|
jfitzpat
Apr 23, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #51 of 77
(3099 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2009
Posts: 32
|
dobson wrote: If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. I believe that, in this case, the asymptote is a result of the limits of the mathmatical model, not evidence in its own right. If we feed a taper cable through a small sized hole in a sheet of steel, the contact forces do not reach astronomical levels when tested. But astronomical is probably worth keeping in mind. If there were no friction, things like accretion would not occur. So, no stars, no planets, and no heavy metals to make tapers from.
dobson wrote: I place what I need to to be safe. I try not to get into a rut, though. By practicing lesser-used placements, I'm prepared to safely climb in a greater variety of conditions. Very sensible!
|
|
|
|
|
cush
Apr 23, 2009, 7:35 PM
Post #52 of 77
(3093 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320
|
while they do have springs in the design the springs aren't required for the device to work. a cam with no springs would be reletively useless. a big bro with no springs, while very hard to place, would still hold.
|
|
|
|
|
Lazlo
Apr 24, 2009, 2:13 AM
Post #53 of 77
(3060 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2007
Posts: 5079
|
cush wrote: while they do have springs in the design the springs aren't required for the device to work. a cam with no springs would be reletively useless. a big bro with no springs, while very hard to place, would still hold. Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
marde
Apr 24, 2009, 6:59 PM
Post #54 of 77
(3023 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2006
Posts: 169
|
dobson wrote: ... If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. ... Thats indeed theoretical bs, because if you reduce the taper angle close to 0°, there will be no outward forces at all. All you got is a parallel sided piece of metall falling out of the crack. . And at least on my nuts the taper angle or overall geometry has not changed yet.
dobson wrote: Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. Why? Cams rely on friction, Nuts on a form lock. That should work without friction, and without astronomic high forces.
|
|
|
|
|
desertwanderer81
Apr 24, 2009, 7:19 PM
Post #55 of 77
(3017 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 2272
|
caleb_danner wrote: granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. I know i spell I speel to!! Just not gud.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Apr 26, 2009, 6:59 AM
Post #56 of 77
(2981 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
dobson wrote: sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. It quickly seems apparen that your theoretical world is flawed in theory. In theory land there are two contact forces between parallel surfaces - friction and the normal force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force You seem to have completely forgotton about this normal force which just so happens to be the most important force in nut placements. With wedged nuts in wedged shaped cracks it is trivial to resolve the force vectors allowing only for forces that are normal to the surfaces. In contrast cams operate in parallel cracks where the two contact force vectors are both orthoganal to the force applied. Thus friction forces are required to resolve the vector problem. To get more geeky the two contact normal vectors are not parallel in the plane thus vector resolution can occur. With parallel cracks an orthoganal vector in terms of friction is needed to oppose the applied force. If you are going to do the math. Do it right. And don't ignore the 50% of the contact forces! (written aggressively but no malice intended, you went geek so I went geekier)
(This post was edited by patto on Apr 26, 2009, 7:00 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Apr 26, 2009, 1:09 PM
Post #57 of 77
(2962 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
caleb_danner wrote: I'm curious if their are any using only passive gear Mo cow bell approach to climbing Replying to this original question - the other day I did a lead using only tricams. It's what I happened to have with me at the time my partner suggested I lead up the route.
|
|
|
|
|
gdtbave
Apr 27, 2009, 11:41 PM
Post #58 of 77
(2925 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2009
Posts: 14
|
granite_grrl wrote: The subject of this thread pains me. He he he!!
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 16, 2009, 9:49 AM
Post #59 of 77
(2841 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
That's right kids, Memorial Day 2009 is going to be the first 'National Cam-Free Day'! Go passive and grab a piece of history. Hell you'll still have harnesses, ultra-stick rubber, and skinny ropes - go for it, and get a taste of how Grandma and pa did things in the bad ole' days. Quaking or smiling, it will be a day you won't forget!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 17, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #60 of 77
(2786 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
healyje ill take that challenge. heading ot to dome rock next weekend to hopefully do anti jello craack and tree route of course!
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 18, 2009, 9:48 PM
Post #61 of 77
(2733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
That's the spirit...!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 18, 2009, 11:32 PM
Post #62 of 77
(2724 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
so does that cut out semi actuve gear like tricams?
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
May 19, 2009, 2:07 AM
Post #63 of 77
(2697 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Technically yes, but hell, let's not quibble - if it doesn't have a spring or axle...
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 19, 2009, 2:56 AM
Post #64 of 77
(2689 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well ill just use them passively, technically they do have an axle....
|
|
|
|
|
fresh
May 19, 2009, 2:28 PM
Post #66 of 77
(2658 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
healyje wrote: That's right kids, Memorial Day 2009 is going to be the first 'National Cam-Free Day'! Go passive and grab a piece of history. Hell you'll still have harnesses, ultra-stick rubber, and skinny ropes - go for it, and get a taste of how Grandma and pa did things in the bad ole' days. Quaking or smiling, it will be a day you won't forget! oh man, I can't wait to read the accidents & injuries forum on tuesday.
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 20, 2009, 9:54 PM
Post #67 of 77
(2624 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well it looks like ill actually get to do the climb saturday comlpleetly passive!! wouldnt be the first time, but the last one i did was only 1 pitch
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 12:47 AM
Post #68 of 77
(2591 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Why don't you REALLY go full on purest, and toss all the metal, use only knotted slings? There are actually crags where this is the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 23, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #69 of 77
(2589 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
well i could fill my pockets with rocks, wear hobnail boots and climb on a hemp rope ohh, and wear my laterhosen (Sp) but i think i would get alot of strange looks, ill try throwing in a knoted slink or two just for you....
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
May 23, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #70 of 77
(2588 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
skinner wrote: Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Why don't you REALLY go full on purest, and toss all the metal, use only knotted slings? There are actually crags where this is the rule. Next you'll be pushing for wool socks over hiking boots!
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 4:27 AM
Post #72 of 77
(2579 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
ford4x4 wrote: well i could fill my pockets with rocks.. No need to, here ya go, some ultra natural passive pro. (btw.. I found this rock in a creek, as is, with hole, -sling)
ford4x4 wrote: ..wear hobnail boots and climb on a hemp rope ohh, and wear my laterhosen (Sp) but i think i would get alot of strange looks, ill try throwing in a knoted slink or two just for you.... Atta boy! You never know when that skill might come in handy.. (dumb-a$$ partner drops rack)
|
|
|
|
|
skinner
May 23, 2009, 4:58 AM
Post #73 of 77
(2573 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 1, 2004
Posts: 1747
|
bill413 wrote: skinner wrote: Ya I climb with a set of nuts too, always.. tend to carry smaller ones in ice though Doesn't that limit the routes you can do in winter? Limits pretty much everything I can do!
|
|
|
|
|
ford4x4
May 23, 2009, 5:11 AM
Post #74 of 77
(2571 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 47
|
hey all- natural id use it, looks like it would be more bommer than a cam
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Jun 2, 2009, 5:02 PM
Post #75 of 77
(2511 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
patto wrote: dobson wrote: sungam wrote: Of course they all create friction, but in a 0 friction world nuts would still work, wouldn't they? Nuts would not function in a zero friction world. They would either split or crush the rock with outward force, or the force would destroy the nut itself. If you'd like to do the math, notice that as you reduce friction and taper angle, outward force increases. There's an asymptote at zero friction or angle where outward force approaches infinity. Of course this is all theoretical, and has no place in the real world; nor do arbitrary gear definitions. It all makes interesting discussions, but I don't take it to the rock. It quickly seems apparen that your theoretical world is flawed in theory. In theory land there are two contact forces between parallel surfaces - friction and the normal force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_force You seem to have completely forgotton about this normal force which just so happens to be the most important force in nut placements. With wedged nuts in wedged shaped cracks it is trivial to resolve the force vectors allowing only for forces that are normal to the surfaces. In contrast cams operate in parallel cracks where the two contact force vectors are both orthoganal to the force applied. Thus friction forces are required to resolve the vector problem. To get more geeky the two contact normal vectors are not parallel in the plane thus vector resolution can occur. With parallel cracks an orthoganal vector in terms of friction is needed to oppose the applied force. If you are going to do the math. Do it right. And don't ignore the 50% of the contact forces! (written aggressively but no malice intended, you went geek so I went geekier) Thanks for doing the correction. 0 tapper nuts... Ugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|