Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Rgold’s recommendation not to fall.
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All


dirtineye


Jul 7, 2004, 4:37 PM
Post #101 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
It can be dismissed out of hand as old school raving.

DMT

I had no idea any Old Schoolers were into those rave things. Do they also do foam parties? What ever happened to passing a bottle of port around the campfire?

Port? That's the stuff our grandmas nipped while cooking Thanksgiving Dinner, no? No, I don't think port quite gets the job done anymore.

X-tacy and viagra dude. Where ya been??? The stiff guy dancing by the door is pointing the way...

DMT

You need viagra? All I need is my Sweetie.

Oh wait, I don't want to hijack this thread!

I guess you could say she and I have fallen for each other. This fall has serious consequences. It is a long fall with no pro. So far, so good!


dingus


Jul 7, 2004, 4:56 PM
Post #102 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I think you may have missed the point. If all you know how to do is climb until you top out or fall, then you can only climb at or near your limit in environments that are condusive to that - like plastic and steep sport routes.

And that is different from the inherent limitations of trad exactly HOW? If all you know is 'on sighting' then you limit yourself to routes you can on sight... well DUH!!! In each case we are limited by the 'rules of style.' To say that sport climbing limits us to sport climbing... well now, I have to agree with THAT point.

In reply to:
The idea of working the grades and not falling in trad is that you learn the valuable skills of downclimbing and retreat.

Well, amongst a lot of other things, yeah. I simply don't make the mistake of extrapolating trad experience and applying it to other styles with a brush so broad that I would be tempted to suggest that falling off a route teaches us nothing about climbing it.

That's like saying, working to memorize the lines of a play (instead of on-sighting it) teaches us nothing about the play, because we didn't get it right the first time. Pardon me, but that is just ridiculous.

In reply to:
Without practice, downclimbing anywhere close to your top grade is not going to happen. And, without the safety net of knowing you can back off, the gear factor is going to cap your trad limit. I think that is why so many wicked strong young climbers, honed on bouldering and plastic, still hit a wall at 5.9 in trad.

In my experience, everyone encounters the 5.9 wall in trad, be they self taught idiots like me or gym bred punks with tats and face jewellery. 5.9 and up, in trad, is HARD. It requires specialized techniques and experience.

Funny, will you examine the reverse... why so many trad climbers hit the wall at 5.11 sport? Will you take a hard look in that mirror too?

In reply to:
How else would an old duffer like me wind up retrieving gear from a 5.8 climb for 5.13 sport climbers?

Why, the same way they could be retrieving your leaver biner for you... they possess skill, strength, techniques that you do not. That ought to be obvious.

In reply to:
Another issue is building judgement, it takes quite a bit of experience in trad for most climbers to be able to identify 'benign' falling conditions.

Its like you have this TV and it only shows you the black and white of trad vs. sport. My TV? It's in color man, and I have learned to ignore most of these arbitrary absolutes as 'style dependant.' Judgement is always the most important aspect of ANY form of climbing. Trad climbers do not hold exclusive rights to the word.

Cheers
DMT


tradmanclimbs


Jul 7, 2004, 5:02 PM
Post #103 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 2599

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My thought was that if you worked anything 3,000 times it would improve your climbing. I certainly wouldn't recomend it and it would boar me to death but just hikeing up to the cliff 3,000 times is going to get you in pretty good shape. I was basicly responding to a stupid statement with a stupid reply. I certainly belive that you shouldn't be popping off of 5.7's like a ripe plumb and downclimbing skills are key to survival but if you don't push yourself at the upper end of your limit you will not get as good as your potentual.


andy_reagan


Jul 7, 2004, 5:32 PM
Post #104 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 12, 2004
Posts: 1075

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think there are two curves diametrically opposed to each other. On the one hand, a beginner will probably be returned very little "working" a route (much in the same way doing sport specific training would return him very little). The beginner would be better served by onsighting as many problems as he can in as many different areas as possible. However, the more advanced climber would seem to have greater returns by "projecting" a certain route just past his limit insofar as that climber would want to push his grade limit (this correlates to the greater returns a more advanced climber would see using sport specific training as opposed to just climbing).

Thats just how I see it though. All that aside, I hope to continue attempting onsights over redpoints. Onsighting is just too much damn fun compared to "working a route". :lol:


kalcario


Jul 7, 2004, 6:44 PM
Post #105 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*One particular route can only teach you so much about climbing. Climbing one route has a limited number techniques and demands on the climber. If you are only working on the skills necesary for that particular route, then the other skills tend to fade.*

Except that, obviously, the skills learned on one climb apply to others, like the chords learned to play one song on guitar are used on other songs. Projecting sport routes will not make you less skillful on sport routes, there is such a thing as carry-over benefit.

*If I get stuck on a power move that keeps spitting me off, and I keep trying it over and over to the exclusion of anything else. Then I will eventually improve my power to the point of being able to do that move, at which point I will most likely have lost the endurance to finish the route.*

This makes no sense. In the course of repeatedly trying one move, you're "most likely" going to lose your endurance? I have never had this experience in 15+ years of sport climbing, you have MORE endurance after the crux feels easier, not less. Maybe if you have no endurance to begin with...


bighead


Jul 7, 2004, 6:55 PM
Post #106 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 15, 2004
Posts: 68

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Holy smokes, people! If a person says that they think it is good to work a route and take falls I seriously doubt they mean every single time they climb. I think the majority of climbers onsight climb more than they work a climb. I think most people who climb at a limit where they fall don't do it every time they go out, I know I certainly don't. I also think it's silly to limit yourself to only one option. Different climbs call for different techniques and approaches and a good leader shouldn't be scared to push himself and risk a fall if it is determined to be safe. They should also be able to recognize dangerous situations and know when to back off from a climb.


bobd1953


Jul 7, 2004, 6:57 PM
Post #107 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 3941

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Funny, will you examine the reverse... why so many trad climbers hit the wall at 5.11 sport? Will you take a hard look in that mirror too?

Right on man. One more point. Why do so many trad climbers hit the wall at 5.10 trad? That was a level reached almost 60 years ago. Very rarely do hear of new trad routes in the 5.11 realm or above and if you do they were most likely done by a climber with a strong background in sport climbing.


vivalargo


Jul 7, 2004, 6:57 PM
Post #108 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: 1512

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This flash vrs. working discussion is somewhat like arguing about the merits of playing jazz or classical music. With jazz, you pretty much let her rip over a loose theme or melodic line, whereas in classical you slave over the composition ad nauseum.

I was always pretty much a jazz player for lack of patients. I really regret not having worked on at least a few boulder problems when I was climbing all the time, new stuff (new back then) that might have held up today. If I pretty much couldn´t do something straightaway, I pushed on and maybe came back if when I was in better shape.

I trust I could have learned a lot by working something. Aside from Phoenix, in which I couldn´t fit my fat hands, I don´t think I ever returned to a Valley climb to finish it off.

Perhaps a balance of ample on-sight work plus a few projects might keeps things most interesting. Lean too far one way or another and you might regret it later. I do . . .

JL


alpnclmbr1


Jul 7, 2004, 8:01 PM
Post #109 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*One particular route can only teach you so much about climbing. Climbing one route has a limited number techniques and demands on the climber. If you are only working on the skills necesary for that particular route, then the other skills tend to fade.*

Except that, obviously, the skills learned on one climb apply to others, like the chords learned to play one song on guitar are used on other songs. Projecting sport routes will not make you less skillful on sport routes, there is such a thing as carry-over benefit.

That is not an exception, that is an "in addition."
Sure, projecting has benefits to offer. But my point is that it can be overdone to the point that where it can become a detriment to your climbing ability.

In reply to:
*If I get stuck on a power move that keeps spitting me off, and I keep trying it over and over to the exclusion of anything else. Then I will eventually improve my power to the point of being able to do that move, at which point I will most likely have lost the endurance to finish the route.*

This makes no sense. In the course of repeatedly trying one move, you're "most likely" going to lose your endurance? I have never had this experience in 15+ years of sport climbing, you have MORE endurance after the crux feels easier, not less. Maybe if you have no endurance to begin with...

You climb twenty feet of easy jugs and fall off of a technical crux. repeat endlessly until you can do the move with less effort, then the rest of the route seems easier endurance wise. This is because you dialed the route, not because you improved your endurance.
Bouldering while hangdogging or while bouldering tends not to be good for endurance. That is pretty basic.


nirvana


Jul 7, 2004, 8:21 PM
Post #110 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2004
Posts: 138

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary. Then ask yourself, and yourself alone, one question. 'Does this path have a heart?' If it does, the path is good; if it doesn't, it is of no use."

--Don Juan to Carlos Castañeda


gds


Jul 7, 2004, 8:25 PM
Post #111 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 8, 2004
Posts: 710

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
"Look at every path closely and deliberately. Try it as many times as you think necessary. Then ask yourself, and yourself alone, one question. 'Does this path have a heart?' If it does, the path is good; if it doesn't, it is of no use."

--Don Juan to Carlos Castañeda
After chewing peyote!


nirvana


Jul 7, 2004, 8:26 PM
Post #112 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2004
Posts: 138

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

:lol:


kalcario


Jul 7, 2004, 8:31 PM
Post #113 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

* You climb twenty feet of easy jugs and fall off of a technical crux. repeat endlessly until you can do the move with less effort, then the rest of the route seems easier endurance wise. This is because you dialed the route, not because you improved your endurance.*

Really? I guess...I guess I just never knew that...

*Bouldering while hangdogging or while bouldering tends not to be good for endurance. That is pretty basic.*

yeah but according to you if I try the crux repeatedly I will "most likely have lost the endurance to finish the route", which is just a ridiculous statement.


curt


Jul 7, 2004, 8:37 PM
Post #114 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*One particular route can only teach you so much about climbing. Climbing one route has a limited number techniques and demands on the climber. If you are only working on the skills necesary for that particular route, then the other skills tend to fade.*

Except that, obviously, the skills learned on one climb apply to others, like the chords learned to play one song on guitar are used on other songs. Projecting sport routes will not make you less skillful on sport routes, there is such a thing as carry-over benefit.

Interesting analogy, but I don't see how playing a chord over and over incorrectly will lead to you playing that chord properly in some other song.

Curt


alpnclmbr1


Jul 7, 2004, 8:45 PM
Post #115 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*Bouldering while hangdogging or while bouldering tends not to be good for endurance. That is pretty basic.*

yeah but according to you if I try the crux repeatedly I will "most likely have lost the endurance to finish the route", which is just a ridiculous statement.

I have done that a number of times over the years.
You climb up to the crux and fall off, repeat for a month and tell me your endurance would not suffer.

Endurance is my strong point, when I work on power to compensate for that, my endurance suffers. Simple enough.


Partner cracklover


Jul 7, 2004, 8:59 PM
Post #116 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Here is another take on 1 try vs. 20:

Realization 5.15a 35-40 tries spread over 3 years, 3 years later still world's hardest route, monument to human perseverance and willpower

Stand at the base of this thing and tell me trying it over and over again will make you weaker. Oh but I guess that since failing repeatedly on it was "reinforcing repeated failure" and that it was "bad for (his) on-sighting skills in the short run at least" that he should have just given up.

Kalcario, Curt, Dirtineye, et al,

I'd like to introduce a notion I got from Vermin's writings. I bring it up because I think in this 1 try versus 20 argument, you're all kind of missing a huge issue. To borrow a phrase from acting - where's your motivation? Here's the idea. If you want to get strong, fast, then when deciding what to work on, _f*ck the grade_. Find a line or problem that makes you get all creamy just looking at it. Never mind how hard it is, just work on it. You will be inspired to succeed on this problem, where another problem of equal or lower difficulty would have bested you. Alternatively you may find that after much work, the problem is simply too much for your current abilities, in which case you may want to return to it later (as Largo suggests). But either way, you will be guaranteed to have pushed yourself _to succeed_ in the process, and that is what will make you stronger, and inspire you to improve your technique. Not because of some desire to "be a V9 climber" (what the h3ll kind of inspiration is that?), but for the love of a beautiful line.

I learned Leavittation. It took me literally hundreds of attempts before I could get up a twenty foot overhanging offwidth, but I did it. Why? Because it seemed so unbelievable that it could be done, I just had to do it!!!

But truth be told, I think that this whole sub-thread is beside the point. The above advice is really only relevant for bouldering, sport climbing, and _experienced_ trad leaders.

The real issue is that there is a process involved in becoming a competent trad climber. There's a lot to learn, and it requires climbing a lot of rock to do it. In the process, it is expected that you will work your way up through the grades. And falling during this process, to steal a line from Brutus, is a "BAD IDEA". The point I take from Rich's post is that until you've reached a certain level in that process, you don't have a full enough bag of tricks needed to deal with the stuff that starts going wrong right when it can hurt you the most. Those skills are not just about gear placement. They're also about such wide-ranging skills as reading the rock (for line of least resistance, availability of gear, solid rock, etc), reading the weather, self rescue, knowing whether you'll fall off a given move, and having a fine-tuned guage of your own abilities wrt all of the above.

Or, more simply - you need to fill your bag of skills before you use up your bag of luck. Start falling too soon, and you'll use up that bag of luck real fast.

As it happens, I'm now in the middle of my fourth season of leading. Just in the last few months, I've already taken perhaps 4 times the number of falls that I'd taken in the entire last three years (maybe eight and two). As it happens, it's also my first season of seriously taking on 5.10 trad. But Dingus is right too - this has simply seemed a natural state of affairs for me, given my confidence level and the relative safety of the climbs I've been on.

Oh, and I still don't like to fall. It's just that I'm now finding myself on climbs where I have a well protected sequence at the edge of my ability, and the confidence to push myself to the point where there's a reasonable chance that I may fall. If all the signals in my head say "go", I'll go for it!

GO


kalcario


Jul 7, 2004, 9:04 PM
Post #117 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 1601

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

*You climb up to the crux and fall off, repeat for a month and tell me your endurance would not suffer.*

Well, working something that far out of my range would be pretty stupid to begin with unless I had already done every other route at the crag, even then I know when I'm licked, if I still can't do the moves after a month of trying I'd be pretty stupid to keep going. Linkage is another story though, if I can do all the moves but can't put them together, and I like the route and the line, *then* I'm in for the long haul.


alpnclmbr1


Jul 7, 2004, 9:15 PM
Post #118 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
*You climb up to the crux and fall off, repeat for a month and tell me your endurance would not suffer.*

Well, working something that far out of my range would be pretty stupid to begin with unless I had already done every other route at the crag, even then I know when I'm licked, if I still can't do the moves after a month of trying I'd be pretty stupid to keep going. Linkage is another story though, if I can do all the moves but can't put them together, and I like the route and the line, *then* I'm in for the long haul.

Linkage is definetly where the crux is or should be. How hard are the moves on most routes? Crux moves are often more a matter of reading them right as opposed to actually being hard. If I couldn't do all the moves in a day or two, I would move on. Linking can keep me going for a long time, sometimes to long. Repeatedly falling off of an easy 11 move at the top of a 12 or 13 can be frustrating and hard to let go of.


miklaw


Jul 7, 2004, 9:27 PM
Post #119 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2004
Posts: 99

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I hate to fall but should more often.
But one thing I've noticed is that grabbing runers is often worse than falling:-
I know of cases where people have unclipped themselves from rings, many cases where people have lifted out trad gear, and two cases where a leader broke a finger grabbing gear.


tech_dog


Jul 7, 2004, 9:45 PM
Post #120 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2004
Posts: 224

Re: Rgold’s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Over years and years of practice and education, I've determined that climbing is best done in the upward direction.

Falling is almost always in the downward direction, and is a much less effective technique for getting to the top of the object being climbed.


dingus


Jul 7, 2004, 10:07 PM
Post #121 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I hate to fall but should more often.
But one thing I've noticed is that grabbing runers is often worse than falling:-

I know of one very experienced climber who will disgaree with you.

Rarely, as in almost never, is grabbing a runner 'worse' than falling. Now you may feel soiled for having done so, but me? I'd rather FEEL dirty than BE DIRTY with a broken leg, or worse.

Used to be, I'd go to great lengths to avoid grabbing pro and 'tainting' the ascent. Tell you want... I'd rather taint a fucking route than taint my leg or ankle.

Taint no fun, breaking your leg...

rgolds admonition about not making a habit of falling on moderate leads... put that shit in the bank dudes! These other tangents, while interesting to some, are not important signals.

Not falling on moderates... THAT IS SIGNAL.

Cheers
DMT


Partner kimgraves


Jul 7, 2004, 10:31 PM
Post #122 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2003
Posts: 1186

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Used to be, I'd go to great lengths to avoid grabbing pro and 'tainting' the ascent. Tell you want... I'd rather taint a f---ing route than taint my leg or ankle.

In 1972 the Chouinard Equipment catalog came out that started the “clean climbing” movement using nuts and runners over pins and bolts. (See: http://climbaz.com/...ard72/chouinard.html if you’ve never read it.) It was very exciting to all of us.

I was asking some “old timer” what they though of it. They said, “All these clean ideas are great. But I’m not going to die for Yvon’s marketing campaign. I’ll put in a pin if I think I need one.”

Best, Kim


tedc


Jul 7, 2004, 10:51 PM
Post #123 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2003
Posts: 756

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
One of the most satisfying moments in climbing for me is when I'm above my gear and faced with making moves at my limit, where the possibility of falling is equal to the possibility of success. ...... What it comes down to for me is that a willingness to fall is proportionate to my commitment level........ Generally, the more willing I am to fall, the more commited I am to a climb. Sounds kinda contradictory, but when I accept the possibility of falling (and don't dwell on it), I often pull through the move and don't fall....,

Your philosophy scares me; And yet it is nearly identical to mine and I don't scare myself. I think I'd better give that some thought.


dirtineye


Jul 7, 2004, 10:56 PM
Post #124 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

Kalcario, Curt, Dirtineye, et al,

I'd like to introduce a notion I got from Vermin's writings. I bring it up because I think in this 1 try versus 20 argument, you're all kind of missing a huge issue. To borrow a phrase from acting - where's your motivation? Here's the idea. If you want to get strong, fast, then when deciding what to work on, _f*ck the grade_. Find a line or problem that makes you get all creamy just looking at it. Never mind how hard it is, just work on it. You will be inspired to succeed on this problem, where another problem of equal or lower difficulty would have bested you. Alternatively you may find that after much work, the problem is simply too much for your current abilities, in which case you may want to return to it later (as Largo suggests). But either way, you will be guaranteed to have pushed yourself _to succeed_ in the process, and that is what will make you stronger, and inspire you to improve your technique. Not because of some desire to "be a V9 climber" (what the h3ll kind of inspiration is that?), but for the love of a beautiful line.

I learned Leavittation. It took me literally hundreds of attempts before I could get up a twenty foot overhanging offwidth, but I did it. Why? Because it seemed so unbelievable that it could be done, I just had to do it!!!

But truth be told, I think that this whole sub-thread is beside the point. The above advice is really only relevant for bouldering, sport climbing, and _experienced_ trad leaders.

The real issue is that there is a process involved in becoming a competent trad climber. There's a lot to learn, and it requires climbing a lot of rock to do it. In the process, it is expected that you will work your way up through the grades. And falling during this process, to steal a line from Brutus, is a "BAD IDEA". The point I take from Rich's post is that until you've reached a certain level in that process, you don't have a full enough bag of tricks needed to deal with the stuff that starts going wrong right when it can hurt you the most. Those skills are not just about gear placement. They're also about such wide-ranging skills as reading the rock (for line of least resistance, availability of gear, solid rock, etc), reading the weather, self rescue, knowing whether you'll fall off a given move, and having a fine-tuned guage of your own abilities wrt all of the above.

Or, more simply - you need to fill your bag of skills before you use up your bag of luck. Start falling too soon, and you'll use up that bag of luck real fast.

As it happens, I'm now in the middle of my fourth season of leading. Just in the last few months, I've already taken perhaps 4 times the number of falls that I'd taken in the entire last three years (maybe eight and two). As it happens, it's also my first season of seriously taking on 5.10 trad. But Dingus is right too - this has simply seemed a natural state of affairs for me, given my confidence level and the relative safety of the climbs I've been on.

Oh, and I still don't like to fall. It's just that I'm now finding myself on climbs where I have a well protected sequence at the edge of my ability, and the confidence to push myself to the point where there's a reasonable chance that I may fall. If all the signals in my head say "go", I'll go for it!

GO

Hmmm, well I don't espouse the work it to death ideology, I was just pointing out that that method does produce results. In fact I am more fond of the four tries and move on to return another day ideology, except in a few cases.

I do indeed choose new lines (UNCLIMBED Previously) based on the warm fuzzy feeling I get from looking up at it. BUT, and make no mistake about it, the only way I get that creamy feeling is with My Girl.

Arguing that a beginner should fall before they are prepared would bet stupid.

THis preparation should start with BOULDERING, and then solid gear placement skills, adn then following and cleaning, and then leading on vertical or near vertical rock that takes solid pro every two feet or more.

That's my view, contradict it and die, heretic! (just kidding)

While it is often true that low moderates make for terrible fall consequences, this is not always the case. There are many low grade climbs that beginners can take falls on without getting hurt. In fact, I've seen a good climber (5.11 sport at the time) fall on a particular 5.8 that is almost impossible to get hurt on. Almost the same story goes for a 5.7 I know in the same area. (yeah they are a little sandbagged, but not much)

I can't really comment on when to climb what grade, people should tackle whatever grade they want to whenever they feel up to it. Falling or not falling is also your own responsibility, but I would seriously recommend that you PRACTICE falling in a Controlled, Safe eay before you get to the point where you might have no choice and no experience. Falling in a panic and in fear is a great way to get hurt badly. IF you think you are not in control of a fall, then you need to practice!!!

Nobody (I hope) is saying that you should like to fall. I am saying (and a few others as well say) that you should be trained and able to deal with a fall in the best possible way should it happen. (Shameless Plug Warning) Arno even offers this training.

As for beginners, PLEASE choose climbs based on the fall consequences, not the grade. Please choose climbs that will take a LOT of pro and then make sure you PLACE a lot of pro!! Never run it out thinking you need to use your remaining strength to finish the climb when you could place a solid piece and prevent the possibility of injury. Hanging on gear is way better than hitting on the ground.

And in the end, Don't fall on your average ledged out chunky low angle beginner climbs-- hell don't even get on em. Those things are dangerous!


alpnclmbr1


Jul 7, 2004, 11:07 PM
Post #125 of 202 (9739 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Rgold?s recommendation not to fall. [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I hate to fall but should more often.
But one thing I've noticed is that grabbing runers is often worse than falling:-
I know of cases where people have unclipped themselves from rings, many cases where people have lifted out trad gear, and two cases where a leader broke a finger grabbing gear.

Grabbing a draw on a sport climb is a definete no no.

Hanging on trad gear: I will down climb until I am below the piece and can inspect it. Then I will clip straight into it to rest. (it put less force on the piece)

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook