Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
climb x vs madrock
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


gogo


Mar 16, 2010, 4:47 PM
Post #26 of 48 (12406 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 198

Re: [taydude] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Guess I'll play this game a little longer.

The top guys in the sport do not need specific shoes to climb the world's hardest climbs. I agree. But doesn't that also means the average climber does not need specific shoes to climb average climbs?

And unlimited free shoes is nice - but if Mad Rock was really as bad as some people on this site claim, why would anyone use them? People talk as if the shoes themselves will some how make your climbing ability go down...

I also know people who have blown out shoes in weeks, from different brands. It is generally technique. Likewise, I've seen people climb very hard in all different brands, and it is generally technique. Good footwork can make any pair of shoes last.

And w/ the manufacturing - many companies manufacture in China and SE Asia. Sportiva's site lists factories in China and Vietnam. It does not automatically mean that quality will be low; how many products in general get made overseas and used in the U.S.? How many climbing shoe companies manufacture overseas also?

Caldwell ripped apart several pairs of Miuras on one trip on El Cap. Does that mean they are poorly made?


(This post was edited by gogo on Mar 16, 2010, 4:48 PM)


Partner cracklover


Mar 16, 2010, 4:57 PM
Post #27 of 48 (12393 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [gogo] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

gogo wrote:
Guess I'll play this game a little longer.

The top guys in the sport do not need specific shoes to climb the world's hardest climbs. I agree. But doesn't that also means the average climber does not need specific shoes to climb average climbs?

And unlimited free shoes is nice - but if Mad Rock was really as bad as some people on this site claim, why would anyone use them? People talk as if the shoes themselves will some how make your climbing ability go down...

I also know people who have blown out shoes in weeks, from different brands. It is generally technique. Likewise, I've seen people climb very hard in all different brands, and it is generally technique. Good footwork can make any pair of shoes last.

And w/ the manufacturing - many companies manufacture in China and SE Asia. Sportiva's site lists factories in China and Vietnam. It does not automatically mean that quality will be low; how many products in general get made overseas and used in the U.S.? How many climbing shoe companies manufacture overseas also?

Caldwell ripped apart several pairs of Miuras on one trip on El Cap. Does that mean they are poorly made?

I'm sorry, but the personal experience of myself and many others here says that you're just plain wrong. Shoes *do* make a difference, and some really are higher quality than others, in all sorts of ways.

GO


jt512


Mar 16, 2010, 5:00 PM
Post #28 of 48 (12389 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [gogo] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

People would have a more favorable opinion of Mad Rock if they realized that their shoes were actually manufactured by Mad Rock, even if they are a different brand.


gogo


Mar 16, 2010, 5:01 PM
Post #29 of 48 (12387 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 198

Re: [cracklover] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

To each their own, I guess.

I've had a lot of positive experiences with Mad Rock and know many climbers that have also. I'm sorry to hear yours has not been the same.


Shroom


Mar 16, 2010, 5:05 PM
Post #30 of 48 (12382 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 14, 2009
Posts: 61

Re: [jt512] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
People would have a more favorable opinion of Mad Rock if they realized that their shoes were actually manufactured by Mad Rock, even if they are a different brand.

Interesting. Do you have links to support this? Does MR make the shoes, or do they all get made by some sweat shop who also happens to make MR?


jt512


Mar 16, 2010, 5:16 PM
Post #31 of 48 (12368 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [Shroom] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (6 ratings)  
Can't Post

Shroom wrote:
jt512 wrote:
People would have a more favorable opinion of Mad Rock if they realized that their shoes were actually manufactured by Mad Rock, even if they are a different brand.

Interesting. Do you have links to support this? Does MR make the shoes, or do they all get made by some sweat shop who also happens to make MR?

Mad Rock is the actual manufacturer. They own the factory. No links. Information is from personal communication.

Jay


KirbyC


Mar 16, 2010, 5:45 PM
Post #32 of 48 (12346 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 3, 2008
Posts: 118

Re: [jt512] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ooh come on, any more hints you can give us? :D This sounds juicy..


gosharks


Mar 17, 2010, 2:35 AM
Post #33 of 48 (12284 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268

Re: [gogo] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.


(This post was edited by gosharks on Mar 17, 2010, 2:37 AM)


Partner angry


Mar 17, 2010, 2:41 AM
Post #34 of 48 (12278 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [gosharks] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.


jt512


Mar 17, 2010, 2:58 AM
Post #35 of 48 (12269 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [angry] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.

Makes me wonder about their hangers.

Jay


Partner angry


Mar 17, 2010, 12:18 PM
Post #36 of 48 (12238 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [jt512] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
angry wrote:
gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.

Makes me wonder about their hangers.

Jay

Seeing as the hangers have no gate, they should be fine.


darkgift06


Aug 18, 2010, 5:15 PM
Post #37 of 48 (11954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 16, 2009
Posts: 492

Re: [angry] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

theres a big add in Gripped this month for Climb X... & The prices are wicked cheep & they say they match us$ to Canadian$.


Kinobi


Aug 25, 2010, 6:35 PM
Post #38 of 48 (11842 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2009
Posts: 74

Re: [qwert] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qwert wrote:
...
If you are not ok with the last part however, be carefull! they are not the only ones producing in china. Even a lot of the italians have production lines in china for their cheaper stuff.

qwert

Uncorrect..
ONLY La Sportiva does it. And mainly for US market.
E
Italy.


P-Dud


Dec 6, 2010, 12:52 AM
Post #39 of 48 (11595 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2010
Posts: 2

Re: [angry] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
angry wrote:
gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.

Makes me wonder about their hangers.

Jay

Seeing as the hangers have no gate, they should be fine.

Really, really... sez who? I would have to agree that one of the rope bags I owned left a lot to be desired. The quality of the stitching was sub par. I do prefer my Metolius rope bags. Other than that, please inform me of a noted failure of one of the other quoted products. Which biner has ever failed? Please, any incident report? Anytime there have been recalls with MR biners? Any of them? Any reports of them falling apart? How about those lousy harnesses? Anything? How many haul bags of theirs have you used that have fallen apart? How many reported haul bag failures have there been on a wall?
You people are so fucin stupid! Haters! They generally have good products with great prices, period.
They are a company that makes shoes and other climbing products that I have used extensively for years and have never had a problem. Never a problem with the chalk bags, slings, belay device, chalk pod or biners (locking & non-locking). Never. I know a lot of people who have MR shoes, harnesses and biners and none have ever had a problem with any of them. I have owned 5.10, Boreal, La Sportiva, Evolve and Mad Rock shoes. The only ones that ever let me down were the Boreal & La Sportiva.
The only time that I have heard criticisms about the quality of the products it is from one retailer and ALL the rest have been from individuals who have never used a single MR product, rather they have HEARD this and/or that or from choads like you. So “Angry”, you dumb fuc, how many of their biners that you have owned have failed? Which harness do you have that has failed? How many of their haul bags do you own that have blown out. You and your type make me want to puke? Ignorant, inbred, misinformation inciting, choads!Pirate And I’m trying to be nice.Tongue


curt


Dec 6, 2010, 1:15 AM
Post #40 of 48 (11574 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [P-Dud] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

P-Dud wrote:
...I know a lot of people who have MR shoes, harnesses and biners and none have ever had a problem with any of them...

Liar.

Curt


johnwesely


Dec 6, 2010, 2:51 AM
Post #41 of 48 (11541 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [curt] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
P-Dud wrote:
...I know a lot of people who have MR shoes, harnesses and biners and none have ever had a problem with any of them...

Liar.

Curt

Dude joined the site to attack someone who doesn't even post here anymore. Classy.


Gmburns2000


Dec 6, 2010, 3:33 AM
Post #42 of 48 (11523 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [KirbyC] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

KirbyC wrote:
Ooh come on, any more hints you can give us? :D This sounds juicy..

Late response to an old post, but it's not as juicy as you might think. While I can't give more than the example noted below, I find it hard to believe they (and possibly madrock) are the only example.

Giant manufactures a significant amount of the low-to-mid range non-pro ($1000 and under) mountain bikes for companies such as Trek, Specialized, etc. I know this from my personal experience working in that industry (so no links).

Things may have changed since then, but as I remember Giant was the largest mountain bike manufacturer in the world at the time, manufacturing most of the bikes one sees on the trail, except those bikes don't get the Giant brand slapped on the downtube.

So seeing that MR possibly makes another company's shoes doesn't even make me blink.


qwert


Dec 6, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #43 of 48 (11459 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394

Re: [P-Dud] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

P-Dud wrote:
angry wrote:
jt512 wrote:
angry wrote:
gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.

Makes me wonder about their hangers.

Jay

Seeing as the hangers have no gate, they should be fine.

Really, really... sez who? I would have to agree that one of the rope bags I owned left a lot to be desired. The quality of the stitching was sub par. I do prefer my Metolius rope bags. Other than that, please inform me of a noted failure of one of the other quoted products. Which biner has ever failed? Please, any incident report? Anytime there have been recalls with MR biners? Any of them? Any reports of them falling apart? How about those lousy harnesses? Anything? How many haul bags of theirs have you used that have fallen apart? How many reported haul bag failures have there been on a wall?
You people are so fucin stupid! Haters! They generally have good products with great prices, period.
They are a company that makes shoes and other climbing products that I have used extensively for years and have never had a problem. Never a problem with the chalk bags, slings, belay device, chalk pod or biners (locking & non-locking). Never. I know a lot of people who have MR shoes, harnesses and biners and none have ever had a problem with any of them. I have owned 5.10, Boreal, La Sportiva, Evolve and Mad Rock shoes. The only ones that ever let me down were the Boreal & La Sportiva.
The only time that I have heard criticisms about the quality of the products it is from one retailer and ALL the rest have been from individuals who have never used a single MR product, rather they have HEARD this and/or that or from choads like you. So “Angry”, you dumb fuc, how many of their biners that you have owned have failed? Which harness do you have that has failed? How many of their haul bags do you own that have blown out. You and your type make me want to puke? Ignorant, inbred, misinformation inciting, choads!Pirate And I’m trying to be nice.Tongue
Saved

qwert


P-Dud


Dec 6, 2010, 11:30 PM
Post #44 of 48 (11386 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2010
Posts: 2

Re: [johnwesely] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
curt wrote:
P-Dud wrote:
...I know a lot of people who have MR shoes, harnesses and biners and none have ever had a problem with any of them...

Liar.

Curt

Dude joined the site to attack someone who doesn't even post here anymore. Classy.

That's part of my hyphenated middle name, Classy-Liar!

To be fair, I have to say that I have the utmost respect for the inbred Angry. The man sent me a personal e-mail and spelled out his experiences. Now that IS classy. I can fully see where he is coming from considering what he has dealt with. I wish he would share the experiences to back his views here. It is odd though, when you look at some of his past posts, there is positive reviews regarding Mad Rock products. What gives?

Yes, johnwesley, I did join just to attack someone! Ya gotta start somewhere. What better way than to see who gets suckered into some drama... Telling.
It's a rock climbing forum fer christ sakes... don't take things so personally or seriously!

Angry- Thanks for the tip! You were right, it IS way better than it sounds! And, I would prefer Mr. Pud!

There is nothing that should be taken personally unless I know you personally!


Pedrolius


May 17, 2013, 6:24 AM
Post #45 of 48 (9902 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2013
Posts: 13

Re: [yodadave] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Now the flame wars have frozen (?)...

Has anyone used Climb X shoes recently?? Bought/tried some, and able to give me an honest pro/con opinion?

Live in China now and they are pretty cheap. Almost everyone here seems to climb in them. Most are using the simple entry level Climb X "beginner" shoes, and some are even boosting up things that are 8a, 8b...

My first two pairs of shoes were MadRock shoes (locos), Complaints: took a while to wear in/soften the hard sole for grip, and everything that was superficial and could fall off without the performance being effected did fall off.

Other than that meh, they were a climbing shoe that suited my foot.

Gone through a few 5.10s and la sportivas since then.

Is it just shoe eliteism that makes me hesitate or will I be disappointed with a $50 dollar purchase?


bearbreeder


May 17, 2013, 6:41 AM
Post #46 of 48 (9899 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960

Re: [Pedrolius] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Pedrolius wrote:
Now the flame wars have frozen (?)...

Has anyone used Climb X shoes recently?? Bought/tried some, and able to give me an honest pro/con opinion?

Live in China now and they are pretty cheap. Almost everyone here seems to climb in them. Most are using the simple entry level Climb X "beginner" shoes, and some are even boosting up things that are 8a, 8b...

My first two pairs of shoes were MadRock shoes (locos), Complaints: took a while to wear in/soften the hard sole for grip, and everything that was superficial and could fall off without the performance being effected did fall off.

Other than that meh, they were a climbing shoe that suited my foot.

Gone through a few 5.10s and la sportivas since then.

Is it just shoe eliteism that makes me hesitate or will I be disappointed with a $50 dollar purchase?

i wear the climbx drifters ... they work as well as most other shoes i own ... and they cost me 50 smackaroos

im not saying they are the best shoes in the world, but i can do 5.11+ trad in em just fine ... they arent whats limiting me

as you can see i have some minor experience with different shoes Wink




Pedrolius


May 17, 2013, 7:08 AM
Post #47 of 48 (9883 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2013
Posts: 13

Re: [bearbreeder] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks for your quick reply!
From your minor experience shared I think I will just go ahead and get some climb x shoes....
I'm not cheap... wait yes I am. Rephrasing.
I don't mind spending extra on gear that relates to safety. But a shoe failure doesn't usually kill...


notapplicable


May 17, 2013, 6:30 PM
Post #48 of 48 (9839 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771

Re: [jt512] climb x vs madrock [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
angry wrote:
gosharks wrote:
gogo wrote:
Mad Rock puts out a lot of shoes at a decently low price, yet can climb well - there is no reason that one couldn't climb 5.13 in basic Flashes.

Been there, done that.

I have no issues (through 5 years?) at all with workmanship on MR shoes. Now their ropebag on the other hand... If I were to do that again, I would prob just spring for another Metolius. The difference in quality between the two is much larger than the price difference.

That's what I'm saying.

I don't care about the shoes but their rope bag, haulbag, harnesses, and biners are nowhere near the quality of the other brands. Not even close.

Makes me wonder about their hangers.

Jay

Heh heh heh

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...0;page=unread#unread

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook