sounds like he needs to hear it from a MAN.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 10:36 AM
Post #96497 of 103554 (1585 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [carabiner96] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
carabiner96 wrote:
drivel wrote:
haha that ben guy just asked if it was my time of the month, in french.

i replied, in french: "Yes, I am covered in blood. Too bad you're not, too?"
I know, I speak enough french to get that lol...looks like his was deleted?

I had to google translate, but I got the point.

they were both mod-deleted. I'm kinda bummed, actually. I thought "I'm covered in blood" was a pretty funny response to being asked if it was my time of the month.
He came back sheepish. I accepted.

Hot damn, I've got this going on and a polictical/bull shit debate going on on Mal's facespace page. Nothing is getting done this morning.

Paul, we need you to talk to the dummy again, sounds like he needs to hear it from a MAN.


this is hella amusing, y'all. I haven't had this much fun in an internet fight in a while.


drivel


Jan 28, 2013, 10:37 AM
Post #96498 of 103554 (1583 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2010
Posts: 2453

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

Also, I'm kind of impressed that they deleted the "time of the month" post, but they left the one of me saying "fuck you" and "sit down and shut up" were the same level of civil.


camhead


Jan 28, 2013, 10:56 AM
Post #96499 of 103554 (1575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 20760

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

cool, ima go check it out.


carabiner96


Jan 28, 2013, 10:56 AM
Post #96500 of 103554 (1575 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12553

Re: [drivel] You are not wanted here. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Can't Post

drivel wrote:
Also, I'm kind of impressed that they deleted the "time of the month" post, but they left the one of me saying "fuck you" and "sit down and shut up" were the same level of civil.
Sounds like those moderators need some midol.

BA dam CHING!

Also, I may have tripled my MP PC+++ today. I only ever go over there when there's a fight one uv you guys started.

First page Previous page 1 ... 3856 3857 3858 3859 3860 3861 3862 3863 3864 ... 4143 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Community : Campground

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook