I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
Thirteen if I could wash the sand off of her first. Damn. Fifteen depending on how she'd let me wash it off. Fifteen really naughty, dirty things.
Only fifteen? I can think of at least thirty naughty things I could do to her...you really need to get out more wjca. lol
I wanna play!
The eleven devious and disturbing things I just did to MYSELF while looking at that picture was only a small down payment on what I would do to her if she were tied up in my basement my girlfriend.
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
Beastiality is defined as "sexual relations between a person and an animal; sodomy." The same goes for necro.
There is no distinction made between who is doing what to whom. So long as one of them is dead and the other is sodomizing him/her/it, I say it counts.
Now that I think about it though, this is one of the most pointless semantical arguments ever undertaken. No matter what you call it, something so terrible and wrong is happening that anyone with any sense is going to know exactly what your describing and hate you passionately for putting that image in their head.
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
Beastiality is defined as "sexual relations between a person and an animal; sodomy." The same goes for necro.
There is no distinction made between who is doing what to whom. So long as one of them is dead and the other is sodomizing him/her/it, I say it counts.
Now that I think about it though, this is one of the most pointless semantical arguments ever undertaken. No matter what you call it, something so terrible and wrong is happening that anyone with any sense is going to know exactly what your describing and hate you passionately for putting that image in their head.
I see yore point. Necrobeastiality it is!!!1111eleventyone1
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
Beastiality is defined as "sexual relations between a person and an animal; sodomy." The same goes for necro.
There is no distinction made between who is doing what to whom. So long as one of them is dead and the other is sodomizing him/her/it, I say it counts.
Now that I think about it though, this is one of the most pointless semantical arguments ever undertaken. No matter what you call it, something so terrible and wrong is happening that anyone with any sense is going to know exactly what your describing and hate you passionately for putting that image in their head.
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
Beastiality is defined as "sexual relations between a person and an animal; sodomy." The same goes for necro.
There is no distinction made between who is doing what to whom. So long as one of them is dead and the other is sodomizing him/her/it, I say it counts.
Now that I think about it though, this is one of the most pointless semantical arguments ever undertaken. No matter what you call it, something so terrible and wrong is happening that anyone with any sense is going to know exactly what your describing and hate you passionately for putting that image in their head.
I see yore point. Necrobeastiality it is!!!1111eleventyone1
Yep, this thread pretty much rocks. We have it all: A near winning race to necrobeastiality. Hawt ladiez. Agreements on said necrobeastiality. More hawt ladiez. Laz working out the cunundrum. This thread gets 5 imaginary stars for sher.
I honestly hope that you forget to declaw the next gerbil that you insert rectally and the little fucker lances an arteriole. You will bleed out of your asshole and die while you feel the little bugger still squirming.
necrobeastiality in six posts! Woot!
Not quite, not the fact that the hampster is still craweling about. Not dead.
I say if their is a carnal act and one of the subjects is dead, it counts. Perhaps a panal discussion is in order.
I say that it is both necrophilia and beastphilia, but because the beast is not necro it's not necrobeastiality. rite?
Beastiality is defined as "sexual relations between a person and an animal; sodomy." The same goes for necro.
There is no distinction made between who is doing what to whom. So long as one of them is dead and the other is sodomizing him/her/it, I say it counts.
Now that I think about it though, this is one of the most pointless semantical arguments ever undertaken. No matter what you call it, something so terrible and wrong is happening that anyone with any sense is going to know exactly what your describing and hate you passionately for putting that image in their head.
3 /
14%
