|
caleb_danner
Mar 19, 2009, 4:21 AM
Post #1 of 77
(8422 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2007
Posts: 226
|
I'm curious if their are any using only passive gear Mo cow bell approach to climbing
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Mar 19, 2009, 12:28 PM
Post #2 of 77
(8366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
The subject of this thread pains me.
|
|
|
|
|
grampacharlie
Mar 19, 2009, 12:33 PM
Post #3 of 77
(8362 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 388
|
Henry Barber still uses only passive pro. The guy is a legend who has put up notable first ascents and first free ascents all over the world. He still climbs and can be found around NH fom time to time. He's the most high profile climber I can think of, though there are some regions where that is the style. Eastern Europe is know for bold styles and in the Check republic I beleive, they use only soft pro, meanin no metal touches the rock. (wedged knots, slung horns, ect.) I like going sans cams from time to time on stuff below my onsight limit for shits and giggles. It really helps make for efficient gear placements in the long run. Make sure that the first placement is multi-directional. Very important, or you could zipper everything out on a fall. (look in How to Rock Climb, by John Long for a good illustration on zippering)
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Mar 19, 2009, 1:05 PM
Post #4 of 77
(8325 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
I only climb on a rack of doubles of every tri cam size with triples in pink and red.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Mar 19, 2009, 1:38 PM
Post #5 of 77
(8292 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Hexes aren't always passive.
|
|
|
|
|
hansundfritz
Mar 19, 2009, 1:46 PM
Post #6 of 77
(8283 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 139
|
Until a few years ago, I can say that I was virtually cam-free. I had a few older cams on my rack, but didn't place them very often. My climbing is mostly at the Gunks, so my old rigid-stem Friends were not as good there in the horizontals as Tri-Cams and even hexes. Even with the famed gunks tie-off, they never looked or felt right to me. I really like the Tri-cams there b/c they're multi-directional and don't walk -- especially for that first critical piece off the ledge, the Jesus Nut. I have recently begun using a few TCUs and Camalots -- but honestly still reach for the stoppers, saddle wedges (yikes, what are those?), and Tri-Cams more often. Not sure if your thread was intended to be serious, but there you have it from this old-timer.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Mar 19, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #7 of 77
(8252 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics!
|
|
|
|
|
Tipton
Mar 19, 2009, 2:30 PM
Post #8 of 77
(8233 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 12, 2007
Posts: 272
|
I did all passive until just recently when I picked up a bunch of cams with my tax money. I enjoyed it and could climb pretty much whatever I wanted. I think I will continue to do the passive thing from time to time, I was just ready to start climbing harder trad and felt like picking up some cams would help speed my ascents on more difficult climbs. I also needed to expand my rack for multipitch climbing and with the cams and all my passive gear I should be completely covered.
|
|
|
|
|
andrewG
Mar 19, 2009, 3:01 PM
Post #9 of 77
(8198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2008
Posts: 102
|
sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros?
|
|
|
|
|
reno
Mar 19, 2009, 3:03 PM
Post #10 of 77
(8196 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283
|
granite_grrl wrote: The spelling of the subject line of this thread pains me. Yep.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Mar 19, 2009, 3:13 PM
Post #11 of 77
(8190 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
I climbed with a single set of nuts and hexes (BD) and a single .75 BD camalot for my first year of climbing. I learned a lot....but a 5.8 is much more daring with only one cam in your arsenal.
|
|
|
|
|
GeneralZon
Mar 19, 2009, 3:14 PM
Post #12 of 77
(8187 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2008
Posts: 273
|
reno wrote: granite_grrl wrote: The spelling of the subject line of this thread pains me. Yep. yea...
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Mar 19, 2009, 3:15 PM
Post #13 of 77
(8184 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
andrewG wrote: sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros? What about sliding nuts?
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Mar 19, 2009, 4:03 PM
Post #16 of 77
(8155 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
caleb_danner wrote: granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. I know i spell Did t2stone reproduce again~~?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Mar 19, 2009, 4:14 PM
Post #17 of 77
(8135 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Lazlo wrote: andrewG wrote: sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros? What about sliding nuts? I consider anything that relies on twisting, camming, or other movements to stay in positions. To me this includes cammed hexes, ball nutz, cammed tricams, cam hooks (leepers), copperheads and big bros. Passive includes threads, nuts, wedged hexes, pins, hooks, wedged tricams, wedged knots, chockstones, and cams with stops that are placed fully open (when you already used the right sized nut or whatever). But of course that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Mar 19, 2009, 4:23 PM
Post #18 of 77
(8122 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
dr_feelgood wrote: acorneau wrote: I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics! Sweat will go easily if you have big tri-cams. Yeah, I have a full set, but will probably leave them at home and take the nuts and hexes instead. We were on Sweat a couple weeks ago and I didn't think about the all-passive send. Probably will be on other stuff this weekend anyway. Perhaps something in the Triple Cracks area....
|
|
|
|
|
andrewG
Mar 19, 2009, 5:44 PM
Post #19 of 77
(8075 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2008
Posts: 102
|
I'd have to say sliding nuts are out. And anything without a spring is passive, even if when place correctly it has a camming action. Still torn on the big bro though, protects passively but is active to place (sort of). Maybe it should be based on the amount of fiddling to place, in which case big bros would be passive for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Mar 19, 2009, 6:12 PM
Post #20 of 77
(8053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
okay, I just thought of a better way to describe it. Active gear actively creates friction (which holds it in place) when pulled on. Passive relies on the rock being in the way of it's movement.
|
|
|
|
|
pornstarr
Mar 19, 2009, 6:22 PM
Post #21 of 77
(8037 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 824
|
all gear creates friction when pulled on, passive or not.
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Mar 19, 2009, 6:24 PM
Post #22 of 77
(8031 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
sungam wrote: okay, I just thought of a better way to describe it. Active gear actively creates friction (which holds it in place) when pulled on. Passive relies on the rock being in the way of it's movement. That's a ridiculous definition and many spring loaded camming device placements would actually fit in there. There are pod shaped placements that hold a cam without relying on the springs and camming angle friction. Cammed hexes, tricams and big bros rely on a feature of the rock to provide a pivot that holds them in place. I would say that only ballnuts and SLCDs are active. Gear that relies on springs and movement within the device to engage the rock. On easy climbs my friends and I often play gear games. Tricam only ascents. Nut only ascents. Some climbs take passive gear best and it doesn't even need to be contrived. I wouldn't make a day of it though.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Mar 19, 2009, 6:39 PM
Post #23 of 77
(8013 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
hafilax wrote: sungam wrote: okay, I just thought of a better way to describe it. Active gear actively creates friction (which holds it in place) when pulled on. Passive relies on the rock being in the way of it's movement. That's a ridiculous definition and many spring loaded camming device placements would actually fit in there. There are pod shaped placements that hold a cam without relying on the springs and camming angle friction. Cammed hexes, tricams and big bros rely on a feature of the rock to provide a pivot that holds them in place. See what I said about tricams and cams placed passively. As far as hexes and tricams needing a feature... they really don't. I honestly can't say with big bros, never having used one or even held one in my hands. Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? As would threads. Pins are friction based too, I guess, but I still wouldn't call them active.
|
|
|
|
|
joeforte
Mar 19, 2009, 6:39 PM
Post #24 of 77
(8013 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093
|
Sometimes I climb things with just my 5 WC hexes. Makes me all fuzzy inside. I remember climbing a 90 foot crack that went from fingers to fists, and I placed all five hexes, in exact order, smallest to biggest.
|
|
|
|
|
patmay81
Mar 19, 2009, 6:40 PM
Post #25 of 77
(8012 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081
|
sungam wrote: okay, I just thought of a better way to describe it. Active gear actively creates friction (which holds it in place) when pulled on. Passive relies on the rock being in the way of it's movement. technically the rock IS in the way of the cam lobes, but I wont be a smart ass. I got your point. to the OP, I climb exclusively on active pro. nuts and hexes suck! nah, I'm just kidding. I do love finding bomber natural placements (slung chocks and horns, threaded features) and nothing feels as secure as a bomber #11 BD nut placement. But I also really like the ease of placement of cams and don't think I would ever care to try an "all passive" climb any time soon.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Mar 20, 2009, 3:43 PM
Post #26 of 77
(3181 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
acorneau wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: acorneau wrote: I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics! Sweat will go easily if you have big tri-cams. Yeah, I have a full set, but will probably leave them at home and take the nuts and hexes instead. We were on Sweat a couple weeks ago and I didn't think about the all-passive send. Probably will be on other stuff this weekend anyway. Perhaps something in the Triple Cracks area.... Becky's? Owl Crack would certainly be the easiest since it's the smallest.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Mar 23, 2009, 2:25 AM
Post #27 of 77
(3105 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Well, I didn't get my all-passive climb in this weekend. Maybe when we go to the Wichita's.....
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Mar 23, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #28 of 77
(3071 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
There's a particular climb that I love and climb often. Back before I had cams, I'd always place a large hex in the one trad pro option...now-a-days I automatically take a #2 Camalot with me instead. The hex is bomber enough....but I always take the cam. Why, i wonder? Easier to place, I guess....or remove rather. Cams are just sexy. Bottom line.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 23, 2009, 2:51 PM
Post #29 of 77
(3064 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
dr_feelgood wrote: acorneau wrote: I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics! Sweat will go easily if you have big tri-cams. meh. Sweat goes easily as a v0- boulder problem.
|
|
|
|
|
apeman_e
Mar 23, 2009, 3:53 PM
Post #30 of 77
(3048 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2008
Posts: 212
|
The amish protect their climbs with ONLY passive gear. Active gear is the work of the devil, though some amish youth experiment with cams as teenagers.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Mar 23, 2009, 3:57 PM
Post #31 of 77
(3046 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
apeman_e wrote: The amish protect their climbs with ONLY passive gear. Active gear is the work of the devil, though some amish youth experiment with cams as teenagers. One thing is for certain... Amish climbers NEVER zipper their pro. NEVER! DMT
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Mar 23, 2009, 5:27 PM
Post #32 of 77
(3021 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
dingus wrote: apeman_e wrote: The amish protect their climbs with ONLY passive gear. Active gear is the work of the devil, though some amish youth experiment with cams as teenagers. One thing is for certain... Amish climbers NEVER zipper their pro. NEVER! DMT Ummm. Am I missing out on some inside joke?
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 23, 2009, 5:33 PM
Post #33 of 77
(3016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
Lazlo wrote: dingus wrote: apeman_e wrote: The amish protect their climbs with ONLY passive gear. Active gear is the work of the devil, though some amish youth experiment with cams as teenagers. One thing is for certain... Amish climbers NEVER zipper their pro. NEVER! DMT Ummm. Am I missing out on some inside joke? yes. Amish do not use zippers. It was funny. hehehe.
|
|
|
|
|
northfacejmb
Mar 23, 2009, 5:33 PM
Post #34 of 77
(3016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2006
Posts: 234
|
Yeah, yet as my first trad lead I placed 14 pieces of pro on that short climb... What a noob I was then..
