Forums: Climbing Information: General:
who cares about the environment?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


danegerous


Jun 10, 2005, 9:25 PM
Post #1 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2005
Posts: 141

who cares about the environment?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

first, it's a question, not a statement.

are all climbers really that environmentally friendly? just wondering whether it's the loud ones that are gun-ho about nature or is it pretty much everyone?

thanks for your time...hippies


Partner j_ung


Jun 10, 2005, 9:30 PM
Post #2 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.


Partner j_ung


Jun 10, 2005, 9:31 PM
Post #3 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.


keinangst


Jun 10, 2005, 9:40 PM
Post #4 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2003
Posts: 1408

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think that everything in nature can serve some use to man, but it's up to us how we limit the extent. There's a fine line to walk between moderate use/stewardship and total, nonrenewable rape.

To keep it in perspective, I think the couple of summers of sewage overflows that precipitated (bad pun) the 2 Glacier Point/Apron rockfalls in Yosemite have done far more damage than 50+ years of climbing.


darkside


Jun 10, 2005, 11:03 PM
Post #5 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 15, 2001
Posts: 1687

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Why climb outdoors if not for the environment? The ecology, flora, and fauna are all part of the experience. You don't have to be an eco-freak to appreciate it all and you don't have to gush about it every time but......

If you can't at least respect the environment, then just stay in the frigging gym and stop causing access problems for the climbers who know what they have.

I'm not talking about prancing around every woodland flower as if it's sacred, or being afraid to walk down a trail in case you erode it. Try to create the least impact you can and be aware of how other users see climbers and you go a long way to protecting our climbing areas.


ihategrigris


Jun 10, 2005, 11:11 PM
Post #6 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2005
Posts: 757

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Oh yeah, cause all those golfers, off roaders, power boaters, hunters, skiers, bus loads of tourists, BBQing red necks etc. are frigging wonderful for the environment. Shame on us, we should definately learn from these groups :P.

-JP


renohandjams


Jun 10, 2005, 11:48 PM
Post #7 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 24, 2005
Posts: 616

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I used to work for the forest service, it makes you love the outdoors and take care of mother nature.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-kenny
http://www.TradRack.com
Free Email Account, yourname@TradRack.com, click on the link below to see if the name you want is available:
http://www.tradrack.com/...atalog/freeemail.php


Partner j_ung


Jun 11, 2005, 12:36 AM
Post #8 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Oh yeah, cause all those golfers, off roaders, power boaters, hunters, skiers, bus loads of tourists, BBQing red necks etc. are frigging wonderful for the environment. Shame on us, we should definately learn from these groups :P.

-JP

:lol:

OK, point taken. We're not the worst.

But if you step back a moment and take a look at an area where climbers are really the only user group, the environmental damage we do is obvious. Walk along the shore of Summersville Lake, WV on a sunny Saturday in the fall and force yourself to look only at the imact we climbers have had. Trails, ladders, chalk, bolts, impacted ground, entire swaths of wall scrubbed free of lichen, a dead zone ten feet wide that runs almost the entire length of the cliff... It's astonishing and it's more the norm than an exception. There are hundreds of crags all across the US that are swarmed with climbers every sunny weekend and their effects are the same.

I'm not saying we have to be stopped, and this should not be taken as a cry for any type of action on our parts. I'm just saying that most of us do our fair share of damage, no matter how badly we want not to.

I won't speak for anyone else, but I partake because I value my experience more than the bits of habitat that I've trampled. It doesn't mean I hate nature. It just means that I'm willing to accept a certain degree of environmental damage. There are lines I won't cross, just as I suspect there are for all of us. It's up to each of us and the communities in which we climb to decide where those lines are. When we make them too liberal for land managers, they decide for us.


crshbrn84


Jun 11, 2005, 12:41 AM
Post #9 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 22, 2004
Posts: 223

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

really renohandjams, i currently work for the forest service and i chop down trees and brush. I loved the outdoors before i became a wildland firefighter, but thats just how i was raised.


reno


Jun 11, 2005, 1:16 AM
Post #10 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This question comes from the guy who posted a pic of bouldering on rocks with petroglyphs.... Oh, what sweet irony.


tlacey


Jun 11, 2005, 1:18 AM
Post #11 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 17

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
...If you can't at least respect the environment, then just stay in the frigging gym and stop causing access problems for the climbers who know what they have.

I'm not talking about prancing around every woodland flower as if it's sacred, or being afraid to walk down a trail in case you erode it. Try to create the least impact you can and be aware of how other users see climbers and you go a long way to protecting our climbing areas.

Agreed, and I like "prancing around the flowers", it's good exercise. It is a bummer to see trash left lying around, although that's not always left by just climbers, plenty of other folks who spend time outdoors leave their trash too. We pack-it-in/out and pick up stuff that's been left by others.

For the most part the places I've climbed in AZ are still pretty clean, but I also tend to go to places that are more off the beaten path. To me it just makes sense to take care of the environment because it feeds my soul and my habit. :wink:


micronut


Jun 11, 2005, 1:45 AM
Post #12 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2002
Posts: 1760

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

people can debate the impacts of cleaning cracks, trundling the base of climbs and boulders, bolts, chalk, litter.....these are minor enviormental issues, almost more a question of asthetics.

the major impact is in the buying of the new rope, the gore-tex shell and the lycra top, the stealth C4 sticky rubber, hot forged caribiners, CNC'd cam stops, poly underwear, and then driving to the rock.

so let's face it, we are all total enviorment abusers. for me, it's just a question of trying to minimize my impact through good planning and logistics.


Partner phaedrus


Jun 11, 2005, 1:57 AM
Post #13 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 3046

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I honestly don't see how one can be a climber and NOT care about the environment... which leads me to wonder why there aren't more Adopt-a-Crags being done and more climbers participating in them, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms....


wjca


Jun 11, 2005, 2:01 AM
Post #14 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Oh yeah, cause all those golfers, off roaders, power boaters, hunters, skiers, bus loads of tourists, BBQing red necks etc. are frigging wonderful for the environment. Shame on us, we should definately learn from these groups :P.

-JP

Hunters actually are a group that give back to the environment. They create habitat in places where the habitat is dwindling. They keep down populations of animals that have been concentrated due to the sprawl of human development. E.G. too large of a concentration of deer leads to starvation and inbreeding, which leads to weaker animals that are suseptible to disease.

Off Roaders, yes, very destructive.

Bus loads of tourists? Imagine all those tourist arriving one or two per car. The buses help reduce emissions.

BBQing rednecks? F-ck you, I happen to be a BBQing redneck, and am very light on the environment. I have never drilled a bolt, I take my pro with me (because that is what climbers should do), I am as light as I can be with the chalk, I pack out other peoples garbage, and I even recycle junk mail.


sbaclimber


Jun 11, 2005, 2:12 AM
Post #15 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hunters actually are a group that give back to the environment. They create habitat in places where the habitat is dwindling. They keep down populations of animals that have been concentrated due to the sprawl of human development. E.G. too large of a concentration of deer leads to starvation and inbreeding, which leads to weaker animals that are suseptible to disease.

:lol: this sounds like an attempt at a hijack (not purposely of course) :wink:

I think climbing can be bad for the environment, but tends to have various impacts depending on the local ethics/rules. Back in the Daks in NY, there were no protected plants (to my knowledge at least) growing on the cliffs. So, if you needed to clean a hold or a crack for some gear, you did it. Here in Chch, NZ, there are so many protected plants around, most places have some sort of policy that doesn't allow you clean much of anything! Thankfully I have never been anywhere where litter was a big problem (most of us climbers, if they we litter left by someone else, cleaned it up too), but trails and erosion will always be a problem no matter what.


dingus


Jun 11, 2005, 2:27 AM
Post #16 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I honestly don't see how one can be a climber and NOT care about the environment... which leads me to wonder why there aren't more Adopt-a-Crags being done and more climbers participating in them, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms....

Sounds like the same subject to me, and self-contradictory at that!

Cheers bro
DMT


sick_climba


Jun 11, 2005, 2:41 AM
Post #17 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2005
Posts: 508

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Um yeah I think we deffinatly do put our part into envriomental destruction with our hiking, and to those climbers who use chalk, but I think we generaly care about it and do what we can to ensure that it stays healthy so we can give back to the earth for the good times it gives us.


flawrence


Jun 11, 2005, 2:43 AM
Post #18 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 19

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Use, not abuse.
There is always going to be some impact, the rest of the animals using this planet impact it also, that's part of the balance.
I do most of my climbing in a National Wildlife Refuge so we play by stricter rules than a lot of places but I like it that way.


veep23


Jun 11, 2005, 3:01 AM
Post #19 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2002
Posts: 125

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"Hunters actually are a group that give back to the environment. They create habitat in places where the habitat is dwindling. They keep down populations of animals that have been concentrated due to the sprawl of human development. E.G. too large of a concentration of deer leads to starvation and inbreeding, which leads to weaker animals that are suseptible to disease."

Sorry man... but that is b.s. Hunters tend to kill the strongest males (10 point buck on the wall) of a population thus weakening the gene pool. And if hunters weren't killing the predator species, they wouldn't "need" to keep down the population of deer. Nature has a pretty good system of taking care of itself. So... while people may enjoy hunting, and thats fine, they should just admit why they like it and quit justifying themselves as "friends of the environment".


pleaseclimbveryhard


Jun 11, 2005, 5:46 AM
Post #20 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 17, 2005
Posts: 11

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Props to Veep for what he said...

It is also important to note that most sport hunters (i.e. hunters not hunting for profit) are interested in preservation of environment and ecosystems so that their prey will have a strong population for future hunting. Aldo Leopold, a prominant environmentalist in the 20th century, was a sport hunter for most of his life. That being said,

sport hunting sucks.

AHMEN


tree


Jun 11, 2005, 6:25 AM
Post #21 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 6, 2005
Posts: 15

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In a since its like there are three types of "environmental abusers". Its impossible not to have an impact on the environment, its just a matter of how much/how little and what your motives are I think.

The first is the group who genuinely loves and appreciates the esoteric values of the environment. They love being in it, using it, making a conscious effort to protect it, but still want to have some fun. I believe most rock climbers tend to fit in this category. ( Tend to = room for fluff). The second type of group I think would be the people who love the outdoors but treat it badly. People who leave crap everywhere, and are flat out disrespectful to their surroundings. They reek the benefit but don't give anything back. And then there is the third type that doesn't like the environment at all. They see its value as means of a place to dump chemical waste etc.

All three groups value the environment, but in different ways. The first values it and uses it responsibly. The second doesn't use it responsibly. The third doesn't care at all what happens.


This is just my observations, I know there there is a lot of room for debate and what not with this observation, I'm not trying to cause all that, its just kind of what Ive noticed.

Personally, I like to think I fit in the first category. Although, I find that i tend to go in the second ~ I drive when I could sometimes bike etc. But the important thing is that I realize that I value the environment and work to make the effort to protect and use it. Which is why i want to study environmental engineering woo hoo.


Oh an yes...I'm one who enjoys to frolic in the flowers....


danegerous


Jun 11, 2005, 12:15 PM
Post #22 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2005
Posts: 141

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

the question i have now is, how many of you take a gorcery bag to the store, or practice "more than average" means of environmental friendliness? i recycle, and i dont litter...anyone go a little further? andyone go crazy?


bandidopeco


Jun 11, 2005, 12:50 PM
Post #23 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2004
Posts: 257

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Personally I try to be as thoughtful as I can. I usually go climbing in a pair of cargo pants and I dedicate one big pocket for trash. I use this to carry out my own and some of what I see on the ground on the return from the crag. To me seeing a piece of litter when in nature is kind of like having a scratch on a good CD: it kind of ruins the moment.

Like most things you can't really generalize. There are some conscious climbers and some thoughtless pricks, but for the most part I think we're better then average. For example when I was going to school in Santa Barbara my friends and I went out to Red Rocks (the Santa Ynez ones) for some climbing and swimming in the river. While setting up the top-rope and climbing these ass holes were taunting us and before we left they started having fun by throwing empty beer bottles at the rocks (not at the ones we were on). I've never seen any climbers do anything like that.

Our sport places us in nature and we can be considerate if we choose to be. We will have some impact, but most climbing areas are still recognizable as nature, what other sports can you say that for? (besides surfing and rafting)

my 2 cents


bandidopeco


Jun 11, 2005, 1:00 PM
Post #24 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2004
Posts: 257

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One more thing. I'm living in Japan right now so I'm kind of a forced good recycler. I have to sort my garbage into no less then 7 categories: burnable, non-burnable and recyclable groups A, B, C, D, and E. There are 4 different types of trash bags I have to buy and they have to be from my city. Also I have to right my name on them. It's a bit of a pain in the ass but I can see the point. One bad thing is that this actually encourages littering. I go for jogs, and when I get on little-used roads their sides are littered with 10 year old abandoned TVs and cars filled with "gomi". But what can you do?


shanedms


Jun 11, 2005, 2:36 PM
Post #25 of 48 (4442 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 23, 2005
Posts: 39

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In a since its like there are three types of "environmental abusers". Its impossible not to have an impact on the environment, its just a matter of how much/how little and what your motives are I think.

The first is the group who genuinely loves and appreciates the esoteric values of the environment. They love being in it, using it, making a conscious effort to protect it, but still want to have some fun. I believe most rock climbers tend to fit in this category. ( Tend to = room for fluff). The second type of group I think would be the people who love the outdoors but treat it badly. People who leave crap everywhere, and are flat out disrespectful to their surroundings. They reek the benefit but don't give anything back. And then there is the third type that doesn't like the environment at all. They see its value as means of a place to dump chemical waste etc.

More internal classification. Just what rock climbing needs.

-shanedms


dingus


Jun 11, 2005, 3:53 PM
Post #26 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
To keep it in perspective, I think the couple of summers of sewage overflows that precipitated (bad pun) the 2 Glacier Point/Apron rockfalls in Yosemite have done far more damage than 50+ years of climbing.

To continue that perspective, Glacier Point is an exfoliation dome. That means rock falls occur there frequently, geologically speaking. I have a tough time think of that rockfall as 'environmentally damaging' regardless of its cause.

Those were certainly human damaging of course. But rockfall IS part of that environment.

Cheers
DMT


Partner bill


Jun 11, 2005, 4:27 PM
Post #27 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2004
Posts: 1061

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
This question comes from the guy who posted a pic of bouldering on rocks with petroglyphs.... Oh, what sweet irony.

He was also off trail in an area that prohibits off trail travel.


danegerous


Jun 11, 2005, 4:33 PM
Post #28 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2005
Posts: 141

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
This question comes from the guy who posted a pic of bouldering on rocks with petroglyphs.... Oh, what sweet irony.

He was also off trail in an area that prohibits off trail travel.

don't forget i've peed in the woods and two days ago i shot a ground squirrel because he looked at me funny.


tree


Jun 14, 2005, 7:34 PM
Post #29 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 6, 2005
Posts: 15

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

More internal classification. Just what rock climbing needs.

-shanedms


It wasn't specific to rock climbers, but to everybody :P . and it was very general, many people can infact at some points in thier life fit in to all the areas mentioned. just a general observation.


shiggetyshiva


Jun 14, 2005, 8:08 PM
Post #30 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 18, 2005
Posts: 174

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I care, and do my best to recycle and pack out other folks' trash. I think it's sad when climbers, hikers, or anyone who ventures outdoors can't be bothered to take with them the twinkie wrappers, soda bottles, etc. that they brought with them. :(

I am curious about the impact climbers have over time on crags and boulders, and decided to do some research to see what the scientific community thinks.

Here is an example of what I found (below). There were other articles with similar findings, perhaps not surprisingly. Although I'm just as carefree as anyone else of scraping dirt, etc. out of a good hold (which could potentially serve as a living area for small organisms), I think it's important to be mindful of the long-term impact we all may have.



McMillan, M. A., & Larson, D. W. (2002). Effects of Rock Climbing on the Vegetation of the Niagara Escarpment in Southern Ontario, Canada. Conservation Biology, 16.

ABSTRACT: The cliffs of the Niagara Escarpment support unique and diverse plant communities. Although recreational rock climbing has become extremely popular in North America over the past two decades, little is known about the effect of this sport on the natural biota. We examined the ecological effects of rock climbing on vascular plant, bryophyte, and lichen communities along the Niagara Escarpment in southern Ontario. We made comparisons among randomly selected climbed and unclimbed rock outcrops by sampling from three positions: plateau (or cliff edge), cliff face, and talus (or cliff base). Density, percent cover, species richness, and species diversity of vascular plants were lower on climbed outcrops than on unclimbed outcrops. In addition, the proportion of alien plants was three times greater in climbed areas than in unclimbed areas. The frequency and richness of bryophyte species were also significantly lower in climbed areas. The frequency of lichens was the same on climbed and unclimbed cliffs, but species richness was significantly lower in climbed areas, and community composition differed between climbed and unclimbed areas. Our results suggest that rock climbing has significant negative effects on all aspects of the vegetative community on cliffs. Therefore, we recommend that conservation plans be modified to include specific policies regarding recreational rock climbing for lands containing exposed cliffs. For example, we suggest that the establishment of new climbing routes be banned in protected areas along the Niagara Escarpment.


fiend


Jun 14, 2005, 8:13 PM
Post #31 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Save the Lichens!


Partner drector


Jun 14, 2005, 9:08 PM
Post #32 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I care about the environment but I'm not an activist.

I think that the environment is most often NOT hurt in any PERMENANT way by climbers, boaters, hunters, rednecks with BBQs, etc... .

What people do for sport and fun is small compared to what our cars, mines, nuclear power, etc... do.

Then there is the next ice age that will do even more damage than we could imagine compared to our flattening out the vegatation at our favorite boulder or drilling a few bolt holes.

But I care so I try not to litter, drill holes in rocks, or flatten out vegatation because destruction of any small amount is dumb when it can be avoided.

Dave


darkside


Jun 14, 2005, 10:56 PM
Post #33 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 15, 2001
Posts: 1687

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

I am curious about the impact climbers have over time on crags and boulders, and decided to do some research to see what the scientific community thinks.

Here is an example of what I found (below). There were other articles with similar findings, perhaps not surprisingly.


McMillan, M. A., & Larson, D. W. (2002). Effects of Rock Climbing on the Vegetation of the Niagara Escarpment in Southern Ontario, Canada. Conservation Biology, 16.


While climbers undoubtedly have an impact, so does pretty much any user group and every individual. Should you never venture off the highway or city streets, even if you were to take a bus rather than operate a car, you still have an impact on the environment. It may be less directly but just how do you think they produce the power that your computer is using right now, where did the hydro-carbons come from that were used to make your computer parts? Get my drift?

As for the above study, had you done further research, you would have found new research from the same university that shows a different side of the research. Based on limitations with the older study, a new study was conducted. One of the premises for the new study was that while climbed cliffs were shown to have lower vegetation, the older study did not seek to explain why this was the case. The new study looks at climbs and microsite characteristics that may explain the discrepencies.

Note the sentences I highlighted within the text. I have the full article for anyone wishing to read more or Alpine Club of Canada members can read the last Gazette.

Kathryn Kuntz, M.Sc. "Grant winner offers recommendations for Niagara Escarpment". ACC Gazette Vol.20, No.1 Winter 2005

(Excerpt as submitted)
New Research
With the aid of funding from the Alpine Club of Canada, I was able to examine the relative influence of pre-existing microhabitat conditions vs. direct rock climbing disturbance to the cliff face vegetation communities of the Niagara Escarpment. To remedy prior experimental design problems, I sampled climbed and unclimbed cliff faces in the Milton, Beaver Valley and Bruce Peninsula regions. Climbing routes sampled were 5.10 to 5.14 in difficulty. Over 150 plots across twenty cliff faces were sampled quantitatively for vascular plant, moss and lichen species richness, cover and community structure, as well as for microtopographic feature size and frequency, and measures influencing microclimate.
Results revealed that certain microhabitat conditions are related to increases in the richness and cover of cliff face vegetation, and that rock climbers select for different microhabitat conditions when establishing climbing routes. No decreases in vascular plant, moss or lichen species richness or cover on climbed cliff faces were attributable to direct climbing disturbance. As well, pre-existing microhabitat conditions explained larger proportions of variation in vegetation community structure between unclimbed and climbed cliff faces than climbing disturbance. Unfortunately, impacts of climbers are not restricted to the cliff face. Climbers must access cliff faces from either the plateau above or the talus below. Previous research has found more severe trampling impacts in both the talus and on the plateau on climbed cliffs, when compared with unclimbed cliffs4 and 6 - 8 x more signs of physical damage to eastern white cedars growing on climbed cliffs when compared with unclimbed cliffs5. Management recommendations regarding climbing must therefore address potential impacts to the cliff face, plateau and talus vegetation communities.

