<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Rockclimbing | Ascents | North America/United States/Kentucky/East/Red River Gorge (Climbing)</title>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/routes/North America/United States/Kentucky/East/Red River Gorge (Climbing)/</link>
<description>North America/United States/Kentucky/East/Red River Gorge (Climbing)</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) 2007 D4DR Media | Rockclimbing.com - All rights reserved.</copyright>
<ttl>5</ttl>
<item>
<title>Brambly Downslide (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - ... but the rock is somewhat fragile. Maybe once enough holds break off this will turn into 5.10a. For now, it doesn&#039;t merit more than 5.9</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=97229</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Don&#039;t Take Yer Guns to Town (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Didn&#039;t know what to expect and am a bit conservative, so I just traversed/led over from the adjacent 5.7 (The Offering) anchor  and set a TR (EASY - take a blue and a yellow TCU). Turns out that was probably unnecessary as this was not really a 10c, more like 5.7 with a single 10a move. The one move up onto the roof is fun and is really the only hard part. It&#039;s a *little* hard moving up to the anchors from there, but not really too bad. It&#039;s quite safe as one can clip the roof bolt before trying the move and then clip the bolt above probably before you finish the actual move (I saw someone do this). &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It&#039;s quite enjoyable though just for the opportunity to heel hook something outdoors :) Maybe if one was unable to heel hook effectively it would earn the 10c rating.  I think the routes in this area (Bruise Brothers Wall) might be a little soft or maybe it just fits my climbing strengths. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=77006</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>good tang (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - Fun.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=91234</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Immodium AD (5.6)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Short easy route via gear up to the CH4 anchors. Consider it a warm-up for Sweet Jane. Protection was scattered and not just in the primary crack. The start and clipping the anchors are the only parts that offer much challenge, relative to the rest of the route.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=97238</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Manic Impression (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=661</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>On the Prowl (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Melow slab climbing. Felt easier than 5.10</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=97230</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Peer Pressure (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 1 - I don&#039;t often come down from climbing anything feeling disgusted, but this route came close. Short face of choss, fragile rock (a friend who was climbing after me broke off something at the top, and it looked like there were lots of other freshly-broken-off features). Not worth it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I guess .10b is fair, but if you compare this route to the other two 5.10 slabs in the same area, then either the other two should be downgraded from 5.10a to 5.8, or this one should be upgraded to 5.10c/d. Maybe it was 5.10b before all the features broke off, but as it is now, all &quot;5.10 climbers&quot; in our group had a hard time on this route...</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=97231</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Sweet Jane (5.8)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - This is a nice soft 8. Definitely easier than some of the other 5.8s in the area (it is listed as a 5.8- in the area guidebook). The harder part is at the top. The bolt comes along just where you need it. Mostly small gear except for a big piece near the top to protect your anchor clipping. I ended up trending left under the roof and then had to traverse across the big ledge to get up under the anchors. Manage your slings accordingly or potentially suffer the weird mess of tangles that I did on descent.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=97240</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>The Infidel (5.11d)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - nice route.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=96534</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>5th Bolt Faith (5.10c)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - tougher to be confident with frozen hands, another great route</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79856</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>A-Beano (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - can skip the last move if your tall</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=77301</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>A-Beano (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Pretty easy and like everyone says, good for beginning leaders and warm-ups. Very safe and reassuring bolt distance. I actually thought it was a little less obvious than CH4, but both were pretty relaxed and maybe a little light for the grade, esp when compared to some other 7s in the area - most of the Long Wall area 7s seemed much harder. Hardcore folks can continue up over the roof onto the 11a... watched some guy work this and have a mild panic attack. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Interesting side note: Weird iron ore(?) in the rock makes it look like there used to be a walkway bolted to the wall or something but I think it is just the geology.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=77301</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>CH4 (5.8)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - cool holds</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=77302</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>CH4 (5.8)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Nice easy safe route to warm-up on and train the new sport leader. Downclimb it too for added value (why don&#039;t more people downclimb? It&#039;s the best way to get out of trouble.) The only mildly tricky part even close to 5.8 involved reaching the anchors. It could be a little more exciting if one was short. About the same difficulty and with maybe a more clear line than A-Beano just to the left. Like most of the other routes, the only other mildly difficult part is getting started.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=77302</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Flutterby Blue (5.9)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - It&#039;s a fun route for the grade. It&#039;s easier if you are taller as one of the shorter folks in the group had to do some interesting moves to manage a few of the sections. The alt start is pretty cool. Try both.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=75184</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Gettin&#039; Lucky In Kentucky (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - A fine name for an even finer line.  perfect red-riv rock</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79854</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Hey There, Fancy Pants (5.10c)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - I really liked this one, it felt like a well designed gym problem. It has a fun rockover move at the crux, I blew my redpoint but immediately sent it after I looked at for a second as I leaned back from the TR (yea, yea, remove the true redpoint from the grading, but I would have easily re-climbed it if we had time). &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I can see why someone might say this isn&#039;t 10c but I think it&#039;s more a matter of being able to make it easier if one works the technique and doesn&#039;t need to power through it. I find routes that just require power to make the harder grade really kind of boring - this wasn&#039;t like that at all IMO. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79543</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Little Viper (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - This is another great 10 in this area. The crux was really the tricky part but with some forethought it isn&#039;t too bad. I might try to  lead it next time!&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;Burly looking but rusty steel chains and link to rap through.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79502</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Plate Tectonics (5.9)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - that start aint got no feet!</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79855</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Rat Stew (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - first .10a onsight</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=72866</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>The Beeneling 5.10b**** (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - fell at crux...</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79871</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>The Offering (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - Another nice beginner lead. The only tricky part is that the anchors are on a slightly negative slope. Also, as noted, the belayer might slip if not paying attention. We anchored the belayer &quot;just in case&quot;. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Note: It&#039;s pretty easy to traverse over and clip the anchors for the nearby 10c &quot;Don&#039;t take your guns to town&quot; - I led over with a couple small cams and dropped a trailed line there. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=79346</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>There Goes The Neighborhood (5.11c)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=80589</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Disappearer (5.11c)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - crux busted me up</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=43328</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Funkadelic (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=914</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Jack in the Pulpit (5.10d)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=44046</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Jims dihedral (5.10a)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - Brilliant!</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=27361</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>King Me (5.11b)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - great line!</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=44045</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Roadside Attraction (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - VERY VERY FUN!  Wide Offwidth near top prefers hexes not cams.  If its open, GET ON IT!  only did P1, double up on 1s 2s and a 3, left the 4 on the ground</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=504</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Super Dario *** (5.11c)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=3198</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Tissue Tiger (5.12b)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - A nice short intro to the red!</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=14416</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Arrowhead (5.7)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - This was just a neat thing to climb. It appears right in front of you as you top out the trail. It would have been cooler if it were just a little taller. Nice view from the top and room for at least 3 or so persons up there. Was pleased to see that someone had put in a nice new pair of shiny rings for the anchors in addition to the older rusty gear (one part spins but is heavy duty looking)  that was up there already. I just clipped into both sets. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I&#039;d probably say it was on the lighter side of a 5.7. The start seemed to be the most difficult part (keep your second snug on belay or have a spotter if they are iffy on the beginning boulder problem). Many nice stances and several pockets for mid-size to small cams (TCUs - C4 #2). Coming around the corner of the ledge about mid-way up is probably the mental crux. The gear got a little small there on up and I was glad to have a 00 grey TCU at one point and I backed up a few of the small pieces. As someone else mentioned the rock seemed a bit gritty/sandy and maybe a little less than strong so I wasn&#039;t real keen on the prospect of testing my placements but the climbing wasn&#039;t too hard. &lt;BR&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=8125</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Wadcutter (5.9)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - felt a lot easier than when i got on it 4 years ago...</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=16265</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Bandolier (5.11a)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - It was cold.  Sent it clean the next day when it was warmer.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=3782</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Bandolier (5.11a)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=3782</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Razorback (5.6)</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - This seemed very short and pretty straightforward. A bit cruddy and dirty however. Warm-up or learner trad. We found it via the mass of colorful rap slings.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=27012</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Hippocrite (5.12a)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - 3 burns still a sally w/ 1 fall</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=25049</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Centerfire (5.11c)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - no notes</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=3783</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>crack attack (5.9)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - Awesome climb, if only it were longer</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=91237</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Loosen Up (5.10b)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - *</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=19889</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Five Finger Discount (5.8)</title>
<description>Rating: 5 - so thin and so sexy, great laybacks and fingerjams will lead to smiles</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=726</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Central Scrutinizer (5.9)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - I took a ride on a top rope someone put up and it was a fun route. I do trad too, and I agree looking at it from the ground up it looks blank. I climbed with an eye for the gear and there were indeed options for nut placements and maybe micro cams - a nice horizontal and several v-slots as you get higher up. It would probably have scared me quite a bit as I went since you probably wouldn&#039;t want to pass up or miss any placements!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It was a fun climb though, with nice crimps and smooth face climbing moves.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=506</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Brontosaurus (5.10c)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - Even though I&#039;m a pretty weak crack climber I foolishly decided to follow and clean this for someone. Kicked my butt, even though I slid a #2 C4 up ahead of me as a directional as I went and took breaks periodically. I did learn a bit about crack climbing technique the hard way. Such as: It is important to cam your right foot into the crack to take a lot of the load. Lie-backing this crack will make a hard problem even harder. The crux was annoyingly at the end just where it looks like it ought to let up. It got a lot smoother and harder to hang on. The free hanging rap station/anchors made for an interesting rappel, plus you can look up at the terrifying &quot;Welcome to Ole Kentuck&quot; while huffing and puffing and be glad you aren&#039;t on that SOB... yow.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I&#039;m glad to see it was recorded here as a 10c instead of the 10b that the Ellington guide has it listed at.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=23311</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>SYNCHRONICITY (5.11a)</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - 4 burns still no red point....</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=11100</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>