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Mar 23, 2009, 5:39 PM
Post #35 of 77
(3012 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
camhead wrote: Lazlo wrote: dingus wrote: apeman_e wrote: The amish protect their climbs with ONLY passive gear. Active gear is the work of the devil, though some amish youth experiment with cams as teenagers. One thing is for certain... Amish climbers NEVER zipper their pro. NEVER! DMT Ummm. Am I missing out on some inside joke? yes. Amish do not use zippers. It was funny. hehehe. Ah. Gotcha. I over thought it.
|
|
|
|
|
diebetes
Mar 23, 2009, 5:59 PM
Post #36 of 77
(3001 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 18, 2007
Posts: 106
|
grampacharlie wrote: Make sure that the first placement is multi-directional. Very important, or you could zipper everything out on a fall. (look in How to Rock Climb, by John Long for a good illustration on zippering) ...Making sure your first piece is multi-directional is not a guarantee that zippering will not occur. Think of the line that the rope will take once weighted- on wandery routes, all the gear in the middle could zipper, leaving the first and the last pieces. Be careful.
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Mar 23, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #37 of 77
(2966 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
camhead wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: acorneau wrote: I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics! Sweat will go easily if you have big tri-cams. meh. Sweat goes easily as a v0- boulder problem. This is true. However, when the gloriously epic summit of enchanted rock is only 20 higher, it is almost a waste to not practice gear placements. You are speaking to a guy who managed to do the 10 pitch traverse of the main dome out of sheer boredom.
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Mar 23, 2009, 9:48 PM
Post #38 of 77
(2954 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
sungam wrote: Lazlo wrote: andrewG wrote: sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros? What about sliding nuts? I consider anything that relies on twisting, camming, or other movements to stay in positions. To me this includes cammed hexes, ball nutz, cammed tricams, cam hooks (leepers), copperheads and big bros. Passive includes threads, nuts, wedged hexes, pins, hooks, wedged tricams, wedged knots, chockstones, and cams with stops that are placed fully open (when you already used the right sized nut or whatever). But of course that's just me. Fuckin' kids these days. I tell 'ya. Any gear that is not spring loaded is "passive" even if it relies on camming action. Duh... Curt
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Mar 23, 2009, 9:52 PM
Post #39 of 77
(2950 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
acorneau wrote: Well, I didn't get my all-passive climb in this weekend. Maybe when we go to the Wichita's..... I both routes I lead yesterday were all on passive pro. The first was on purpose, the second I didn't realize I had forgot my sling of cams until I was halfway up the route. It can be good to climb on only passive gear sometimes. It will improve your climbing if you normally reach for cams first.
|
|
|
|
|
rogue10186
Mar 24, 2009, 3:36 AM
Post #40 of 77
(2926 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2005
Posts: 937
|
That bad huh? How is the traverse, I've thought about doing it next time I'm out that way for shitz and giggles.
|
|
|
|
|
slavetogravity
Mar 24, 2009, 5:10 AM
Post #41 of 77
(2912 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2003
Posts: 1114
|
Climbed with this cat in Australia back in 03. Not only would this guy ONLY climb with a rack of passive gear, he also refused to use chalk and refused to ware climbing shoes. He would lead 5.11 face and crack with ease. Crazy but true.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Mar 24, 2009, 6:37 AM
Post #42 of 77
(2910 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. I feel your pain. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Mar 25, 2009, 4:45 AM
Post #44 of 77
(2827 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
dr_feelgood wrote: camhead wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: acorneau wrote: I'm going to try to get in a passive-only climb this weekend. Back to the basics! Sweat will go easily if you have big tri-cams. meh. Sweat goes easily as a v0- boulder problem. This is true. However, when the gloriously epic summit of enchanted rock is only 20 higher, it is almost a waste to not practice gear placements. You are speaking to a guy who managed to do the 10 pitch traverse of the main dome out of sheer boredom. He also happens to be a guy who can't make it up a route "boy scouts" climb and not break his leg. .......sorry Doc... I had too.. here, have a beer... it's not PBR, but it is the Tank House Ale I've ben drinking for the past several hours... pretty good shit if I say so myself.
|
|
|
|
|
i_h8_choss
Mar 25, 2009, 5:46 AM
Post #45 of 77
(2819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 2, 2007
Posts: 694
|
this post, along with the footage in the sharp end plus matt samet's article in climbing had me thinking of how good that rock will be for my grandkids to climb on. unlike the dirty grungy crappy overused holds that are out there now.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Mar 25, 2009, 5:48 AM
Post #46 of 77
(2813 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
Lazlo wrote: slavetogravity wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/187451-largest_30875.jpg[/image] Climbed with this cat in Australia back in 03. Not only would this guy ONLY climb with a rack of passive gear, he also refused to use chalk and refused to ware climbing shoes. He would lead 5.11 face and crack with ease. Crazy but true. Dang! That's impressive. I admire his desire to stay true to his style! very impressive- i'm shocked he uses a harness- you'd think he'd just tie in with a bowline around his waist!
|
|
|
|
|
dobson
Mar 25, 2009, 6:04 AM
Post #47 of 77
(2802 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2004
Posts: 104
|
sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. I place what I need to to be safe. I try not to get into a rut, though. By practicing lesser-used placements, I'm prepared to safely climb in a greater variety of conditions. Phillip
|
|
|
|
|
yay_chris
Apr 23, 2009, 5:42 PM
Post #48 of 77
(2600 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2004
Posts: 141
|
dobson wrote: sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. I place what I need to to be safe. I try not to get into a rut, though. By practicing lesser-used placements, I'm prepared to safely climb in a greater variety of conditions. Phillip WIN.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 23, 2009, 6:54 PM
Post #49 of 77
(2582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
curt wrote: sungam wrote: Lazlo wrote: andrewG wrote: sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros? What about sliding nuts? I consider anything that relies on twisting, camming, or other movements to stay in positions. To me this includes cammed hexes, ball nutz, cammed tricams, cam hooks (leepers), copperheads and big bros. Passive includes threads, nuts, wedged hexes, pins, hooks, wedged tricams, wedged knots, chockstones, and cams with stops that are placed fully open (when you already used the right sized nut or whatever). But of course that's just me. Fuckin' kids these days. I tell 'ya. Any gear that is not spring loaded is "passive" even if it relies on camming action. Duh... Curt Are big bros passive then?
|
|
|
|
|
Factor2
Apr 23, 2009, 7:16 PM
Post #50 of 77
(2574 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 188
|
sungam wrote: curt wrote: sungam wrote: Lazlo wrote: andrewG wrote: sungam wrote: Hexes aren't always passive. What about tricams and big bros? What about sliding nuts? I consider anything that relies on twisting, camming, or other movements to stay in positions. To me this includes cammed hexes, ball nutz, cammed tricams, cam hooks (leepers), copperheads and big bros. Passive includes threads, nuts, wedged hexes, pins, hooks, wedged tricams, wedged knots, chockstones, and cams with stops that are placed fully open (when you already used the right sized nut or whatever). But of course that's just me. Fuckin' kids these days. I tell 'ya. Any gear that is not spring loaded is "passive" even if it relies on camming action. Duh... Curt Are big bros passive then? aren't they spring loaded? if they are then no.
|
|
|
|
|
jfitzpat
Apr 23, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #51 of 77
(3098 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2009
Posts: 32
|
dobson wrote: If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. I believe that, in this case, the asymptote is a result of the limits of the mathmatical model, not evidence in its own right. If we feed a taper cable through a small sized hole in a sheet of steel, the contact forces do not reach astronomical levels when tested. But astronomical is probably worth keeping in mind. If there were no friction, things like accretion would not occur. So, no stars, no planets, and no heavy metals to make tapers from.
dobson wrote: I place what I need to to be safe. I try not to get into a rut, though. By practicing lesser-used placements, I'm prepared to safely climb in a greater variety of conditions. Very sensible!
|
|
|
|
|
cush
Apr 23, 2009, 7:35 PM
Post #52 of 77
(3092 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320
|
while they do have springs in the design the springs aren't required for the device to work. a cam with no springs would be reletively useless. a big bro with no springs, while very hard to place, would still hold.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Apr 24, 2009, 2:13 AM
Post #53 of 77
(3059 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
cush wrote: while they do have springs in the design the springs aren't required for the device to work. a cam with no springs would be reletively useless. a big bro with no springs, while very hard to place, would still hold. Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
marde
Apr 24, 2009, 6:59 PM
Post #54 of 77
(3022 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 169
|
dobson wrote: ... If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. ... Thats indeed theoretical bs, because if you reduce the taper angle close to 0°, there will be no outward forces at all. All you got is a parallel sided piece of metall falling out of the crack. . And at least on my nuts the taper angle or overall geometry has not changed yet.
dobson wrote: Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. Why? Cams rely on friction, Nuts on a form lock. That should work without friction, and without astronomic high forces.
|
|
|
|
|
desertwanderer81
Apr 24, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #55 of 77
(3016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272
|
caleb_danner wrote: granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. I know i spell I speel to!! Just not gud.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Apr 26, 2009, 6:59 AM
Post #56 of 77
(2980 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
dobson wrote: sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. It quickly seems apparen that your theoretical world is flawed in theory. In theory land there are two contact forces between parallel surfaces - friction and the normal force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force You seem to have completely forgotton about this normal force which just so happens to be the most important force in nut placements. With wedged nuts in wedged shaped cracks it is trivial to resolve the force vectors allowing only for forces that are normal to the surfaces. In contrast cams operate in parallel cracks where the two contact force vectors are both orthoganal to the force applied. Thus friction forces are required to resolve the vector problem. To get more geeky the two contact normal vectors are not parallel in the plane thus vector resolution can occur. With parallel cracks an orthoganal vector in terms of friction is needed to oppose the applied force. If you are going to do the math. Do it right. And don't ignore the 50% of the contact forces! (written aggressively but no malice intended, you went geek so I went geekier)
(This post was edited by patto on Apr 26, 2009, 7:00 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Apr 26, 2009, 1:09 PM
Post #57 of 77
(2961 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
caleb_danner wrote: I'm curious if their are any using only passive gear Mo cow bell approach to climbing Replying to this original question - the other day I did a lead using only tricams. It's what I happened to have with me at the time my partner suggested I lead up the route.
|
|
|
|
|
gdtbave
Apr 27, 2009, 11:41 PM
Post #58 of 77
(2924 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2009
Posts: 14
|
granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. He he he!!
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 16, 2009, 9:49 AM
Post #59 of 77
(2840 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
That's right kids, Memorial Day 2009 is going to be the first 'National Cam-Free Day'! Go passive and grab a piece of history. Hell you'll still have harnesses, ultra-stick rubber, and skinny ropes - go for it, and get a taste of how Grandma and pa did things in the bad ole' days. Quaking or smiling, it will be a day you won't forget!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 17, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #60 of 77
(2785 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
healyje ill take that challenge. heading ot to dome rock next weekend to hopefully do anti jello craack and tree route of course!
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 18, 2009, 9:48 PM
Post #61 of 77
(2732 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
That's the spirit...!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 18, 2009, 11:32 PM
Post #62 of 77
(2723 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
so does that cut out semi actuve gear like tricams?
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 19, 2009, 2:07 AM
Post #63 of 77
(2696 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Technically yes, but hell, let's not quibble - if it doesn't have a spring or axle...
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 19, 2009, 2:56 AM
Post #64 of 77
(2688 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well ill just use them passively, technically they do have an axle....
|
|
|
|
|
fresh
May 19, 2009, 2:28 PM
Post #66 of 77
(2657 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
healyje wrote: That's right kids, Memorial Day 2009 is going to be the first 'National Cam-Free Day'! Go passive and grab a piece of history. Hell you'll still have harnesses, ultra-stick rubber, and skinny ropes - go for it, and get a taste of how Grandma and pa did things in the bad ole' days. Quaking or smiling, it will be a day you won't forget! oh man, I can't wait to read the accidents & injuries forum on tuesday.
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 20, 2009, 9:54 PM
Post #67 of 77
(2623 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well it looks like ill actually get to do the climb saturday comlpleetly passive!! wouldnt be the first time, but the last one i did was only 1 pitch
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 12:47 AM
Post #68 of 77
(2590 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Why don't you REALLY go full on purest, and toss all the metal, use only knotted slings? There are actually crags where this is the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 23, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #69 of 77
(2588 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well i could fill my pockets with rocks, wear hobnail boots and climb on a hemp rope ohh, and wear my laterhosen (Sp) but i think i would get alot of strange looks, ill try throwing in a knoted slink or two just for you....
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
May 23, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #70 of 77
(2587 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
skinner wrote: Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Why don't you REALLY go full on purest, and toss all the metal, use only knotted slings? There are actually crags where this is the rule. Next you'll be pushing for wool socks over hiking boots!
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 4:27 AM
Post #72 of 77
(2578 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
ford4x4 wrote: well i could fill my pockets with rocks.. No need to, here ya go, some ultra natural passive pro. (btw.. I found this rock in a creek, as is, with hole, -sling)
ford4x4 wrote: ..wear hobnail boots and climb on a hemp rope ohh, and wear my laterhosen (Sp) but i think i would get alot of strange looks, ill try throwing in a knoted slink or two just for you.... Atta boy! You never know when that skill might come in handy.. (dumb-a$$ partner drops rack)
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 4:58 AM
Post #73 of 77
(2572 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
bill413 wrote: skinner wrote: Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Doesn't that limit the routes you can do in winter? Limits pretty much everything I can do!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 23, 2009, 5:11 AM
Post #74 of 77
(2570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
hey all- natural id use it, looks like it would be more bommer than a cam
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Jun 2, 2009, 5:02 PM
Post #75 of 77
(2510 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
patto wrote: dobson wrote: sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. It quickly seems apparen that your theoretical world is flawed in theory. In theory land there are two contact forces between parallel surfaces - friction and the normal force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force You seem to have completely forgotton about this normal force which just so happens to be the most important force in nut placements. With wedged nuts in wedged shaped cracks it is trivial to resolve the force vectors allowing only for forces that are normal to the surfaces. In contrast cams operate in parallel cracks where the two contact force vectors are both orthoganal to the force applied. Thus friction forces are required to resolve the vector problem. To get more geeky the two contact normal vectors are not parallel in the plane thus vector resolution can occur. With parallel cracks an orthoganal vector in terms of friction is needed to oppose the applied force. If you are going to do the math. Do it right. And don't ignore the 50% of the contact forces! (written aggressively but no malice intended, you went geek so I went geekier) Thanks for doing the correction. 0 tapper nuts... Ugh
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Jun 2, 2009, 5:22 PM
Post #76 of 77
(628 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
ford4x4 wrote: healyje ill take that challenge. heading ot to dome rock next weekend to hopefully do anti jello craack and tree route of course! Tree Route!!! I did Tree Route all passive the first time, or did I have a yellow TCU by then? Dang. I've been so jonesing to get back on it since last spring.
|
|
|
|
|
tradrenn
Jun 10, 2009, 1:44 AM
Post #77 of 77
(591 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
hafilax wrote: sungam wrote: okay, I just thought of a better way to describe it. Active gear actively creates friction (which holds it in place) when pulled on. Passive relies on the rock being in the way of it's movement. That's a ridiculous definition and many spring loaded camming device placements would actually fit in there. There are pod shaped placements that hold a cam without relying on the springs and camming angle friction. Cammed hexes, tricams and big bros rely on a feature of the rock to provide a pivot that holds them in place. I would say that only ballnuts and SLCDs are active. Gear that relies on springs and movement within the device to engage the rock. On easy climbs my friends and I often play gear games. Tricam only ascents. Nut only ascents. Some climbs take passive gear best and it doesn't even need to be contrived. I wouldn't make a day of it though. Ever try to place a SLCD in a stopper mode ? Just adding fuel to fire, ya know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|