|
Julka7
Oct 28, 2009, 1:13 AM
Post #1 of 10
(7315 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 34
|
Someone fell off Ape Call this monday. Does anyone have any info? Does anyone know the name of the person? I have a suspicion that it's someone that I spoke to that morning, wanted to confirm..
|
|
|
|
|
coolcat83
Oct 28, 2009, 1:49 AM
Post #2 of 10
(7268 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1007
|
Do you know where they fell off? Injuries?
|
|
|
|
|
Julka7
Oct 28, 2009, 2:12 AM
Post #3 of 10
(7233 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 34
|
This is info I got from the ranger -- the guy fell from about 25 feet, decked and broke his back. He did not lose consciousness. This is second hand info.
|
|
|
|
|
TheRucat
Oct 28, 2009, 2:48 AM
Post #4 of 10
(7188 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2008
Posts: 234
|
Hmm yeah, if its the climb im thinking of and remember correctly the gear is pretty sparse for the first 25 feet or so of that climb. I don't think I placed any gear till quite a ways up on that one. Broken back doesn't sound good, hope he recovers well!
(This post was edited by TheRucat on Oct 28, 2009, 2:49 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Oct 28, 2009, 4:26 AM
Post #5 of 10
(7113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
TheRucat wrote: Hmm yeah, if its the climb im thinking of and remember correctly the gear is pretty sparse for the first 25 feet or so of that climb. I don't think I placed any gear till quite a ways up on that one. Yeah, you don't get really good gear till after the first 5.8 crux. BITD there used to be a pin, and the horizontal above it that really protects the move wasn't blown out and could accept some opposition tiny stoppers. If the route were new today and somewhere else than the Gunks, there would probably be a bolt protecting the move. Best wishes for an uncomplicated recovery.
|
|
|
|
|
tradmanclimbs
Oct 28, 2009, 11:43 AM
Post #6 of 10
(7038 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599
|
If the rout was historicaly protected by fixed gear, why would the pin not be replaced with a new pin or bolt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Oct 28, 2009, 2:22 PM
Post #8 of 10
(6888 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
tradmanclimbs wrote: If the rout was historicaly protected by fixed gear, why would the pin not be replaced with a new pin or bolt? See the thread posted by sween345. Short answer - the ethic in the Gunks is to not replace fixed pins if the placement will take a nut or cam or whatever. The ethic is also vehemently against retro-bolting. Regarding that particular climb, that low crux was not really protected by a pin. Where you really wanted pro there's only a micro-nut thin horizontal filled with quartz crystals, most of which have now sheared off, leaving a flare. It was a tricky, sketch placement 30 years ago that you knew would probably blow in a fall. The pin under that kept you off the deck, maybe, depending on slack and rope stretch, but not necessarily from getting hurt. That pin was in a good horizontal that took a 1" cam. If that pin is gone, there's no need to replace it.
|
|
|
|
|
anthonycb
Oct 28, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #9 of 10
(6758 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 4, 2008
Posts: 4
|
I think that the micronut placement in question isn't really that bad as long as you fall to the right-which is the direction one would expect since your are moving up and right toward the corner and top of the slab. If you fall left, it might pull depending on how well you set it. 5 feet below that (10 feet off the deck), there's a decent small cam placement and 5 or 6 feet past the micronut there's a good .75 or #1 camalot placement followed by another #2 camalot 3-5 feet past that. It's a really great climb marred only by about 20 feet of boring climbing in the middle and the issue of having to do one of the cruxes protected by a sideways micronut. The climb immediately to the right, Ape and Essence, on the other hand looks like a horror show to lead despite getting a PG in the Williams Guide. I heard sirens in the early afternoon on Monday and was hoping that it wasn't an injury. Sorry to hear that it was. I hope that the injured party heals up quickly and completely.
|
|
|
|
|
jtr109
Oct 29, 2009, 5:22 PM
Post #10 of 10
(6571 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 8, 2005
Posts: 8
|
I helped carry the injured climber down on monday. I didn't catch his name. He had long hair and a beard and was climbing with a lady. It looked like he had placed two pieces, one was out to the left of the horizontal and did not appear to have been clipped. Just a guess, but I think he slipped while trying to make that clip. He was awake, conscious and alert throughout. I don't know how extensive his injuries were. I think he and his partner gave some thought to self-transport to the hospital, though he was clearly hurting and I doubt that would have been possible. Hope it wasn't as serious as a broken back.
|
|
|
|
|
|