Forums: Climbing Information: General:
more dangerious???
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


orestes1724


Sep 2, 2001, 5:20 PM
Post #1 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2001
Posts: 1414

more dangerious???
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

is lead climbing more dangerious then top rope??? if it is how much more??? my step dad said its way more dangerious and you can get hurt really easlly...he also said if you fall the "pegs" can come out of the rock but im not sure if hes lieing or he just doesnt know??????


Partner pianomahnn


Sep 2, 2001, 7:02 PM
Post #2 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 16, 2001
Posts: 3779

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm going say it truly comes down to the person climbing. With top roping, if the person setting anchors is a absolute moron, you're chances of dying are much greater than if some trad guru is setting the pro.

Each has its own safety advantages, but each has its own safety disadvantages. If you learn the skills needed to climb safely, both should be equally safe.

It then comes down to difficulty. Setting pro is much of the time much more difficult then placing a top rope...and blah blah blah...see where I'm going?



Partner rrrADAM


Sep 2, 2001, 9:18 PM
Post #3 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17543

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Think of it this way:

If your toproping and you fall, you'll only fall the amount of slack+stretch in the line,
a few feet.

If your leading and you're above your last piece, you'll fall twice the amount you're above the piece+slack+stretch, 10 feet above WILL equal more than a 20 foot fall and so on.

OFCOURSE leading is more dangerous than TRing.

rrrADAM


climberchk


Sep 3, 2001, 1:40 AM
Post #4 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2001
Posts: 304

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I must agree. There are so many more things that can go wrong with leading compared to climbing on a top rope. No matter what way you climb, there is always a risk. Leading just has a few more than TR does. But if done correctly, and with the proper know-how, you can grealty reduce your risks! Hope it helped!


daisuke


Sep 3, 2001, 1:26 PM
Post #5 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2001
Posts: 904

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

one big difference in leading is the chance of slamming into the rock/wall on the way down, and if you're on a gym wall that can mean a grip in the side. you don't have this problem with toproping since you just hang when you fall, still... leading can be more fun at times. if a climb is no longer motivating in toprope you can up the ante and lead it.

protection shouldn't come out if it's well set, cams can come out but I doubt your dad will have a say in the matter or will mind once you're ready for it


orestes1724


Sep 3, 2001, 4:20 PM
Post #6 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2001
Posts: 1414

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

my dads an ass and he doesnt care if im ready...its if he feels like it. lol.


orestes1724


Sep 3, 2001, 4:28 PM
Post #7 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 2, 2001
Posts: 1414

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks guys


climberchk


Sep 3, 2001, 10:47 PM
Post #8 of 32 (3688 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2001
Posts: 304

more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Good luck with him!


MikeDierson


Feb 7, 2013, 11:17 AM
Post #9 of 32 (3282 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 7, 2013
Posts: 18

Re: [orestes1724] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

orestes1724 wrote:
is lead climbing more dangerious then top rope??? if it is how much more??? my step dad said its way more dangerious and you can get hurt really easlly...he also said if you fall the "pegs" can come out of the rock but im not sure if hes lieing or he just doesnt know??????

I destest the opinion that it is more dangerous. In top roping you have a three mabey four point anchor. That's is! In situation of catastrophic anchor failure, you go lights out as they say in my country. In the lead the anchor is supplimented by your pro selections in the lead. If anchor fails its a switch over to simul-climb senerio and anchor can be reistabuished. The uncle sounds ingorent of the complexities of the situation. Climb on young lad. Lead and learn as they say.


(This post was edited by MikeDierson on Feb 7, 2013, 11:33 AM)


bearbreeder


Feb 7, 2013, 11:37 AM
Post #10 of 32 (3264 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2009
Posts: 1960

Re: [MikeDierson] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

i am the necromancer ... you may have been dead for 12 years ... but i will re-animate you

muhahahaha Tongue


skelldify


Feb 7, 2013, 3:52 PM
Post #11 of 32 (3170 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 20, 2013
Posts: 62

Re: [orestes1724] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

[quote "orestes1724"]my dads an ass and he doesnt care if im ready...its if he feels like it. lol.[/quote]


Doesn't sound like either of you are ready.


SylviaSmile


Feb 7, 2013, 7:09 PM
Post #12 of 32 (3121 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 982

Re: [skelldify] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

skelldify wrote:
[quote "orestes1724"]my dads an ass and he doesnt care if im ready...its if he feels like it. lol.[/quote]


Doesn't sound like either of you are ready.

Given that it's been 12 years, let's hope they are ready now. Or at least not dead.


skelldify


Feb 7, 2013, 7:32 PM
Post #13 of 32 (3106 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 20, 2013
Posts: 62

Re: [SylviaSmile] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ahahaha! Good point!


cervicornis


Feb 8, 2013, 12:49 PM
Post #14 of 32 (2963 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2005
Posts: 58

Re: [orestes1724] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's been a while since I last browsed RC.com. Wow. I feel sad.


