|
|
|
|
itakealot
Dec 3, 2004, 7:22 AM
Post #1 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382
|
I see it everytime I go to the gym, and now I keep my mouth shut, but tonight my climbing partner so wants her other friend to climb outside, so we put her on the auto belay to teach her about lead climbing. That was a disaster in itself, but as we would yell beta about technique, like the basic, "the hold is by your knee," sorta stuff, she came down and said that since she had been climbing for a year in the gym that she felt her technique was good enough. We will have to slowly deconstruct her on her first outdoor trip, unfortunately.
But to all Gym climbers who have learned in the gym from other gym climbers who have learned in the gym by only taking an introductory class, a year of gym climbing does not make an expert, even you can climb moderate grades on TR.
If you want to learn go to the lead climbing area of the gym and watch atleast one climber who can climb 11d and above. Pay attention to their:
feet (toes)
Hips (up and in)
arms (when climbing static-straight)
My favorite line from a gym climber was "I could do that climb in 1 minute," and when I told them that was great, but no necessarily going to improve their technique, that person was soooo deflated. Then I suggested she needs to climb with someone atleast a number grade above her abilty, outside of course.
Good or bad, depending on how you look at it, atleast in Gym they don't teach people how to place pro. Imagine of all these Gym climbers started showing up to trad areas.
Sorry for ranting.
|
|
|
|
|
lazyjammin
Dec 3, 2004, 7:33 AM
Post #2 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 200
|
I agree, after climbing in the gym for even a few weeks and then going outdoors I have lost technique. Ive noticed that I can lead pretty hard outdoors, but I expend much more effort than people who climb regularly outdoors. At the same time though I started in the gym, and though I climb outdoors all the time, I doubt I would be as good as I am now without the strength I have gained in the gym. Though training in the gym feels not as worthwhile anymore.
Another con to the gym is that it does not prepare you for running it out, since they make you clip every four feet. Its taking me a while to become comfortable running it out.
|
|
|
|
|
climber15
Dec 3, 2004, 8:50 AM
Post #3 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 30, 2004
Posts: 39
|
Mydad and I were talking about this the other day. In his generation you never commited to moves you couldnt reverse, and every thing was done staticly, so as to maintain a good stance and a comforitable position. I have grown up in the dynamic era, were dynos are frequent and irraversable moves are often performed, with only the consequence of a four foot fall (and it beeing a nuciance to get back to the crux again). I beleive the gym fullfilles its purpose, to get stronger and climb harder. Not to run it out, or place gear, or get in comforitable positions. I agree that one should watch a climber that can climb harder, but Ive seen climbers that are just hella strong, and half campus everything. Their good because thier strong, but they havent the experience or technique to take it outside and get out of hairy situations. I know this through personal experience when I as a gym rat went outside for the first time 2 years ago. Ive learned alot since then.
|
|
|
|
|
maxdacat
Dec 3, 2004, 10:05 AM
Post #4 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2004
Posts: 142
|
In reply to: my climbing partner so wants her other friend to climb outside, so we put her on the auto belay to teach her about lead climbing. That was a disaster in itself Sorry for ranting.
however i think the sooner you get outside to climb the better....ideally one would never have to set foot inside a gym as they are horrible sterile places that can never compete with the outdoors but are a necessary evil for us weekend warriors.
just because your partner doesn't have great technique indoors doesn't mean she shouldn't get outside....i would want to nurture that desire as it means she might even be a proper climber not some jumped-up gym rat :lol:
i don't think gym leading is going to prepare her for outdoor leading as she seems to think....best to go outdoors and start from scratch and let her talents develop naturally....she might feel happy being a "career" second, or might want to jump on the sharp end ASAP.
If i had to make one recommendation it would be a minimum of 6 months solid outdoor seconding experience (pulling out pro, taking down anchors etc) and don't worry about dummy leads etc just put 'em straight on something well within their ability.
Good luck to her!
|
|
|
|
|
pylonhead
Dec 3, 2004, 10:18 AM
Post #5 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2004
Posts: 283
|
How exactly does gym climbing foster these bad techniques? Everything you mention will make you a better climber on plastic as well as rock, and when you look at good climbers in the gym they've got their hips up and in, they're toeing down on their feet, their arms are straight.
You had a point in there somewhere, but instead chose to start yet another gym bashing thread. Yawn.
|
|
|
|
|
graniteplanet
Dec 3, 2004, 2:12 PM
Post #7 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 54
|
Actually the gym does foster bad technique. A lot of top climbers use them of course because they are a great tool for raw power and sport-specific strength, but it does foster bad technique. I belive the reason for this lies in the nature of artificial holds themselves. Outdoors if you have a side pull as an opening hand hold then chances are it might be later used for a heel hook. Inside you can stand on top of 90% of the holds set as side pulls. Also, outdoors there is frequently a larger number of options for feet, especially on routes, allowing good climbers to use a lage number of possible body positions in the best way. The focus becomes more on the feet and this is good technique. Would say more but I'm late for class.
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Dec 3, 2004, 2:43 PM
Post #8 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
Okay, so let me get this straight:
You think that having lots and lots of options to plonk your feet down any old how fosters good technique? And having to use highly specific and accurate footwork for the requirements of a particular problem is bad technique?
You have actually been rock climbing haven't you?
:?
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Dec 3, 2004, 2:59 PM
Post #9 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Not again...
If I post that crack climbing fosters bad face climbing technique or that slab climbing fosters poor steep technique, my point will only be as valid as this thread.
A gym is different than outside, granted, but it doesn't foster poor technique. It fosters some techniques that might be better suited to indoors, to be sure, but it can also be the single most powerful training tool (shy of consistent outdoor climbing) available... if you know how to use it correctly.
Climbing is climbing. There are only different mediums. Everything else is in your head in one form or another.
|
|
|
|
|
bad_lil_kitty
Dec 3, 2004, 3:10 PM
Post #10 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 1, 2004
Posts: 2341
|
In reply to: In reply to: The Gym Fosters Poor Technique Which is why 99% of the top climbers in the world use gyms to train in. You obviously know more than them, right? Why don't you explain to us all how it is that they spend so much time indoors but are still mysteriously able to send grades outdoors that you can't even imagine touching? Come on, put up or shut up.
Agreed, Tradman... Indoors is great for training and also for some of us gals who don't want to climb late into the evenings alone...
And agree w/ Jay - climbing is climbing and they are in and of themselves two completely different environments...
If you have fun, do it.
Learning to lead inside a gym (e.g. a class) is perfect also for those who don't want to weigh down a group (e.g. outdoors day trip - when you work all week the last thing you want to do is hold EVERYONE up)... Not sure, if autobelay-learning-to-lead is a good method... .02
I do better outdoors bouldering then indoors but who cares... and I liked my crack climbing experience, but the ONLY ONE crack in my gym is just that... it's just one.. not the same as the variety you will find in nature...
blah blah blah
|
|
|
|
|
bad_lil_kitty
Dec 3, 2004, 3:13 PM
Post #11 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 1, 2004
Posts: 2341
|
oh and re: technique - it's really the person.... kinda like, it's not the computer that is failing... it's the kid operating it ;)
|
|
|
|
|
itakealot
Dec 3, 2004, 3:25 PM
Post #12 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382
|
In reply to: But to all Gym climbers who have learned in the gym from other gym climbers who have learned in the gym by only taking an introductory class, a year of gym climbing does not make an expert, even you can climb moderate grades on TR. In reply to: In reply to: The Gym Fosters Poor Technique Which is why 99% of the top climbers in the world use gyms to train in. You obviously know more than them, right? Why don't you explain to us all how it is that they spend so much time indoors but are still mysteriously able to send grades outdoors that you can't even imagine touching? Come on, put up or shut up.
Of course a world class climber knows how to train, whereas the above described does not.
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Dec 3, 2004, 3:31 PM
Post #13 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
Oh, I see.
You're saying that people who have poor technique and need to improve shouldn't train - because they don't know how to, is that it?
That's much clearer.
:lol:
Keep going, you're getting sillier.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Dec 3, 2004, 3:52 PM
Post #14 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
In reply to: oh and re: technique - it's really the person.... kinda like, it's not the computer that is failing... it's the kid operating it ;)
My thought is that gyms spawn new climbers, and new climbers have bad technique. Manufactured holds, primarily flat wall surfaces, and paint-by-numbers routes may poorly prepare indoor climbers for outdoor climbing, but they are better than nothing. I don't know why the OP things someone needs any climbing technique to transition to real rock, anyway. She'll go outside, develop new skills, etc. Recommend starting a couple of grades lower than in the gym to get a feeling for real rock and see how she does. I'd worry more about focusing on proper anchoring and safety issues rather than technique. That's what's probably most lacking in strictly gym climbers.
|
|
|
|
|
graniteplanet
Dec 4, 2004, 5:19 PM
Post #15 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 54
|
tradman wrote:
In reply to: Okay, so let me get this straight: You think that having lots and lots of options to plonk your feet down any old how fosters good technique? And having to use highly specific and accurate footwork for the requirements of a particular problem is bad technique? You have actually been rock climbing haven't you?
Yeah, I've been climbing a few times. What I was implying in my statement was that outdoors you have a number of different options for feet, not that there are giant ledges to hop up on as you seem to think I implied. Having many footholds, invariably all small, teaches you to use them in the best way possible for you. You learn what works and what doesn't because things are not laid out for you, you have to think about were you are going to put your feet and why that is best. Inside things are laid out for you, setters want you to move in a certain way and most new climbers act on the principle of "see small hold, put foot there" without thinking about why that foot goes there and if it would be best to put it there. Also, some of those top climbers you mentioned that train on plastic freely admit that outdoors requires more technique, Nels Rosassan for example. Most top climbers use the gym to train sport-specific strength, as I said already, which helps them send amazingly hard grades. Just because someone trains on plastic, and there is nothing at all wrong with that, it is a great tool, and sends hard grades does not mean that training on plastic is the secret to good technique, if so then hitting the campus board is the best technique training out there.
|
|
|
|
|
allan_thomson
Dec 4, 2004, 5:25 PM
Post #16 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 12, 2003
Posts: 596
|
In reply to: I agree, after climbing in the gym for even a few weeks and then going outdoors I have lost technique. Ive noticed that I can lead pretty hard outdoors, but I expend much more effort than people who climb regularly outdoors. At the same time though I started in the gym, and though I climb outdoors all the time, I doubt I would be as good as I am now without the strength I have gained in the gym. Though training in the gym feels not as worthwhile anymore. Another con to the gym is that it does not prepare you for running it out, since they make you clip every four feet. Its taking me a while to become comfortable running it out.
Have you tried skipping every other clip in the gym? Someone I know says they do this to help them get that feeling of running it out in the gym.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Dec 4, 2004, 5:32 PM
Post #17 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Gyms are wonderful places for intermediate to advanced climbers to get stronger and more confident.
Most of the people I've seen who've learned at a gym are really in for a long and frustrating battle once they do go outside.
Hit real rock as much as possible and use the gym to improve strength and power. I realize that some people only climb inside, this idea is to me, mind boggling.
Who cares, it's only a gym right?
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Dec 6, 2004, 1:19 PM
Post #18 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
In reply to: if so then hitting the campus board is the best technique training out there.
Ah, now see, there's your mistake right there: the campus board isn't a technique training tool, it's for strength training.
"Technique" is something that's quite different from strength. It's quite complicated, and I really don't have time to explain it to you. As a starting point though, your example of having several small footholds to choose from is a good example: choosing the easiest option is not all there is to good technique. If you actually want to get better at climbing, you'll need to practice moving in and from less-than-ideal positions.
Doing easy stuff doesn't lead to improvement. It's quite possible that you just want to climb stuff which has lots of ideally-placed holds for you to choose between, but the rest of us are probably looking for something a bit more challenging and need to practice some.
:roll:
|
|
|
|
|
kahuna3602
Dec 6, 2004, 1:39 PM
Post #19 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2001
Posts: 318
|
One thing missing from this thread. The quality of the technique required is directly proportional to the quality of the routesetter who set it. I've been lucky enough to see some of the countries best routesetters in action and I guarantee if they don't want you to use a hold exactly as they intended, you won't. I've seen them shave foot chips, fill in holes and place them so there is no other way to use it. I think its actually pretty impressive. I'm glad to have the oportunity to learn from them.
Gym climbing will never be the same as rock climbing but it's a great tool for climbing better.
|
|
|
|
|
punk_rocker333
Dec 6, 2004, 1:45 PM
Post #20 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 9, 2004
Posts: 387
|
I'm glad that I learned outdoors. I know what to expect. Although, I agree that the gym is great for strength and endurance training. I recently climbed a 76 foot-high wall, that's the highest I've ever climbed and it was a great work out.
|
|
|
|
|
graniteplanet
Dec 6, 2004, 3:27 PM
Post #21 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 54
|
Tradman, it seems like you really bent on undermining my opinion not because it has no base but because it is different from yours. You are assuming a great deal from my posts such as that I In reply to: you just want to climb stuff which has lots of ideally-placed holds for you to choose between, but the rest of us are probably looking for something a bit more challenging and need to practice some.
This is a decent topic to discuss, better than another shoe thread at least, fshizzle and kahuna3602 both make excellent points and I have to admit that really good setters can challange one's technique, I've had the experience of encountering such setters myself. In saying that the gym fosters bad technique I am only stating that from my personal experience. Moving from the gym to outside I found I was not able to power through many problems, I had to use my feet much more and break the habits climbing in a gym had taught me. I wasn't able to campus nearly as much and I found myself using heel-hooks in many situations that the gym couldn't mimic. Anyway, sorry for the long post, keep the good points comming, on both sides.
|
|
|
|
|
outdoorsie
Dec 6, 2004, 5:35 PM
Post #23 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 15, 2003
Posts: 302
|
Ok, so this has very little to do with the recent posts in this thread, but the overall topic reminded me of some thoughts I had this fall. Last summer, I moved from Indiana to Colorado, spent a month on the road, and did not climb indoors for 4+ months (but bouldered or climbed outside 4-5 days a week!). It was an *awesome* summer. Needless to say, my onsight skill went way up on real rock this summer. Like, from barely 9 to early 11s.
But the crazy thing is, going back into the gym this fall was humiliating. I was overgripping, using horendous footwork, completely unable to read a sequence (the route was TAPED! What's wrong with me??), it was horrible! It's taken a couple of months now, but I'm almost back into the same level of gym climbing that I was last spring. The stupid part is, I discovered on a trip out to Shelf a few weeks ago, that my outdoor climbing is now seriously suffering! My ability to read routes outdoors, to find rests and crack-climbing techniques have all seriously degraded!!
So, here's my thought, climbing indoors is good for climbing indoors. You can develop technique that will get you up all the hard routes in the gym, but I don't think that technique transfers well outside. Climbing outside, similarly, does not transfer well back into the gym. It almost feels like two different sports to me now. Crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
graniteplanet
Dec 6, 2004, 7:32 PM
Post #24 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2004
Posts: 54
|
Actually, you haven't done any real debating. The only point you've really made can be summed up as saying "well all the pros do it so it must be good". You have picked apart other people's arguements by taking their comments out of context and then added in little comments of your own that seem to try to make them sound stupid. i.e.
In reply to: You have actually been rock climbing haven't you? In reply to: That's much clearer. Keep going, you're getting sillier.
I don't think I'm taking these comments out of context in that I'm not twisting your words around, talking down to people really just stands on its own. I honestly don't care in the least if you don't agree with what I believe. If you do winde up making a few good points and showing me that I might be wrong, as outdoorsie and j_ung are doing, then fine I'm better off for better understanding the other side. I just don't like a superior attitude talking down to people he or she doesn't know. Discusion is great when it leads somewhere, when you can admit that the other side has valid points and can keep an open mind to them, you have a decent chance of learning something then. Would you throw around the comments and insults if we were having this discussion around a dinner table? Sorry man, I just appreciate a little politness and respect in discussions.
|
|
|
|
|
thinksinpictures
Dec 6, 2004, 8:08 PM
Post #25 of 37
(6739 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2003
Posts: 447
|
In reply to: Actually, you haven't done any real debating.
Alright then, here's something for you to "debate." You said:
In reply to: ...some of those top climbers you mentioned that train on plastic freely admit that outdoors requires more technique...
I think almost anyone will acknowledge that climbing outdoors requires more finely honed technique than climbing indoors. Most of the arguments in this thread seem to be based on this premise. It is, however, a fallacy to take this to mean that climbing indoors fosters poor technique, which it does not necessarily.
The only instance in which I can see a strong argument for indoor climbing leading to poor technique is if someone were to go outside for the first time and somehow expect each hold to be immediately apparent. I don't see why any thinking person who has ever seen a rock would make such an assumption, but let's give it some credence anyway. Even under that condition, there would still be no problem after the outdoor newbie had a couple moves pointed out to him/her.
In this case, you might make an argument that indoor climbing fosters poor onsight technique, or poor routefinding skills, but certainly not poor overall climbing technique.
Overall though, I think that kahuna makes one of the best points in this thread so far:
In reply to: The quality of the technique required is directly proportional to the quality of the routesetter who set it.
If you've ever climbed a route set by a stellar routesetter, you might back off your argument a bit. When I climbed at the BRG in Boston, Tim Kemple was setting there, and I found many of his problems to require as much problem solving and as finely honed technique as similarly graded problems at Pawtuckaway or the Woods (though P-Tuck is a better example). Perhaps your gym's routesetter needs improvement?
|
|
|
|
|
takeme
Dec 6, 2004, 8:36 PM
Post #26 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 7, 2003
Posts: 367
|
In reply to: In reply to: Tradman, it seems like you really bent on undermining my opinion not because it has no base but because it is different from yours. Yes, it's called "debating". You state a position and I attempt to prove you wrong. It's a shame that you're taking this so personally, I'll leave you alone for now.
It's a shame that you've made it personal.
|
|
|
|
|
rocknalaska
Dec 6, 2004, 9:09 PM
Post #27 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 19, 2002
Posts: 129
|
Most of what has been said has been based on personal experience Well, to add in my experience:
Some people adapt to real rock very well from gym climbing, some adapt very poorly.
Some people have a difficult time transitioning from indoor to outdoor and vice versa, and some people have no trouble at all.
Some people learn good technique in a gym, some people don't.
Some people learn good technique climbing outside, some people don't.
This last statement seems very pertinent to this argument. If climbing outside can lead to poor technique, then it is not outside or inside climbing that leads to poor technique, rather some other factor.
To add more muck to the already murky water of this debate, different people have different ideas of what is good technique. I've met people who have great crack climbing technique(climbing up to 5.12 trad) who fall off of a 5.10 sport route because they have no concept of certain basic sport techniques.
I think the problem stems from generalization. It takes a certain skill set to climb inside. It takes different skills to climb outside. Some of these skills transfer very well. Some don't. I think how much transfers accross is more based upon the individual rather than the location.
Last thought. Lets change outside and inside to granite and limestone. You can apply the same argument. And it is equally invalid.
My .02$
|
|
|
|
|
bad_lil_kitty
Dec 6, 2004, 10:14 PM
Post #28 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 1, 2004
Posts: 2341
|
In reply to: In reply to: oh and re: technique - it's really the person.... kinda like, it's not the computer that is failing... it's the kid operating it ;) My thought is that gyms spawn new climbers, and new climbers have bad technique. Manufactured holds, primarily flat wall surfaces, and paint-by-numbers routes may poorly prepare indoor climbers for outdoor climbing, but they are better than nothing. I don't know why the OP things someone needs any climbing technique to transition to real rock, anyway. She'll go outside, develop new skills, etc. Recommend starting a couple of grades lower than in the gym to get a feeling for real rock and see how she does. I'd worry more about focusing on proper anchoring and safety issues rather than technique. That's what's probably most lacking in strictly gym climbers.
I'm not sure really what you're getting out - what your rebuttal is towards me. That said, there are different elements, different styles which may require different techniques and to have a set of techniques that work well regardless of one's enviornment can be a good thing.... for example:
I am a MAC user - I use different techniques when writing tech documents (which is what I do for a living). Those techniques and short-cuts may not be the best for editing programs I use while working on a PC. Two similar (concepts here would be parallel to climbing) things requiring two different methods (techniques) - the outcome (goal of climbing is to top out) is a finished project that is finished in a timely and accurate manner.
Why be good at two things that perhaps I may not use on a daily basis (e.g. inside vs outdoors climbing) cause it makes me a more well rounded candidate when I test Gov. applications; I know the technology behind the two (how the applications work on MACs and PCs); with the knowledge and skills that have allowed me to use the technique (fast and efficiently) I may be offered perhaps a new position based upon the fact that I can work on two separate platforms (environments).
|
|
|
|
|
bad_lil_kitty
Dec 6, 2004, 10:18 PM
Post #29 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 1, 2004
Posts: 2341
|
In reply to: In reply to: Tradman, it seems like you really bent on undermining my opinion not because it has no base but because it is different from yours. Yes, it's called "debating". You state a position and I attempt to prove you wrong. It's a shame that you're taking this so personally, I'll leave you alone for now.
:D oh tradman - you'll be dreaming of these kids too ;) :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
korntera
Dec 6, 2004, 10:28 PM
Post #30 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 14, 2004
Posts: 422
|
I love gym climbers than can be kinda funny. One guy I took climbing outdoors after he climbed in the gym for a year( I had only been climbing 6 months at the time) And i hoped on a 5.7 and lead it and then belayed him from the top so we could do the second pitch on his first outdoor climb. Halfway up the 5.7(and he climbs a full number ahead of me in the gym) he was scared and thought he was on the hardest thing of his life. It was very funny to see this gym climber struggling on a 5.7 when a climber who had climbed for half as long outdoor could climb 3 number grades higher. If you climb indoors and CAN go outdoors, do it ever chance you freaking get or get laughed at when you tell people you climbed 3 times a week for a year and want your mom on a 5.7
|
|
|
|
|
jonnyb
Dec 6, 2004, 11:05 PM
Post #31 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2003
Posts: 51
|
As solely an outdoor climber for many years, I finally joined a gym a bit less than a year ago. I have found it has helped tremendously with my technique. Reading sequences, being deliberate with my feet, all kinds of things. It's even helped my lead head. Gyms can be a great place to learn technique, but like anything, you have to focus on learning technique to learn it...
..oh yea, they make you strong too..
|
|
|
|
|
cgranite
Dec 7, 2004, 12:07 AM
Post #32 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2003
Posts: 366
|
The Gym is not a place to learn good technique. If you are a person that is new to climbing, then obviously your going to be learning technique in a gym. That is basic climbing technique, which you could just as easily learn by climbing a tree. Once a person has learned basic techniques, the Gym will only hinder their progression in this area.
The gym will only build strong muscle because the individual is constantly forcing bad technique.
I bet that muscles will even develop unconventionally for outdoor climbing and good technique.
True Technique is learned by going out doors with a partner who is better than you, and who has climbed much longer than you.
Poor technique will make climbing a punishment that will only give you satisfaction through accomplishments, while good technique will make climbing flow and give you pleasure no matter what.
That is what I have learned through my experiences in climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
itakealot
Dec 7, 2004, 12:33 AM
Post #33 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2003
Posts: 382
|
In reply to: The Gym is not a place to learn good technique. If you are a person that is new to climbing, then obviously your going to be learning technique in a gym. That is basic climbing technique, which you could just as easily learn by climbing a tree. Once a person has learned basic techniques, the Gym will only hinder their progression in this area. The gym will only build strong muscle because the individual is constantly forcing bad technique. I bet that muscles will even develop unconventionally for outdoor climbing and good technique. True Technique is learned by going out doors with a partner that better than you, and who has climbed much longer than you. Poor technique will make climbing a punishment that will only give you satisfaction through accomplishments, while good technique will make climbing flow and give you pleasure no matter what. That is what I have learned through my experiences in climbing.
Thanks for spelling it out, I concurr and probably minions of others.
as for this:
In reply to: Oh, I see. You're saying that people who have poor technique and need to improve shouldn't train - because they don't know how to, is that it? That's much clearer. :lol: Keep going, you're getting sillier.
I give up. I am invoking Occam's Razor principle. (maculated, coylec, is this the proper usage?)
|
|
|
|
|
phlsphr
Dec 7, 2004, 1:02 AM
Post #34 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 10, 2003
Posts: 262
|
I think the gym is a good place to learn and improve technique. I work on my technique a lot in the gym over the winter, and it pays off outside over summer. Its not that the gym fosters poor technique, its just that it doesn't foster all the technique you will need. The problem is that you can only work on a subset of the technique you need at a typical gym. The smaller the gym, the more this is so. My gym has no cracks, no slab, and not much in the way of roofs to pull, so obviously offers no little or no way to improve those particular techniques. Moreover, the technique I can work on is limited to the variety of routes set by the route setters.
The other point being largely missed in this discussion is that what you don't learn in a gym is how to read rock. Reading a route in a gym is fundamentally different than reading routes outside, because in the gym you should ask yourself "Why did the routesetter put that particular hold in that particular spot, oriented in that particular way?" That kind of question makes no sense outside. It is not "poor technique" to ask that question indoors, but it is a way of thinking about routes that does not transfer to outside.
|
|
|
|
|
jonnyb
Dec 7, 2004, 1:04 AM
Post #35 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 3, 2003
Posts: 51
|
In reply to: The gym will only build strong muscle because the individual is constantly forcing bad technique.
I really don't see why you think this. Maybe it has to do with what someone said earlier about routesetters. If the routes aren't well set, I'd imagine they wouldn't be that beneficial. I climb at a gym with really quality routesetters.
Trust me, I used to be on the other side of the fence. I wouldn't go near gyms. A climber who was far better than me recommended I go to the gym, saying it would really help my technique. I've found the most drastic jump in my ability since joining the gym.
For me, it really simplifies the equasion when you have the holds already set out for you and the climber's job is to then figure out the most effecient way to move through the sequence. In 'real' climbing, it is all much more complicated, with many more options, but I find myself coming up with much more clever solutions to cruxes, and creative ways of saving my arms that I'd never considered before.
|
|
|
|
|
thinksinpictures
Dec 7, 2004, 1:18 AM
Post #36 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 25, 2003
Posts: 447
|
In reply to: I am invoking Occam's Razor principle.
Occam's razor is the principle that entities must not be multiplied beyond what is necessary, or in simpler terms, the idea that the simplest explanation is the most appropriate. Given a variety of experiences as to whether gym climbing helps or hinders outdoor technique, I'm inclined to suggest that the simplest explanation in this thread is that the development of good technique in a gym setting is a function of the quality of routes, and thus the quality of routesetters.
Finals really bring out the post-whore in me.
|
|
|
|
|
cgranite
Dec 7, 2004, 1:49 AM
Post #37 of 37
(4488 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 5, 2003
Posts: 366
|
What I meant by that comment was that if a person is climbing with poor technique then they will be putting unnecessary force on their fingers, arms, and backs causing certain muscles to constantly grow giving them a crutch for bad movement. In the gym this can also cause injury quicker than someone with good technique.
By my statement, I didn't mean that the gym doesn't build muscle. The only use for the gym is to build muscle, endurance, and give 24-7 climbing.
I think the gym is a great place to build power and strength for increasing your ability, but there is much more to climbing than strength and your not going to get that from the gym.
I know there are a lot of people who go to the gym and then go out doors, and feel that they climbed better due to technique rather than the fact that they climbed stronger because they had three pumpy gym sessions earlier that week.
It is truth that technique optimizes the strength you all ready have and will make you feel stronger while climbing, but also just building muscle can have the same effect. That is what the gym does.
You can train Technical movements in the gym in order to build those tiny muscles needed, but it's not going to build up the engrams you will need for applying it on rock.
And it’s good someone mentioned reading rock because that’s the most important part in applying proper technique. Another thing to note it the fact that gym holds are generally screwed onto the wall, so every hold is immediately positive. This is very different from the real rock, especially when reading the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