There are more aspects to the new report both good and bad but the gist is that while climbers do have an impact, it is not solely climbers that are the reason for less vegetation on climbed cliffs. We also choose routes with less vegetation on them. While that is hardly news to climbers, there is now a study that demonstrates this fact and that is favourable news for access if we keep in mind the other aspects of the report.


shiggetyshiva


Jun 15, 2005, 3:04 PM
Post #34 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 18, 2005
Posts: 174

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i agree that climbers probably don't impact nature more than any other recreational user group (in fact, probably less than many user groups, e.g. ATV riders). however, if only sampling climbing routes rated 5.10 to 5.14 doesn't constitute some kind of sampling error/bias, i don't know what does.

in any case, it's obviously important for the climbing community to police itself in terms of taking care of the areas we love to frequent.


icyfrosty


Jun 15, 2005, 3:21 PM
Post #35 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 21, 2004
Posts: 31

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's the only Planet we got... for now :) So I think it would probably be a good idea to keep it in a livable fashion, because once you cross that line well... we are all kinda screwed :s

Keep climbing without Trashing.


tallnik


Jun 16, 2005, 12:46 PM
Post #36 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 18, 2004
Posts: 595

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Danegerous...

I was all stoked for you and your fledgling company, and was eagerly awaiting the day I could order some stuff and help your business grow. But, you come off as quite an ass in this topic...

Environmentally irresponsible companies I generally try to avoid.
If your actual opinion on the environment differs from the way it is portrayed here, then why not respond?

And I think it's lame that you ask us to post our opinion and don't post your own position.
I climb partly because of my love for nature draws me to the outdoors. There I have an impact, granted, but I try to minimize in it as many ways possible, without giving up climbing. For me, this extends merely beyond picking up trash at the crag, etc, but into all aspects of my life. As an environment student I constantly see the evidence which is accumulating against us for the way we live, and it is very shocking and sobering. Simply put, we can get away with living however we want, but only for so long. I know the difference I as one person make is pretty minimal on the grand scale, but if I do it because to live any other way would be false for me.


Nik


pinnaclechick


Jun 16, 2005, 1:22 PM
Post #37 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 7, 2002
Posts: 1890

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Save the Lichens!

And the cryptobiotic soil


azrockclimber


Jun 16, 2005, 2:10 PM
Post #38 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 666

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.

this is stupid...

--not me and the people that I climb with. You probably are a selfish bastard but trying your "best" to limit impact sounds a little weak. It sounds like you don't really try your best or you'd have a little more to say about it...so why don't you try being a little more honest.
--If I am heading to a crag and a faster way would be for me to stomp through delicate plants/ cryptobiotic soils... and the like I stick to the trail. I cart out my shit whenever possible( often). I NEVER leave trash or tape etc...I pick up others trash( hikers/ campers/ and sometimes climbers)
--However, I drive a big gas guzzling SUV to the crag / climbing location...so I loose on that one.
--when it comes to me in the "woods"/ "wilderness" I do everything possible, that I know of, to limit my impact on the area. and yes it is important to me and it really pisses me off when I see other climbers being irresponsible. Most of the time I see people being pretty damn good about it.


tradgal


Jun 16, 2005, 3:08 PM
Post #39 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2005
Posts: 384

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Back to the question "Who cares about the environment?" Good question..hard answer. While we all care about the environment in some way, be it recycling, picking up trash, minimizing impact by staying on trails, hunting for population control (WTF!), we are all guilty of abusing the environment. Just being alive, we abuse the environment. It is a part of living. Until we all move to a commune, grow our own fruits and vegetables, raise livestock, share responsibilities, separate our trash even into scraps, donate that car to the needy, quit using hair products, deodorant or even certain soaps, until we stop using pesticides and stop being selfish in general...then we are all guilty of not caring about the environment fully. I am a selfish bitch/bastard just like J-ung, just like most i would imagine. I am not ready to do that, but willing to find my own happy medium.
On a side notet the whole hunting issue, it being about controlling population is BS! Yes, I understand that hunting does control species from breeding out of control. No question it effects ecosystems greatly and in a good way. But-poaching is hunting something illegally, and sport hunting--well it's a sport! Just like climbing, it is a form of recreation. And, do you think hunters try to stay on marked trails or do they trample vegetation? DO you think they pick up their empty shells all the time. Hell, I have seen a dead carcus lying at the base of a cliff, obviously decomposed, but still with an arrow through an undistinguishable part of its body. What happenned to LNT when you see the remains of a successful hunt? Can you honestly say hunters go out with their full-on riot gear to protect the environment or do they go out as SPORTSmen and women? I think the latter.


dingus


Jun 16, 2005, 3:14 PM
Post #40 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Just being alive, we abuse the environment.

I don't buy this notion, nor do I accept it.

I accept that many of us indulge in destructive technologies and behaviors, yes. But I do not accept the radical notion that merely through breathing, eating, drinking and fornicating (4 of my favorite things!) I am abusing the environment.

Clkimbing? Mildly abusve I guess, nothing much to get in a tizz about. The rubber manfuacture process for our shoes is probably worse than just about anything we do, including driving to the crag. They can't even make that stuff in the U.S., our enviro laws are too strict!

Cheers
DMT


tradgal


Jun 16, 2005, 3:32 PM
Post #41 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 11, 2005
Posts: 384

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"I accept that many of us indulge in destructive technologies and behaviors, yes. But I do not accept the radical notion that merely through breathing, eating, drinking and fornicating (4 of my favorite things!) I am abusing the environment. "

I didn't say existing, I said living. Living...where do you breathe at night? In your home made entirely of recycled woods and materials and powered by the sun? Do you have a compost pile in your backyard for the scraps of food you don't eat? Do you recycle every bottle and can you drink out of? Do you make sure restaurants do the same? Is that condom you fornicate with or birth control method you use entirely natural, not tested on animals, made from all natural elements?

The acts of eating, breathing, drinking and fornicating are some of my favorite things as well. Mankind needs those things to exist, to sustain. But, as part of living, we dont do this is the best way possible. As part of enjoying the time we spend on Earth, we use forms of recreation and comfort. Not necessary to survive, but being a selfish creature, I need and want those things to live!


sick_climba


Jun 16, 2005, 4:44 PM
Post #42 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2005
Posts: 508

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
"I accept that many of us indulge in destructive technologies and behaviors, yes. But I do not accept the radical notion that merely through breathing, eating, drinking and fornicating (4 of my favorite things!) I am abusing the environment. "

I didn't say existing, I said living. Living...where do you breathe at night? In your home made entirely of recycled woods and materials and powered by the sun? Do you have a compost pile in your backyard for the scraps of food you don't eat? Do you recycle every bottle and can you drink out of? Do you make sure restaurants do the same? Is that condom you fornicate with or birth control method you use entirely natural, not tested on animals, made from all natural elements?

The acts of eating, breathing, drinking and fornicating are some of my favorite things as well. Mankind needs those things to exist, to sustain. But, as part of living, we dont do this is the best way possible. As part of enjoying the time we spend on Earth, we use forms of recreation and comfort. Not necessary to survive, but being a selfish creature, I need and want those things to live!
No we don't handle those things the way we should. And why? becuase man kind has driven its self insane with inssecent need to succeed! Most of us will never be happy with what we have. Always wanting the bigger and the better. A small child once moved from a tiny two bedroom house with his 3 brothers and his single mom in to a much larger house. they could all have their own rooms. The little boy, the youngest, said to his mother. "Mommy, this house is to big I want to back to the old house."
His mother asked "Hunny in this house you can have your own room! Why would you want to go back?" The boy lowered his eyes to the ground and a tear began to form in his right eye, "I guess," he said, "but this house takes up the the homes of the birdies and deers and other animals." Suprising the mind of a young child. for even they understand that this is important. But unfortunatly to live in this insane world with these people who are so sane they have driven them selfs mad, we need these sorts of things. A large percentage of human kind has lost knolage of any type of ilderness survival. Most of them in their late 30s early 40s and to addapted to this enviroment to learn now. All any one can ever do is teach the children. Instead of bitching about how the present is horrible. Its to late to change the present because its allready here were screwed in that sence. But we can infact change the future in the long run if we show childeren the joys and beauty of nature while it is still here. That is the only way to save this earth in the long run. We can all do our part now, but in the end children are our future... unless we stop them now! Lol sorry yeha in the end teaching a child is the best way to go about it. My 2 cents... again. (lmao)
Climb on
Chris


Partner j_ung


Jun 16, 2005, 5:15 PM
Post #43 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.

this is stupid....

Stupid? :?

In reply to:
--not me and the people that I climb with. You probably are a selfish bastard but trying your "best" to limit impact sounds a little weak. It sounds like you don't really try your best or you'd have a little more to say about it...so why don't you try being a little more honest.
--If I am heading to a crag and a faster way would be for me to stomp through delicate plants/ cryptobiotic soils... and the like I stick to the trail. I cart out my s--- whenever possible( often). I NEVER leave trash or tape etc...I pick up others trash( hikers/ campers/ and sometimes climbers)
--However, I drive a big gas guzzling SUV to the crag / climbing location...so I loose on that one.
--when it comes to me in the "woods"/ "wilderness" I do everything possible, that I know of, to limit my impact on the area. and yes it is important to me and it really pisses me off when I see other climbers being irresponsible. Most of the time I see people being pretty damn good about it.

Soooo.. in other words, we completely agree. You listed some specific things you do limit your damage. I left specifics out.

If you need specifics, here you go. I do all the same things you do, except I don't drive an SUV. I am also active in local access groups. I dig deep holes to crap in and wipe my ass with leaves and rocks. Seriously, I can't remember the last time I buried toilet paper outside. I practice commonly accepted LNT ethics in every aspect of my outdoor experience...

...and it still doesn't erase the impact I have on the environment when I climb. I've drilled bolts, permanently damaging the stone. I clip every bolt I pass and routinely seek out sport climbs. I trample lichens if they're unfortunate enough to lay across my climbing path. I shoo bats and lizards off my holds. I trample the soil next to the cliffs every single time a I go out, and guess what, you do too.

As far as I know, the only difference between us is that I'm conscious of the damage I cause and accept it.


fiend


Jun 16, 2005, 5:15 PM
Post #44 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.

this is stupid...

--not me and the people that I climb with. You probably are a selfish bastard but trying your "best" to limit impact sounds a little weak. It sounds like you don't really try your best or you'd have a little more to say about it...so why don't you try being a little more honest.
--If I am heading to a crag and a faster way would be for me to stomp through delicate plants/ cryptobiotic soils... and the like I stick to the trail. I cart out my s--- whenever possible( often). I NEVER leave trash or tape etc...I pick up others trash( hikers/ campers/ and sometimes climbers)
--However, I drive a big gas guzzling SUV to the crag / climbing location...so I loose on that one.
--when it comes to me in the "woods"/ "wilderness" I do everything possible, that I know of, to limit my impact on the area. and yes it is important to me and it really pisses me off when I see other climbers being irresponsible. Most of the time I see people being pretty damn good about it.

I don't want to put words in his mouth but what j_ung was probably alluding to was the fact that climbing itself can be seen as an invasive activity. We pop bolts into rock, break trails to get to cliffs, trample vegetation at the base and top of cliff faces, we create parking lots or pullouts, we create visual garbage by coating areas with chalk.

If we all cared so damn much about the environment then we'd be living out in the woods like cavemen. If we were 'true environmentalists' then we wouldn't do things like climbing or mountain biking. Picking up garbage and sticking to the big trail is what I think j_ung means by limiting his impact, but he's making the observation that many would not consider this enough.

I could be wrong. For all I know j_ung is that guy that leaves his McDonald's garbage out at the crags.

edit: although j_ung replied while i was typing, I don't want to erase my post because ... uh...

POSTCOUNT++


wjca


Jun 16, 2005, 5:22 PM
Post #45 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Back to the question "Who cares about the environment?" Good question..hard answer. While we all care about the environment in some way, be it recycling, picking up trash, minimizing impact by staying on trails, hunting for population control (WTF!), we are all guilty of abusing the environment. Just being alive, we abuse the environment. It is a part of living. Until we all move to a commune, grow our own fruits and vegetables, raise livestock, share responsibilities, separate our trash even into scraps, donate that car to the needy, quit using hair products, deodorant or even certain soaps, until we stop using pesticides and stop being selfish in general...then we are all guilty of not caring about the environment fully. I am a selfish b----/bastard just like J-ung, just like most i would imagine. I am not ready to do that, but willing to find my own happy medium.
On a side notet the whole hunting issue, it being about controlling population is BS! Yes, I understand that hunting does control species from breeding out of control. No question it effects ecosystems greatly and in a good way. But-poaching is hunting something illegally, and sport hunting--well it's a sport! Just like climbing, it is a form of recreation. And, do you think hunters try to stay on marked trails or do they trample vegetation? DO you think they pick up their empty shells all the time. Hell, I have seen a dead carcus lying at the base of a cliff, obviously decomposed, but still with an arrow through an undistinguishable part of its body. What happenned to LNT when you see the remains of a successful hunt? Can you honestly say hunters go out with their full-on riot gear to protect the environment or do they go out as SPORTSmen and women? I think the latter.


Way to stereotype hunters. They are not all like this. Just like not every rock climber is roaming virgin rock with a gas-powered hammer drill and a bag full of bolts just looking for the next 5.7 crack to put up.


And for azrockclimber, the only time J_ung is a selfish bastard is when the lights go out. Or so I've heard.


azrockclimber


Jun 16, 2005, 5:42 PM
Post #46 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 666

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
I think we're one of the most environmentally damaging user groups out there.

Personally, I think I'm a selfish bastard who routinely puts my own fun interest ahead of environmental matters. I try my best to limit my impact, but not at the expense of where and how I want to climb.

That's about as honest as I can be.

this is stupid....

Stupid? :?

In reply to:
--not me and the people that I climb with. You probably are a selfish bastard but trying your "best" to limit impact sounds a little weak. It sounds like you don't really try your best or you'd have a little more to say about it...so why don't you try being a little more honest.
--If I am heading to a crag and a faster way would be for me to stomp through delicate plants/ cryptobiotic soils... and the like I stick to the trail. I cart out my s--- whenever possible( often). I NEVER leave trash or tape etc...I pick up others trash( hikers/ campers/ and sometimes climbers)
--However, I drive a big gas guzzling SUV to the crag / climbing location...so I loose on that one.
--when it comes to me in the "woods"/ "wilderness" I do everything possible, that I know of, to limit my impact on the area. and yes it is important to me and it really pisses me off when I see other climbers being irresponsible. Most of the time I see people being pretty damn good about it.

Soooo.. in other words, we completely agree. You listed some specific things you do limit your damage. I left specifics out.

If you need specifics, here you go. I do all the same things you do, except I don't drive an SUV. I am also active in local access groups. I dig deep holes to crap in and wipe my ass with leaves and rocks. Seriously, I can't remember the last time I buried toilet paper outside. I practice commonly accepted LNT ethics in every aspect of my outdoor experience...

...and it still doesn't erase the impact I have on the environment when I climb. I've drilled bolts, permanently damaging the stone. I clip every bolt I pass and routinely seek out sport climbs. I trample lichens if they're unfortunate enough to lay across my climbing path. I shoo bats and lizards off my holds. I trample the soil next to the cliffs every single time a I go out, and guess what, you do too.

As far as I know, the only difference between us is that I'm conscious of the damage I cause and accept it.

I don't think I shoo too much of anything...but whatever...basically I think your original post was lacking then...if you do everything that I do then you are being very environmentally conscious and are causing very little damage.....

so Is drilling bolts damaging the environment...I would have always said yes but does it infact DAMAGE the environment. give me some insight here? aethetics definitely, but I'm not sure if it is damaging. Tell me why it is harmful to the environment DIRECTLY.


fiend


Jun 17, 2005, 6:03 AM
Post #47 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 25, 2001
Posts: 3669

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Um, think about it this way... I'm going to put a 10mm expansion bolt into your forehead. Do you think this would 'damage' you in anyway?

Sure it's minor when done to the rock, but there are those who say it's ruining an aesthetic blank face or the refelection from the hanger is keeping a certain species of bird from nesting near the cliff, which in turn is causing an increase in a certain bug that is eaten by the bird, which in turn causes the trees to all be eaten, which in turn .... yadda yadda.

Introduce a new element into a given ecosystem and you change it. Obviously there are varying degrees of change, and I think everyone here would agree that bolting is a negligible damage, but it is a damage nonetheless.

Seems simple to me. Anyone with half a brain acknowledges that they're going to have an impact on any given area and should attempt to keep said impact at a moderate level.

Should I not hike through the woods because I'd kill some plant life, bugs and macrosoilthingies?

Should I instead hike anywhere I choose and have my friends join me so that we can dig up multiple trails crisscrossing everything, not forgetting to keep them wide enough that we can get our ATVs in there?

Or should we hike in a responsible manner, trying to keep our trail use and impact to a moderate level?

If you need someone to tell you which is the 'right' answer then you're probably in trouble.


hosebeats


Jun 17, 2005, 10:01 AM
Post #48 of 48 (4252 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 4, 2003
Posts: 83

Re: who cares about the environment? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Any popular area, regardless of who uses it for what, is going to get thrashed. The bosque that runs along the Rio Grande looks totally different in Albuquerque than the one in Taos or even Coralles.

Summersville Lake in WV is a good example. We as climbers trash and tromp that area frequently. Then again with out the popularity of the NRG and Summersville that entire area would suffer economically. I'm not saying that this is a fair trade off, but its true. I'm sure quite a few businesses, like the Cathedral cafe or even Biscuit World, don't mind a 10ft dead zone near the cliff base.

Places like the NRG and Summersville suffer from easy accessibility from the parking lot. If it isn't us hiking around, putting in ladders, and bolts some other user group would be the dominate damagers. It's unfortunate but that's what happens when every one goes and climbs the same 12 climbs at Orange Oswald.

I would much rather see that 10ft. dead zone and well packed trail than allow dirt bikes and quads in. What we see in Summersville is minor compared to areas like Ocatillo Wells in SoCal. Off roaders wet dream come true, Ocatillo sits in the Mojave (I think its the Mojave) and is just thrashed every weekend by every swingin dick with a dirt bike. It's fun to hop on a quad and just blast through the desert. The damage to the area is pretty apparent though. As long as it is kept within that area only that small percentage is going to get beat up.

Crags make up a small, small percentage of the back country area. We might damage the surrounding area by camping and hiking but not much more than the average backpacker. Hell, most cliffs aren't worth even climbing. They are chossy crap piles that no one has any business climbing. We climb a very small amount of whats out there. If we fuck up half of what we do climb as bad as Summersville our impact will still be marginal compared to equestrians, hikers, ATV'ers, boaters, and everyone else. Look at Yosemite, tons of climbers go through there all the time. Still, we represent a fraction of the annual visitors. Sure, there are a lot of chalk marks and other damage done by us but it's almost insignificant compared to the masses that trample the hell out of that valley.

If you really want to avoid people and feel that you are in a pristine area that hasn't been screwed over by man there are a ton of places to climb. You can't avoid pissing some one off, just like you can't avoid fucking up the outdoors when you go appreciate them. No matter how hard you try something is going to happen.

All that being said, I try very hard to limit the damage I do but I also accept that the area won't be the same. Wow, that's a long rambling post. Perhaps I'll edit it when I'm not so tired. Not even sure what point I was trying to make in the first place. Definlty time for bed.


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook