Forums: Climbing Information: Injury Treatment and Prevention:
11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Injury Treatment and Prevention

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Sep 19, 2005, 3:25 AM
Post #51 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Best of hopes for his family and friends.

Havenīt bothered reading the whole thread yet, so I just thought Iīd remind people that Google will link to these forums and your replies; so please choose your words carefully.


reno


Sep 19, 2005, 3:34 AM
Post #52 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Can we please get this discussion back on a civil, adult, mature track?

We're talking about an injured climber. Analyze and critique the accident all you want, but please lay off the personal jabs. Want to take cheap shots at each other, do so in Scummunity, please.

Thanks,


lumberg


Sep 19, 2005, 4:46 AM
Post #53 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 21

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
if he climbed 60 feet, and fell off, then i'm sorry to be an asshole, and jerk, but I just have to laugh at the stupidity of that idiot..

Moderator? Are you reading this? Are there no limits? Laughing at the near death of an 11 year old boy has the right to be heard?

I agree that most threads turn into repeated reactions to one completely useless, tasteless, ignorant (and usually hateful) post, which completely ruins the purpose of the forum. Perhaps the best reaction to posts of this kind would be to completely ignore them. Literally just pretend it wasn't posted, and procede with having a mature, useful discussion.

Better yet, the moderator's might want to take their jobs a little more seriously and just take the initiative to delete posts like this right away. I don't think we have to worry too much about censureship when it comes down to common human decency. Honestly, would anyone else mind if completely useless posts by people who are so inhumane and ignorant that they would laugh at the near death of an 11 year old boy were deleted? Am I totally off base here?

Edited to include:

From moderator's sticky: "this is a serious forum and if there is going to be poor behaviour in threads where families may stumble on to then this site will act to clean house. If you want to prattle on about any subject then head to the community forum. This forum will be reserved for those wishing to conduct themselves in a manner fitting a civil society."

Then do it, for god's sake. In the meantime, this forum is being spoiled by a couple rotten apples.


davidji


Sep 19, 2005, 4:58 AM
Post #54 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 30, 2003
Posts: 1776

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
start praying for the kid.
What you said.


reno


Sep 19, 2005, 5:19 AM
Post #55 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
if he climbed 60 feet, and fell off, then i'm sorry to be an asshole, and jerk, but I just have to laugh at the stupidity of that idiot..

Moderator? Are you reading this? Are there no limits? Laughing at the near death of an 11 year old boy has the right to be heard?

I agree that most threads turn into repeated reactions to one completely useless, tasteless, ignorant (and usually hateful) post, which completely ruins the purpose of the forum. Perhaps the best reaction to posts of this kind would be to completely ignore them. Literally just pretend it wasn't posted, and procede with having a mature, useful discussion.

Better yet, the moderator's might want to take their jobs a little more seriously and just take the initiative to delete posts like this right away. I don't think we have to worry too much about censureship when it comes down to common human decency. Honestly, would anyone else mind if completely useless posts by people who are so inhumane and ignorant that they would laugh at the near death of an 11 year old boy were deleted? Am I totally off base here?

Edited to include:

From moderator's sticky: "this is a serious forum and if there is going to be poor behaviour in threads where families may stumble on to then this site will act to clean house. If you want to prattle on about any subject then head to the community forum. This forum will be reserved for those wishing to conduct themselves in a manner fitting a civil society."

Then do it, for god's sake. In the meantime, this forum is being spoiled by a couple rotten apples.

Lumberg:

A few words from the mod, if I may?

Yes, I'm reading this. Hence my comment above asking to get this back on track.

Yes, there are limits. But it's not easy to define just where those limits are... Am I do delete posts that you find offensive, even if others do not? Am I to delete posts that only I find offensive? Perhaps the majority? If so, then a majority of whom? People that read this thread? People that visit RC.com? Majority of moderators? Of non-mods?

I see from your profile that you've been a member here since July of this year. From that, I'll take the liberty of pointing out a bit of history of which you may not be aware... forgive the indulgence, please.

A while back, as this website grew rapidly, the desire to keep it "clean" so to speak, led to some overzealous moderator activity... deleting posts based on no set criteria, mods editing other's posts, blocking and banning users for such egregious actions as using profanity, installing word filters that changed profanity words to less-offensive.... that sort of thing. We've gotten past that, and for the most part we take a hands-off approach to mod duties... we let the users self-moderate (as you have seen here... someone makes an offensive or unseemly comment, and the rest of the members jump all over him for it.) Works better that way.

So yeah, I see posts that I may think are wrong, offensive, rude, or crass. But it would be morally wrong for me to project my views on "right" and "wrong" when exercising my mod duties.

If you don't like someone's posts, you have several options available to you:
1. Ignore it.
2. Use the "thumbs down" icon below that users name to place him/her on your "killfile" list.
3. Tell him/her you think he/she is rude and crass... in a civilized manner, of course.
4. Shoot a PM to Philbox, the Big-Kahuna of the moderator staff (my "boss," such that I have a boss... mods don't get paid and vollunteer their time.)

I'm going to bring this up in the mods forum and ask the rest of the staff what they think... we'll act accordingly. But I do promise you that I'm not ignoring this... it's just that as of right now, I really don't have any basis for deleting posts other than I don't like what someone said. And, as mentioned, that just isn't cricket.


valeberga


Sep 19, 2005, 5:27 AM
Post #56 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 2, 2003
Posts: 434

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wow, sick, I wonder what his next proj will be. Now that he know not to fall, he could start sending like crazy!


overlord


Sep 19, 2005, 5:28 AM
Post #57 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i think that post is offensive and rude, but shouldnt be deleted or anything. it hurts the poster more than anybody else. if hes a prick let the world see him for what he is.


reno


Sep 19, 2005, 5:28 AM
Post #58 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
if he climbed 60 feet, and fell off, then i'm sorry to be an asshole, and jerk, but I just have to laugh at the stupidity of that idiot..

Moderator? Are you reading this? Are there no limits? Laughing at the near death of an 11 year old boy has the right to be heard?

I agree that most threads turn into repeated reactions to one completely useless, tasteless, ignorant (and usually hateful) post, which completely ruins the purpose of the forum. Perhaps the best reaction to posts of this kind would be to completely ignore them. Literally just pretend it wasn't posted, and procede with having a mature, useful discussion.

Better yet, the moderator's might want to take their jobs a little more seriously and just take the initiative to delete posts like this right away. I don't think we have to worry too much about censureship when it comes down to common human decency. Honestly, would anyone else mind if completely useless posts by people who are so inhumane and ignorant that they would laugh at the near death of an 11 year old boy were deleted? Am I totally off base here?

Edited to include:

From moderator's sticky: "this is a serious forum and if there is going to be poor behaviour in threads where families may stumble on to then this site will act to clean house. If you want to prattle on about any subject then head to the community forum. This forum will be reserved for those wishing to conduct themselves in a manner fitting a civil society."

Then do it, for god's sake. In the meantime, this forum is being spoiled by a couple rotten apples.

Lumberg:

A few words from the mod, if I may?

Yes, I'm reading this. Hence my comment above asking to get this back on track.

Yes, there are limits. But it's not easy to define just where those limits are... Am I do delete posts that you find offensive, even if others do not? Am I to delete posts that only I find offensive? Perhaps the majority? If so, then a majority of whom? People that read this thread? People that visit RC.com? Majority of moderators? Of non-mods?

I see from your profile that you've been a member here since July of this year. From that, I'll take the liberty of pointing out a bit of history of which you may not be aware... forgive the indulgence, please.

A while back, as this website grew rapidly, the desire to keep it "clean" so to speak, led to some overzealous moderator activity... deleting posts based on no set criteria, mods editing other's posts, blocking and banning users for such egregious actions as using profanity, installing word filters that changed profanity words to less-offensive.... that sort of thing. We've gotten past that, and for the most part we take a hands-off approach to mod duties... we let the users self-moderate (as you have seen here... someone makes an offensive or unseemly comment, and the rest of the members jump all over him for it.) Works better that way.

So yeah, I see posts that I may think are wrong, offensive, rude, or crass. But it would be morally wrong for me to project my views on "right" and "wrong" when exercising my mod duties.

If you don't like someone's posts, you have several options available to you:
1. Ignore it.
2. Use the "thumbs down" icon below that users name to place him/her on your "killfile" list.
3. Tell him/her you think he/she is rude and crass... in a civilized manner, of course.
4. Shoot a PM to Philbox, the Big-Kahuna of the moderator staff (my "boss," such that I have a boss... mods don't get paid and vollunteer their time.)

I'm going to bring this up in the mods forum and ask the rest of the staff what they think... we'll act accordingly. But I do promise you that I'm not ignoring this... it's just that as of right now, I really don't have any basis for deleting posts other than I don't like what someone said. And, as mentioned, that just isn't cricket.


lumberg


Sep 19, 2005, 5:31 AM
Post #59 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 21

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Reno, I completely understand what you are saying, and yes, I am new to this site so I was not aware of the history. It explains a lot. But I still have to say that you are letting these forums be ruined. The rest of us decent people just can't resist; we always let the terms of an important topic, partcicularly when it comes to accidents, be dictated by one or two disrespectful morons. I guess my point is that it looks to me like the self-moderation model is not working when it comes to accident/injury/safety topics. And your advice to ignore these posts is sound, but doesn't fix the problem that the threads do in fact get completely ruined by these people. Ignoring the one comment does not fix the problem that the entire thread is off-topic.

I also agree that any standard is arbitrary. But can you really tell me that you don't know whether or not it's appropriate (or even useful in any manner) for someone to say that they laugh at the near death of an 11 year old boy?

In any case, I sincerely appreciate your thoughtful response and am very happy to see that the issue is being taken seriously. Please let us know what you all moderators think about it. thank you


epic_ed


Sep 19, 2005, 5:55 AM
Post #60 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In most cases like this we, as mods, have tried to move away from running around putting out fires to letting the community of RC.com self-moderate as much as possible. This is a classic case in point where it is working very well. While Dima's statements are certainly crude and lack compassion, there is no clear violation of the TOS. Could we delete it? Sure -- we can ax anything that we, as a group of moderators, agree is inappropriate or offensive.

However, often the best action is to let statements like Dima's stand. They stand as a record for all of the public and climbing community to see just what kind of guy Dima is. His comments are now public record on our site and anyone wondering if they should hang out with or rope up with this guy can see some examples of what it might be like to interact with him in person. Make your choices accordingly.

In addition, the comments that have followed by many of our regular users have covered the base quite nicely. You, our community of members, have let Dima know that his comments were out of line and won't be tolerated. This message is much more profound coming from the community than it is from us clowns "behind the curtain" who get accused of interfering way too much, anyway. You guys handed Dima his ass -- as you should have. And I'm willing to bet he thinks twice about making similar comments in the future.

There are instances where we need to jump in a delete inappropriate content. While Dima's comments are ridiculous, this isn't one of them.

Ed


climbia


Sep 19, 2005, 12:53 PM
Post #61 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2002
Posts: 88

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Does anyone have info on the excact area of backbone he was at? There are not meny 60' cliffs at Backbone. Some really info would be great.


scottquig


Sep 19, 2005, 1:39 PM
Post #62 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 10, 2005
Posts: 298

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

While I really feel sorry for the kid, some people are placing all the blame on the scout leader. We don't know any details of the event. Imagine that the kid wandered out at night (maybe because the scout leader had told him not to climb it earlier in the day) and climbed/fell at some point during the night. That could happen to any adult leader.

Clearly, we don't know all the circumstances of the event, and it is hard to place an appropraite amount of blame on an internet forum without really knowing what happened.


Partner angry


Sep 19, 2005, 2:28 PM
Post #63 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dima, how many 11 year olds do you hang out with? Do you see their ability to make good decisions?

I do, I see a ton of them every day. I'm a teacher. I'll tell you, 11 year olds are 87% retarded. They don't think at all. To call this kid an idiot is to call him 11 years old. Still doesn't mean he deserved to be hurt like this.


cchildre


Sep 19, 2005, 2:37 PM
Post #64 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 5, 2004
Posts: 671

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Would everyone do us a favor and stop exploring the what-if's, deal with what we know and fighting about it. Stop the criticizm of this kid who, could or could not have been actually rock climbing. I haven't read yet that anyone knows if the kid was out exploring and fell that he climbed the entire 60 feet and fell. The situation is very vague, so keeping the critizm vague might be in order as well. Those laughing at this kid....wait till you laying face up on the hard stuff staring at the parapedics...hoping you really are moving your toes and don't just think you are. I don't think any of us would be laughing, but you will remeber...karma will be around to see you soon.


Partner nostalgia


Sep 19, 2005, 2:46 PM
Post #65 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: 793

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As a Scout Leader and certified BSA climbing instructor, I thought I'd inject my 2c into this most civil and levelheaded discussion.

First, yes, it was dumb of the kid to climb 60 feet with no protection: dumb from our point of view. Think back to when you were 11 or so. Did you think about the ramifications of your actions? I remember when I was on my first cruise with my parents, I guess I was about 14. We were swimming in a little bay surrounded by these great cliffs made of some kind of pumice-like rock. I looked up at a wall that was easily 50 feet and just started climbing right out of the water. No pro, no harness, no shirt, no shoes, no fear. The thought of falling never even crossed my mind. Does that make me stupid? No, it makes me a young boy. It's what we do. Hell, we used to climb the corner of our school to get roofed tennis balls all the time. We used to jump things on our bikes that terrify me now. We'd set up launch ramps for our skateboards and jump each other lying on the ground. We'd skitch buses on city streets. Helmets? What the hell are helmets? Kids have no sense of mortality. None.

Second, yes, the Scout leader must bear most of the responsibility. It's unfortunate, and the accident may have been completely unpreventable, but if the boy was in the care of the Scout leader, then that leader is ultimately responsible for the boy's well-being, and I'm sure the leader is absolutely sick over it. Whether or not the accident was the leader's fault is another story. And I definitely think the child should bear some of the responsibility for his own actions, and should have a good talking-to about safety.

As Mac said, we're all Monday morning quarterbacking. Maybe the leader didn't drill safety into the boy's head well enough. Maybe they weren't even there to climb and the kid just went bananas. Maybe the kid started climbing while the leader was telling the troop about today's activity (try to keep the attention of a group of 11-year-olds for more than a minute at a time), and by the time the leader saw him, the kid was already 20 feet off the ground. Maybe the kid refused to follow directions. Maybe the Scout leader was completely negligent and let the kid do it. Maybe, maybe, maybe. Unless you were there, how do you know?

Anyway, I guess people must speculate and throw blame without all the facts; it's just the way the Internet and our insanely litigious society goes. Just think a minute before you do.

-Joe


double


Sep 19, 2005, 4:55 PM
Post #66 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 29, 2003
Posts: 136

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Looks like the purpose of this post was to get dima and lilclimber18's post count up. Drivel. It's sad that the kid fell...c'mon, didn't everybody do things like this when you were younger? It's normal to act recklessly and think you're invincible at 11. As for looking for somebody to lay charges against, that is pathetic. Hope the kid is back to health soon...he needs an instructor to tap into that obvious climbing talent he's showing.

Bryan


renohandjams


Sep 19, 2005, 6:29 PM
Post #67 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 24, 2005
Posts: 616

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Ok, so the kid probably was a moron, but that's not to say that it wasn't the responsibility of the scout leader to watch him and tell him when he is doing stupid stuff (climbing 60 ft. without any protection).

I help 11 year old scouts go climbing and repelling sometimes and they aren't very bright. You have to keep your eye on them all the time because they are too curious and active for their own good. I think the fault lies in the gaurdian/scout leader, not in the stupiditiy of an 11 year old.


decorahhughes


Sep 20, 2005, 3:49 PM
Post #68 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 11

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One of the local news stations here updated their story at http://www.kwwl.com/.../story.asp?S=3864176

In reply to:
(AP) A Cedar Rapids Boy Scout who fell 60 feet down a ravine is expected to recover from his injuries.

11-year-old Kyle Mann fell during a hike with his scout troop at Backbone State Park near Strawberry Point on Saturday. He was flown by helicopter to University Hospitals in Iowa City. The boy's mother, Carol Mann, says that all things considered, her son is doing well. She says Kyle broke his collarbone, his shoulder and at least two vertebrae. He also has a bruised and partially collapsed lung and both arms are in a sling.

Carol Mann says her son had almost climbed a steep slope between two trails when he lost his footing and fell from the top of the ravine.

Sounds like a possible hiking accident rather than climbing. I can think of one area in particular - between the Drive-In and Cake Walk - where there is an very steep slope/ravine. If you tumble, you could easily go sixty feet.


decorahhughes


Sep 20, 2005, 3:55 PM
Post #69 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 11

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One of the local news stations here updated their story at http://www.kwwl.com/.../story.asp?S=3864176

In reply to:
(AP) A Cedar Rapids Boy Scout who fell 60 feet down a ravine is expected to recover from his injuries.

11-year-old Kyle Mann fell during a hike with his scout troop at Backbone State Park near Strawberry Point on Saturday. He was flown by helicopter to University Hospitals in Iowa City. The boy's mother, Carol Mann, says that all things considered, her son is doing well. She says Kyle broke his collarbone, his shoulder and at least two vertebrae. He also has a bruised and partially collapsed lung and both arms are in a sling.

Carol Mann says her son had almost climbed a steep slope between two trails when he lost his footing and fell from the top of the ravine.

Sounds like a possible hiking accident rather than climbing. I can think of one area in particular - between the Drive-In and Cake Walk - where there is an very steep slope/ravine. If you tumble, you could easily go sixty feet.


Partner macherry


Sep 20, 2005, 3:59 PM
Post #70 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks for the update

I glad the boy's going to be okay


Partner cracklover


Sep 20, 2005, 6:42 PM
Post #71 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

First of all, my best wishes go out to the hurt boy, and his family and friends. I wish them all strength, hope and, maybe soon, joy. I hope the boy who fell has a full and a speedy recovery.

Now to the other issue.

In reply to:
In most cases like this we, as mods, have tried to move away from running around putting out fires to letting the community of RC.com self-moderate as much as possible. This is a classic case in point where it is working very well. While Dima's statements are certainly crude and lack compassion, there is no clear violation of the TOS. Could we delete it? Sure -- we can ax anything that we, as a group of moderators, agree is inappropriate or offensive.

However, often the best action is to let statements like Dima's stand. They stand as a record for all of the public and climbing community to see just what kind of guy Dima is. His comments are now public record on our site and anyone wondering if they should hang out with or rope up with this guy can see some examples of what it might be like to interact with him in person. Make your choices accordingly.

In addition, the comments that have followed by many of our regular users have covered the base quite nicely. You, our community of members, have let Dima know that his comments were out of line and won't be tolerated. This message is much more profound coming from the community than it is from us clowns "behind the curtain" who get accused of interfering way too much, anyway. You guys handed Dima his ass -- as you should have. And I'm willing to bet he thinks twice about making similar comments in the future.

There are instances where we need to jump in a delete inappropriate content. While Dima's comments are ridiculous, this isn't one of them.

Ed

In general, I agree with this stance 100%. Yes, Dima will learn something from this process, and the community as a whole will learn something, too, exactly along the lines you stated. I think that in general, this self-moderation is very good for the climbing community of rc.com.

But in this particular forum - in the case of serious accidents and death, is it good for the larger community - outside us climbers, including family and friends - for rc.com to be the platform for these flamefests? Of course not! Think of how these posts will appear to a family member! So RC.com has to decide who they are serving, and how best to do that.

In addition, while the climbing community will learn something, that *will not* keep this from happening again. Dima may see the error of his ways, but as has been pointed out before, there will always be a new Dima. Next time there's an accident, the new one will pop up, and this same thing will happen.

So if we don't want to see this sort of flame-fest next time, what to do?

My prefered solution would be for everyone else to simply distance themselves from the next Dima without engaging him on his level. Acknowledge that creating a flame war is simply selfish - it makes us feel better, but disrespects the family and friends who might come here looking here for informed analysis, and whether or not they get that, they might leave comforted by the show of support from the community... or digusted by the squabbling.

But to be honest, I think that's unrealistic. People will react emotionally to Dima. How could they do otherwise? We're human, and when we see the face of tragedy as our own, we react emotionally!

I believe that only the moderator's censure of the next Dima will smooth the waters. It's up to the managers of the site to decide whether the tradeoff is worth it. Personally, I don't know.

GO


davidji


Sep 20, 2005, 6:54 PM
Post #72 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 30, 2003
Posts: 1776

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
People will react emotionally to Dima. How could they do otherwise?
In general (not in any way about Dima), if a user pushes your buttons so that you're likely to get enmeshed in pointless arguments or flamefests with them, why not hit the "thumbs down" button to ignore the offending user's posts?

I did not even consider that with Dima, and use that button rarely, but I do use it.


Partner cracklover


Sep 20, 2005, 7:06 PM
Post #73 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
People will react emotionally to Dima. How could they do otherwise?
In general (not in any way about Dima), if a user pushes your buttons so that you're likely to get enmeshed in pointless arguments or flamefests with them, why not hit the "thumbs down" button to ignore the offending user's posts?

I did not even consider that with Dima, and use that button rarely, but I do use it.

Sure, that's a fine response. But it requires a maturity not all here posses. And maturity aside, if you had suffered a tragedy, or a close loved one of yours had, and you saw callous and demeaning language thrown around - can you swear that you would not react from the gut? I'm pretty level-headed, and I wouldn't swear I could hold my tongue.

GO


davidji


Sep 20, 2005, 7:19 PM
Post #74 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 30, 2003
Posts: 1776

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
if you had suffered a tragedy, or a close loved one of yours had, and you saw callous and demeaning language thrown around - can you swear that you would not react from the gut?
Absolutely not. Just pointing out an alternative. Not sure everybody was aware of that button.


Partner drector


Sep 20, 2005, 8:05 PM
Post #75 of 80 (10530 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037

Re: 11-year-old boy took a 60 feet fall [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think everyone should stop using words like stupid and dumb. An 11 year old might be a super-genious for an 11 year old and still be considered dumb by adult standards.

He was 11 and probably had all of the inteligence and knowledge that can be expected from a healthy 11 year old. I wish him the best of luck.

I always keep an eye out for my kid because I know that young kids can get into bad situations really easy.

Dave

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Injury Treatment and Prevention

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook