|
clausti
Jan 13, 2005, 3:35 AM
Post #26 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
In reply to: Go ahead and wear it. I am just telling you that you look like a sleaze and are not attractive when you do. well, all y'all can just tack hip-huggers that I wear on the list of my pandering and questionable behaviors.
In reply to: My daughter will never wear them I'll tell you that much. plus I am getting some horrific deja vous on this statement. where have I heard that before. oh yeah, my dad said it.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jan 13, 2005, 3:44 AM
Post #27 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: In reply to: The worst part of women's clothing is those freakin' "hip-huggers". Someone needs to tell them that a woman's waist is a little bit higher than just above the pubic bone. Those things are so sleazy and make the girl look like a slob. I see overweight girls with their love handles spilling out strutting around like they are being attractive or something. Man those things suck! Girls, you are not attractive when you wear that crap. :P some of us will wear that crap if we please. hip huggers are actually really comfy esp if you, like me, are short waisted and enjoy being able to simultaineously sit down in jeans and also breathe. I wish they'd bring back the hip-huggers that the girls wore in the '70s. Those were hot, and a lot more flattering than the current styles. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Jan 13, 2005, 3:54 AM
Post #28 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
In reply to: I wish they'd bring back the hip-huggers that the girls wore in the '70s. Those were hot, and a lot more flattering than the current styles. -Jay hehe, my mom [teenage years coinciding with that whole decade] looked at the jeans i'm currently wearing [button] and said "I swear I think I wore jeans identical to that. wish I'd kept my old ones."
|
|
|
|
|
kimmyt
Jan 13, 2005, 3:58 AM
Post #29 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 4546
|
In reply to: Go ahead and wear it. I am just telling you that you look like a sleaze and are not attractive when you do. My daughter will never wear them I'll tell you that much. Low-rise jeans are the answer to many a girls prayers. No more waist gap. Gals, I think you know what I'm talking about. K.
|
|
|
|
|
unabonger
Jan 13, 2005, 4:04 AM
Post #30 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689
|
In reply to: Go ahead and wear it. I am just telling you that you look like a sleaze and are not attractive when you do. My daughter will never wear them I'll tell you that much. "dominator"? "My daughter....blahblahblah". Sounds to me like you are overcompensating for a childhood where you felt wildly out of control. Careful or she'll be pole dancing as soon as she hits 18 and can get the fuck away from home. UB
|
|
|
|
|
rendog
Jan 13, 2005, 4:07 AM
Post #31 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 2468
|
hey yo STEVE! lighten the fVck up man! people can wear what they want, and many of US don't find them sleezy. sure those girls that wear 'em that have rolls out over the tops...yeah that ain't cool welcome to the 21st century man, women have control over what they wear/do/think etc. deal with it
In reply to: OK guys imagine rosanne in a pair of hip huggers that are way too small for her and a bikini top dude you suck.... that's a visual in my head i DID NOT need!
|
|
|
|
|
dominator
Jan 13, 2005, 4:07 AM
Post #32 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 72
|
Hey dumbabonger...my username is taken from a famous boulder problem. My daughter has self-respect and class.
|
|
|
|
|
unabonger
Jan 13, 2005, 4:08 AM
Post #33 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689
|
In reply to: I wish they'd bring back the hip-huggers that the girls wore in the '70s. Those were hot, and a lot more flattering than the current styles. -Jay Those were worn a bit higher up the waist. Had to cover up the big hippy bush that was threatening to advance on the belly button. Anyway, it sounds to me like you have Oedipus issues going on. To each his own.
|
|
|
|
|
unabonger
Jan 13, 2005, 4:12 AM
Post #34 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2003
Posts: 2689
|
In reply to: Hey dumbabonger...my username is taken from a famous boulder problem. My daughter has self-respect and class. I'm pretty sure that has nothing to do with the jeans you let her wear, though.
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Jan 13, 2005, 4:21 AM
Post #35 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
In reply to: welcome to the 21st century man, women have control over what they wear/do/think etc. deal with it! ....sure ren that's true, but they still need to consider these 'roll out over the tops' can make you go blind.... there's a line drawn between wearing what you want to be trendy and wearing what you should to look classy....
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jan 13, 2005, 4:26 AM
Post #36 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
In reply to: In reply to: I wish they'd bring back the hip-huggers that the girls wore in the '70s. Those were hot, and a lot more flattering than the current styles. -Jay Those were worn a bit higher up the waist. No, I think they were lower.
In reply to: Anyway, it sounds to me like you have Oedipus issues going on. I'm not sure why you would think something like that. -Jay
|
|
|
|
|
bumblie
Jan 13, 2005, 1:43 PM
Post #37 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 18, 2003
Posts: 7629
|
It's not the clothes that are offensive, just some of the bodies crammed into those clothes. When did it become fashionable for fat girls to show their bellies to the world? Oh no, it's a flab-alanche :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
shakylegs
Jan 13, 2005, 4:48 PM
Post #38 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774
|
For real titillation in the accompanying-a-girl-while-she's-shopping-for-clothes arena: go with your gf/wife/um-friend while she's trying on bathing suits. Salesfolks are often hands-on while helping, so you get to view some mild girl-on-girl action, and you don't even have to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
rendog
Jan 13, 2005, 5:08 PM
Post #39 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 2468
|
In reply to: For real titillation in the accompanying-a-girl-while-she's-shopping-for-clothes arena: go with your gf/wife/um-friend while she's trying on bathing suits. Salesfolks are often hands-on while helping, so you get to view some mild girl-on-girl action, and you don't even have to pay for it. :shock: i never knew! [bows in gratitude to the almighty S H A K Y L E G S !]
|
|
|
|
|
shakylegs
Jan 13, 2005, 5:19 PM
Post #40 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 4774
|
I am a font of tips when it comes to voyeurism.
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Jan 14, 2005, 1:05 PM
Post #41 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
Re: hip huggers, low rise, what ever you want to call them. There are pants that hang on your hips, and there are pants where your ass hangs out when you sit down. Plummer crack is not attractive, and I wonder where girl's sence of dignity has gone (maybe they don't get it, being very hard to see your own ass). Talking to sister #1 - "Emily, there's a hole in the rear of your pants......are you wearing a thong?" "Yeah, why do you care" She doesn't understand that I don't want to see her ass cheaks well enough that I can tell she's wearing a thong (my poor brother!!). Talking to sister #2 - "Sarah" seeing large amounts of ass crack hanging out of her pants "maybe you should pull your pants up a little" Sister scowling at me: "I don't care, it doesn't bother me." Is this the norm now??? Will I be plagged to see plummer crack till this trend dissapears?
|
|
|
|
|
eowyn1025
Jan 16, 2005, 3:26 AM
Post #42 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 27, 2002
Posts: 267
|
agreed. fat hanging out is gross, thongs and rears hanging out is gross not to mention screams "i'm a slut". not attractive. and dominator: i'm just glad to see that there are some dads left in the world who care that much about their daughters. Mine did, wouldn't let me wear that stuff, and I didn't end up pole dancing or hating him.
|
|
|
|
|
newbierockstar
Jan 16, 2005, 3:39 AM
Post #43 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2004
Posts: 1010
|
In reply to: on the list of my pandering and questionable behaviors. that's a big word for a such a little gal :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Jan 16, 2005, 4:02 AM
Post #44 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
In reply to: In reply to: on the list of my pandering and questionable behaviors. that's a big word for a such a little gal :wink: I am a veritable font of such. Alas, as you have yet to be graced with my eloquence. Truly, I am capably of facile elocution.
|
|
|
|
|
newbierockstar
Jan 16, 2005, 4:04 AM
Post #45 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2004
Posts: 1010
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: on the list of my pandering and questionable behaviors. that's a big word for a such a little gal :wink: I am a veritable font of such. Alas, as you have yet to be graced with my eloquence. Truly, I am capably of facile elocution. ....and of using spellcheck, I see.... :wink: :) 8^)
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Jan 16, 2005, 4:08 AM
Post #46 of 46
(937 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
yeah, 'cause if I don't use spellcheck I suck royally. It was always *really* annoying on in-class essays when I would think of words that I wanted to use, but couldnt spell them. and I'd have to rephrase....
|
|
|
|
|
|