SylviaSmile


Feb 8, 2013, 2:33 PM
Post #15 of 32 (2925 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 982

Re: [cervicornis] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

On the other hand, wouldn't it be fun to start spelling it "dangerious"?


Syd


Feb 8, 2013, 3:00 PM
Post #16 of 32 (2916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 300

Re: [MikeDierson] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I destest the opinion that it is more dangerous. In top roping you have a three mabey four point anchor. That's is! In situation of catastrophic anchor failure, you go lights out as they say in my country.

I use 2, rarely 3 on TR. The chances of an anchor such as a living tree 6 inches or more in diameter having "catastrophic failure" are ridiculously remote. The only real dangers from correctly set up TRs are short radius swings on wandering routes, rockfall ... but these risks can be minimised.

Conversely, the opportunities for failures leading to injury when leading are many. Injuries (or death) when leading are inevitable if you climb long enough, no matter how good or careful you are. For example, one of the best and most experienced climbers in the country broke both his ankles leading a route he had bolted himself.

Abseiling is probably more dangerous than either, mainly because of foolhardiness.


maldaly


Feb 9, 2013, 8:50 AM
Post #17 of 32 (2831 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1206

Re: [Syd] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

There are more injuries top roping and lowering and more deaths leading. You pick: which is more dangerous?

Climb Safe,
Malcolm


Syd


Feb 9, 2013, 1:17 PM
Post #18 of 32 (2774 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 300

Re: [maldaly] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
There are more injuries top roping ...

Where did you get your data ?


maldaly


Feb 9, 2013, 2:30 PM
Post #19 of 32 (2763 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1206

Re: [Syd] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ANAM. But realize that they only cover accidents that require a rescue or ones that are self reported. Gym accidents and sport climbing accidents rarely make it in.


(This post was edited by maldaly on Feb 9, 2013, 2:32 PM)


Syd


Feb 9, 2013, 2:46 PM
Post #20 of 32 (2755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 300

Re: [maldaly] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Link please. There's nothing here to suggest that top roping has more injuries:
http://americanalpineclub.org/p/anam-statistics

This report suggests that leaders have far more accidents, deaths and injuries than seconds, (equivalent to top roping) :
http://www.rockymountainrescue.org/publications/2012_WEMJ_RMRG_Rock_Climb_Accidents.pdf


Syd


Feb 11, 2013, 9:55 AM
Post #21 of 32 (2644 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 300

Re: [Syd] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

From the lack of response, it is apparent that there is no data that suggests top roping is more dangerous than leading. It should be obvious to any climber that leading is far more dangerous than top roping.


marc801


Feb 11, 2013, 10:00 AM
Post #22 of 32 (2643 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2689

Re: [Syd] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Syd wrote:
From the lack of response, it is apparent that there is no data...
No it isn't. You asked on a Saturday afternoon and got all pissy on Monday morning. Just maybe people who care enough to do your research for you have lives outside of RC. Maybe they're even climbing.


Parkerkat


Feb 11, 2013, 11:34 AM
Post #23 of 32 (2606 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2008
Posts: 263

Re: [rrrADAM] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would counter that statement as it automatically implies everyone is exactly the same, which they aren't. What I can say after working on and off in the gym and climbing 5 years outdoors is that TRing is FAR more dangerous than Leading. Why?
- you don't wake up one day as a non-climber and say Hey - lets go lead some rock - typically you build up to it and learn the skills needed and how to belay before you lead.
- the nature of leading also means you're usually full systems-go, not in autopilot as I've seen Many TRs do (just pull that slack, no need to even watch them climb - dumb!!)
- There is a far greater likelyhood that when TRing, there are more beginners than experienced climbers - that just how it goes - almost everyone starts on a TR, so the likelyhood of those on a TR having little to no experience is far greater than when leading.

I end it by saying - So far, I've been lucky and encountered very few mishaps outdoors by leaders.. I think maybe once and it was more of a bad math situation (the leader was one draw short)... but what I can say is that I can't even count the number of gym and outdoor accidents or near accidents from those Top Roping.

As the first person to respond said - its all safe and sound if you take the time to learn the skills. [


Syd


Feb 11, 2013, 3:07 PM
Post #24 of 32 (2558 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2012
Posts: 300

Re: [marc801] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

OK, so it's Monday ... where's the data supporting the crap the TR is more dangerous ?
Sure, more beginners TR than lead and I've seen plenty of stupid stuff and maybe some minor scrapes but it is absolute rubbish to claim it is more dangerous than leading.


jt512


Feb 11, 2013, 6:06 PM
Post #25 of 32 (2519 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 11, 2001
Posts: 21887

Re: [maldaly] more dangerious??? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
There are more injuries top roping and lowering and more deaths leading. You pick: which is more dangerous?

Your categories seem strange. Are top roping, lowering, and leading supposed to be mutually exclusive? If so, then I have trouble believing that top roping (excluding lowering) is more dangerous than leading (excluding lowering).

Jay

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?
$157.95 (10% off)
$49.46 (10% off)
$26.96 (10% off)
$18.54 (10% off)



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook