USnavy wrote:
After reading the thread from mp.com about
bounce testing, I got a bit curious as to how much force a
bounce test in the real world actually produces. Two members in that thread said they bounced around in a sling, or dropped a weight in a sling, and got an impact force of around 4 kN. That seemed excessively high to me, especially considering Metolius quotes a hard
bounce test at 2 kN. So I decided to replicate real-world aid
bounce tests and see how much force they produce. This testing is non-conclusive; it is simply for fun. It is, more or less, a
test of how much force I will inflict on pieces I
test, rather than an absolute statement regarding
bounce testing forces.
The point of this thread was to be as real world as possible. So I conducted this
test in Yosemite, on an aid route, on aid placements (an A0 bolt ladder). I conducted the tests using all the gear I normally use on a wall, and in the exact manner I would
test a placement on a wall. In every case, I tested the placement quite aggressively – I didn’t hold back.
-I used a 5,000 lb load cell with a rated accuracy of .02%, and a computer driven strain gauge analyzer that sampled the load cell at 500Hz.
-I weigh 158 lbs
-On the tests I was wearing a rack, the rack weighed 17.5 lbs
-I was using Yates adjustable daisy chains (nylon)
-I was using Metolius wall step 8-step aiders
(1) I conducted six different tests. The first set shows an aider
bounce test versus a daisy
bounce test, but without a rack.
(2) The second set is the same as the first, but with a [nearly] full El Cap clean aid rack (which weighs 17.5 lbs).
(3) The last set was an absolute worst possible case scenario where I was hanging only from the load cell and no part of my body was touching the lower piece. The first
test in the series showed an aggressive daisy
test. The second
test shows an excessively aggressive daisy
test where I was literally slamming myself down onto my daisy as hard as possible. This
test was more aggressive than any
bounce test I would use on a wall. I was wearing the rack in both tests in this series.
[img]http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/5060/bouncetest1.png[/img]
[img]http://img713.imageshack.us/img713/4073/bouncetest2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1306/bouncetest3.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/6531/1001471f.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/2579/1001475dj.jpg[/img]
[img]http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/7007/1001478q.jpg[/img]
The absolute highest force incurred on the top piece occurred during the last
test (the excessively aggressive
test,) and racked in 681 lbf. or 3.03 kN. However, that
test was synthetically extreme. The highest force incurred during a realistic aggressive
bounce test was 643 lbf. or 2.86 kN. But again, I was hanging solely from the piece which is not realistic in a wall climbing scenario. So the highest force incurred using an aggressive daisy
bounce test that is realistic to a wall climbing scenario is 618 lbf. or 2.75 kN.
So my testing seems to imply that a hard
bounce test in your aiders will produce 400-550 lbf and a hard
bounce test directly on your daisy chains will produce 500-600 lbf. I find it unlikely that I would be able to produce a higher impact force using conventional nylon pocketed daisy chains simply because I was bouncing around hard enough that if I were fified into a pocketed daisy, the aggressive bouncing would likely result in the fifi coming out of the pocket. However, it is possible that using a Dyneema daisy chain would result in a higher impact force; maybe I can
test that in the future.