http://www.rockclimbing.com/routes/rss/ North America/United States/Utah en-us (C) 2005 5 Rating: 3 - I had no idea this was a climb before seeing the anchors so we hopped on it and turns out its harder than what i usually do. who knew. It's also a pretty crumbly rock in some places, and cleaning up is a pain in the... neck http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=95048 Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 4 - cruxy start that slowly lets up. Pay attention to rope drag when switching cracks for pro. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=86417 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - There is a new route left of the arete with 5 bolts. All but the first are in easy reach of the arete. I shouldn't really claim an onsight because I clipped the bolts. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102276 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - fun easiest climb up there with the exception of hummer http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=1044 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 4 - More overhanging that it looks. The face holds are tempting but slippery. The crack is 5.9 but climbing the polished face holds feels about 10a. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102275 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 4 - takes small pro at crux, and yes, it is contrived http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=52967 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - fun moves! awesome climb http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=1524 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 4 - didn't check out the next pitch, but the first one is, again, the quality http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=32917 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - Fun and easy http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102252 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - A few sections of interesting climbing make it a decent route for the grade. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=9 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - Didn't know that grade when I hit it on TR at the end of the day. It gave me some trouble so I'm glad to see it was an 11a. Nice start, a bit tricky in the middle, stout finish. Easy sections in between detract from the overall quality or give you a break depending on your perspective. I was glad for the breaks. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=37401 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - So much fun! http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=424 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - Some horizontal cracks that look great from the ground are too flared to take solid pro. A few options for micro nuts, micro cams, or ball nutz up high. I didn't feel good about the pro so I haven't led it. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102277 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 3 - Good protection in horizontal cracks. Used TCU/Master Cam #3, #4 (#3 would have been better) and #1 between the bolts. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102278 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 2 - Be careful with the pro, many sections have flakes inside the crack that may break under the load from a cam in a fall. Large nuts and hexes work great. The best moves were near the top with a hint of exposure. Recommend seconding rather than TR for someone not solid on the grade. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102279 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - fun moves on an intimidating overhang http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=91181 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - A little funky at the bottom, then sinker jams for 80' or so. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=3689 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 4 - again, quality http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=15232 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800 Rating: 5 - Great route. Just crank though the crux on bomber jams and cruise to the top. http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=66159 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800