|
tradman
Apr 24, 2006, 11:44 AM
Post #2 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
Mmm, posting pages from an anti-christian hate site. Very mature convincing. Tell us, why do you hate christianity so much? The infidelguy is open and honest about his hatred and its roots. I think we'd like to see you explain why you hate and fear christianity so much that it's become an obessession which has almost completely overtaken your posting on this forum.
|
|
|
|
|
tisar
Apr 24, 2006, 12:24 PM
Post #3 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2577
|
Even I - and you won't call me religious in any way - could easily spot out a handful of obvious flawed statements in the first article. Enough not to read any further. On the other hand I could name a few incidents (and threads) of the recent past which are well able to give a cause for the aversion displayed. I never was against religion or christianity, but I'm about to get pretty fed up with people who are trying to tell me my life and/or my view of it is worth less then theirs... - Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
boondock_saint
Apr 24, 2006, 12:31 PM
Post #4 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157
|
In reply to: Tell us, why do you hate christianity so much? oh here's a quick and good one THE CONCISE HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD DATING BACK TO CONSTANTINE
|
|
|
|
|
tisar
Apr 24, 2006, 12:52 PM
Post #6 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2577
|
In reply to: In reply to: On the other hand I could name a few incidents (and threads) of the recent past which are well able to give a cause for the aversion displayed. Those same threads are hardly adverts for tolerance on the part of atheists either. Yet you don't see me or other christians starting anti-atheist hate threads, now do you? Similarly, you don't see us obssessing endlessly about atheism, attacking, ridiculing and outright lying about it, because atheism genuinely doesn't bother us. Can you say the same about your side? No. But then, I'm not a side but a perfectly indepedent entity with an opinion on my own. And you won't find me attacking, ridiculing and lying about religion... at least not in a way that should provoke anyone beyond a good argument. - Daniel edit to say: Which should have been obvious by my first post alone...
|
|
|
|
|
thorne
Deleted
Apr 24, 2006, 1:00 PM
Post #7 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
In reply to: In reply to: Tell us, why do you hate christianity so much? oh here's a quick and good one THE CONCISE HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD DATING BACK TO CONSTANTINE I frequently get the impression that some people consider the net impact of Christianity on the western world to be negative. Do people really think this?
|
|
|
|
|
boondock_saint
Apr 24, 2006, 1:24 PM
Post #8 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: Tell us, why do you hate christianity so much? oh here's a quick and good one THE CONCISE HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD DATING BACK TO CONSTANTINE I frequently get the impression that some people consider the net impact of Christianity on the western world to be negative. Do people really think this? the net impact? Certainly. I think Christianity has improved in the recent years but for nearly two thousand years they were pretty much the sole source of corruption and countless bloodshed.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Apr 24, 2006, 2:07 PM
Post #10 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
In reply to: Similarly, you don't see us obssessing endlessly about atheism, attacking, ridiculing and outright lying about it, because atheism genuinely doesn't bother us. I was pretty much agreeing with everything you said, until that. YOU may not feel bothered by atheism, but if you think that's the norm everywhere, come spend a year in the southeastern US.
|
|
|
|
|
thorne
Deleted
Apr 24, 2006, 2:17 PM
Post #11 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
In reply to: "It is impossible to exaggerate the importance of the coming of Christianity. It brought with it, for one thing, an altogether new sense of human life. For the Greeks had shown man his mind; but the Christians showed him his soul. They taught that in the sight of God, all souls were equal, that every human life was sacrosanct and inviolate. Where the Greeks had identified the beautiful and the good, had thought ugliness to be bad, had shrunk from disease and imperfection and from everything misshapen, horrible, and repulsive, the Christian sought out the diseased, the crippled, the mutilated, to give them help. Love, for the ancient Greek, was never quite distinguished from Venus. For the Christians held that God was love, it took on deep overtones of sacrifice and compassion." - R. R. Palmer (standard college history text)
In reply to: "The history of Christianity is inseparable from the history of Western culture and of Western society. For almost a score of centuries Christian beliefs, principles, and ideals have colored the thoughts and feelings of Western man. The traditions and practices have left an indelible impress not only on developments of purely religious interest, but on virtually the total endeavor of man. This has been manifest in art and literature, science and law, politics and economics, and, as well, in love and war. Indeed, the indirect and unconscious influence Christianity has often exercised in avowedly secular matters--social, intellectual, and institutional--affords striking proof of the dynamic forces that have been generated by the faith over the millenniums. Even those who have contested its claims and rejected its tenets have been affected by what they opposed. Whatever our beliefs, all of us today are inevitable heirs to this abundant legacy; and it is impossible to understand the cultural heritage that sustains and conditions our lives without considering the contributions of Christianity."
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Apr 24, 2006, 2:44 PM
Post #12 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
In reply to: I was pretty much agreeing with everything you said, until that. YOU may not feel bothered by atheism, but if you think that's the norm everywhere, come spend a year in the southeastern US. The southestern US is not "everywhere". And although we're all well aware of just how beleaguered the atheist contingent here feels, as I've already said the vast majority of the agression here comes from them. If you or anyone else feels abused by christians, why not address your frustrations to those you think are abusing you, be it in the southeast or wherever, instead of those of us here who aren't?
|
|
|
|
|
boondock_saint
Apr 24, 2006, 2:52 PM
Post #13 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157
|
wow thank you for that very enlightening history lesson "They taught that in the sight of God, all souls were equal, that every human life was sacrosanct and inviolate." :lol: Christianity practially invented the do as I say not as I do shit. The higher up the ranks you go the less belief you're likely to find. They are a business and always have been. I suppose one good thing Christianity did was to promote art but that propaganda was well worth their money. Besides there always would have been families like the Medici who would have commisioned works.
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Apr 24, 2006, 3:02 PM
Post #14 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
In reply to: I suppose one good thing Christianity did was to promote art but that propaganda was well worth their money. Boondock, without the church there would have been no renaissance. They were almost single-handedly responsible for the development of western art. They were also the main force behind the development of architecture, engineering, eduation, literacy, health care, psychology, literacy, economics, banking, literature and almost every other spect of our culture. Your idea that christianity is universally bad is in stark contrast to the historical facts.
|
|
|
|
|
thorne
Deleted
Apr 24, 2006, 3:21 PM
Post #17 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
In reply to: In reply to: Similarly, you don't see us obssessing endlessly about atheism, attacking, ridiculing and outright lying about it, because atheism genuinely doesn't bother us. I was pretty much agreeing with everything you said, until that. YOU may not feel bothered by atheism, but if you think that's the norm everywhere, come spend a year in the southeastern US. I wonder where people get the idea that in the southeast "obssessing endlessly about atheism, attacking, ridiculing and outright lying about it" is commonplace. Outside of actually attending church (which is not that frequent), I rarely come across situations where Christianity is pressed upon me. There's the occasional Jehovah's at my door and during my 20s the earnest but gentle chiding of family friends about joining a church, but there was none of this "you're going to be damned to the fiery pits of hell unless you change your heathenous ways". :evil: :evil: :evil: It's like people take rare instances and convince themselves this is a regular occurance. :?
|
|
|
|
|
tisar
Apr 24, 2006, 3:35 PM
Post #18 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2577
|
In reply to: I said no such thing. In fact I specifically said I didn't think being homosexual was a disease. Sorry, skip the 'disease' part. I can't see where you draw the line, but I don't mind if you're talking about an (obviously unwanted) 'biological condition' and a disease. Especially not as the only parallels you did draw where your kidney and the Down's syndrom. Either way it is an insult. Imagine someone argues: Red haired people are unwanted, therefore we should prevent all further generations from being born red haired. As a red haired, maybe a little proud of being 'different' I would be pissed to the bone.
In reply to: As an aside to this, if you're offended by me, why would it make sense to abuse other people because of it? Yet this is what we see time and time again from so many posters. I don't (and feeling offended by a statement and hatred are damn two pair of shoes). And I agree that many things around here are at best bad taste, either side. - Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
boondock_saint
Apr 24, 2006, 3:42 PM
Post #19 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2005
Posts: 2157
|
In reply to: In reply to: I suppose one good thing Christianity did was to promote art but that propaganda was well worth their money. Boondock, without the church there would have been no renaissance. They were almost single-handedly responsible for the development of western art. They were also the main force behind the development of architecture, engineering, eduation, literacy, health care, psychology, literacy, economics, banking, literature and almost every other spect of our culture. Your idea that christianity is universally bad is in stark contrast to the historical facts. :boring: You know nothing. The renaissnace started because it did, not because the church said so. As far as the Catholic church was concerned we would have stayed in the Gothic period forever. You think Ghiberty put his name on the doors of the Florentine Baptistry because the pope said so? Uh noooo. (If you don't know what I'm getting it: The renaissance was not only the rebirth of the greco-roman style it was also the start of indivuality and distinction. Everyone knows who painted the Sistine Chapel but pretty much no one knows who built the Notre Dame in Paris or Chartres, yet they are both equally amazing works of art/architecture.) Take some of the works done by Bernini for example. The Baldacchino, Barcaccia, Fountain of Four Rivers just to name a few, were all representative of the Pope's dominance over the entire world (esp. the FoFR). St. Peter's square? What do you think all those columns represent? Like I said, there were the Medici who literally pured money into the arts. If the church hadn't been taking everyone's money hand over fist I'm sure there would have been other equally significant patrons.
|
|
|
|
|
tradman
Apr 24, 2006, 3:46 PM
Post #21 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 14, 2003
Posts: 7159
|
In reply to: Sorry, skip the 'disease' part. I can't see where you draw the line, but I don't mind if you're talking about an (obviously unwanted) 'biological condition' and a disease. Especially not as the only parallels you did draw where your kidney and the Down's syndrom. Either way it is an insult. Imagine someone argues: Red haired people are unwanted, therefore we should prevent all further generations from being born red haired. The person is never unwanted. I said that in the thread you're referring to as well. The biological condition they have, however, may well be unwanted. You'd do well to learn the difference between a person and their actions. It would help you understand my point about homosexuality, and it would help you understand why guys like me and pinktricam continue to post here and care about the people despite the abuse we get for it.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Apr 24, 2006, 3:56 PM
Post #24 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
The "care" responsible consenting adults want comes in the form of respect and equality. That's where PTC's care for gay people goes awry.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Apr 24, 2006, 3:59 PM
Post #25 of 117
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
In reply to: In reply to: I wonder what would happen if somebody produced an atheism-evengelizing TV show. If I got on the airwaves and preached that there is no God, would there be a backlash? Actually, we have such programs here already. Richard Dawkins was given his own huge-budget two part mini series to preach exactly that (in fact it was slightly stronger, the series was called "The Root of All Evil?"). I think any TV station airing such a show in the US would be boycotted. I think there would be whole boycott efforts organized by religious conservatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|