<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Rockclimbing.com</title>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/routes/rss/</link>
<description>North America/United States/Utah/Salt Lake - Utah Counties/Big Cottonwood Canyon</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(C) 2005</copyright>
<ttl>5</ttl>
<item>
<title>Alien</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - There is a new route left of the arete with 5 bolts. All but the first are in easy reach of the arete. I shouldn&#039;t really claim an onsight because I clipped the bolts.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102276</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Isogram</title>
<description>Rating: 4 - More overhanging that it looks. The face holds are tempting but slippery. The crack is 5.9 but climbing the polished face holds feels about 10a.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102275</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Thieve&#039;s Reprieve</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Some horizontal cracks that look great from the ground are too flared to take solid pro. A few options for micro nuts, micro cams, or ball nutz up high. I didn&#039;t feel good about the pro so I haven&#039;t led it.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102277</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Face the Fax</title>
<description>Rating: 3 - Good protection in horizontal cracks. Used TCU/Master Cam #3, #4 (#3 would have been better) and #1 between the bolts.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102278</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Intern&#039;s Burn</title>
<description>Rating: 2 - Be careful with the pro, many sections have flakes inside the crack that may break under the load from a cam in a fall. Large nuts and hexes work great. The best moves were near the top with a hint of exposure. Recommend seconding rather than TR for someone not solid on the grade.</description>
<link>http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/routes/review.cgi?ID=102279</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>