|
caughtinside
Dec 7, 2009, 6:12 PM
Post #526 of 794
(4465 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
and ptftw.
|
|
|
|
|
dingus
Dec 7, 2009, 6:14 PM
Post #527 of 794
(4459 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
adatesman wrote: You all were bound to complain anyway, so I took the quicker option. No you didn't. Quickest of all is to take action and take no credit, ever. Just do what you're gonna do and NEVER EVER explain it. 'No reply' is much faster. No needed to know it was you, or why you did it. DMT
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 7, 2009, 6:46 PM
Post #528 of 794
(4448 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #529 of 794
(4435 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Dec 7, 2009, 7:02 PM
Post #530 of 794
(4428 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay Fair enough. Where shall I split it? After rgold's climactic post. It was all down hill after that although there were a few notable dips before that.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 7, 2009, 7:03 PM
Post #531 of 794
(4428 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay Fair enough. Where shall I split it? That's what they pay you the big bucks to figure out. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 7:11 PM
Post #532 of 794
(4421 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Dec 7, 2009, 7:15 PM
Post #533 of 794
(4413 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay Fair enough. Where shall I split it? That's what they pay you the big bucks to figure out. Jay I'm fine with it being left unsplit and left here, so if you want it split and returned to General you'll have to tell me where you want it done. Bear in mind it's threaded, so splitting things cleanly isn't usually an easy thing to do. EDIT- Oh, and I have no way to undo a split so there's no way to go back if you chose the wrong spot. i agree. split it at Rgolds post and lock the top and let this crap stay here and continue on it's meandering way
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Dec 7, 2009, 7:18 PM
Post #534 of 794
(4409 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay Fair enough. Where shall I split it? That's what they pay you the big bucks to figure out. Jay I'm fine with it being left unsplit and left here, so if you want it split and returned to General you'll have to tell me where you want it done. Bear in mind it's threaded, so splitting things cleanly isn't usually an easy thing to do. EDIT- Oh, and I have no way to undo a split so there's no way to go back if you chose the wrong spot. how bout you just move the whole thing back then chuckles?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Dec 7, 2009, 7:23 PM
Post #535 of 794
(4400 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: jt512 wrote: adatesman wrote: Should I have split the thread? Yes. And you still should split the thread and return the relevant posts to General. Jay Fair enough. Where shall I split it? That's what they pay you the big bucks to figure out. Jay I'm fine with it being left unsplit and left here, so if you want it split and returned to General you'll have to tell me where you want it done. Bear in mind it's threaded, so splitting things cleanly isn't usually an easy thing to do. I honestly don't give a damn what forum it is in. I might feel differently, if, like rgold, I had spent my valuable time crafting a thoughtful message. If you want to keep people like rgold posting here, maybe you should think before you act, rather than mindlessly throw his posts into the trash. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 7:32 PM
Post #536 of 794
(4395 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 7:34 PM
Post #537 of 794
(4391 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Dec 7, 2009, 8:34 PM
Post #538 of 794
(4371 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
adatesman wrote: jakedatc wrote: i agree. split it at Rgolds post and lock the top and let this crap stay here and continue on it's meandering way Hmm.... Looks like a good spot to me as well, as it falls just prior to 2 of the incidents that got brought up in the Mod forum. One problem though- the thread splitting thing doesn't just chop the thread at a certain point, but rather moves that branch of the tree into a new thread. Because of this I'd have to split off a dozen or so branches and there's no way to merge them all back together into a single thread. Not so pretty an option, unless you all are ok with simply splitting things at RGold's post and tossing the rest. i dunno what you mean by 'tossing' the rest. but have to add my two cents that up to and including rgold's post is some pretty good climbing discussion, and it seems a shame to chuck it all.
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Dec 7, 2009, 8:43 PM
Post #539 of 794
(4366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
Some individual posts were hidden a while back when they drifted off topic and into threats - can't all the off topic ones be hidden versus splitting? Though good luck with that now. Aside from making the call, there is of course the same argument from people who spent lots of time writing their off topic posts, as they were now sort of on topic when that drift was clearly not being stomped out. Why can't everyone just post exactly how I'd want them to in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 8:46 PM
Post #540 of 794
(4362 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Dec 7, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #541 of 794
(4359 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
And for the record, I read every post in this thread and think there were good, topic/climbing-related posts after rgold's as well. Looks like at least gabe had one there, and some of the posts on why Petie thought not actually holding onto the rope while belaying was OK were insightful on the way he and his friends approach climbing and were certainly on topic.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Dec 7, 2009, 9:08 PM
Post #542 of 794
(4345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
adatesman wrote: clausti wrote: adatesman wrote: jakedatc wrote: i agree. split it at Rgolds post and lock the top and let this crap stay here and continue on it's meandering way Hmm.... Looks like a good spot to me as well, as it falls just prior to 2 of the incidents that got brought up in the Mod forum. One problem though- the thread splitting thing doesn't just chop the thread at a certain point, but rather moves that branch of the tree into a new thread. Because of this I'd have to split off a dozen or so branches and there's no way to merge them all back together into a single thread. Not so pretty an option, unless you all are ok with simply splitting things at RGold's post and tossing the rest. i dunno what you mean by 'tossing' the rest. but have to add my two cents that up to and including rgold's post is some pretty good climbing discussion, and it seems a shame to chuck it all. tossing = recycle bin DON'T YOU DARE!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
adatesman
Dec 7, 2009, 9:31 PM
Post #543 of 794
(4335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479
|
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Dec 7, 2009, 9:33 PM
Post #544 of 794
(4329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
adatesman wrote: sungam wrote: adatesman wrote: tossing = recycle bin DON'T YOU DARE!!!!! Oh, I dare. Although to be honest I don't care enough to keep debating this and will throw it back to General momentarily. I still think the content past page 15 is out of place, so kindly get things back on track. {insert whatever noise it makes when threads are moved} so, relevant to both this thread and climbing in general, what do you feel is the height at which your toproper "needs" you to "keep your hands on the belay"?
(This post was edited by clausti on Dec 7, 2009, 9:34 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Dec 7, 2009, 9:34 PM
Post #545 of 794
(4326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
adatesman wrote: sungam wrote: adatesman wrote: tossing = recycle bin DON'T YOU DARE!!!!! Oh, I dare. Although to be honest I don't care enough to keep debating this and will throw it back to General momentarily. I still think the content past page 15 is out of place, so kindly get things back on track. {insert whatever noise it makes when threads are moved} SHhhhhhhhloooooooooooooooooofffffffffffffffpppppppppppP
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Dec 7, 2009, 9:39 PM
Post #546 of 794
(4315 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
clausti wrote: adatesman wrote: sungam wrote: adatesman wrote: tossing = recycle bin DON'T YOU DARE!!!!! Oh, I dare. Although to be honest I don't care enough to keep debating this and will throw it back to General momentarily. I still think the content past page 15 is out of place, so kindly get things back on track. {insert whatever noise it makes when threads are moved} so, relevant to both this thread and climbing in general, what do you feel is the height at which your toproper "needs" you to "keep your hands on the belay"? with or without a pad?
|
|
|
|
|
CrazyPetie
Dec 7, 2009, 9:42 PM
Post #547 of 794
(4311 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2008
Posts: 407
|
clausti wrote: adatesman wrote: sungam wrote: adatesman wrote: tossing = recycle bin DON'T YOU DARE!!!!! Oh, I dare. Although to be honest I don't care enough to keep debating this and will throw it back to General momentarily. I still think the content past page 15 is out of place, so kindly get things back on track. {insert whatever noise it makes when threads are moved} so, relevant to both this thread and climbing in general, what do you feel is the height at which your toproper "needs" you to "keep your hands on the belay"? Obviously if you dont think they are going to fall, you really dont have to do anything as a belayer... Just Kidding!!!111@% Stupid heads.
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Dec 7, 2009, 9:42 PM
Post #548 of 794
(4309 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
wonderwoman wrote: Posts are supposed to be relevant to the topic, but since there is no video anymore, there is no way to post something relevant to it. Nevermind the major thread drift... Sucks that there was such thread drift, shame on the people participating in it, right?
wonderwoman wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: Whats an outdoor climb? for those of us who can't stand cold temps and live in the northeast, that's not even remotely funny. Ummm... it's 69 degrees in Boston right now... Insanity!!! So how 'bout that weather? Oh crap, shame on me...
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Dec 7, 2009, 9:59 PM
Post #549 of 794
(4263 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
mojomonkey wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Posts are supposed to be relevant to the topic, but since there is no video anymore, there is no way to post something relevant to it. Nevermind the major thread drift... Sucks that there was such thread drift, shame on the people participating in it, right? wonderwoman wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: Whats an outdoor climb? for those of us who can't stand cold temps and live in the northeast, that's not even remotely funny. Ummm... it's 69 degrees in Boston right now... Insanity!!! So how 'bout that weather? Oh crap, shame on me... weather certainly is a climbing related topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Dec 7, 2009, 10:08 PM
Post #550 of 794
(4816 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
wonderwoman wrote: mojomonkey wrote: wonderwoman wrote: Posts are supposed to be relevant to the topic, but since there is no video anymore, there is no way to post something relevant to it. Nevermind the major thread drift... Sucks that there was such thread drift, shame on the people participating in it, right? wonderwoman wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: Whats an outdoor climb? for those of us who can't stand cold temps and live in the northeast, that's not even remotely funny. Ummm... it's 69 degrees in Boston right now... Insanity!!! So how 'bout that weather? Oh crap, shame on me... weather certainly is a climbing related topic. I'm about to go free solo in the cold. WOoOOOOOo!
|
|
|
|
|
|