Forums: Climbing Information: The Lab:
Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for The Lab

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30 Next page Last page  View All


adatesman


May 21, 2009, 11:17 PM
Post #151 of 747 (7418 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


the_climber


May 21, 2009, 11:22 PM
Post #152 of 747 (7407 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
the_climber wrote:
Done right Brazing is about as good and as stong as it gets.

Well, not quite.... A braze will never be stronger than a weld, but that's just me being pedantic since they're basically the same thing but with different temperatures/filler metals. TongueAngelic

I was going to compare it to welding, but like you say... welding is just a little different and a little more... you know.

Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I seem to recall brazing being stonger (done right) on cable than welding.

Either way, Enjoy your chop suey!


(This post was edited by the_climber on May 21, 2009, 11:23 PM)


adatesman


May 21, 2009, 11:33 PM
Post #153 of 747 (7392 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


k.l.k


May 21, 2009, 11:37 PM
Post #154 of 747 (7383 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2007
Posts: 1190

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
If CCH wants to make a statement they are more than welcome to identify themselves and do so, but trying to post anonymously through a shill is unethical IMO.

Yeah, no kidding. In any case, you're doing whoever it is a favor, since the posts are relentlessly stupid. If they did come from CCH, they could only make things worse for themselves by stringing it out.

Moreover, if the CCH email and the posts resolve to the same IP, then I think that you or one of the other mods should tell us.

I'd like to think that no one at CCH is stupid enough to start posting anonymously in this thread, but given the history, it's a distinct possibility.


Partner drector


May 21, 2009, 11:50 PM
Post #156 of 747 (7351 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Well, not quite.... A braze will never be stronger than a weld, but that's just me being pedantic since they're basically the same thing but with different temperatures/filler metals.

(My bolding in the quote above)

Welding is the fusion of two pieces of the same metal by melting them together. They become one single piece of material. It is not glue and it does not bond them. They become one in the same way that pouring a bunch of molten steel into a mold makes a single part. Filler material, which is always the same basic metal as the original, is not required and is not needed with some techniques.

Brazing is more similar to gluing in that the silicon bronze or other brazing material bonds to the other metals. There is no fusion into one single piece of material.

Welding is not basically the same with a different filler.

Brazing is beyond strong enough for many applications including connecting cables to cam heads so the discussion is moot. It just seems wrong to give out incorrect technical information about the nature of welding vs. brazing.

Dave


adatesman


May 22, 2009, 12:08 AM
Post #158 of 747 (7324 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

 


adatesman


May 22, 2009, 12:10 AM
Post #159 of 747 (7314 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


afahrlan


May 22, 2009, 12:50 AM
Post #164 of 747 (7259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 9, 2008
Posts: 7

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I really wish you hadn't banned her, because it'd sure be nice to hear an explanation from their end.


adatesman


May 22, 2009, 12:57 AM
Post #165 of 747 (7243 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


spikeddem


May 22, 2009, 1:23 AM
Post #166 of 747 (7211 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Word from Nadia at CCH is that they're formulating a reply to put up on their website "ASAP." (As of 7:46 Central)

I e-mailed them to remind them that situations like these provide opportunities for companies, and that with a little showing of good faith and follow through CCH has a chance to put a lot of people's minds (and wallets) at ease. Response time of four hours isn't bad.


adatesman


May 22, 2009, 1:27 AM
Post #167 of 747 (7197 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


healyje


May 22, 2009, 2:33 AM
Post #171 of 747 (7088 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [notapplicable] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

When CCH can't even improve something as easy as communicating with their customers and the climbing public at large, it doesn't bode well for their ability to change how they make and QC their product.

It's not like we're asking them to master twitter or anything...


jt512


May 22, 2009, 2:40 AM
Post #172 of 747 (7077 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [adatesman] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

adatesman wrote:
jrathfon wrote:
Well, after reading all 4 pages, this last post answered my question.

Yeah, sorry about that. I would have done it up front but didn't want to run the risk of destroying evidence since its readily obvious if you have it in hand and know anything about welding/brazing. But so far CCH has yet to ask to see them (opting instead to grill me on my professional background, degrees, etc), so might as well cut them open.

I think you should post their correspondence.

Jay


adatesman


May 22, 2009, 2:43 AM
Post #173 of 747 (7067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


jt512


May 22, 2009, 2:51 AM
Post #174 of 747 (7584 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [lightrack] SAFETY ALERT- MORE ALIEN FAILURES [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lightrack wrote:
Cams break......aliens are always bashed on.....

i still use mine

a good friend of mine broke 3 brand new C4's already this season, yet there is never a bash thread on BD's

the heads simply crushed on a 3 meter fall

Did he break all three in one 3-m fall or 1 each in three 3-m falls, or, maybe, are you just making shit up?

Jay

First page Previous page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : The Lab

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook