|
hafilax
Mar 2, 2011, 4:08 AM
Post #26 of 56
(2385 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
macherry wrote: hafilax wrote: While I won't say that artificial sweeteners are good for you, there isn't much evidence that they are that bad for you unless you have a rare high sensitivity to them. They certainly aren't addictive. Why do you think they put loads of caffeine in Mt. Dew in the States (they aren't allowed to in Canada)? it would be the same as getting a sugar fix. Aspartame is 200 times sweeter than sugar. There's barely any of it in the products it's used in which is why it has so few calories. FWIW I think it tastes awful.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 2:53 PM
Post #27 of 56
(2366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 2:54 PM
Post #28 of 56
(2365 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
hafilax wrote: Aspartame is 200 times sweeter than sugar. There's barely any of it in the products it's used in which is why it has so few calories. FWIW I think it tastes awful. Funny thing is I think normal soda tates awful.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 2, 2011, 3:10 PM
Post #29 of 56
(2357 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. I read some recent articles about studies showing that it might not be an effective weight-loss tactic, though. Basically, artificial sweeteners still "fool" your body into thinking it is getting high calories, and it retains them form other sources, or something like that. http://abcnews.go.com/...d=4271246&page=1 Personally, I am a severe caffeine junkie, completely addicted. However, I've always been fine with just black coffee. No calories, tastes awesome, is more economical than most other drinks. Only drawbacks are slight yellowing of teeth, risk of ulcers in some cases, and my students telling me that I talk too fast.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Mar 2, 2011, 3:21 PM
Post #30 of 56
(2352 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda
(This post was edited by macherry on Mar 2, 2011, 3:24 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 3:28 PM
Post #31 of 56
(2348 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. I read some recent articles about studies showing that it might not be an effective weight-loss tactic, though. Basically, artificial sweeteners still "fool" your body into thinking it is getting high calories, and it retains them form other sources, or something like that. http://abcnews.go.com/...d=4271246&page=1 Personally, I am a severe caffeine junkie, completely addicted. However, I've always been fine with just black coffee. No calories, tastes awesome, is more economical than most other drinks. Only drawbacks are slight yellowing of teeth, risk of ulcers in some cases, and my students telling me that I talk too fast. You are basically correct. Starting in the mouth your body senses what it thinks is sugar. As such it starts up its digestive process in anticipation of receiving calories. When your body doesn't receive these calories you get hungry and typically crave carbohydrates thus causing you to want to eat. Basically diet soda can give you a case of the munchies. As for coffee I've never been able to stand the stuff outside of a late with some flavoring. Life would be so much better if I could simply learn to drink coffee or tea.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Mar 2, 2011, 3:30 PM
Post #32 of 56
(2343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
macherry wrote: personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda This is just talking-out-of-my-ass judgemental anecdotalism, but here's my take (and JT512 will probably be in to tell me how RONG I am shortly): people who go for diet sodas already have an addiction to sweets, they binge on it, and it's easy for them to relapse into sugary shit. Personally I know nobody who has shed weight and kept it off by drinking diet soda in lieu of regular soda.
(This post was edited by camhead on Mar 2, 2011, 3:30 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 3:37 PM
Post #33 of 56
(2338 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
macherry wrote: personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda Well I'm a type 1 diabetic (produce no insulin) so I'm not completely sure about the effects of artificial sweeteners on type 2 diabetics. I think it has to do with my previous post how the artificial sweeteners in diet soda can cause you to crave carbohydrates which in turn can cause problems with someone who is trying to manage thier blood sugar by strictly managing their diet. That being said there are a great number of natural / normal foods that a type 2 diabetic isn't supposed to eat when compared to the rest of us (including type 1 diabetics).
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Mar 2, 2011, 3:42 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 3:41 PM
Post #34 of 56
(2334 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
camhead wrote: macherry wrote: personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda This is just talking-out-of-my-ass judgemental anecdotalism, but here's my take (and JT512 will probably be in to tell me how RONG I am shortly): people who go for diet sodas already have an addiction to sweets, they binge on it, and it's easy for them to relapse into sugary shit. Personally I know nobody who has shed weight and kept it off by drinking diet soda in lieu of regular soda. This is correct. Just like eating low fat or low carb food options have been shown to actually cause weight gain. I'm not talking about eating a healthy / natural low fat or low carb diet but instead buy say the low fat Oreos instead of the normal ones.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Mar 2, 2011, 4:01 PM
Post #35 of 56
(2323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
camhead wrote: macherry wrote: personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda This is just talking-out-of-my-ass judgemental anecdotalism, but here's my take (and JT512 will probably be in to tell me how RONG I am shortly): people who go for diet sodas already have an addiction to sweets, they binge on it, and it's easy for them to relapse into sugary shit. Personally I know nobody who has shed weight and kept it off by drinking diet soda in lieu of regular soda. i like a quarter pounder with cheese, some mcnuggets, and large fries.........with a diet coke please
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 4:46 PM
Post #36 of 56
(2314 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
macherry wrote: camhead wrote: macherry wrote: personally if i drank soda i would rather have sugar. but soda, diet or regular is foul shit. i'm not convinced consuming aspertame in any quantity can be good for you. i'll have to look it up, but there were several studies i sent off to my brother (who has type 2 diabetes and drinks buckets of diet soda) that it is not a good substitution for those with diabetes. i think i sent this to my brother....he's also overweight and on high blood pressure meds http://www.healthcentral.com/...80/trouble-diet-soda This is just talking-out-of-my-ass judgemental anecdotalism, but here's my take (and JT512 will probably be in to tell me how RONG I am shortly): people who go for diet sodas already have an addiction to sweets, they binge on it, and it's easy for them to relapse into sugary shit. Personally I know nobody who has shed weight and kept it off by drinking diet soda in lieu of regular soda. i like a quarter pounder with cheese, some mcnuggets, and large fries.........with a diet coke please Done that.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 5:05 PM
Post #37 of 56
(2314 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent.
(This post was edited by wonderwoman on Mar 2, 2011, 5:10 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 5:20 PM
Post #38 of 56
(2308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Very interesting! I was always told by doctors and their ilk that aspartame consumption and it's corrilation to cancer requuired huge amounts of consumption. Based on my body weight I was told I would have to drink something like 100 cans of diet soda a day for a week to ingest the amount of aspartame that injected into a labratory animal (in a single dose) and caused it have cancer. I was also told that aspartame is flushed from your body via urination there was supposed to be no real way for the levels of aspertain to build up in a humans body to levels that where harmful. Dang!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 5:38 PM
Post #39 of 56
(2304 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
chadnsc wrote: Based on my body weight I was told I would have to drink something like 100 cans of diet soda a day for a week to ingest the amount of aspartame that injected into a labratory animal (in a single dose) and caused it have cancer. Actually, what it says in the 2007 article: "For animals fed at the 2,000 ppm level, there was a significant increase in the incidence of lymphomas/leukemias and malignant mammary tumors...approximately the equivalent of a 45-pound child drinking 5 cans of diet soda or a 150-pound adult consuming 14 packets of sweetener per day."
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Mar 2, 2011, 5:40 PM
Post #40 of 56
(2302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Based on my body weight I was told I would have to drink something like 100 cans of diet soda a day for a week to ingest the amount of aspartame that injected into a labratory animal (in a single dose) and caused it have cancer. Actually, what it says in the 2007 article: "For animals fed at the 2,000 ppm level, there was a significant increase in the incidence of lymphomas/leukemias and malignant mammary tumors...approximately the equivalent of a 45-pound child drinking 5 cans of diet soda or a 150-pound adult consuming 14 packets of sweetener per day." How many packets of sweetener does the average can of diet soda contain?
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 5:50 PM
Post #41 of 56
(2293 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
spikeddem wrote: wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Based on my body weight I was told I would have to drink something like 100 cans of diet soda a day for a week to ingest the amount of aspartame that injected into a labratory animal (in a single dose) and caused it have cancer. Actually, what it says in the 2007 article: "For animals fed at the 2,000 ppm level, there was a significant increase in the incidence of lymphomas/leukemias and malignant mammary tumors...approximately the equivalent of a 45-pound child drinking 5 cans of diet soda or a 150-pound adult consuming 14 packets of sweetener per day." How many packets of sweetener does the average can of diet soda contain? No idea. But I can picture my mom using 14 packs of sweetener per day!
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 6:11 PM
Post #42 of 56
(2288 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
But if you look at it this way: 5 cans per 45lb person = 15 cans per 135lb person So, a lot of soda. Maybe not 100 cans per day. but a lot. Also, these focused on prenatal exposure. Chad, don't get pregnant!
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 7:00 PM
Post #43 of 56
(2276 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
wonderwoman wrote: But if you look at it this way: 5 cans per 45lb person = 15 cans per 135lb person So, a lot of soda. Maybe not 100 cans per day. but a lot. Also, these focused on prenatal exposure. Chad, don't get pregnant! I'll do my best but no guarantees.
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Mar 2, 2011, 7:09 PM
Post #44 of 56
(2273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent. I just skimmed the paper. It's pretty interesting. I'm not great with statistics but I've been reading a lot of papers related to diet lately so I'm starting to get familiar with that type of analysis. One of the more interesting tidbits was that the coats of the rats that were fed aspartame turned yellow in a similar fashion to rats that were fed methanol in their water. Methanol is one of the compounds that aspartame breaks down into in the gut. The increase in cancer rates is certainly statistically significant but I'm not convinced at how significant the absolute increase in cancer is. I guess that's why they recommend further study and not an outright ban. They sneak it into a few foods that I eat but not a whole lot. I'm not all that concerned with the amounts I consume.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 10:31 PM
Post #45 of 56
(2263 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
hafilax wrote: wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent.I just skimmed the paper. It's pretty interesting. I'm not great with statistics but I've been reading a lot of papers related to diet lately so I'm starting to get familiar with that type of analysis. One of the more interesting tidbits was that the coats of the rats that were fed aspartame turned yellow in a similar fashion to rats that were fed methanol in their water. Methanol is one of the compounds that aspartame breaks down into in the gut. The increase in cancer rates is certainly statistically significant but I'm not convinced at how significant the absolute increase in cancer is. I guess that's why they recommend further study and not an outright ban. They sneak it into a few foods that I eat but not a whole lot. I'm not all that concerned with the amounts I consume. I think the concern is geared toward the harm it might have on the developing fetus. Can't stand the taste of the stuff myself. I don't drink soda & if I can't pronounce the 'food' ingredient on the label, I am not going to put it in my body.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Mar 2, 2011, 10:35 PM
Post #46 of 56
(2259 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
wonderwoman wrote: hafilax wrote: wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent.I just skimmed the paper. It's pretty interesting. I'm not great with statistics but I've been reading a lot of papers related to diet lately so I'm starting to get familiar with that type of analysis. One of the more interesting tidbits was that the coats of the rats that were fed aspartame turned yellow in a similar fashion to rats that were fed methanol in their water. Methanol is one of the compounds that aspartame breaks down into in the gut. The increase in cancer rates is certainly statistically significant but I'm not convinced at how significant the absolute increase in cancer is. I guess that's why they recommend further study and not an outright ban. They sneak it into a few foods that I eat but not a whole lot. I'm not all that concerned with the amounts I consume. I think the concern is geared toward the harm it might have on the developing fetus. Can't stand the taste of the stuff myself. I don't drink soda & if I can't pronounce the 'food' ingredient on the label, I am not going to put it in my body. Massachusetts? Hopefully not Boston, otherwise you won't be able to eat anything since you clearly can't pronounce any of the ingredients correctly. :)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Mar 2, 2011, 10:38 PM
Post #47 of 56
(2258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: wonderwoman wrote: hafilax wrote: wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent.I just skimmed the paper. It's pretty interesting. I'm not great with statistics but I've been reading a lot of papers related to diet lately so I'm starting to get familiar with that type of analysis. One of the more interesting tidbits was that the coats of the rats that were fed aspartame turned yellow in a similar fashion to rats that were fed methanol in their water. Methanol is one of the compounds that aspartame breaks down into in the gut. The increase in cancer rates is certainly statistically significant but I'm not convinced at how significant the absolute increase in cancer is. I guess that's why they recommend further study and not an outright ban. They sneak it into a few foods that I eat but not a whole lot. I'm not all that concerned with the amounts I consume. I think the concern is geared toward the harm it might have on the developing fetus. Can't stand the taste of the stuff myself. I don't drink soda & if I can't pronounce the 'food' ingredient on the label, I am not going to put it in my body. Massachusetts? Hopefully not Boston, otherwise you won't be able to eat anything since you clearly can't pronounce any of the ingredients correctly. :) Could be worse, could be from Minnesota, we can't pronounce anything right. Or was it that everyone else is sayin it wrong
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Mar 2, 2011, 11:26 PM
Post #48 of 56
(2255 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
spikeddem wrote: wonderwoman wrote: hafilax wrote: wonderwoman wrote: chadnsc wrote: Kartessa wrote: chadnsc wrote: camhead wrote: chadnsc wrote: Grrr, gave up caffeine yesterday and I am in no way thinking of turkey at any temperature. Now what would you go and do a stupid thing like that for? Does this have something to do with your diabeeteez? No it has to do with me drinking a 2 liter of Diet Mt. Dew a day, every day, for the past eight years. It's not the caffeine you should be worrying about, that aspartame can do fucked up shit to your body and brain... Maybe you should take up drinking coffee or tea. Actually hailifax nailed it. . . . there is no scientific proof that aspertain or phenofeltroics (sp?) ; the two artifical sweetners in diet soda have any detramental health risks for humans when injested in the amounts found in diet soda. Well other than like normal soda it can damage your teeth. Sorry to be a party pooper on Aspartame, but I have a toxicology midterm next week. At the top of one of my assigned 2007 Environmental Prospective readings is: Aspartame Cancer Risks Revisited Prenatal Exposure May Be Greatest Concern In March 2006, EHP published the first compelling experimental evidence for the carcinogenic effects of aspartame at a dose level within range of human daily intake [EHP 114:379–385; Soffritti et al.]. A second animal study by the same research team now indicates that the carcinogenic effects of aspartame are magnified when exposure begins during fetal life [EHP 115:1293–1297; Soffritti et al.]. and from the December 2010 American Journal of Industrial Hygiene: Aspartame administered in feed, beginning prenatally through life span, induces cancers of the liver and lung in male Swiss mice. Conclusions: On the basis of these results, together with previous carcinogenicity bioassays conducted on rats in our laboratories, APM should be considered a multiple site, transspecies carcinogenic agent. A re-evaluation of the current regulations on APM remains, in our opinion, urgent.I just skimmed the paper. It's pretty interesting. I'm not great with statistics but I've been reading a lot of papers related to diet lately so I'm starting to get familiar with that type of analysis. One of the more interesting tidbits was that the coats of the rats that were fed aspartame turned yellow in a similar fashion to rats that were fed methanol in their water. Methanol is one of the compounds that aspartame breaks down into in the gut. The increase in cancer rates is certainly statistically significant but I'm not convinced at how significant the absolute increase in cancer is. I guess that's why they recommend further study and not an outright ban. They sneak it into a few foods that I eat but not a whole lot. I'm not all that concerned with the amounts I consume. I think the concern is geared toward the harm it might have on the developing fetus. Can't stand the taste of the stuff myself. I don't drink soda & if I can't pronounce the 'food' ingredient on the label, I am not going to put it in my body. Massachusetts? Hopefully not Boston, otherwise you won't be able to eat anything since you clearly can't pronounce any of the ingredients correctly. :) What of it? I just had myself a peanut buttah & honey sandwich for dinnah.
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Mar 2, 2011, 11:48 PM
Post #49 of 56
(2249 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
I thought Bostonians drank "seltzah".
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Mar 3, 2011, 12:30 AM
Post #50 of 56
(2235 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
hafilax wrote: I thought Bostonians drank "seltzah". Sam Adams.
|
|
|
|
|
|